₦airaland Forum

Let's put this into perspective:

Hector Bellerin and Rob Holding: £1.5M

Kyle Walker and John Stones: £105M

I know which I'd prefer...

Nobody put a gun to his head to sign rubbish... but as usual... Eruditor and raumdeuter will lick his ass...

laribari:
My point is clear enough. Nothing is worth dying for!

Well, it's clear now that your brain need examination because you are not seeing me, neither do you know what i look like yet you are analyzing my butt. Please talk with a brain joor. there are many things to use to diss me but not that mumu talk. did i display a picture of me?

I don't need to see you to know your ass is flatter than 90 years old woman breasts...

1. it's either your ass is bigger than that lady own... which means there's nothing there... rather than shot and mess...

2. Or it's smaller than the lady own... which is still filled with shit and mess...

now since your brain is paining you...

lemme break it down further...

whether you've got a pumped ass... or your ass is flat... nah shit and mess still dey inside...

and you aren't brave enough to put up your picture because you're a jobless troll... and you don't have a life... that the only thing you can hate on is a woman with a very big ass...

Bramall... player...
Walcott... them better offload that nigga fast...

laribari:
Na shi*t and mess full am. Big yansh na wahala abeg. She go dey go toilet reach 4 times a day.

You no dey shit and you no dey mess... and your yansh still flat pass shoemaker slippers... so what exactly is your point...

That woman had to touch it...

That's what a very big ass does... it's magnetic... it's captivating... e go be like charm...

yansh... big yansh dey sweet abeg...

raumdeuter:
The 34yr old player you told us Pep signed when would he be presented

Read the news bruv... he rejected shitty because he wants to be champion and not come 4th or 3rd...

The 34 going 35 can see from Italy that Man Shitty won't be champions come end of the season...

My point is... Man Shitty went for him and he turned them down...

raumdeuter:
This Dani ALves that Pep signed when will they present him

eruditor

Apparently... he's too good a player at 35 to be under the shambolic management of a bald coach...

iPopAlomo:
This has to be the best troll - "Lukaku desperately wanted to return to Chelsea but his first touch took him to United"
































His second touch took him back to Chelshit!!!

His third touch took him prison...

sod09:
Hey guys the 17/18 fpl will be open next week 17 July or so
I'm thinking of opening a league for arsenal fans alone ,wat do u All think.
Both classic and h2h league
I need opinions

No need... I didn't even keep up... let's just join the ones created for nairaland...

Arsenal 5th place: Lacazette... United 6th place: Lukaku...












Chelsea Champions: Llorente.

Forget it... Arsenal isn't buying any player again this season... bar youth players and female players... but first team squad... e don complete...

This has to be the best troll - "Lukaku desperately wanted to return to Chelsea but his first touch took him to United"
































His second touch took him back to Chelshit!!!

sod09:

pple sabi criticize ehn

I don't even understand... I love detailed movies... people talk and you listen... I've seen the movie twice and will see it again... not all these shoot shoot shoot... scatter everywhere... and call it movie... rubbish

Anybody that doesn't like "King Arthur - Legend of the sword" because it didn't follow the rubbish series titled Merlin needs brain surgery... same to all the critics at Rotten tomato.com

obixcel:
Not good enough, and these are some of the many reasons:
- Poor build up of the story line
- Inadequate and poor character representation
- Awful CGI and graphics with no substance
- Too many pointless scenes that if edited out won't last up to the 2 hrs
- No Merlin? Morgana just died for no reason?
etc etc I could go on and on.
I had rather rewatched Conan The Barbarian or even the King Arthur 2004 than this modern expensive crap. Not surprised the movie performed Poorly at the Box Office.

Obviously... you watched the movie with your nose...

sod09:
abi ooo hes not god na, he can go if he wants
imagine, bellerin handed transfer request cos of barca too many ungrateful modafuckers in that team, wengay always loyal to them fabregas,rvp,hleb,et al
they all betrayed him,if na me dat bellerin will suffer for it,i will make sure he die for bench the remaining of his contract or demote him to under 21

This shit ain't true bruv... Nobody handed any transfer request yet...

Lana1:
Uncle, hope u don go buy sweater to go with that bottle of Alomo?? Heard Thursday nights can be very cold in KuvukiLand!!

From experience...

De Gea rolls it out to Bailly, Bailly through to Pogba, Pogba turns, chips it over to Martial, into Rashford, through to Lukaku...










































Goal kick!!!!

Lubyna:
Sorry about my statement about you not being able to read. I didn't mean to be rude. That wasn't even my intention.

Women and men aren't the same. Men don't go into relationships for the same reasons as women and men certainly don't have the same needs or responsibilities as women. A guy dating a woman who is hardworking but broke, isn't the equivalent of a woman dating a guy who is broke. Men are conventionally, and I'd argue naturally the providers in a relationship. Women are naturally inclined to want their man to take the driving seat in the relationship, in all aspects. To put it plainly, women want men who can provide and take care of them. It doesn't mean she shouldn't strive to be financially successful, but this is the reality of relationships. On the other hand, no man goes into a relationship expecting his woman to take care of him. In fact, most men prefer to be more financially successful than their partners. I hope I have answered your question?

Don't bring me back to this. I have already explained what I meant. Yes. Being financially successful is indicative of intelligence. Intelligence is a broad them that admits of various definitions, but my definition of intelligence, which subsumes most of the definitions which you'd come across anywhere, is being able to utilize acquired knowledge in solving problems. And why are you fixating on Intelligence? There are other qualities I mentioned alongside intelligence that being wealthy is indicative of. Dino and Evans are intelligent people. Dino is a wealthy politician who has occupied various high level political posts in the past. You have to be intelligent to be able to do this. Evans was able to kidnap lots of people, gain profit from the act and remain hidden and undetected for many years. Only an intelligent person can achieve this. I am not in anyway justifying the morally reprehensible crimes of Evans and the bad things Dino Malaye has done in the past. I am just trying to answer your question about whether or not they are intelligent. When I say someone is financially successful, hardworking, ambitious and goal oriented, and wants someone who shares the same traits as she does, I am obviously not referring to people like Evans and Dino. The kind of women I categorically referred to in my OP certainly aren't concerned about just money. Money is a standard among other standards. Certainly this kind of woman would examine the past and present of her potential spouse. She'd date someone who she knows his source of income, and who she is certain this source of income is safe and won't jeopardize her life in the future. Obviously someone like Evans and yahoo boys don't fit this criteria. You are making it seem like all financially successful men are touts or kidnappers and all broke guys are morally upright.

Most successful men are touts or kidnappers and most broke guys are morally upright...

There... I've fixed it...

bignero:
easy bro

counter my claims and shame me with facts
my name not buhari..

Apologies on Lacazette... Lacazette seems a done deal...
the rest though... no be you give Lemar and Sanchez biro sign...

ogbiwa:
Mate I never came on this thread to exchange words just football chatter. Though I realize now football chatter is not complete without disagreements and conflicting opinions.

However you're conflicting yourself bro. What started this discuss was you saying Wenger played 3-4-3, I clearly explained the tactic behind that to you, now you turned to say it's 3-4-2 or 3-5-1? Are those football formations? The FM game you played where did you see any of those formations? That a manager tweaks his team around cos of a red card does that suddenly mean that's the formation the manager is known for and plays? I don't argue if you can't be consistent with your points mate.

Secondly I honestly suggest you either google or ask football savvy people on the full definitions of FULL BACKS (RB,LB) and WING BACKS (RWB,LWB) and the DIFFERENCE between them. You most likely can't tell the two apart with what you posted up there and these are not things you learn by just watching football passively for 20 years. Some of them are things you learn by asking questions and researching. So I won't even begin trying to correct what you wrote. Sagna is not a full back right. Wehdone Sir. So because a right or left back bombs forward automatically transforms him to a wingback? You just don't know the difference mate! Pls name one team in any developed league in the world that plays full backs that don't bomb forward, in this day and age?

Finally, I'm not an Arsenal fan nor do I dislike Arsenal. So long as it's a football club I don't have to be a fan to know details about that club, which it seems like I unfortunately do more than you who has been watching for a century. Note at no point here have I mentioned when I started watching football or who started before the other. I feel those are inconsequential if you can't state basic football facts and be consistent with them.

I know you might still probably reply to spew more inaccuracies but I'll probably not reply again as there's obviously nothing to gain in it for me.

Peace.

English is worrying you...

when arsenal is a man down...
when an arsenal player has been sent off...
when an arsenal player is injured and all 3 subs has been used...

Arsene Wenger uses 3 at the back...

thereby switching his favoured 4-3-3 to 3-5-1 or 3-4-2... the only person looking for straws to clutch on his you...

fyi: from Google...

A wingback is expected to go up and down their respective wings to support in attack when in possession and come back and defend when out of possession.
A fullback's primary job is to defend first and then if the team is on the ascendancy, join in on the attack.
But, in modern football, there's hardly any difference. You see fullbacks like Shaw, Baines, Alves, Alba etc who are more suited to an attacking role i.e wingback than a fullback but are comfortable playing either position with ease.

better read my previous posts again...

3-5-1 and 3-4-2 indicates a player is missing...