1. It is established from the Sunnah that the head of the child is to be shaved on the seventh day after the birth:

From Samurah (radiyallaahu `anhu) that Allaah’s Messenger (salallaahu `alaihi wassallaam) said:

“A child is held in pledge by his `aqeeqah that is slaughtered on his behalf on the seventh day, and he is named and his head is shaved.”

Reported by Ahmad (7/5), Abu Dawood (2838), At-Tirmidhee (1522). It was graded Saheeh by: At-Tirmidhee, Al-Haakim, Abdur-Razzaaq Al-Ishbeelee and others.

Salmaan Ibn `Aamir Ad-Dabbee (radiyallaahu ‘anhu) said that: I heard Allaah’s Messenger (salallaahu `alaihi wassallam) say:

“For the child there is an `aqeeqah, so spill blood on his behalf (i.e. slaughter an animal) and remove from him harm.”

Al-Bukhaaree (5472), Abu Dawood (2839).

Al-Hasan Al-Basree (d. 110H, rahimahullaah) said:

“The removal of harm is shaving the head.”

Reported by Abu Dawood (2840).

Ibn Abdil-Barr said in At-Tamheed (4/318) said:

“As for the shaving of the head of the child at the time of `aqeeqah, then the scholars used to recommend that – and it is established from the Prophet (salallaahu `alaihi wassallam) in the hadeeth regarding the `aqeeqah, ‘His head is shaved and he is named.'”

2. Some benefits concerning the shaving of the head of a baby:

Ibnul-Qayyim (rahimahullaah) said in At-Tuhfatul-Mawlood (p.121):

“Removing the harm from him, and the removal of weak hair so that stronger hair replaces it, which is firmer than what was there before, and it is better for one’s head. Alongside that there is relief for the child, and opening of the pores in the scalp so that the unpleasant vapour may escape with ease. And in that there is a strengthening of the eyesight, the nasal passage and the hearing.”

3. An issue: Should the hair of a baby girl be shaved?

In this there is some differing between the Scholars, but what is apparent is that the head of the baby girl is also to be shaved for the following reasons:

Maalik Ibn Anas (d.179H, rahimahullaah) narrated in Al-Muwatta (2/501) from Ja`far Ibn Muhammad, from his father who said:

“Faatimah the daughter of Allaah’s Messenger (salallaahu `alaihi wassallam) weighed the hair of Hasan, Husayn, Zaynab and Umm Kulthoom, and she gave its weight in silver as charity.”

This narration is mursal-saheeh (authentic except for the fact that there is a narrator missing) – however, there is within it Muhammad Ibn Al-Husayn Ibn `Alee Ibn Abee Taalib (radiyallaahu `anhumaa) who narrates this from his family, and he is more knowledgeable concerning them. And this is supported by the statement of the Messenger (salallaahu `alaihi wassallam):

“And shave his head.”

Furthermore the Prophet (salallaahu `alaihi wassallam) explained the wisdom behind removing the hair of the new-born because it is harmful saying: “And remove from him harm.”

So this encompasses every new-born, whether it be male or female, and Allaah knows best.

TheSourcerer:
Morning X

1. It is established from the Sunnah that the head of the child is to be shaved on the seventh day after the birth:

From Samurah (radiyallaahu `anhu) that Allaah’s Messenger (salallaahu `alaihi wassallaam) said:

“A child is held in pledge by his `aqeeqah that is slaughtered on his behalf on the seventh day, and he is named and his head is shaved.”

Reported by Ahmad (7/5), Abu Dawood (2838), At-Tirmidhee (1522). It was graded Saheeh by: At-Tirmidhee, Al-Haakim, Abdur-Razzaaq Al-Ishbeelee and others.

Salmaan Ibn `Aamir Ad-Dabbee (radiyallaahu ‘anhu) said that: I heard Allaah’s Messenger (salallaahu `alaihi wassallam) say:

“For the child there is an `aqeeqah, so spill blood on his behalf (i.e. slaughter an animal) and remove from him harm.”

Al-Bukhaaree (5472), Abu Dawood (2839).

Al-Hasan Al-Basree (d. 110H, rahimahullaah) said:

“The removal of harm is shaving the head.”

Reported by Abu Dawood (2840).

Ibn Abdil-Barr said in At-Tamheed (4/318) said:

“As for the shaving of the head of the child at the time of `aqeeqah, then the scholars used to recommend that – and it is established from the Prophet (salallaahu `alaihi wassallam) in the hadeeth regarding the `aqeeqah, ‘His head is shaved and he is named.'”

2. Some benefits concerning the shaving of the head of a baby:

Ibnul-Qayyim (rahimahullaah) said in At-Tuhfatul-Mawlood (p.121):

“Removing the harm from him, and the removal of weak hair so that stronger hair replaces it, which is firmer than what was there before, and it is better for one’s head. Alongside that there is relief for the child, and opening of the pores in the scalp so that the unpleasant vapour may escape with ease. And in that there is a strengthening of the eyesight, the nasal passage and the hearing.”

3. An issue: Should the hair of a baby girl be shaved?

In this there is some differing between the Scholars, but what is apparent is that the head of the baby girl is also to be shaved for the following reasons:

Maalik Ibn Anas (d.179H, rahimahullaah) narrated in Al-Muwatta (2/501) from Ja`far Ibn Muhammad, from his father who said:

“Faatimah the daughter of Allaah’s Messenger (salallaahu `alaihi wassallam) weighed the hair of Hasan, Husayn, Zaynab and Umm Kulthoom, and she gave its weight in silver as charity.”

This narration is mursal-saheeh (authentic except for the fact that there is a narrator missing) – however, there is within it Muhammad Ibn Al-Husayn Ibn `Alee Ibn Abee Taalib (radiyallaahu `anhumaa) who narrates this from his family, and he is more knowledgeable concerning them. And this is supported by the statement of the Messenger (salallaahu `alaihi wassallam):

“And shave his head.”

Furthermore the Prophet (salallaahu `alaihi wassallam) explained the wisdom behind removing the hair of the new-born because it is harmful saying: “And remove from him harm.”

So this encompasses every new-born, whether it be male or female, and Allaah knows best.

for non Muslim , before u start crucifying the rulings, please read with non bias mind

Thanks

e

story story

Good for her
Even her political enemy congratulate her

congratulations to the winner
eku iroju for the loser

congratulation to the winner

AlBaqir:


# If you understand Arabic, you wouldn't have misconstrued that verse even without checking the book of Qur'anic exegesis (Tafasir).

# The word "Salat" does not always mean "five daily prayer/Salat". It could be "praise, supplication etc" depending on the context in which it is being used. In the verse you have quoted, it doesn't mean "the five daily prayer" rather it follows and derived its meaning from the word "Du'a - call/supplication/prayer" in the opening sentence of the same verse: "Say, 'Call Allah or Call ar-Rahman..."

# Let me cite you another example, the same word "Salat" is used in the following two verses with absolutely different meaning:

1. Surah Al-Ahzab, Verse 56:

"Surely Allah and His angels are Praying upon the Prophet (yuSALUna ala Nabiy); O you who believe! call for (Divine) blessings on him and salute him with a (becoming) salutation."

* yuSALuna - present (tense) verb of "Salat".


2. Surah Maidah: 6

" O ye who believe, when you rise for Salat, wash your faces and your hands..."


* It is crystal clear that the word "Salat" in the first verse means "praise, blessings" while it means the conventional "five daily prayer" in the second verse.


# So, the ayah you have quoted simply gives directive on how "supplication/prayer/Salat - Du'a" (again not five daily salat) are to be recited when we CALL (id'u) or calling Allah or Ar-Rahman. We should not shout (aloud) like the Christians or keep mute and murmuring like the Jews. We should rather maintain a balance course.


# Reciting surah al-Fatiha and other suwar aloud (not shout) and in lowest voice during Salat of different time is established in various ahadith whereby the sahabah could heard and followed the recitation of their Imam, the holy Prophet (salallahu alayhi wa ahli).

AlBaqir:


# If you understand Arabic, you wouldn't have misconstrued that verse even without checking the book of Qur'anic exegesis (Tafasir).

# The word "Salat" does not always mean "five daily prayer/Salat". It could be "praise, supplication etc" depending on the context in which it is being used. In the verse you have quoted, it doesn't mean "the five daily prayer" rather it follows and derived its meaning from the word "Du'a - call/supplication/prayer" in the opening sentence of the same verse: "Say, 'Call Allah or Call ar-Rahman..."

# Let me cite you another example, the same word "Salat" is used in the following two verses with absolutely different meaning:

1. Surah Al-Ahzab, Verse 56:

"Surely Allah and His angels are Praying upon the Prophet (yuSALUna ala Nabiy); O you who believe! call for (Divine) blessings on him and salute him with a (becoming) salutation."

* yuSALuna - present (tense) verb of "Salat".


2. Surah Maidah: 6

" O ye who believe, when you rise for Salat, wash your faces and your hands..."


* It is crystal clear that the word "Salat" in the first verse means "praise, blessings" while it means the conventional "five daily prayer" in the second verse.


# So, the ayah you have quoted simply gives directive on how "supplication/prayer/Salat - Du'a" (again not five daily salat) are to be recited when we CALL (id'u) or calling Allah or Ar-Rahman. We should not shout (aloud) like the Christians or keep mute and murmuring like the Jews. We should rather maintain a balance course.


# Reciting surah al-Fatiha and other suwar aloud (not shout) and in lowest voice during Salat of different time is established in various ahadith whereby the sahabah could heard and followed the recitation of their Imam, the holy Prophet (salallahu alayhi wa ahli).

AlBaqir:


# If you understand Arabic, you wouldn't have misconstrued that verse even without checking the book of Qur'anic exegesis (Tafasir).

# The word "Salat" does not always mean "five daily prayer/Salat". It could be "praise, supplication etc" depending on the context in which it is being used. In the verse you have quoted, it doesn't mean "the five daily prayer" rather it follows and derived its meaning from the word "Du'a - call/supplication/prayer" in the opening sentence of the same verse: "Say, 'Call Allah or Call ar-Rahman..."

# Let me cite you another example, the same word "Salat" is used in the following two verses with absolutely different meaning:

1. Surah Al-Ahzab, Verse 56:

"Surely Allah and His angels are Praying upon the Prophet (yuSALUna ala Nabiy); O you who believe! call for (Divine) blessings on him and salute him with a (becoming) salutation."

* yuSALuna - present (tense) verb of "Salat".


2. Surah Maidah: 6

" O ye who believe, when you rise for Salat, wash your faces and your hands..."


* It is crystal clear that the word "Salat" in the first verse means "praise, blessings" while it means the conventional "five daily prayer" in the second verse.


# So, the ayah you have quoted simply gives directive on how "supplication/prayer/Salat - Du'a" (again not five daily salat) are to be recited when we CALL (id'u) or calling Allah or Ar-Rahman. We should not shout (aloud) like the Christians or keep mute and murmuring like the Jews. We should rather maintain a balance course.


# Reciting surah al-Fatiha and other suwar aloud (not shout) and in lowest voice during Salat of different time is established in various ahadith whereby the sahabah could heard and followed the recitation of their Imam, the holy Prophet (salallahu alayhi wa ahli).

jazakumulahu khaeron.

190:
After all these sleeping positions them go wake up still go BOMB people

must you comment...... A good Muslim who understand the religion and practice it according to prophet Muhammad teaching will not wake up and start bombing other people

educative thanks

Breast milk is the most nutritious food for baby from birth to 6 month of age because it contain all nutrients needed by child during that period. As a result of this it is important for us to join hands together in sustaining continuous breastfeeding.
As the world breastfeeding day begin today let join MaCRIB in celebrating breastfeeding week
����. maternal and child resource initiative on Breastfeeding (MaCRIB)# invite you to her World breastfeeding week celebration

Breakdown of programmes for the breastfeeding week celebration


Day 1: Monday 31st of July 2017
Film show
Title: Fomoloyan
�Venue: Oba Aderemi Health Centre, Aderemi road Ile Ife
�Time: 9.00am prompt
Note: No African time

Day 2: Wednesday 2nd of August,2017
#Breastfeeding talk for health care providers , nursing mothers and all other interested individuals#

�Venue: Pediatric unit phase 5 OAUTHC (Obafemi awolowo teaching hospital complex) Ile Ife
�Time: 8.00am prompt
Note: No African time

Day 3: Thursday 3rd of August, 2017

#Comprehensive workshop for professional and health workers ; presentation of Awards plaques and certificate

�Venue: Oba Aderemi Health centre Hall, Aderemi Road Ile Ife

�Time: 9.00am prompt
Note: No African time

Thanks

For any information you can visit the MaCRIB Secretariat @ Department of family, Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, faculty of Agriculture Obafemi Awolowo University Ile Ife or call 08033966882

Pls rebroadcast

Thanks

Naija tinx

interested 08033966882

potential terrorist!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bro something dey touch your brain
pls I will just advice that we should try to know d details f d issue before comment

thanks for did post but Yoruba people use to say bi ogiri o ba lanu alangba kole Raye WO ogiri meaning cos of d open in d wall gave chance for d lizard to have ways. the issue n oau campus is more than been christianization of oau d issue is within d oau Muslim community and d students even when d place was destroyed yesterday d chief iman was dia. so don't let us blame any Christian for dis act dey are just acting upon d report gave to them by our fellow Muslim. regarding d statement released calling d mosque brothel d statement did not correct but dis people are just searching for things to back up dia inhuman altitude. Majority of Muslim and some Christian on campus have been used dis facilities either for religion tinx or academic tinx cos I know some Christian dat use to come for tutorial inside d mosque even some pass d nite dia during exam period so as to read with dia Muslim colleagues or personal reading so if dis place is been used for brothel as dey said in dia released such people would have revealed d secret and I want to let d general public know that dia are no special room in d mosques all d room dia were always open any time of d day for general use. to end this I will urge my Muslim brothers and sisters on dis platform not to blame any Christian on dis matter d issue is between we Muslim and let try and resolve d matter among ourself for d progress of Muslim

Xtopherprince:


Oga translate for me abeg, I no sabi read English again

“There was one that we told them to open, they refused. We told them that if they don’t open it, we are going to force it open. “After 15 minutes, one of them just made a signal and the place was opened. We went there at exactly 11am. “When it was opened, there were 12 girls locked there and others in the room.

The 12 girls locked inside were praying bah? Smh.

that statement is false if you understand how mosque is built you will know that you don't normally access d female side from d male side . on dat dey d madam DSA want to access d female side from d male side in which d door is always locked cos female have anoda route dat dey used to access dia own place of worship in d mosque DAT is wot make it long before d door was opened on dat dey and d time is not up to 15mins has it was reported d time is like 7mins but u know dat a liar will always exaggerate tinx
hope have done justice to ur question

mykl01:
Note the name....! AbdulRasheed Bakare. It will come up again in our national discourse, and not for anything good. Give it time to incubate

obo must you talk

Sufisunni:
Bokoharamists in OAU courtesy of Buhari's minister.
These boys are hell bent in tarnishing the image of Islam. Their anthem is, I am a true follower of Islam, whereas he/she sees others as infidels be it his muslim brother or other religions.

l
pls try to find more about d issue before u comment

Xtopherprince:
Another extremist group in the making.

nothing like extremist pls read d comment of d school CSO is just an issue between 95% Muslim students on campus and d Muslim community who are using d DSA to tarnish d image of all Muslim students on campus

shukuokukobambi:


If this is the case, then its a sad day

there is nothing like abducted girls dey her people who are reading in d sister side of d mosque

BeardedMeat:
Undercover Muslim Fundamentalist.... We know you. By the way, has efo tete finally kicked the drum? Just curious o...

who is undercover Muslim extremist you better find out d truth before comment . so as to avoid d wrath of Allah

I will start my comment by saying a popular Yoruba adage " koye ka ba ago ni bi to ye ka to ba ogbon " and I will advise us to no d redument of d issue before any oda comment on dis matter. Madam D.S.A so go low to be commenting on issue dat involve Muslims students and Muslim community on oau campus and d issue started a long tym ago about 17 years. For her to nao take side because of her hatred to Islam religion don't come as a surprise because d people she label the extremist are over 95% of Muslim students in oau. pls asked madam DSA d no f people dat havebeen attacked or molested by did people I know she can't mention any cos dis Muslim students alway go peacefully and associate peacefully with all other students in d university in regard of dia religion and ethnic group. I will just advice madam DSA to play d role of a good mother on dis issue not as a person who hate Muslim

hmmmmm wise words from wise man

THE LION HAS SPOKEN.....THE LIGHT HAS BEACONED.......OLOYEDE'S REPLY TO THE 49 DELUDED HYBRIDS THE 49 LIARS: A REBUTTAL December 31, 2016 Featured 2 THE 49 LIARS: A REBUTTAL “They have no knowledge of such a thing, nor their fathers. Grievous is the word that comes forth from their mouth. What they say is nothing but falsehood.” (Q.18:5) If I were a Professor of English, I would have begun by repudiating the authors of the verbiage that generated this rebuttal, circulated on Wednesday and Thursday (December 28 and 29, 2016) with sadistic frenzy in traditional and new media, as deranged, reckless, mischievous and psychopathic nincompoops. But as I am not, I would only take recourse to the Prophet’s statement when he was unjustly persecuted on the day of Taif: God forgive them perhaps something good will come from their future generations. In spite of the allusion to Prophet Muhammad’s approach, I would not have condescended to dignifying the defamatory statements issued against my person with a response on three counts. The first count is that one would not bite a dog simply because a dog has bitten one. The second is that the issue was claimed to have been reported to the EFCC, which has the means to take the right course of action after establishing the prima facie of the case brought before it. The third is the need to thwart the Satanic objective of distracting me from the national assignment which they protested against but failed. Nevertheless, given the avalanche of text messages, mail and phone calls I have received from all over the world, I realize that if I do not set the records straight, at least for those who believe in me and what I represent, like Dr Mahfouz Adedimeji of the University of Ilorin, whose appreciated intervention was on point, I might not be fair to them. Secondly, the assassins did widely circulate and celebrate the “destruction” of the “victims” beyond the EFCC and across nations. I therefore deserve to be heard through the same routes. In a period when common sense is no longer common, it would not be surprising that some people would not take effusions that are bereft of an iota of sense with a pinch of salt. So, the vituperations that “the 49 liars” and their mentors directed at me more than four years after I left office as Vice-Chancellor of the University of Ilorin are explained thus: The Pension Act of 2004 provided that 7.5 per cent of emoluments should be deducted from staff salaries and remitted into their pension accounts with Pension Funds Administrators (PFAs). Most universities, including the University of Ilorin, based the calculation of 7.5 per cent on basic salary and transport allowance. This was the case between July 2004 and December 2006 before I became Vice- Chancellor. I know no PFA and if salaries were deducted and saved in employees’ accounts, I would not be the beneficiary. Then, from January 2007, the Government that is matching the employees’ contribution with another 7.5 per cent directed that the deduction should be based on Consolidated Pay. Some universities were compelled by the fake and fraudulent campus hyenas not to comply with the directive of 2007. About two years into my tenure, my attention was drawn to the new decision which was of course advantageous to workers whose higher sum was being equally matched by the Government. I convened a meeting of stakeholders including the Unions on the Government directive and all parties agreed not only to commence the higher savings (which Government doubles rather than double lower contributions) but also to double the difference for a certain number of months to ensure full compliance with effect from the stipulated January 2007. I summoned the Ilorin representatives of all the PFAs to reiterate the date of compliance from when higher matching additions from Government should also be credited to each contributor’s account. Any averagely educated person would understand who the beneficiaries of the compliance are, who for their tomorrow sacrifice a part of today’s comfort rather than the unreasonable agitators who insist on consuming tomorrow. Some universities under the spell of some club crawlers do not comply to the eventual disadvantage of their unfortunate retirees and perhaps to the advantage of clever PFAs. If those who parade doctoral degrees cannot understand this simple logic, may God save Nigeria from the anarchists. I as Vice-Chancellor complied and I believe few other universities did. How that would benefit me personally baffles me. The subsequent introduction of IPSS made deductions by the university unnecessary. Government was making the deductions from the source and crediting the PFAs and these ignorant characters believe that my successor should also be nailed on behalf of the Federal of Ministry of Finance. If what was being deducted at the University of Ilorin had been abnormal, IPSS would have corrected the abnormality, common sense dictates. When grey areas arose, clarifications were made with the PFAs. For my own pension deductions, I also had to approach my PFA to be on the same page with them regarding my contributory pension. Those who compare the contributions of two Professors based on different interpretations of deduction suffer from selective amnesia more so when Professors are of different levels. Some Senior Lecturers even earn higher Basic Pay than some Professors based on the number of years they have spent on their ranks. Why did they hide this fact as a possible factor for disparity in intra-university or inter-university disparity? Why would supposed academics who teach research methods not start from PENCOM for authentic information before unilaterally declaring UNILORIN guilty and celebrating insubordination? I am extremely selective in accepting gifts from even personal friends. My needs are limited and my legitimate income is sufficient to spend on my volunteer work. I have never in my life collected bribe, inflated contracts, extorted anyone nor accepted gifts beyond “Thank You greeting cards” from any contractor, dead or alive. As Vice-Chancellor, I started the practice of publishing the financial transactions of the University every Monday in a publication circulated far and wide by hand and online. This has happily been sustained by my successor to-date. Those who have skeletons in their cupboards don’t choose to publish their financial details. I am aware many universities don’t do so till today and the charlatans who make frivolous allegations against me should mention their mentors who do so. Information Technology is good to determine the quality of the hirelings assembled to assassinate my character. The only one I faintly know among them led his pastor and his father-in-law, a former Vice-Chancellor of the University of Ibadan, to me in order to mount pressure on me to offer his wife, the Vice- Chancellor’s daughter, a temporary appointment as an Assistant Lecturer. I bulged to pressure out of deference to the father-in- law (because the Department could do without an additional lecturer) and the man of God. But soon thereafter, this character became a strong advocate of withdrawal of the power of temporary appointment of the Vice-Chancellor! I do not claim perfection as it is the exclusive preserve of the Almighty Allah but I dare say I stand on a higher moral pedestal than “the 49 liars” and their masters. God will continue to keep them busy and they shall continue to lament their failure at the University of Ilorin and in life precipitated by their own inner insolvency. The barking of dogs does not affect the flight of a plane. This statement is just to re-assure my admirers that the allegations against me are like pure wind with no solidity. I remain who I have ever been by the special grace of Allah, the Almighty. Lastly, my explanation does not foreclose the possibility of legal action against the authors of the campaign of calumny against me and their willing collaborators. For the latter, I hope they will have the shame of publishing my rebuttal and if they don’t, I still believe it will reach all the right audience, anyway. I rest my case for now and season’s greetings to you all. Signed Prof. Is-haq O. Oloyede, OFR, FNAL

people sha hw abuja police go fy arrest Niger Delta militant in Lagos

dis is d dog

thanks i will try that.

hello pals, please what can I do, we have a German Sheppard dog but d dog still feel shy at 6 months of age any time she saw people even I she always run to hide her face under car ,tank or any other things
please what can I do to make dis dog bold and her mother is very tough

From MSSNOAU to all Stalites, Freshers, friends and well-wishers within and outside OAU Campus

MADAM D.S.A AND HER “BROTHELS”,
A RESPONSE.

In a five page sheets of nausea issued from the Madam, Acting Dean of the DSA this afternoon (Dr. G.O Akinola), she claimed, after paragraphs of ambiguities and name-calling, that the well-known and well-visited Awo and Faj hall mosque is “running a brothel”, breeding prostitution.
Though we never expect nothing less from the DSA, but we never know it will stoop this low. We wonder if any sense of honour remains in the heart controlling the hand that penned that release. For it calls to mind baffling questions already begging for answers, not to talk of the shock and rage the association of “prostitution” with two hall mosques, a religious space, is certainly going to provoke.

HER VISIT TO THE HALL MOSQUES
What provoked this laughable accusations, we were told in her release, was her visit to the Hall mosques two days ago.
Clearly naive, she went into the mosque from the male side and started banging on the door from that side, in the name of knocking, in a bid to gain access to the female side. The ridiculousness of the situation was clearly manifest in the slowness of the sisters from their section of the mosque to open the door she was knocking, for they are not used to sudden knocks on their door from the brother's side at any other time except during the time for academic tutorials and arabic classes which have fixed times.
So they were slow to open the door, and when it was eventually opened and Madam DSA barged in, the only explanation she could give was that these sisters were slow to open the door because they are prostitutes, and the mosque where we all worship our lord, she claims, is where they ply their trade!
Her entry was just the beginning of an ugly story.
We have seen this, and before we see more, we are challenging her to employ all the might in her possession to bring out subtantive evidence that there are brothels in the mosques and that it is breeding prostitutes. The honour of multitudes she is dallying with will not leave unchecked!
But that aside, her whole bundle of papers need dissection, for it is rare to find such a concentration of falsehoods and inaccuracies that have been managed to be packed into five sheets:
1. On her claim that “students who wanted to impose themselves and their doctrines which are not consistent with the constitution of MSSN Members caused issues at the inauguration” at the central mosque.

Her first obvious collision with the truth was this – And it shows her complete ignorance of the details of this issues before delving into it or a deliberate and mischievous effort to turn the while story upside down.
Even the most passive Muslim student on this campus knows the true story of what led to the “inauguration” fracas, and we all know the elderly initiator and sole participant to initiate the disturbance that day. She would be kind to tell us if it is a sin to raise your hand to ask a question at an open gathering or if the elder flying at the questioner with the aim of trying to tear him into shreds justify the act of trying to impose executives on thousands of mature students who are capable of steering their own affairs.

The DSA hasn’t made its research enough despite the surplus sources of information as regards what really happened at the central mosque that day. We can only say she has only chosen to get her info from where she wishes clearly. An evidence that was witnessed by hundreds of students can never be written away by a few lines with her manufactured version. The while world knows who really caused the issue. Madam, you are not writing for imbeciles to read. Video records abound.

2. On her insistence on “a week to be given to permit the group interact with the Mainstream MSSN and settle their disagreement”

Our records of meetings with her rather shows her insistence of solving issues amicably with the Muslim Community rather than the so called ”Mainstream MSSN”(whatever that means, unless the MC is now the Mainstream MSSN) as she claims.

However, this also points to her ignorance of the issue on ground. A week or not, she seem not to realize, or have deliberately closed her eyes to the glaring fact before, during and after the “Inauguration” saga that the MC she is sending us to convince within a week to persuade to come back to its senses is not ready to shift grounds on its decision to forcefully impose a minute set of faceless mischievous students on the generality of OAU Muslim students as leaders at any cost.
We will ask her if it is that easy to convince an antagonist to a truce, when he is even ready for a dialogue, within a week, not to talk of one who is not ready for one in the foreseeable future, if ever. Anyway, posterity will record us a making an attempt in her one week of ordering us to take a camel through the eye of a needle and at our last meeting with her, that is on 31st August we reported to her that the camel won’t bulge to even move not to talk of passing it through the eye of a needle.

3. On her claim that the two hall mosques are being used for “ anti-mainstream MSSN rhetorics and doctrinal disagreement on campus, including recruitment of students for their separate teachings”
At this juncture, it becomes clear that the Acting Dean must be having a hidden personal stake in this brightening embers, for she has been seen fanning it.
Our advice to her is not take this issue personal, for when it grows beyond her purview, only God knows how many she will answer to.
In short, we call on her to produce evidence of recruitment going on at the two mosques! Her failure to do so guarantees her a place in the hall of liars, at the corner of those known with producing blatant lies.

4. On her mention of suggesting closure of the mosques while we go and reach agreement on “doctrinal or worship issues”.
What does she know about the doctrines and mode of worship in Islam?
Our many meeting with her usually put us at a disadvantage on some issues regarding Islam simply because of her inability to grasp the meaning of some simple Islamic concepts, even despite her claim agelong purported Muslim affiliations.

5. On the “report” she claimed came to her that a “religious programme” is being planned to be held in Awolowo Hall Cafeteria the following Day (i.e 28th August, 2016).
We wonder the idle individual or individuals who gave her the highly unnecessary “report” that a programme that has been holding every Sunday at that venue decades before her appointment as the Acting Dean will also holds on the 28th. If not being having a mischievous agenda, sponsored or wholly her own, she’d not suddenly develop a ridiculous suspicion towards an open and peaceful programme already well known to both Muslims and Christians on this campus.

6. On her claim that we sent a text message to the DSA that we’d all be having a “continuous assessment tests from 10am to 5pm on the 31st August” to avoid meeting with her.
This is either a calculated twisting of the facts on this or an innocent misreading of our text message, which since her motives is now getting clearer, we will only be too glad to explain to her again.
No test of any nature will hold from 10am to 5pm on this campus and she very well knows that. How she concluded that the that the text message mentioning that “our” tests which (collectively) is referring to various brothers that will be participating at the meeting having their various tests in their various department at different times between 10am and 5pm of the 31st of August can be misread beats the imagination.
The wordings of the text message sent to her (through the Vice-Dean):
“Good evening sir, we request the meeting should be shifted as some of us will be having tests at that time and will be finishing around 5pm, we want to know when it will be convenient for you. Thanks…

7. On her bizarre claim of girls being “locked” “in a room” in the mosque “by their leaders.”
The locked room being referred to by this forever baffling Acting Dean is the entrance to the female section of the mosque. On this, we don’t find it surprising that she is even unaware of the plain and common fact that Muslims have separate places of worship sectioned separately for males and females in all mosques, since we have witnessed her other blunders regarding her familiarity with Islam.

8. On her claim that the said girls she met in their side of the mosque are “locked” there by their leaders, we have nothing to say except
“…supplicate earnestly and invoke the curse of Allah upon the liars” Qur’an 3 vs 61.

9. On her strange admission of finding girls at the mosque “during lecture hours”.
We wonder if everybody on campus have the same lecture hours that dictates everybody be at lectures at the exactly the same time? So it really gives one mental agony seeing how she’s making an issue of finding them at the mosque when they should be in her own defined “lecture hours”. Does their lack of a lecture at that time and their presence in the mosque at that time justify calling them prostitutes!!! Acting dean!!!

10. She said there is a practice of “harboring girls in rooms within the mosques”.
We’ll be glad to see her point again to the female side of the mosque where the females perform their daily acts of worship as the room where “harboring girls in the mosques” is going on. The world will be glad for the laugh.

11. Even as ID cards were obligingly giving to her, this jesting Madam pulled up her dishonorable conclusions out of thin air.
Our hasty acting dean shoots herself in the leg after implying our sisters are in their side of the mosque performing immoral action by admitting she obtained ID cards, obligingly, from all of them except one who wasn’t with hers and was vouched for by a brother.
We want to ask if girls that she says don’t “go to lectures” at “lecture hours”, girls that have been “locked” in by her manufactured “their leaders” and are plying the trade of prostitution in the Mosques use for worship of the lord will obligingly hand over their active ID cards to her if they have something to hide?
Madam D.S.A came to the Mosque on an agenda, no doubt, and the scapegoat she thought will be slaughtered after a chase turned out to be human afterall, and they, to her chagrin, came to her slaughter slab without a fight. The knife falls.
We are waiting for her proofs (hard one) that they are conducting prostitution in the Mosque where we all pray, and how career prostitutes who are locked up managed to obtain the school ID card under her nose.