₦airaland Forum

Ishilove:

Amusing right?

DemiGoddess:
Old man please bounce

Em hello? I already did like 2 hours 30mins ago. Must you overstate it?

STFUareyouGod:
mynd44

Oh yea! You forgot you instigated this right? Yes mynd44, please look into this.

STFUareyouGod:
You'll do well not to quote me again
Thanks

STFUareyouGod:
Nice one op. I'm disappointed how the mods in romance section have been handling some of these 'e-warriors'

I hope the e-warriors also involve you and your crew?

daretodiffer:
Good morning sir, you need to extend rule 2 to include abuse on the basis of gender. You cannot make rules that ban people who insult/abuse other tribes but exclude abuse and derogatory statements that are aimed at a specific sex. I do not deserve to be insulted because I have breasts and vagina. I am human and I deserve to be treated as such.In fact such threads and statements are enough to amount to provocation under rule 2 .

As usual! Another fallacy, appealing to seun's emotion isn't gonna work eh.

Rule two is stated clearly: "Don't abuse, bully, deliberately insult/provoke, fight, or wish harm to Nairaland members OR THEIR TRIBE" Nairaland members equally mean both male and female members.

So please stop playing the victim card! If you're insulted because you possess breast and vagina, report, and stop appealing to people's emotion.

Joy1706:
Some women just irritate me. You'd be surprised that this same woman might not even have the guts to question her hubby. If my husband cheated, I'd break his head b4 remembering there's even a mistress sef

Nna I love you for dis.

DemiGoddess:
So?

Sooo, I'm not patronizing you cos you neither give me business nor pleasure.

Kapisce.

DemiGoddess:
Next time try not to sound patronising

Oh my, please know this, the only people I patronize are those who gives me business and pleasure.

Creamish:
If you read my posts and understood my stand, we wont be having this conversation.


Lemme help u understand where I truly stand on this. The wife and her friends were wrong to have beaten her and disgraced her. A non-violent confrontation shuld av sufficed. A confrontation with the hubby too shuld occur.

D'u understand now?

Yea I do. But I still feel confronting her husband is the best, never the mistress.

Re-read my stand above. Not sure why U think we are in different boats. The only difference btw us is I believe the mistress is as guilty as the husband..

Please quote where I said the husband is not guilty..

That's the problem, I can't find where you said the husband is not guilty. Lol.

Anyway, as long as adultery is not a crime in Nigeria, the mistress and husband are just having fun. Lol. However, assault is very much a crime and the wife should be served a hot cup of coffee with very high caffeine.

Okijajuju1:
You are filled with wisdom..


The lady that was assaulted should just go to court and watch the wife spend some quality time in prison.

And the damages she should sue for in Civil Court should be large enough to keep the woman bankrupt for life.




Attacking the partner your spouse is cheating on you with is much more stupid than attacking your spouse.

Why attack anyone?

Nuff respect to you my fine sir! You're filled with wisdom that many nigerians seem to lack.

DemiGoddess:
Nope.

He's a blasted son of a b!tch who deserves to die by chinese water torture.

I was writing from the wife's point of view and not the husband which is pretty much obvious.

Did I ever glorify the man's ass?

So either you have problem understanding or you just trying to spite me.


Please don't ever get sarcastic with me again 'cause it never goes down well.


Thank you fine sir!

Hey calm down, no need to start issuing ultimatums. I reacted to what I saw, you should have understood that. Or was it explicitly written that you were speaking from the wife's point of view? I'm not clairvoyant I'll have you know.

pinceprinz:
In plain, simple English? OK

In Saudi Arabia, the price of adultery is sentence to death by stoning so, don't do it@ all when you're there even if you're a human right fundamentalist till you reach your West where you are free to even fukc your Dad's wife in the open street without even sleeping in the police den overnight...

Only if you'd understood Pidgin English, this woulda sounded better . Poor u mate!

Well only if you had appropriately stated your statement there wouldn't have been any need for this.

Creamish:
@bolded.. read thru my earlier post.

I did. I'm just bothered you seem more intent on killing the mistress than the man.

Creamish:
We are on the same page on the assault.

What i am trying to understand is your stand on the mistress. Is she right or wrong? Was it ok for her to date a married man?

Why the focus on the mistress? The husband is now left totally in the loop.

Now, I'll ask as regard the emboldened, from which perspective are you coming from, religion, moral or logic?.

Creamish:
Whatever happened, the mistress is guilty. Once she decided to sleep with the hubby, she became guilty. She must av known that she wont be celebrated when caught but she still decided to fvck on nwayz.. So if ur wife decides to sleep with her boss cos she was threatened of her job, u will approve cos it's not her fault?

Let's be realistic here pls..

My dear, being realistic means being reasonable. The mistress is guilty? What about the husband? Did it occur to you that may be the man might have been the one who started the whole affair? Funny you blame the mistress and accuse her of being guilty and you totally ignored the husband.

If my wife decides to cheat on me just to keep her job, I trust she would see the need to tell me that her boss is sexually assaulting her, from there, I'll handle it.

This is why I make damn sure that I'll get married to a woman who respect reason and logic, not one who is a slave to her emotion and her religion.

pinceprinz:
Are u really asking me this question ? , Joking? or is this your way of saying hi? Clarify or if yo serious, reread my lines paying a lil more of your attention to draw reasonable inference please!

May be I misunderstood you. Might I be so bold to ask you what you meant?

Creamish:
Whatz the difference? Hearing a confession and actually catching them...does one make the heart ache less than the other?

Are you saying that it is ok to beat her up when shez caught red-handed?

In the court of law emotions aren't used as evidence, facts are!. That's the difference.

I'm saying its wrong of her to attack her, that if she had done that in her home, then I can be understood and it may fly in court.

The wife assaulted the lady, that's for sure, not just assault, but pre-meditated assault.

Creamish:
Therez a lil devil in everyone Joe. Ur free to spill ur guts. This mistress was having an affair with the husband of a woman who helped her get a job.. she had the affair for a year. The wife got a job for this ingrate.

Abeg.

So? Of course emotion will always take over reason when women are involved. One would have expected her to know who initiated the whole thing, the mistress or the husband.

Or did it bother anyone that may be husband coerced the mistress into having an affair with him, like sleep with me, or loose your job. I'm sure you've heard of such tales?

And I intend to keep my guts intact, it means very much to me, thank you very much.