₦airaland Forum

solreb:
That's left for CSU to decide and CSU didn't complain about that. What you fail to understand is that there are times that USA waiver some requirements. And this has happened to my daughter that they asked her not to sit for maths and English entrance tests and they admitted her.

gidjah:
Is this for real sir?any link to assertain this claim ?

Spending123:
Mynnd44, Rule 15

ban this Moniker for suffocating agbado online miscreants with good living pictures.

If done correctly, it will elicit precise language from the University that will demonstrate that Tinubu’s claims are false. If the deposition is conducted well, no Nigerian judge will be able to dispute such specific statement made by the university if indicted Tinubu and claimed the certificate were false despite attending the university.

The Supreme Court is not likely to allow Tinubu’s gender identity or identity as a man or woman. The Supreme Court may not be discussing whether or not he attended secondary school or primary school since he did not include those certificates. What is at issue here is whether the result he submitted is authentic or forged. If forged, the foundation upon which his election was erected collapses. Very interesting days ahead.

Dr. Law Mefor, an Abuja-based forensic and social psychologist, is a fellow of The Abuja School of Social and Political Thoughts; drlawmefor@gmail.com; Twitter: @Drlawsonmefor.

For the avoidance of doubt, here are the prerequisites to qualify to run for the office of the president under the 1999 Constitution: They are at least 35 years old (40 before 2018); they belong to and are supported by a political party; and they have completed schooling at least as high as the School Certificate level or an equivalent.

The word ‘certificate’ is included in the constitution as well. It is therefore not up to INEC’s discretion under the constitution to assume that a candidate is educated up to secondary without ascertainable proof.

A certificate’s inconsistency alone can render the candidate ineligible at face value. But it is the details of the under-oath deposition, in which university officials will be questioned about the credentials Tinubu flaunts, are what one thinks will hammer the last nail in the coffin.

According to the Constitution, a candidate must provide proof of his secondary education. The CSU credential Tinubu provided as proof must pass integrity test, or Tinubu’s election will be standing on nothing, since without a certificate, INEC has no other way to determine if someone has completed secondary education.

Those who are spinning this out of context have to make Nigerians aware of any other way INEC can objectively assess a candidate’s educational qualification without a certificate. There is no ambiguity in this assertion.

The GCE A-level result’s authenticity and ownership are now unknown. It may or may not belong to the person who is now known as President Bola A. Tinubu. While Tinubu claims to have been born on March 29, 1952, his CSU transcript states that he was born on March 29, 1954. It meant he would have been 14 years old if he had been born in 1954, which was impossible even today let alone in the 60s.

Now the crux of the matter: Tinubu provided INEC with only the CSU certificate. Since a result is constitutionally required, the question is: what will the Supreme Court rely to address Tinubu’s educational qualification for the presidential election if the CSU certificate is adjudged fake, Tinubu has failed to submit a certificate.

Raskimonojendor:
Jeez. KamwuliaExtra is getting overtime pay today.

Algrin:
It's going to be a very loooooong eight years, if not more. I do hope you have a personal doctor sha.

The “F” on Tinubu’s Southwest College transcript may not be a clerical error, even though his admission letter to Chicago State University, dated August 23, 1977, was addressed to “Mr. Tinubu,” not Ms. or Miss Tinubu.

In addition, Bola A. Tinubu submitted a 1970 GCE A-level result to Southwest College when he enrolled for an associate’s degree and claimed to have attended Government College in Lagos. The issue is that the Lagos Government College was founded in 1974. Some see a problem with the chronology there, which again points to forgery that needs to be proven.

The GCE A-level results also reveal that “Bola A. Tinubu” sat the exam while enrolled in the HSC, which was then a two-year programme following five years of secondary schooling. In other words, the certificate holder must have completed secondary school no later than 1968.

More damaging information has come to light also, raising the question of who owns the Southwest College transcript that Tinubu used to enroll at Chicago State University. It is a female’s. Can a university make a mistake like that regarding a student’s gender? The president will stand also accused of identity theft if the university maintains the claim that the student they admitted was a female.

Many claim that Tinubu, who was said to have been born Lamidi Amoda (a Yoruba Muslim variant of Abdulhamid Ahmed) Sangodele in Iragbiji, Osun State, took the identity of a female Bola Adekunle Tinubu to travel to America. This will also be proved in the days ahead.

Before calculating the irreparable damage, the lawyers have feared now that it has come to pass against Tinubu as well as against Nigerians who are the citizens of the country he presides over; let’s take a moment to explore the disclosures about Tinubu from the CSU Documents. News sources both in favour of and against Tinubu are selectively reporting the documents that Chicago State University handed over to former Vice President Atiku Abubakar.

The official records from Chicago State University’s Office of the Registrar proved that “Bola A. Tinubu” studied there “from August 1977 through June 1979” and was “awarded a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration with Honours on June 22, 1979.” Additionally, the registrar swore under oath to this. In America, lying on oath carries a potentially severe penalty of up to a 10-year prison sentence.

The papers rested the question of whether Tinubu attended Chicago State University and received a degree from there. He did. So why is he so alarmed about making his findings public to allude to irreparable damage should that happen? Maybe for the following reasons: the CSU certificate, which Tinubu submitted to INEC, differs from certificates the university issued in 1979 and later, showing that what he submitted didn’t originate from Chicago State University.

He presented a result that was not likely generated by Chicago State University, even though he did legitimately graduate from CSU in 1979. This indicates that the decision was made to fake the document rather than apply for a replacement. A substitute certificate from CSU costs around $20.

However, after completing the Order Form for a replacement, it takes 10 weeks to obtain it. The pressure of time may have encouraged cheating the system and doing it the Nigerian way, which is known as “Oluwole” in local slang, referring to a fake.

Bola Tinubu’s attorneys stated during an urgent appeal before Judge Nancy Maldonado of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Chicago that “severe and irreparable harm will be done to Bola Tinubu if the records are released.” Those were his lawyers’ words and true, are they?

Tinubu, CSU, integrity crisis, the dilemmas, and predicted irreparable damage

paramakina202:
CSU is covering up something.

paramakina202:
Thief Tinübü is impersonating whoever is Bola A tinubu that is the reason he refused to go and collect the original certificate from Chicago state university already issued in his name but choose to forge it at Oluwole.

drlateef:
Produce the whole page where you lifted your quotes. You will see what follows the ones you lifted out with context. Many of you quote where he said the school did not produce his certificate. But you did not quote where he said these are produced by third party vendors which is normal in US. That’s what quoting out of context means.

Severe, irreparable harm will be done to me if Chicago university releases my records, Tinubu begs U.S. senior judge

drlateef:
Produce the whole page where you lifted your quotes. You will see what follows the ones you lifted out with context. Many of you quote where he said the school did not produce his certificate. But you did not quote where he said these are produced by third party vendors which is normal in US. That’s what quoting out of context means.

Rolings:
Wrong.
I don't blame you
Na una make Rufai Oseni....who is a public affairs commentator sees himself as a journalist, you can see the difference between him and real journalists that went through school.

Una funny. If that's the case why are we crying that out doctors are leaving we should simply have replaced them with the likes of Aneke....afterall doctors are not special.

Taylor94:
But it’s legal to rule 250Million Nigerians with a forged certificate


Rules in Nigeria is only meant for the poor


Bros/sis if you get money and you know say you dey your right


Any Mumu lawyer wey near you talk rubbish just target him mouth with your left feast


Tinubu has reduced these high profile lawyers to zero


Na this Tinubu case cast Nigerian lawyers nobody dey rate them again

drlateef:
Simple english you don’t understand. How can you understand a deposition?. I said you quoted out of context. Do you know what that means, as opposed to misquoting?

optimusprime2:
Because the "Bola A. Tinubu" that was "assumed" to have gotten into CSU in the first place, is very different from the Bola Ahmed Tinubu that is "assumed" to have graduated...

Perhaps the Bola A. Tinubu who is said to be Bola Ahmed Tinubu doesn't even exist in the first place and was made up to shadow a Bola Ahmed Tinubu that originally didn't exist... Tchai! Naija presido na Mystery??

Westchester:
Y0l0ba and forgery a love story better than twilight saga 😂😂

Watch his online urchins try to gaslight us and tag it an Igbo agenda

Dbestbrest:
When will these children of hate stop these nonsense? With all the evidence presented to court by CSU, yet, they come on social media to spew gibberish. This case is in the supreme court but they won't let the court decide because of the hatred for Asiwaju. By the time Asiwaju come for his pound of flesh, they will start playing the victim card like Hamas

Xscape1993:
The strange man call Tinubu has no single certificate or trace to any background. He is a mysterious man....

So, let’s recap this chronology of deceit, lies, identity theft, and forgery.

– Tinubu claims he attended St Paul’s School Aroyola[b] (This school never existed).[/b]

– Tinubu claims he attended Government College Ibadan. Debunked.

– Tinubu claims he attended Government College Lagos and graduated in 1970- The school never existed in 1970.

– Tinubu claims he attended Southwest College (Now Richard Daley College). He never did.

– Tinubu claims he attended CSU. Maybe, but with a stolen identity.

– Tinubu claims he graduated from CSU. Not at all (please see 5 above).

– Tinubu claims the certificate he tendered to INEC in the 2023 presidential election came from CSU. Lie- CSU has since denied the certificate emanated from them.

– Tinubu claims his date of birth is 1952. If you believe this, you believe anything. Other documents he allegedly claims are his bear other dates of birth — March 29, 1954, and 1955.

– Tinubu claims that the $460k- proceeds of narcotics he forfeited to the U.S. government in 1990 was a charge against his account, not against him. Absurd, isn’t it?

– Tinubu claims he worked with Deloitte. Deloitte has since written and debunked this.

In conclusion, this article highlights a series of unsolved cases related to Tinubu, including allegations of forgery, identity theft, and deceit. The discrepancies in his educational and personal history raise significant questions about his credibility and qualifications.

Tinubu claims he was born in 1955

Tinubu’s alleged USC admission application documents indicate that he was born in 1955. Lie from the pit of hell. The truth is that Bola Tinubu’s exact date of birth is unknown. It is recorded on his Nigerian passport that his date of birth was March 29, 1952, and the Richard Daley transcript which he claims to own (he doesn’t own it), bears the date March 29, 1954, as his date of birth.

As this article was about to go to press, I discovered that about two years ago, Wikipedia had it on their website that Tinubu was born on March 29, 1942. Yes, 1942. The Wikipedia profile entry depicting his date of birth as March 29, 1942, has since been deleted. So, which of these four dates is correct? Your guess is as good as mine.

Though this article is focused on the Chicago files, permit me to add four more ancillary evidence to buttress the points above.