₦airaland Forum

WriteerNg:

---

Russia economy is eating it's own muscle but na USA dey drown for debt.

$40 trillion now. While Russia's debt dey decrease.

Russia dey record back to back trade surplus while US dey suffer trade deficit back to back.

Reality is often times disappointing.

Ogbeni propaganda, the US and Russia no be age mates for economics issues, see you talking about trade deficits do you even know what trade deficits means?
Entering the US market is often seen as the final "validation" for an international brand let that sink in for a moment. Are you aware that as of November 2024, the US stocks make up roughly 74% of the MSCI World Index?

Radicalwarrior:
Lol
So because no one has been impeached, we should just assume it’s impossible? That’s like saying ‘no one has died from smoking’ until they do. I’m not running away from reality. I’m refusing to be held hostage by your ‘it’s never happened’ nonsense. If Tinubu breaks the law, he’ll be the first. That’s how history is made.

Obj didn’t actualize 3rd term because the Senate said no. Same Senate you say is ‘at Tinubu’s beck and call’. So even when legislators were loyal to OBJ, they still stopped him. That means the Senate can say no. So your argument collapses: if they could stop OBJ, they can stop Tinubu too.

You want me to name a Nigerian civilian president that was impeached? I’ll name one when it happens. But let’s not pretend ‘it hasn’t happened’ means ‘it’s impossible’. You’re confusing ‘hasn’t’ with ‘won’t’. The constitution doesn’t care about your ‘reality’. It cares about 2/3. If Tinubu breaks the law, the Senate will act — or Nigeria will act on the Senate.

You are sounding very inconsistent, and without direction. So far has Tinubu flaunt any of Nigeria's law, if YES Why then is he still occupying his seat? If NO why not wait till Tinubu break's the law and watch what happens next, instead of ranting carelessly?

Talking about laws, does Nigeria laws gives the president powers to suspend a sitting governor, and a state's house of assembly members? Is it not an offence for police to demand money for bail?

You are a poor student of history, go and read more about Nigeria's past presidents, and their legislators, and you will notice which of the president's has enjoyed loyal support from the senate more. Your current senate President once said that the National Assembly is "2000 percent behind Tinubu and that they are standing on his mandate".

In closing nobody is arguing that Tinubu can't be impeached, but the reality is, given the Nigerian factor, it is more possible for the head of a camel to pass through the eye of a needle, than Tinubu impeachment proceedings even if you rant from now till thy kingdom come lol!!!

PO being a Nigerian politician is never to be trusted though, but won't it be to take the words of a man who once described his current lord and saviour as a drug baron and even provided court papers to back his claims seeiously?

Liverpool take your L and leave our 3 points alone. Goodluck in your top 4 quest.

Radicalwarrior:
Bro, I’m awake. You’re the one sleeping on history. ‘Singing on your mandate’ was the same song for Buhari in 2015. By 2018, those same legislators were trying to impeach him. The Nigerian factor is loyalty to interest, not loyalty to one man. When interest changes, the song changes.

The ‘Nigerian factor’ is what made Saraki’s Senate threaten Buhari with impeachment in 2018. Same factor made Lawan’s Senate block Buhari’s loan request. So which ‘Nigerian factor’ are you talking about? The one that works for Tinubu today, or the one that worked against Buhari yesterday?

So the ‘Nigerian factor’ means the Senate can’t impeach Tinubu, but it could threaten Buhari? Or is the Nigerian factor only when it’s your man? The constitution doesn’t say ‘Nigerian factor’. It says 2/3. If Tinubu breaks the law, that same Senate will act. Watch.

In all your ranting you couldn't even name one Nigerian civilian president that the legislators has successfully impeached. I guessed you are the one that stopped those impeachment moves you made mentioned of. If Obj had these same sets of legislators who are at Tinubu's beck and call, he would have actualised his 3 tenures plan.

Your if Tinubu breaks the law he will be impeached narrative is a weak attempt of you running away from reality. Your assumptions of Tinubu being my man, tells a lot about how you think. Ogbeni dey there they dream why reality dey press your neck.

Radicalwarrior:
Nobody said it’s happening tomorrow. But ‘impossible’ is what they said about Buhari defeating PDP in 2015. Politics changes fast. Senate today, different tomorrow.
Senate presidents commend presidents all the time — that’s their job. But remember: Saraki and Lawan both clashed with their presidents. Senate loyalty isn’t forever.
It sounds ‘un-Nigerian’ because we’ve never done it. But the constitution says it’s possible. If Nigerians are angry enough, even the ‘impossible’ becomes real.

You’re right — today it looks impossible. The Senate President is backing Tinubu, and borrowing is the current plan. But the constitution doesn’t require ‘Nigerian’ to impeach. It requires 2/3 of Senate and House. If Tinubu breaks the law, ignores the National Assembly, or triggers mass protests, the math changes.

Lol!! I don't think you understood the Nigerian context here. Given the Nigerian factor it is impossible for the current senate to impeach Tinubu. It is the Nigerian factor that made the legislators to defend the actions of the executive. Same legislators that are already singing on your mandate we stand for Tinubu? Bro abeg wakeup from sleep.

Samantha125:
I once did that and it was the biggest mistake of my life... I couldn't open up to my family because it'd only escalate the issue, so I decided to open up to a family friend thinking since she's older, like in her late 50s, she'd understand and advice me accordingly... But in her response, she told me to go ahead, end it all and go to hell... Those words nearly ended me.

I even decided to take a public transport that day and left everything behind except for my ID and debit card. I could feel that I wasn't in the right state of mind to be behind the wheel and my plan was to disappear without a trace.

So just because someone is your family member or family friend, it doesn't mean they'd have the emotional intelligence to emotionally support you during difficult times... Rather open up to strangers or go for counselling.

For the fact that you had a bad experience opening up to a family friend, doesn't makes it a standard that applies to others. Like I said earlier, whatever rocks the ops boat.

That can't happen with the current senate. Just 2 weeks ago the senate president was even commending the president's and telling his colleagues why it is better to borrow. Impeach Jagaban? that doesn't sound Nigerian, and very impossible.

Oga you can serve the Yala people without being a politician. The only burning desire you have now is that of looting the Yala's people treasury carelessly.

Like play like play Russia is still fighting Ukraine since oh!!. Given the so many post of 10 - 10000 dead soldiers exchange I be think say, Na only civilian women and kids dey Ukraine by now oh!!!

Pinnup:
We somehow have grown past that stage. People online might be closer to you than your neighbour.

Whatever rocks your boat. If you like form all is well around your friends and relatives, while you are dying inside. Na dem go still first strangers ask, why didn't she voiced out her pains.

Start by saying it to those closer to you like friends and family members.

Madmohamed1:
As minister of transport under buhari amaechi fail to bring any development to his own people amarchi beuld trian rails in all the region and fail to beuld single one in Eastern region not even in his South South.

Amarchi beuld trian rail to Niger Republic from Nigeria.

Amarchi beuld transport university amaechi beuld many rails in South West and Northern Nigeria, and do nothing for his people,

Where did he think he will get the support he need .

Guy you u and spelling dey quarrel? Amaechi political career is dead and buried, Even Sowore go win Amaechi with an Asian handicap of -750000.10 votes

Rindo69:
If you are summoned to back up your statement with evidence; you will claim victimisation.

Use your gun come summon me you hear?

It's always easier said than done.
Gun wey dem dey shoot with mouth, E bullet no dey finish.

First and foremost, what service band are you on? One of the reason fellow Band A users in my street, refused to switch our metering system from postpaid to prepaid meters. Although with postpaid it is as if you are using the light for free until it is time to pay your bills.

They complained that there was so much fraud going on with prepaid meters, that BEDC were switching customers band anytime they want.

With our post paid meters, total units used are only calculated at the end of each month, you pay #209.50 * units used, and VAT of 0.075 * total cost of unit used. Dem no burn BEDC staff well to come our street to collect light bills.

babajero:
so who is using kpekus to control your demigods buhari and tinubu that they have totally destroyed the country and the economy. Buhari, tinubu and apc have used less than 12 years to steal what they accused the pdp and the military regime of stealing for the past 40 years.

For you to assume that a person who criticises Jona automatically translates to a Buhari, or Tinubu supporter, exposed how shallow your thinking faculty is. No be everybody be slave to politicians like yourself.

Not surprised, Diezani was Ur expensive side chick. She used her kpekus to control your brains, thereby giving her the privilege of looting our national cake carelessly.

FreeStuffsNG:
Many naive and short-sighted people thought the British Empire will rule forever and missed the opportunity to witness its fall we see today.

All the signs were there that US was a dying empire. Trump helped to accelerate it and nail the coffin.

Iran has effectively blocked the free petrodollars and pushed it to yuan. Now you can see why China did not bother to waste its weapons engaging US. Trump is enough potent weapon to destroy US. It came to pass.

In the next couple of weeks, Trump will either be forced to resign or impeached.

Lol!! are you scared of using the fall of The Soviet Union (USSR) as an example?


The United States still remains:

The world’s dominant reserve currency,
The deepest capital markets,
Has the leading technology firms,
Global military reach,
Energy production,
And even strong universities/research systems.

Even countries that want alternatives to the dollar including China and your putin Russia
still operate heavily inside a dollar dominated financial system.

My friend no doubt, nothing last forever. But swallow this bitter pill, the collapse of US will not happen in your lifetime or that of even your grand kids.

You should be more bothered about the collapse of your disgraced country of concern, instead of the US, Abi Na your collapse?

As for the impeachment of Trump in a couple of weeks time, are you ready to place a bet with your life? E go still worth something to my dogs if properly grilled.

The US leads others follow, if they could handle it during world war 2 even at 106% trust them to still handle this. The most important thing is their debt service to revenue ratio, and investors confidence.

The US is not a disgraced country of concern,
that is spending well over half of her federal revenue on servicing debts.

Power minister no dey carry power bank Waka for US. The US will not borrow billions to build coastal highways that will be overrun by terrorists, ODOGU world power for a reason.

educatedfool:
You're mixing emotion, assumptions, and headlines, then calling it analysis. That video you shared doesn't show people being forced into anything. It shows a human chain. That's something people around the world do voluntarily during protests or to show solidarity. Jumping from that to "they're being used as shields" without proof is you filling in gaps with your own narrative.

Voluntary, you are the one that organised the protest with sole aim of human shields for it to know it was voluntary I guess.

A "strong country wouldn't allow it”? Strong countries also allow protests, even risky ones. Citizens making a choice doesn't automatically mean the military has failed. Unless you're saying any government that doesn't physically drag people away from demonstrations is weak, which doesn't really hold up.

A strong country will not allow civilians to protest around a facility that has been targeted for bombing. How did you know that the citizens made the choice in the first place?

On your media point, you're acting like having "faces" and global offices automatically makes every report accurate. It doesn't. Big outlets have gotten major stories wrong before, sometimes badly. That's exactly why people question claims instead of treating them as gospel. Credibility isn't about size alone, it's about evidence.

I never said all their reports were accurate, you are the one being blinded by western media sentiments. When it suits your narratives their story is TRUE, but FALSE when it doesn't lol!!!

Your whole argument leans heavily on exaggeration. "Airspace occupied," "everything thrown," "careless missiles." If all of that were literally true in the way you're presenting it, the outcome would be very different and not something we'd be casually debating. You're turning complex military and political realities into dramatic one-liners.

Can you please dispute my fact, was Khamenei killed, using a babalawo calabash from Isreal? Or did Isreal use spiritual powerss, can you please tell me where and how Khamenei was killed?

And the assassination point again, you keep repeating it like it settles everything. Security failures happen everywhere. If one high-profile hit defines a country's strength, then no country, including the ones you're praising, comes out looking strong.

I ask again, if your most protected supreme leader could be killed like house flies, what then is the fate of the ordinary man?

What really stands out is how certain you are while relying on interpretations rather than solid proof. You're not just arguing facts, you're amplifying the most extreme version of them. That's why it sounds convincing at first, but falls apart when you actually look at the details.

According to you, the US threw everything they had at Iran, but you are yet to backup your claims with credible fact. If you like cry from now till Jericho Iran can't comfortably fight Isreal let alone the almighty US of A.

A country that invaded your airspace, sniffed the life out of your supreme leader and military ranks like rats, and then closed your ports, is way bigger and stronger than you militarily. Hard pills are hard to swallow I know, but you must accept reality.

Way back then, that was how folks like you hyped Japan, until Hiroshima, and Nagasaki became a history lesson in chemistry classes.

educatedfool:
That video shows people forming a human chain. It doesn't prove they were forced or "used as shields." You're adding that conclusion yourself. People can and do voluntarily protest like that all over the world.

So let's be clear, there's a difference between civilians being used and civilians choosing to stand there. You're blurring that line to fit your narrative.

And on media bias, thanks for proving my point. If sources can have bias, then you can't just take one report and treat it as unquestionable fact when it suits you.

A country you called strong wouldn't allow her citizens to gather around a facility that is about to be nuked by an enemy country. What then is the use of their milliatry?

Talking about media bias and credibility, so I should should believe stories from a website whose domain was registered just 3 years ago, with no credible faces behinds its ownership, over credible news medias with verifiable faces behind them, and even have correspondence in various countries and their government houses? Nawa for the way some of una dey think oh!!.

A country occupied your airspace killed your most protected leader like a housefly, killed your milliatry ranks like common rats. Even your current supreme leader can't address u & Ur people for fear of being killed.

With all these, all you could do is throw missiles carelessly, and use armless humans as shields to protect your power infrastructures. What if same country reciprocated the gesture of throwing missiles at you carelessly?

Open mouth waa!!! say the ALMIGHTY US of A, the ODOGU of world milliatry might threw all they had at Iran
Lol!!! currently enjoying beating the dead horse, knowing fully well that I stand to gain nothing from it.

educatedfool:
You made the claim, so bring the evidence. Telling me to "go search" is just a way of dodging responsibility.

We've already seen how "confirmed" narratives can collapse. The Iraq war was justified with intelligence that later turned out to be "almost entirely wrong"
https://govfacts.org/policy-security/intelligence/the-white-house-iran-dossier-looks-a-lot-like-the-iraq-wmd-case/

So forgive me if I don't take your claim at face value without solid proof. Confidence is not evidence.

I can help you with data if you don't have any to watch the video.

https://www.aljazeera.com/video/newsfeed/2026/4/7/iranians-form-human-chains-across-bridges-at-power-plants


As for govfacts
""
GovFacts presents itself as nonpartisan and educational, but its editorial framing indicates a Left-Center bias. While many explainers are straightforward summaries (e.g., “Can Government Oversight Fix Toxic Fumes on Planes?”), others contain subtle framing critical of Republican figures, particularly Donald Trump. For example, “Do Trump’s Tactics Echo McCarthyism?” and “How the Trump Administration Uses Courts as Policy Tool Against Universities, Media, and States” emphasize authoritarian parallels, executive overreach, and threats to civil society.
"""

That's from mediabiasfactcheck.

You point to western media when the narratives suits you, but discredit same when it doesn't.

educatedfool:
You keep saying "human shields" like you were there watching it happen yourself, when in reality it's the same recycled narrative pushed by Western media every time they want to justify a side. The same media that told the world Iraq had weapons of mass destruction with full confidence, only for it to turn out false. The same media that has misreported conflicts over and over, then quietly walks it back when the truth comes out. But somehow this time you decided it must be 100 percent accurate. Convenient.

So no, people aren't being blinded by sentiment. Some of us just don't swallow everything we're told without questioning it. You hear one version and run with it like it's gospel.

And this idea that "everything was thrown at Iran" is just unrealistic. If everything was truly thrown at them, you wouldn't be here arguing about it like it's some debate topic, the outcome would be obvious. There's a reason things stop where they stop.

About your "most protected man" point, intelligence failures and assassinations happen everywhere, even in the most powerful countries in the world. That doesn't suddenly reduce a whole country to nothing. If that's your standard, then no country on earth is strong.
What's really ironic is you're calling others dishonest, but you're repeating narratives without questioning where they come from or how many times similar stories have been proven wrong. That's not honesty, that's just confidence without verification.

So you are the US defence minister for you to know US threw everything they had at Iran? Guy go search on your favourite news media and dispute my claims of Iran using humans as shield for protecting their power infrastructures from being bombed by the US. Why am I even wasting my time with you? Ur user name says it all, no need beating a dead horse.

educatedfool:
Russia doesn't need to go to Iran. That's the point you’re missing. Iran is not weak or waiting for rescue, it fights its own battles and has been doing that for years.

The same so called world powers you're hyping threw everything they had and still couldn't break it. Instead they started talking ceasefire when things got uncomfortable for them. That is not dominance, that is pressure they couldn't handle.

So no, nobody needs to go fight for Iran. Iran already proved it can stand on its own and push powerful countries to the point where they start looking for a way out

Not weak by using humans as shield? Are you people consoling yourselves, or being blinded by sentiments? US threw everything they had at Iran? Common man be realistic for once, remember the most protected man in Iran was killed like a common rat.
A country blocked all your ports with nothing going in or coming out and you could do little or nothing about it.

People like you are bad friends to keep, because you will never be honest in telling your friends their true strengths, weakness, good and bad habits.

How true is this please? Life can truly be so cruel, but mumsy hope you no shop one guy man clean mouth during your slaying days, wey karma cum carry the matter put for head?

Oga darkness, may nature handle your political ambition, just like how you handled Nigeria power sector as minister of power.

Kukuma title the post as Osimhen biography.