I've worked independently as a civil for the past years, I've a registered company
For this period but not a tax clearance.

Would getting tax clearance validate the experience for all this years?

I don't have payslip and have done most business with other account

tunlex01:

Yes. It’s compulsory.
Speak to your HR or Accountant on how to get tax statement or clearance. Tax deduction on payslip does not change the name of the document; it’s still a Pay slip not a tax statement or clearance.
If you work in Lagos and you have a tax ID, you can chat LIRS on their website

Yes you can.

Andrenalin:


Hello sir,

I am interested in this also, can I inbox you for details on how I can apply for this as well?

Thanks…

High everyone, I'm a coren licensed engineer who's about to apply for Australia engineer assessment I need help on the process please.
Just passed their IELTS bands requirement.

I'm confused on their specific occupation to choose as I saw Civil Engineering technician or draftsman.


Thanks.

Hey everyone,

What are my chances of getting PR visa.

My details.

8 years of experience as a civil engineer.

Certified/coren licensed.

34 years or age.

Thanks.

kamotisha:


This is a dicey one. How were you paid? If they paid into your bank account, print out your statement of account and use a highlight pen to highlight your salary coming in.
I have over 7 years experience but i didnt have payslips for the first 10 months. Out of the 10 months, I was paid by hand for 6 months and paid into acct for the remaining 4 months. I submitted my statement of account for the 4 months and it was counted. The 6 months which I was paid by hand wasn't counted as I had no proof. Luckily for me, the deduction didn't have an effect on my points.
So you can do same. Hope this helps...
All the best!

thanks for your reply.

We were paid with Cheque and the amount wasn't that convincing.
Can cheque photocopies or the books(I know they have a copy) serve the purpose.
I've an Engineering firm registered, up to 1.6 years now, should I use this firm documents, get a tax clearance to substitute this incase I don't get a payslip or if it below what they consider professional fee?

Thanks again.

Has anyone had a positive assessment with EA without a payslips? The companies I've worked for declined to give me but indicated they will outlined it on the reference letter. Please what am I to do, is there a solution to this situation?

fonseca1929:


Upload legible transcript of at least 400dpi to avoid them asking your school.

.

Thank you very much.

Please Family, for EA assessment, does one send Transcript to them or school?

Solitin40:

NO....Form A

ok, do you know their charges if you want to pay with mastercard or any online platform?

Solitin40:
#296 to AU$1....Skye Bank....4days

thanks for your response.
Did you pay with mastercard?

Please I want to pay for school fees, does anybody know exchange rate they're charging at moment to Australia dollar?

Please house, how much Is Naira to AUD conversation rate.

manga5:


Make sure 1. CDR is complete(all three Episodes)
2.Company's Reference letter( stating you job description, salary and years you have worked with them)
3. Payslip and a corresponding bank statement tying it together.
4. English test ( TOEFL or IELTS only)
5. Degree certificate
6. COREN/NSE if you have.
7.

Thank you very much.

What of transcript. .
My formal employer use to pay us with Cheque, Is it valid and I've a company of my own which is less than two years.
How am I going to get all these together?

Can I write to you outside this platform?

Good morning everyone.
Please am about to launch my assessment with EA in Civil Engineering, is there anybody who has done so lately that can provide guidance or assistance in the process? It will be greatly appreciated if somebody volunteers, I don't want to miss steps or make mistakes which may result in failure.

Thanks.

Please house, I've few questions to ask.

I'm a Civil Engineer but did my schooling here in Nigeria, that automatically ruled me out to get assessed by EA, my two chances of getting a visa is through PROJECT BUILDER and CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER. The good thing is am into building construction, going to be assessed by VETASS, their requirements doesn't include any English proficiency test, it's tricky in a way when you consider point to gained.


AGE= 30 points.
DEGREE=15 points.
EXPERIENCE= 5 points.(that if the assessment go well)
Total of 50.
Is the IELTS test a general prerequisite in the assessment and visa application, also an avenue to increase your chances of getting more points.
Thank you all.

kingmassa:
Building will keep collapsing until the national build code is fully implemented and Registered builders fully engaged in the production of building.
Not all civil engineers are into buildings. But a builder is trained to build.
The use of quacks is the major cause of building collapse.
Build wise engage a professional builder.

.
You failed it man, most structural failures are result of faulty or zero design. Even if you give your building to the world best builder and its not adequately designed by a structural/civil Engineer, expect the building to collapse.

Yesterday, the Pope’s historic
environmental encyclical was
published. The document is
almost 200 pages long, which
means that most of us won’t
read it, at least not all of it.
So here are 12 things Pagans
should know about the Pope’s
environmental encyclical:
1. The Pope acknowledges
the “human origins of the
ecological crisis” (¶ 101),
specifically that global
warming is mostly due to the
great concentration of
greenhouse gases which are
released “mainly” as a result of human activity. He calls for
the progressive replacement “without delay” of
technologies that use fossil fuels. (¶ 165)
2. The Pope calls access to safe drinkable water “a basic
and universal human right.” (¶ 11) (Take that Nestle!)
3. The Pope personifies the earth. He opens the encyclical
with words from St. Francis, calling the Earth “Sister” (¶¶ 1,
2, 53) and “Mother” (¶¶ 1, 92) This comes from the hymn of
St. Francis’ “Canticle of Creatures”. However, he does not
refer to “Gaia” or any other goddess, and makes a point of
saying that he is not “divinizing” the earth. (¶ 90)
4. The Pope recognizes that we are part of the Earth.
“Nature cannot be regarded as something separate from
ourselves or as a mere setting in which we live,” he says, “We
are part of nature, included in it and thus in constant
interaction with it.” (¶ 139) “[O]ur very bodies are made up of
her elements, we breathe her air and we receive life and
refreshment from her waters.” (¶ 2) This last sentence will
sound familiar to many Pagans. In fact, it closely resembles
language from “A Pagan Community Statement on the
Environment.”
5. The Pope rejects Gnostic Christianity. “Christianity
does not reject matter,” he says. (¶ 235) According to the
Pope, Jesus “was far removed from philosophies which
despised the body, matter, and the things of the world.” (¶
98) He condemns those “unhealthy dualisms” which marked
some Christian thinkers and “disfigured the Gospel.” (¶ 98)
6. The Pope recognizes that we are part of a vast
interconnected system. No less than 8 times throughout the
encyclical, the Pope observes that “everything is
interconnected,” a fact which, he says, “cannot be emphasized
enough.” (¶¶ 16, 42, 70, 91, 111, 117, 138, 240)
7. The Pope condemns extreme
anthropocentrism, but emphasizes
humanity’s uniqueness. Although the
Pope criticizes “distorted” or “excessive”
anthropocentrism (¶¶ 69, 116), he
nevertheless insists on humanity’s “pre-
eminence” (¶ 90) and “superiority” (¶
220). He eschews “biocentrism” (¶ 118)
and declines to “put all living beings on
the same level.” (¶ 90)
8. The Pope reinterprets the
command in Genesis to exercise
“dominion” over all the earth. He rejects the notion that
being created in God’s image and being given “dominion”
over the earth justifies absolute domination over nature.
Instead, he says, a correct reading of Genesis, reads that
language in the context of the commands to “till and keep,”
the latter word meaning “caring, protecting, overseeing and
preserving” which “implies a relationship of mutual
responsibility between human beings and nature.” (¶ 67)
9. The Pope calls for a “radical change” in our
understanding of the economy and progress. (¶ 171) He
condemns the “deification” of the market” (¶ 56) and a
“magical conception of the market” (¶ 190) (referring
apparently to the “invisible hand”). He says, “The
environment is one of those goods that cannot be adequately
safeguarded or promoted by market forces” (¶ 190), and so he
disapproves of the idea of carbon credits, which would allow
wealthy countries to continue their excessive consumption (¶
117). The Pope also attacks the “modern myth of unlimited
material progress” (¶ 78) and observes that economic
development does not always result in a higher quality of life
for people, and frequently diminishes people’s quality of life
(¶ 194). While he doesn’t go so far as to call for an anti-
capitalist revolution, he does speak of the “subordination of
private property” to the “global common good.” (¶¶ 93, 169).
“The Christian tradition has never recognized the right to
private property as absolute or inviolable, and has stressed the
social purpose of all forms of private property.” (¶ 93)
“[T]here is always a social mortgage on all private property,”
he says, quoting John Paul II. (¶ 93)
10. The Pope calls for an “ecological conversion” of
individuals and communities. (¶¶ 216, 219) The Pope warns
us against seeking only technological solutions to the
environmental crisis. (¶ 144) He calls us to question
“question the the logic which underlies present-day culture.”(¶
197) He also calls for an “environmental education,” which
includes a critique of the myths of modernity, which he lists
as “individualism, unlimited progress, competition,
consumerism, the unregulated market.” (¶ 210). And he
observes that we need a spirituality capable of inspiring us to
protect the planet (¶ 216), a sentiment which was also echoed
in “A Pagan Community Statement on the Environment.”
11. The Pope sees the ecological crisis and poverty as
related, and he rejects population control as a solution.
Throughout the encyclical, the Pope emphasizes the “intimate
relationship between the poor and the fragility of the
planet” (¶ 16) He sees “the cry of the earth and the cry of the
poor” as one. (¶ 49) The Pope condemns proposals to reduce
birth rates as an example of blame-shifting: “To blame
population growth instead of extreme and selective
consumerism on the part of some, is one way of refusing to
face the issues. It is an attempt to legitimize the present
model of distribution, where a minority believes that it has the
right to consume in a way which can never be universalized,
since the planet could not even contain the waste products of
such consumption.” (¶ 50) The also Pope speaks of an
“ecological debt” owed by the global north to the global
south. (¶ 51)
12. The Pope connects the “right to life” to the protection
of the environment. He suggests that the same principles
which move us to defend the environment should be applied
to human life. (¶ 136) The Pope sees our disregard of the
poor, the disabled, and human embryos as connected to our
disregard of nature. (¶ 117) “Since everything is interrelated,
concern for the protection of nature is also incompatible with
the justification of abortion,” he says, “How can we genuinely
teach the importance of concern for other vulnerable beings,
however troublesome or inconvenient they may be, if we fail
to protect a human embryo, even when its presence is
uncomfortable and creates difficulties?” (¶ 120)
www.patheos.com/blogs/allergicpagan/2015/06/19/12-things-pagans-should-know-about-the-popes-environmental-encyclical/?utm_source=SilverpopMailing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Pagan%2006%2024%2015%20(1)&utm_content=&spMailingID=48956146&spUserID=OTA5OTkwMDg0MTIS1&spJobID=703278135&spReportId=NzAzMjc4MTM1S0

I did ask my classmates during my schooling period this exact question, all stared at me. Only one told me its a mystery waiting to be revealed. You make your belief as it pleases and comfort you.

I rep stream one, did civil Engineering in Esut.

Joshthefirst:
Evil is not an entity. I seriously don't know where these guys come up with this nonsense. Evil is the nature of ones character, not an entity that can be uploaded or downloaded into a mainframe.

Its a shame people don't really think these days.

Is this nature a default setting or learned character. If its the former, then somebody created a flawed being and the same time expect it to be flawless.

goshap:
please!, dont flatter yourself pink princess, i got bored a long time ago, you guys make Agnostic look like it was born out of a personal vendetta against the Christian and their God, for some weird reason you guys consider yourself intellectual superiors over the Christians, yet you cant take just. Please am bored i need a real Agnostic dude, who knows the truth and where he/she stands, you'all are a bunch of clowns dancing round a white man philosophical philosophy.

Do you why Jesus said its difficult for a rich man to enter heaven?, if you do understand that, you'd admire the peculiar strength of the Christians, when with all your PhD decree in medicine, and your willing to grasp and accept the concept behind the virgin birth of christ, which devoid all logic.

Still bored please send me a really Agnostic, not clowns n frauds, with parental and authority vendetta.

^ You believe and accept virgin birth of christ, went ahead in another paragraph to call people frauds and clowns when you already be duped by your holy book. So amazing, I wonder who's the clown here. Go and read your holy book in it original language, Clear yourself of any confusion and come back to apologize.

In matters of jesus salvation, the discrepancy or the confusion never started today. This article give a little insight on how it has evolved since ages.
www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfeminism/2014/08/there-is-more-to-christianity-than-penal-substitutionary-atonement.html

I was doing some research and came to know 'bout russia orthodox Church( mostly 60% of population believe in dis faith) and came to know that it was Apostle Andrew(apostle peters brother) who founded this church N to my suprise they share almost same faith and doctrine with catholics. It assured me that all this catholic doctrine is not mere Men doctrine like how most xtain assume it to be. The two church was founded by people who worked with our lord jesus and they founded the church in different part of world but still same faith.. I encourage catholics to be doing more research 'bout dis whole things.

Sagamite:

You are dumb then!

You just proved me ryt dat u lack reasoning n intellect.. There are a lot of tins dat influence Gayism. First is genetics( that I dunno how to xplain how possible its cus our bible told us that God created us all), second is by environment and 3rd is by choice.

Sagamite:

What drugs do you take?

Which religion are you talking about?

The last time I read ur post you were declaring a prayer 4 me n only religious pple pray. I guessed you're a religious person

I pray for your sake that this is just a provocative
question, not an hypothetical proposal?
@ Sagamit
Have you ever done a clerical study on Gay sexual orientation or is ur religion clouding your judgment?? Am very sure if you're on those Gay pple position you won't be here typing as if you're the person that has moral value or knows GOD beta. As I said earlier don't allow ur religion to cloud ur judgment, Do a study with open mind n if av value as self acclaimed you be able to tell the truth that our Government is jux bigotry

Studies showed that if your Identical Twins is Gay you have 99% chanceof being gay. Could it be that both of em are possessed by Evil spirit right from birth to all identical Gay twins in the World??