₦airaland Forum

tctrills:
26 And there was a famine in the land, beside the first famine that was in the days of Abraham. And Isaac went unto Abimelech king of the Philistines unto Gerar.
Please take your correction. The philistines are not Palestinians. You're welcome
This link below will help you differentiate the two
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philistines
Another link to help you
[url]https://www.quora.com/How-does-Philistine-and-Palestine-differ#:~:text=The%20term%20Palestinians%20is%20used,of%20Canaan%20and%20northern%20Sinai[/url].

tctrills:
26 And there was a famine in the land, beside the first famine that was in the days of Abraham. And Isaac went unto Abimelech king of the Philistines unto Gerar.
Please take your correction. The philistines are not Palestinians. You're welcome
This link below will help you differentiate the two
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philistines
Another link to help you
[url]https://www.quora.com/How-does-Philistine-and-Palestine-differ#:~:text=The%20term%20Palestinians%20is%20used,of%20Canaan%20and%20northern%20Sinai[/url].

tctrills:
We use different bibles sir. King of Palestinians is not written in my bible. Please give me the verse.

Klington:
All you Islamic terrorists and your sympathetizers deserve much more than what isreal is doing.

MAY ISREAL CONTINUE TO SUCCEED

tctrills:
You used the word almost certainly mixed race which shows you are not 100 percent sure.
But even at that, the modern Israelis spent 100s of years in Europe so why don't you give them the same privilege. They definitely have mixed blood in them.
Still they are jews.they kept their language and heritage even when it was dangerous to do so.
For hundreds of years they were second class citizens in most countries they lived yet they kept the Hebrew language and religion even when it was more convenient to do without.
If for hundreds of years, the world accepted them as jews in other to persecute them but now they are strong and independent, you want to take it away from them, I can't take you serious.

tctrills:
When was the first world map of nations made?
We're there nations before the maps were created?
What about the history and archeological findings, do we also discard that.
The writings of the historian Flavius Josephus does it also not count?
Many archeological findings are written in Hebrew and can be ready by modern Jews who speak the same language

tctrills:
I still do not understand your argument here. You have said so many things that are wrong.
The bible is not the only claim of the children of Israel.
Contemporal history and archeology also proves the ancient Israel existed. So what exactly is your point?

Emco1:
They only taken back what belongs to them

Fineman2:
https://c.newsnow.co.uk/A/1218359894?-14432:11

Discountsempai:
I took your advice, and this is the first thing google showed me



SAUCE

So, you were wrong.

I have asked google, and google has spoken.

But now, you would start saying 'Kompromat'.

obedience4:
NASA sent men to the moon more than five time's after the first Apollo 11 mission that brought Neil Armstrong to the moon the first time

RenaissanceGuy:
Simply because of the enormous cost involved and the fact there are no immediate returns in resources invested yet, unlike space technology powering our Internet. Imagine spending $257b on the Apollo mission.

Discountsempai:
At the end, there is belief and there is actual facts.

Discountsempai:
They sent five manned missions...

Anyway, you can believe what you want. It makes no difference anyway.

Discountsempai:
Well, I know that when Nigeria sent sattelites into space, people complained about the money spent. Same thing when India sent a robotic mission to Mars.

As at the time of the lunar landing, the USA had a large poverty problem (yes, it was not as bad as other nations, but to many Americans, no one should be poor in their country) and was fighting a war in Vietnam that was costing them a lot of money, and did not end till 1972. And also had a massive aid program to poorer countries. And it was spending a lot of money to combat all these issues.

And they were also spending billions to send about 15 or so men to the moon.

See how it burdens their budget already.?

The only reason why the American congress supported the moon landing was to beat the Soviets. Once done, the show was over. Many Americans wanted an end to the spending too.

That has not stopped NASA from doing other projects

1. Mars : Mariner series (1965),Viking 1 and 2 1976, and several others from 1996.
2.Jupiter: Pionner 11 and 12, Gallileo, Cassini (1974, 1994, 2005/6)
3.Saturn : Voyager 1 and 2, 1980, Cassini HYugens, 2006
4.Uranus, Neptune (Voyager 1 and 2).
5.Mercury : Mariner (1965)

Let's even talk about the USSR
1.Moon: Two unmanned probes 1971
2.Venus: Venera series 1970's and 80's
3.Mars: Several probes 1960's and 70's.
4. Space stations : Salyut, Mir, etc etc.

matify83:
Enlightened me then!

Here we are battling "global boiling" , earth quakes and plastic pollution and you want to justify the humongous resources being deployed into R & D just to conquer a territory that is incompatible with human existence?

Besides taking the cold war to a new frontier and just maybe exploring for rare metals,what possible leverage does the myriad of activities on the south pole of the moon accord mankind?

matify83:
Enlightened me then!

Here we are battling "global boiling" , earth quakes and plastic pollution and you want to justify the humongous resources being deployed into R & D just to conquer a territory that is incompatible with human existence?

Besides taking the cold war to a new frontier and just maybe exploring for rare metals,what possible leverage the myriad of activities on the south pole of the moon accord mankind?

CHARLOE:
How can NASA claim to land a manned space craft on the moon 60yrs ago with outdated technology, and f
has failed to repeat the feat even with advanced tech in their possession up till now? And u still believe they actually landed a manned spacecraft on the moon.They all lied, both america and russia, they faked d moon landings in studios, do your research.

Discountsempai:
Because ...money.

One moon landing cost a lot of money. The problem was, the American government and senate only agreed to do the moon thing because they wanted to 'beat the Soviets'. Once they had done that, the money for further moon landings was not available.

The truth is, space exploration is very expensive. A lot of Americans tolerated the moon landing for pride. Once that was achieved...


Not only USA. Some years ago, India sent a craft to Mars. Many Indians took to the internet to ask their government why they were willing to waste 300 million dollars on a tiny craft to mars, instead of spending it on poor people at home.

obedience4:
Everything is fake to the illiterate black man
Ode, yet you use GPS on your cars, you watch football matches live from miles away
You don't know all these all possible because of man innovation and the advancement from space technology
A moon landing that was televised Live, something that was verified and confirmed by experts in the space tech field, also by countries space agency.
Even Soviet space agency acknowledge the feats,. Ending the space war.
Yet one clown in Nigeria, is taking nonsense all because he has a phone and data ,that is powered by the. Technology that brought a about the moon landing

obedience4:
I don't have time to argue with fools,
I believe you also believe the earth is flat

Your proof is that they didn't do another moon mission

NASA did and exploration of Pluto when they started the New Horizons probe in July 2015,
So because they were no further trips to the planet Pluto, NASA didn't explore Pluto and it was all a lie. Loooooool

Moon landing, doesn't mean it was a man landings, NASA was landed more than 5 rover's on the moon after the Apollo man landing

Please go find another illiterate to converse with.

NOGRUDGES:
I remember reading about India landing on the moon, US looks like the dumb but rich kid trying to use all means to get an A by all means.

Just after India lands on the moon, they also land on the moon after 50 years of landing a manned craft on the moon.


Do they just print dollars to buy whatever they want?

matify83:
The race for the moon to me is a distraction and waste of Earth's scares resources which would have been been better deployed in solving the litany of environmental problems on the mother planet.

We have not subdued mother earth in totality yet and here we are racing for the moon to do what exactly?

raumdeuter:
Obaseki fought against Godfather imposition only for him to impose his stooge Ighodalo and become his godfather

Oshiomole fought against Anenih godfatherism only to become a godfather to Obaseki

What this only prove is that people are hypocrites and they only turn into activists seeking public favor when the game does not favor them

mascot345:
If know FX very well it's not risky.. I trade only high impact news. U need to know the economic calendar. The currency must be very weak or very strong before I enter the market..

And I also track the currency..

I only stay 15 minutes in the market.. some times 3 minutes... I only look for 5 pips and I run out.

Very good stuff.