brain54: One of Vladimir Putin's primary concerns and publicly stated reasons for invading Ukraine was the potential for Ukraine to join NATO and host US military bases.
Putin has long been opposed to NATO's expansion into Eastern Europe, and Ukraine's potential membership in the alliance was seen as a significant threat to Russia's national security. He argued that Ukraine's membership in NATO would lead to the deployment of US and NATO military forces, including missile defense systems, on Russia's borders.
Putin has repeatedly stated that Russia would take steps to protect its interests and prevent the deployment of US and NATO military forces in Ukraine. The invasion of Ukraine in 2022 was, in part, an attempt to prevent Ukraine's further integration with NATO and the potential deployment of US military bases.
So, to answer your question, Putin was indeed strongly opposed to the idea of the US building military bases in Ukraine, and this was one of the factors that contributed to the invasion!
did the US say that it is going to build bases in Ukraine?
Norway, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland (has a US military base) all border Russia to the east and are all members of NATO.
Finland joined just after Russian invasion of Ukraine.
how come Russia did not invade all these countries to prevent "the deployment of US and NATO military forces, including missile defense systems, on Russia's borders"?
I said a referendum was conducted in the Crimea region agreeing to annexation to Russia and you are mentioning Cameroon and Biafra. It's exactly why I won't waste my time typing or disseminating any information because I don't want to waste my time explaining to ignorant people that would still not understand.
when was this referndum conducted and who conducted this referendum?
Yemmysworld91: Fact check me sir Last time I will respond Shalom
can you not state how you were able to arrive at the conclusions below or evidence that supports your claims?
Yemmysworld91: There's no state civil service in Nigeria that can stand toe to toe with that of Lagos state. The reform was done by Tinubu. You can fact check me on this. And I'm not a fan of Jagaban. Let's be objective in our criticisms
1. What is the reform that was done by tinubu that makes no civil service in Nigeria to be able to stand toe to toe with Lagos state civil service?
2. Have you had dealings with every department in the 36 state civil service to arrived at your conclusion?
3. how did you arrive at your conclusion that No state civil service in Nigeria can match that of Lagos since you say you have only interacted with a few civil service?
4. how many is this "tangible few"?
why are you now running away since you were so emphatic?
Yemmysworld91: No state civil service in Nigeria can match that of Lagos. I maintain that. It's even obvious in the administration.
Yemmysworld91: Not necessarily all, but tangible few. No state civil service in Nigeria can match that of Lagos. I maintain that. It's even obvious in the administration. I repeat, I'm no fan of Tinubu
1. What is the reform that was done by tinubu that makes no civil service in Nigeria to be able to stand toe to toe with Lagos state civil service?
2. Have you had dealings with every department in the 36 state civil service to arrived at your conclusion?
3. how did you arrive at your conclusion that No state civil service in Nigeria can match that of Lagos since you say you have only interacted with a few civil service?
Apparently, Tinubu is best thing to happen to Nigeria if not for political sentiments and people who were rejected and they grieved to form a coalition without ID card and registered members.
brain54: Explain what you mean by needless wars...
The wars both (are) fought/fighting aren't even similar. Stalin's wars were expansion based. Putin's war started as defensive to protect Russia's territory even though the objective of the war may have shifted from the initial plans.
In any case both aren't needless wars, especially Putin's!
Which war did Putin start "as defensive to protect Russia's territory"?
Yemmysworld91: There's no state civil service in Nigeria that can stand toe to toe with that of Lagos state. The reform was done by Tinubu. You can fact check me on this. And I'm not a fan of Jagaban. Let's be objective in our criticisms
What is the reform that was done by tinubu that makes no civil service in Nigeria to be able to stand toe to toe with Lagos state civil service?
Have you had dealings with every department in the 36 state civil service to arrived at your conclusion?
damoobaba: 1. When Tinubu was Governor, I benefitted from his education subsidy as a student of LASU.
2. Secondly, I currently sell properties around LFTZ and LFTZ was created by tinubu. A plot of land sold for around #1m in 2014 when i started living here on the Island. Today, it sells above #20m per plot.
Calculate how much I make from selling plots of land every month. You can add the money I make from giving out short let apartments.
damoobaba: And you will never benefit from anything that Tinubu has done so far. And if you continue to go against Tinubu, nothing that Tinubu does will ever benefit you.
Thats why many of your parents ended poor, they keep insulting EVERY GOVERNMENT while others are taking advantage that every government policy.
1. What are the things that tinubu has done so far that he will not benefit from?
2. What are the things tinubu has done that are benefitting you?
3. Is tinubu in office as a favor to Nigerians or he is there to serve Nigerians?
Ikpongiton: ondo, cross river,akwa ibom and the rest of south south states, that owns oil and gas that is sustaining Nigeria and it's past government that overlooked the area that laid the golden eggs.
earlier you said "the area".
Ikpongiton: because it will open up the area that own the resources, that opened Nigeria.
how are the states you mentioned the same thing as "the area"?
you did not answer this question: Where those areas locked up before?
when did ondo, cross river,akwa ibom and the rest of south south states need "opening up"?
damoobaba: And you will never benefit from anything that Tinubu has done so far. And if you continue to go against Tinubu, nothing that Tinubu does will ever benefit you.
Thats why many of your parents ended poor, they keep insulting EVERY GOVERNMENT while others are taking advantage that every government policy.
What are the things that tinubu has done so far that he will not benefit from?
What are the things tinubu has done that are benefitting you?
Is tinubu in office as a favor to Nigerians or he is there to serve Nigerians?
babsbolad: Abeg rest! The population of one local government alone in Lagos is almost the population of many of the states we have in Nigeria. By logic, I believe you should understand better now
Which of the following questions did your response answer?
1. So in Lagos, when everybody goes to school, everywhere will still be noisy?
2. Who and who will be making everywhere noisy after everyone has gone to school?
3. Do you mean that no Nigerian is smart and alert except they grew up in Lagos?
4. That means Nigerian who has gone abroad will not be able to navigate their way because they did not grow up in Lagos.
sparko1: If you can't tell the difference between an individual report and an organization overall growth outlook for a period, I don't see how much help an explanation can do.
The question I asked was, if Peter Obi is convinced the economy is handled badly, what does he propose to do differently, it's easy to say everything is bad, but if that is everything you can say, then there's no point replacing the person there.
Give us a practical demonstration of a proven economy plan that will turn everything around in 3 years, and before you open your mouth, make sure you understand, once you say it and you get it wrong, you only vote comes from beer parlor gang, and maybe the unintelligent angry youth.
I have taken the liberty of repeating my post again.
can you show where you were asked to explain anything?
Reno REno...some years ago, the "experts" also reported that Buhari was managing the economy properly.
should we believe them that they were right because they are the "experts"?
NaijaGoBetter2: Once, bonuses were peanuts. Super Eagles cried, “No pay!” — threatening strike before the 2014 World Cup in Brazil, fearing their $30k-per-player bonus wouldn’t be paid. Nigerians dragged the government online, and it took presidential intervention to resolve the crisis.
Then the Super Falcons shouted, “Too small allowance/bonus compare to Eagle!” — their $23k allowances in 2016 was claimed to be too small by Nigerians. And Nigerians demanded, “Pay them like the Eagles — they’ve brought more glory!”
Fast-forward: the government pays big $100k. Now Nigerians complain, “Too much for ordinary players!” and they compare footballers to doctors, lecturers, and soldiers.
Moral: "Nigerians are Nigerians and you can never satisfy Nigerians"
The government pays $100k or promised to pay $100k?
Is this $100k reward for winning the trophy or is it accumulated match bonuses for the particular competition they won?
Was there no arrangement between the players and their federations as to what they were to earn per game?
gidigbam1: Ease of doing business has nothing on the economic reforms!!!
Buhari's govt was a disaster we were sure was going to happen. With these reforms in place, in the next 5 years Nigeria'#s economy will be better than all of the African countries economy combined together.
Did you read the article?
If buhari's government was a disaster, what did the article say the world bank was PRAISING buhari for?
Can quote verbatim the first sentence of the article?