₦airaland Forum

united scoress










oh wait

united scoress










oh wait

Oasis007:


Are you lost?! Is he Lukaku we are talking about?!

you have not changed ba . both of them are just MATTER - occupying space

lukaku is also a waste in this game forget the few seconds he attempted to play well. pogba is just lorrying around the way i expected lukaku to.

united to lose (points )

Oasis007:
Seems he's envying Sanchez, and he wants pay rise, then he must up his Game in all Matches.

Nihilist what injury is pogba suffering from is it financial injury

Skimpletyger:
We don't know you from here.

Show ID

am new and i am not here to look for trouble.
this your moniker escaped 10years ban ba. good for you

MuttleyLaff:
What is the true meaning of the text?
What was the issue text was highlighting or addressing?

I have no issues with your straw man "God sees the heart"
That is Bible 101 things

So does the traditions of men equate to babbling?
Or does it equate to lip service?

babbling because it is as meaningless as cleaning the outside while the inside is dirty.

having an appearance of righteousness denying/lacking it's power thereof

let's get this party started , united will lose

larride:
You sure you dey watch this match or you dey follow ham through livescore.

a football match is 90 mins and the lad has been average so far

Ibime:
Pogba needs to be moved to AM. Playing in a midfield 2 is not for him. He just dey follow anywhere ball dey, no positional sense. Mourinho should stop trying to prove a point to Scholes. This is how he lost to Spurs.

your own cost you 40m what should united fans do with pogba playing like he is trying not to step on a land mine and that is a 90m CM.

with the way lukaku plays, bats will likely bench him in the WC

Bibidear:
have i said anything bad

read what he wrote and ask him

Oasis007:


He's not referring to you fella. Read the comments made after yours then you gonna get it right.

Nihilist:
i like to look for players to pick from relegation candidates. Bargains can often be found in that market

My mooy pick isn't based on today's game, mind. i only used his performance today to argue against the doctor's suggestion that Mooy is a limited player.

ok, cool but the thing about such players though the talent is handling the pressure with few young players now not wanting to bid their time as a squad player then move on to first team. that's likely why nathaniel left to watford.

SONofnezzar:
I am expecting a slim win for us today

is it ireti slim or pepeye slim

Oasis007:


He's not referring to you fella. Read the comments made after yours then you gonna get it right.

is it the one made by bibidear or the one made by you

CapitalCee:
it's really true. I thought of this few days ago, Newcastle used to pose problems for mourinho

based on this info and as cruxifizio said, united to lose (points )

afrodoc2:
You were on point about Maguire, and I actually liked him too. Wijnaldum moving to Newcastle was always a step down for him.
But this Mooy I have watched for the Aussie national team and I don’t think he is Chelsea level.

Maguire is a good replacement for cahill only if chelsea do not let united get him instead, this one is hoping on signing ve djri from lazio this summer

Nihilist:
i dont agree with this opinion at all.

i dont believe Mooy is limited . the guy is a well rounded cm for me. Good engine, strong. Creative as well as Combative.

The guy has made 3 tackles and 2 interceptions today, made 5 key passes, and copped 2 assists.

Solid performance.

you want a player in your team based on today's performance when their are players that got into your team based on atleast a whole year's performance and are strongly to finish top four. well done sir

Cruxifizio:
I thought it was a general consensus on this thread that akes deal was ok?

leave ibime he is just mad at conte

you will again quote half my post an try to take it round and round just to go in circles, in chess it's trying to be tricky and play for a draw.

now muttleylaff, i say something is for nigeria and you jump in and say it's for yoruba. i said you CLAIMED because it's not what your saying it's what your are claiming and still claiming.

your questions and that your response show your confusion. anothe analogy, it's like
1. are you a girl?
2. when do you change your sanitary pad?

first such a question as in 2 is based on what. was question 1 answered before such question 2 was asked. it could be a boy, or even a girt that doesn't use pad.

and i did answer 1,2,3 i just didn't number it. now i am going to make an assumption about you - it shows you don't take time to read and study before you draw out observation. your reacting to my writing in my posts and not necessary my point.

you want to reach my mind? lol first reach the point of my posts.

no just clarify your own point

tspouse:
I'm sure most us Christians read this in the bible ,God chased Adam and Eve out after they ate the forbidden fruit.the place was locked and was guides by the angels,

The question now is.

Where exactly is the garden

why do you want to know?

MuttleyLaff:
Do you accept that Isaiah 29:13 or Matthew 15:7-9 is talking about how some promise to do something but in reality do diddy squat nothing?
Do you accept that Isaiah 29:13 or Matthew 15:7-9 is talking about when people talk the talk but dont walk the walk?
Babbling is talk done rapidly and continuously in an excited unintelligble and/or incomprehensible way
whilst lip service is just saying something but not actually do it or plan to do what's just said
I am glad you brought up Hannah
Though I was waiting for a window of opportunity to bring her on to the thread, I will leave her for latter and a much more appropriate time

those two options are as useless as your refusal to accept the true meaning of the texts.

why are you confusing yourself bringing up lip service and babbling. are you saying God only listens to intelligent people, because i do know the bible says God sees the heart.

you do know that matt 15 was rebuking the traditions of men. do do do..

jendhorlee:
Genesis 4:17 And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.

all i know is that he gave birth to many children b4 Eve gave birth to seth. it is the wife I'm still wondering where she came from

well you are free to keep wandering or accept what i have told you

jendhorlee:
you said "eve must have given birth to lots of females" which means cain married one of her sisters ??

bt it was recorded in the Bible that cain knew his wife and gave birth to children before Eve gave birth to seth who replaced abel

he didn't marry his sister, my conclusion is that, it wasn't only adam and eve God created

ofcourse God created other things in 6 days but you can't proof your own conclusion that he didn't marry his sister and you have not shown the logic to backup such stance.

then you saying it was recorded in so and so order does not make void the fact eve likely had other children aside cain or in the space of that 130years before seth.

Neurotika:
A human is capable of reasoning without being taught. It's basic science really. A human being born in a wilderness but has access to things to make him survive is capable of basic reasoning. Bringing the 'all knowing God' putting values into us by default into this issue is just you missing the point.

why go too far. how about a baby at home, it's a human being isn't. even doctors say keep out of reach to children who according to you is capable of reasoning without being taught. i never learnt that in basic science.

if indeed missed the point by bringing in that option, where is your point?

do you really believe your illogical conclusion, then test it with your new born baby. good luck

MuttleyLaff:
SMH. Chief, be careful.
What is OK in what you wrote? Stop it already.
Where, how, when did Paul say he prays in the spirit and lacks understanding and other times he prays in the spirit with understanding?
Is that what 1 Corinthians 14:14-19 is dealing with and talking about?
Are you sure you know, recognise and/or understand a conditional remark when you see one?

that's a reply to someelse about 1 corin 14:14 and 15

is it the 'if' there that you issue with. the condition there is simple and clear now. MY SPIRIT

dude all this your talk it's clear you don't know Holy Spirit (note= i didn't write you don't know ABOUT the Holy Spirit)

The condition for him praying in tongues is the Spirit.

vs 15 i will pray with the spirit
in vs 27 also tells you there are times another person is needed present to interpret.

now telling me to quote from scripture an explanation to a scripture i gave using my own words in a simpler form so another can understand is what?

muttleylaff when seperating what tongues is for you and what it is for others as the bible wrote i didn't specify who in the 'others'. now you brought in the who and claimed the others are only unbelievers then i mentioned to you a sign to unbelievers w/o interpretation and like i said an edification to believers with interpretation.

in your 10questions you did alot of assumption of what my answer would be, making your own conclusions and interrogation.

yes, as often as the spirit groans in me
4. i can name it if i was taught it
5. my preference would be considered if it's inspired from my mind. but i am spirit and i'm willing
6. yet again you assume my answer is yes
7. am aware i am praying in it
8. oh i understand very well
9. repeat of number 6
10. in private, in prayer as i am lead and in time God gives me the interpretion. he is the revealer of all mysteries and speaking in tongue is speaking the mysteries of God.

Neurotika:
I actually agree that humans should live based on the Golden rule. But the truth is, most of our laws (especially in Africa) has religious influences in it. Immunity to tax for religious institutions , Laws against the LGBT communities etc. We describe this laws as 'godly' and defend them vehemently. Yet we refuse to use empathy in judging how reasonable they are.

because it is religious doesn't make it the truth

Gggg102:
in cases like yours, you know how people in general want to be treated.
the average person won't want you to be sleeping with his spouse.

or you treat people in a neutral manner

Neurotika:
But there are cases where you cannot know what the person wants or doesn't? Cases where your actions to someone affects a third party that you don't know well like the example I gave. Or cases where you haven't established much relationship with someone to know their likes and dislikes, then a certain situation arise that requires you to behave to them in a way. How do you reconcile this?

Jesus said love your neighbour as yourself. do unto others as you would like done unto you.

just my input

Neurotika:
Plato asked- '' Is conduct right because the gods command it or do the gods command it cos its right?''
What yardstick do we use to measure morality?. Religion or Reasoning?. If you pick Religion,where do you now place Reasoning in determining the morality of an act that religion is silent about? E.g Masturbation, Technology
If you pick Reasoning,why do we then need the gods to interpret morality to us?.
On this cardinal questions lies the confusion that keeps ravaging humanity.

our reasoning is based on what we are taught, religion is basically traditions of men as claim to have gotten it from their gods.

i pick neither, why! lemme explain. it's also connects to where we believe our origin is from i.e who first taught us.
here's a question can an isolated(without interaction) human, learn without being taught?
so did our reasoning self evolve or where we shown by an all knowing God. our morals is based on what we value.

what made man gave man his values.

paxonel:
Read verse 15 as well.

1 Corinthians 14:15 What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also...

That means you must understand what you are saying so that if someone ask you, what are you saying while praying? You should be able to explain to the person so that you will be seen as a mad man

paul said ALSO he didn't say ONLY. it means there are times he prays in the spirit and lacks understanding and other times he prays in the spirit with understanding. ok

jendhorlee:
but according to the Bible, cain got married to a woman before Eve gave birth to any other child

that's your mistake, eve gave birth to another MALE child and has nothing to do with her having females before seth or even before cain.

2. the bible never stated when cain got married.

eezeribe God never asked anyone to shut down their brains but in the bible it is written renew your mind, be wise, build with wisdom, plan.
medical science has not fully collerated the relationship between brain cells and the human mind or conciousness. you have only chosen to accept and belief the speculations of scientists above those who you call christains. you even mentioned them misquoting a bible you know or the one you don't know. the fact you don't know doesn't mean nobody knows - that's arrogance. and the arrogant are also ignorant because they ignore the truth.