Johnydon22's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Johnydon22's Profile › Johnydon22's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 (of 489 pages)
hahn: Mehnn... we are seeing the stupendous barbarism just like you are. Why would anyone burn his children or even his enemy for anything. ![]() You want to protect your children from harm by roasting them in fire, can idiocy get any clearer than this? |
starlingslimnet: Bottom line is if my enemy plans to kill my children i will kill him first of all.. Not because my children disowned me but because he wants to harm my babies.... So whoever plans on killing my babies will first get killed by me to make sure nothing happens to my babies whether am in good terms with my children or not.. Number priority is protecting my children.... Go on bring more |
starlingslimnet:Now it is time to show everybody the cheap straws.. Now everyone look and see what i said.. you asked. starlingslimnet: Only an idiotic father would watch someone kill his child and worse burn them together with the person. . .Now my reply was... johnydon22: Now everyone can see very clearly here now deceptive cheap defence of abstract concepts can get.. If an enemy is going to harm or kill my children, as a good father i will simply kill the enemy first to make sure my children are safe from harm, who in his right senses will burn his children alongside his enemy. . . Now people should come see it clearly..let them judge between us who is correct |
starlingslimnet:Plain straw man has been introduced here and i will like people to take a quick look at my post to see just how cheap lying for yahweh can get... johnydon22: |
Tjayjosh:Nobody asked you who Jesus was here. Can your dishonesty get any cheaper here? |
Krystalzkris: Lmao... Wailing wailers kwa... |
Tjayjosh: Is not accepting Jesus same as being a immoral 2nd what will you loose if you accept God (allah) and his prophet muhammed..? |
theunusualmoon:Thanks but the synonyms of ruse are: angle, artifice, blind, booby trap, curveball, deceit, device, dodge, feint, gambit, game, game plan, gimmick, hoax, imposture, jig, maneuver, ploy, scenario, sham, shenanigans*, shift, stratagem, stunt, subterfuge, switch*, twist*, wile i believe you mistook my usage of the word |
KingEbukasBlog:Lmao. . .you are getting schooled here boy... Why don't you agree with the proofs of evolution . Talk science please**Face palm** How many times will one repeat the same nonsensical childish question. . The 1001th time i am answering Because like many in the scientific world i do not agree to a theory until all possible reviews, studies, observations, experimentations, discoveries has been properly carried out on these theories. It is a position of honesty because a theory can change or modify with more discoveries until it arrives at a truthful approximation.. ![]() Am not sure you understand science as you claim you doAm sure it is obvious here. . One who knows science is a mode of knowledge deduction through systematic approximations or you who make out science to be a dogma. . . it is evidently clear who understand science here.. ![]() If not evolution how can you account for fossils and the similarity between fossils or extinct animals and modern animals . E.g Mammoth and elephantYou see? Evolution is a theory explaining this observed facts. And showing how little you know of scientific postulations you do not know theories can take a drastic turn when a new discovery is made. Evolution as a theory can be modified and improved upon until it reaches a close range of approximated truth. . .till then it doesn't make claims of absolute truth or unchanging dogma that but be believed because it is still under study.. Common meeeehn you can do better than this, you want to force evolution down my throat? Hehehehehe not every science inclined individual agrees with evolution YET... I'm a computer science student . And I don't read off google and try to be condescendingActually googling is not good for your eyes, try books.. ![]() My girl friend is also studying computer science nothing special about that, this is not web design.. ![]() Stop making illogical comparisonsOh meeehn this is an eye sore ![]() first i have shown how my question is a very valid and logically sound question, you still cannot demonstrate how it is logically wrong but desperately hanging on bandwagon to dodge it. Common mehnnn...this is not what i have been teaching, how to dodge questions...let me repeat the question again and hope to get an answer this time.. Which is better; Science that agrees it doesn't have answers and is working towards knowing or religion that insists its dogmas must be taken as truth...? Or if you ask me i advice you save yourself the embarrassment and agree you don't know |
sorextee:Possibly an asteroid hitting a planet... |
KingEbukasBlog: That is correct People needs to laugh naaaa... You are doing a great job giving them what to laugh over ![]() |
KingEbukasBlog:[b] Oh please enough with the people with superior knowledge in science believe these theories. Not everyone in the scientific field agree to a theory until all possible reviews, studies, observations, experimentations, discoveries has been properly carried out on this theories. [size=16] I am one of those who maintain a skeptic nature and we even try finding faults in these theories to make sure a close approximation of truth is reached through these studies.[/size] So to answer again: I am YET to agree with the Big Bang theory, evolution or the hypothetical abiogenesis or biogenesis because these subjects are still under heavy study and there are still many more to uncover in order to perfect these or ultimately find out a better answer. If evidence against evolution arises and is reviewed to be correct evolution would be discarded by the science community, nobody would hold it to be true or believe it. Science means study boy not dogma. . so i am sure this childish hang on a thread has been addressed in full here.. [/b]You are still making illogical comparisons. They are two different concepts Haven't you dodged this long enough? science and religion are opposite concepts and so are open to pure comparison. Science recognize answers through careful study of the subject and religion establish answers without study and shielded from questions. . This is a clear open ground to establish comparison of both method of knowledge deduction. So please na stop the fear and answer me .. Which is better; Science that agrees it doesn't have answers and is working towards knowing or religion that insists its dogmas must be taken as truth...? Hahahahahaha chai... ![]() |
KingEbukasBlog: Lmao. . You still making this childish assertion? .. pitiful.. since when did science become a dogma that needs to be believed? Abiogenesis per say is hypothetical boy am sure you wouldn't know that. You don't even have a premise to clutch on now the issue is scientific theories that are still under study. People with superior knowledge are not johnydon22. .science is consistent study of a subject to improve the knowledge of that subject. Going by your childish assertion people with superior knowledge would believe Mars was a dry red planet until just few days back it was announced that liquid water seasonally flow on mars.. ![]() Awesome isn't it ...you are making illogical comparisons . Habaaa na stop this dodging it is disgraceful. . people here will be laughing their hearts out now. . Answer me in a simple term na. Which is better; Science that agrees it doesn't have answers and is working towards knowing or religion that insists its dogmas must be taken as truth...? Can you man up and tell us which of these two premise of knowledge deduction is better and more reliable.. ![]() Hahahaha i don die.. |
starlingslimnet:This will be the third time i am answering the same question.. I will only settle my ruse with my enemy in what ever way i deem fit and not burn my children. I will not even burn the enemy because that is cruel and barbaric.. Now answer my question because if you dodge it again then we are done.. What will you do if your children disown you, burn them with your enemy? |
KingEbukasBlog:Hahahahahahaha ....i don die That does not answer my question . Why dont you believe in Evolution , Big Bang and AbiogenesisHahahaha now this is the question? i have answered this countless times.. Because these subjects are still under heavy study in science didn't you hear the news8) A specie Homo naledi was unearthed few weeks back showing science doesn't claim absolute truth but rather keeps striving to uncover the actual truth or evidence against a theory. . Come on just agree scientific methods are awesome.. But you are still trying to doge. . and this remains the explanation to scientific guidance. Unlike your absurd dogmas science is open to question, review and argument. . Last i checked these subjects are still under heavy studies so as to make sure it proffers what actually is, if evidence against is found in the course of this study then the theory is discarded unlike you who would clutch on to absurdity no matter what twisting it at will. You are making illogical comparisons its as simple as that .Abeg na stop running around because anyone reading this knows the question was a direct one. Which is better; Science that agrees it doesn't have answers and is working towards knowing or religion that insists its dogmas must be taken as truth...? Stopped dodging and answer like a man.. Actually , its no . I've been a christian all my lifeSo without bible you wouldn't have known murder is wrong. . .Very excellent I being mocked by someone who does not understand the role of science and religion .That moment when someone doesn't know what to say again. . You are still dodging my question at the same time showing us how drunk your God concept is when it comes to impacting knowledge of how things happened.. Let me ask again Which is better; Science that agrees it doesn't have answers and is working towards knowing or religion that insists its dogmas must be taken as truth...? Can you man up and tell us which of these two premise of knowledge deduction is better and more reliable.. ![]() |
starlingslimnet:Am sure i have answered you, my ruse is with my enemy not my children. And what ever makes your children disown you must be a huge fault on your part. I will only settle my ruse with my enemy in what ever way i deem fit after all i am the all powerful one here and created the enemy and not burn my children. Again and we are even discussing reality in relation to myth, that is nonsensical.. meanwhile answer me.. what would you do, burn your children? |
starlingslimnet: I will simply kill the enemy and that is that.. after all the enemy is still a product of yahweh.. Why should i throw my children in a burning fire? So tell me what you would do, throw your children into fire? The barbarism you people exhibit here is just sad to see... |
KingEbukasBlog:Lmao. . and who said you did, it was a question gather your wits. Is believing in a God synonymous to morality? |
KingEbukasBlog:Ok non-believer is also synonymous to sinner in some cases? Meaning anytime you commit sin you are a non-believer or you don't? Non- believers - people who don't acknowledge God's existence ( some religions acknowledge the existence of a supreme being)Tell us the non-believers you were referring to in that post here KingEbukasBlog:Tell us the non-believers you mean here |
KingEbukasBlog:Will you like me to take you up on some schooling about that? ![]() should we dabble into older antiquities? You are definingUnlike your absurd dogmas science is open to question, review and argument. . Last i checked these subjects are still under heavy studies so as to make sure it proffers what actually is, if evidence against is found in the course of this study then the theory is discarded unlike you who would clutch on to absurdity no matter what twisting it at will. Can you stop the dodge work and answer? Which is better; Science that agrees it doesn't have answers and is working towards knowing or religion that insists its dogmas must be taken as truth... The question should be who embedded the reason to feel guilt when murder is committedNo the question is without bible or any religious book telling you not to kill you wouldn't know murder is wrong? pleas stop your running around and answer.. You need to re-read your posts before your posts thoYou have been shown how past events recorded in a book are not infallible...Cheap defence doesn't work here.. evidence that life came from the non-living through a single cell then evolved to become complex beings who can discern between right and wrong , express emotions , reason etc . Ok thenThis is a logical fallacy known as bandwagon fallacy, you cannot address the question but pull unrelated assertions against premises that are not subject of argument here. Please answer me na stop running around Which is better; Science that agrees it doesn't have answers and is working towards knowing or religion that insists its dogmas must be taken as truth... Science is expected to do that jobhahahahaha i don die this God is quite drunk doesn't know how to tell a story though … … Just imagine how you are ridiculing your religion here... |
KingEbukasBlog:Am curious here, is belief in a God synonymous to being moral? Go on lets hear it |
KingEbukasBlog: KingEbukasBlog:So non-believers in what were you referring to here...? Poor escape tactise i must say.. |
KingEbukasBlog:It is open for all to observe here no need implying it.. you are still trying to dodge this question. . Would you use threat to ensure conformity from your kids? please answer... It ? What are we talking aboutIt/she/he . . tell us which it is till then it remains the correct representation.. but while you at it don't forget the question.. "Why does it/she/her need threat to coerce people into submission The question is as illogical as the omnipotence paradoxIt is a very valid question please enough with the straws in order to dodge a question. "What does it do with the belief, does it feed off it? I cant say because I could be wrong . Only God judges . Only. . now we have established it to be different from human judicial system there for it only suggests tyranny here.. you are doing just great in defence of God here.. ![]() |
KingEbukasBlog:really? But you are still the one doing that for him here, all the claims here is from you...God haven't done any... Only a man made God will need man to make itself known to man.. so he will throw them in hell for not believing right? |
KingEbukasBlog:Have been what now?? Ooh shiit. . . this just cracked me up.. Obviously someone does not understand what "abstract representation" meansOh i do so well and i'd rather subscribe to explanations based on actual studies than on the allegedly abstract representation by primitive men banking on their superstition. Fun Question: Do you know the genesis account is a young account in the list of creation myths around? Its comparing Messi and Roger FedererNow this is a cheap straw man. Science provides means of deducting knowledge religion claims to already have that knowledge. i ask again which is better... The bible is historical book combined with teachings that'll guide one on the right path to living right .Same with the Sumerian Hammurabi code, law of neslim these are older ancient laws and antiquities. also the Quran and Hindu veda also teaches these. . . Now question: So without the bible you wouldn't know murder is wrong? Are past events mutable ?Aaaaaaw surely if past events as laid out in a written text goes against the evidence available.. Man has a scientific method of ascertaining and reconstructing past events known as archeology. You are still dodging this question let me repeat it.. [color=#990000]which is better... One that agrees it doesn't know anything and looks towards evidence and study of what is to ascertain the true approximations . or the one that insists everything written in an ancient primitive text is true. yupSo God didn't tell him how it actually happen but just an abstract representative of it? ![]() Hahahahahaha this is getting funnier .. |
KingEbukasBlog:You must be a good parent. . Maybe you will tell your children as your idea of deterring them from touching the meat. "If you touch a meat in that pot i will have you throw into a burning room" that is a threat.. I can see you doing that soon.. Believing in God is an acknowledgement of his existence . So why does it threaten people so as to coerce them to believe. You still haven't answered it "What does it do with the belief, does it feed off it? Some people acknowledge God's existence but still live ungodly lives.You are still dodging it.. Moreover i do not call burning millions in a literal fire forever because they hurt your ego just.. Tell us sir; Will a Muslim go to your version of heaven? |
KingEbukasBlog:That is good and all And you were not desperate by accusing me of being afraid of you and calling for help ? Am sure this thread is enough for all to see the insecure one here Science and Religion are different conceptsExactly the point and you clutch on to religious explanations instead of being open to the finds of scientific studies. So i ask again please answer me which of the two concepts is better.. Science that agrees it doesn't know everything and strives to know by studying what is there to know. or religion that establishes its dogmas and holy books should be held as immutable truth... Please give us the answer we are begging you... The account of genesis in the bible is an abstract representation of whatever went on during the genesis of lifeAnd i guess God told the writer about it right? hahahahahaha just go read about Enuma elis |
KingEbukasBlog:Threats should be treated as threats no matter where it is found. In real life if you threaten me i take it as a threat... Actually , you can choose not to believe - like you've chosen not to believe nowThe young man asked a nice question. "What is it doing with belief, does it feed off people's belief? Not non-believers per se ...Judges don't go about throwing people in jail over what they believe or don't believe. Judges recognize the right to attorney and fair trial that involves arguments between defence and prosecution. . |
KingEbukasBlog:His business... In general knowledge , theology , cute reasoning and common sense ... lets rideGeneral knowledge include science and all. why are you shying away from that. We should draw knowledge from every angle... ![]() Am not calling for help . You mention your crew a million times when you write your epistles - I dont see it as calling for back upMe? Now you are getting desperate. . I don't have a crew i am my own man misconceptions of the creation story ? I dealt with it one Sunday - the post was there for everyone to see .Pheeeeew fun recommendation Go read about Enuma Elish and report your finds. And christians with superior knowledge of science don't see it that way ? You really dwell in self delusion Hahahahahaha this is serious... You still haven't answered that question, let me rephrase it again. Which should be better; Agreeing man do not know everything and being open to what the universe teaches us through intense and thorough studies of it. or establishing everything written in an ancient primitive book is correct and should be held as immutable truth... |
KingEbukasBlog:Actually i have not claimed not to have seen any there are lots of them in the Science Section and we discuss and learn. they teach me many things right there you can join me there cus you really need it. I guess Deepsight , Uyi and Davidylan are not on NairalandLmao. . Davidylan can sure tell i have given him his own taste when he tried infusing religion into science.. You call for help?. . . Why not show us what you've got? There is no shame in not knowingIgnorance by you is denying the existence of a designer because you cannot resolve or better still comprehend the mystery of His existence . Wow ! No ignorance is attributing the result of gravity and matter interactions on a humanoid somewhere talking to himself when he was creating day and night before the sun. I say again why not throw out these unquestionable dogmas you clutch onto by faith and be open to what the universe teaches . . Which is more humble; The one who agrees that he doesn't know everything and looks on to study of things there is to teach him what is. or the one who insists his holy book written by primitive men must be correct and should be held on to as eternal truth. |
KingEbukasBlog: Looks like you are threatened by my presence. . lol. . I understand that. . The science section is open for all i am always there waiting for those Christians. And i wonder who has a good knowledge in science who would disagree with my statement above. I repeat again; there is no shame in ignorance only filling the gap left by your ignorance with superstition without postulating method of deduction is shameful. |
KingEbukasBlog:Unlike you i look on to study to solve the questions of origin not superstition. Ignorance is not a shameful thing the shameful thing there is filling the gap left by your ignorance with assumptions worst still assumptions of ancient men without postulation method of deduction ... |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 (of 489 pages)




