₦airaland Forum

thank you jisos!!!
but i hope the infections are not only temporary hybanating inside their host?

is it a political tactis or what,nigerian oppositions just like crying-rigging even before anything starts,evidence or no evidence.
But,Za Pear of fee-dee-fee is za beginning op rigging pa!!
LOL

Macelliot: Even the question sounds strange to me either.

lol.
you know i know and i know you know that the question is VERY MUCH comprehensible.
But since the question is "strange",please give me another site/material that says "the heart can think".
sir,its not enough to just post any site and you expect everybody to accept it hook-line-and-sinker because its from a "site".Their are loads of baldadash on net,i mean totally irrational and false infos on net,thats why i like going with a widely recorgnised information,eg united nation or government recorgnised.
A dude once told me(on facebook)that pope benedict 13th was killed because he converted to islam,he even backed it with a site,but when i checked wiki i didnt see anything like that.

BossTtdiamonds: Please a question for you sir. What do you believe?

Am sorry sir,you sound relatively convoluted.What do i believe?please explain sir

Macelliot: Why do u wanna know? Hope all is well?

LOL
yes sir,all is well,just suprise that a topic as important as the "heart can think" has not been conventionally recorgnised.i have even gone further to ask seven medical personel but it seems to sound strange to them all.

Macelliot: Yes, the heart can really think....
http://www.ukapologetics.net/biblicalheart.htm

but sir,why has this finding not been conventionaly recorgnised,because a quick search shows most medically recorgise sites/organisations doesnot know/recorgnise this finding

eminex: I appreciate it more that u added mind in bracket, dat makes the explanation easy. Heart there is used figuratively as d seat of motivation (mind).

but sir,the jewish version of the bible actualy used "lev",jewish word for heart and not "sekhel" jewish word for brain.
please dont forget that portn of scripture was initially writen in hebrew.
The figurative use of "heart"(in english)is keeping with the naive understanding of the thinking-faculty,because it was already more convenient.

@macelliot,welldone sir,
i apreciate your effort.
sir,the bible says "as a man thinketh in his HEART...".please do we think with our heart or brain(mind)?

Daguccizgreat: Your foolishness speaks volume, I won't go far to exchange words wit a toad like u

just imagine.
"your foolishness speaks volume".
so you cant do without using insultive words?
whoever you trying to imitate is surely not helping your attitude.

Daguccizgreat: When u don't have any meaningful thing to coment on a thread, just pass. Stupid coment like this makes u look stupid.......fool

"stupid coment...you look stupid.FOOL".
*moves back*
Guy,you must belong to the religion of "peace".
please dont attempt explaining you not of the arab side because its similar to the jewish religion of "peace".
LOL

rattlesnake: What of

Bran tashi.....Abi Na buran tashi

bad boi.
allah,kei kapiri ne.
ka rasa abun da zaka ce sai "bura"?
LOL

my elder brother once predicted that one day govt will stop "allowee",instead,corp members will beging to pay govt "NYSC-fee",after all,the certificate is needed to secure employment.
we are gradually getting there.

tunshe: Did you read the link you quoted? I don't think so sir.

sure sir,i read the link.
we are talking about arab nation here,they can go xtra lenght in proofing a point,so am not suprise at that link.
Sir,the restriction on woman-driver in saudi is not alien to me,and i understand the level of opposition saudi women have been mounting on it,have watched on aljazeera and many medias.
sir,you didnt answer my question,was it saudi ladies that told their govt that driving is a "hard work" for them?and if yes,pls what is difficult if they simply refuse picking a car key?lol

Lailerh: God bless you that's exactly what I was thinking too

anti,pls open your mind,so a law MUST be passed to "help" the woman from a "stressful work" like driving?
Pls where have you read that a saudi woman/women are complaining that their hubbies are forcing them to drive thereby necesitating the enactment of this nature of law?
If driving is "hard/stressful/disrespectful",madam,pls dont ever drive,please how is this a big deal?

tunshe: A list from biased minds
Thumbs up to Saudi Arabia for treating women
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/02/saudi-protest-driving-ban-not-popular

LOL,so ladies dont know that driving is stressfull that your saudi has to assist them "rest".
Oga,so a law must be passed to "help" ladies from driving?
If indeed driving is a "difficult-task",what stops the ladies from droping the car key?
oh! sorry,maybe they(ladies)have be protesting on the streets of jedda,medina,mecca yet we couldnt see them because they were all vailled,lol.
aljazeera(a muslim friendly media)BBC,CNN have severally showed how women are chagrined about this law.
what am i saying?the absence-of-freedom is when,as an adult,am not allowed to choose what i want,as long it doesnot step on anothers right.
mr oga,please how is driving a stressfull stuff that a woman shouldnt be allowd to?
Am sure you will frown at any law that says women should stop entring kitchen.
Sir,this ur logic....make i no talk

freshness2020: Yea collar bone, its crystal clear in the pix!
...and btw I didn't make mention of him been poor!

"yea",neither did i make mention you "make mention him been poor".
only tried to wrong ur INSINUATION.lol

freshness2020: Hilarious footages !
When I saw Aliko's Collar Bones, na there I see say hope D̶̲̅ε̲̣y for me to flesh up!
Na just time!

"collar bone"?the guy was born and brougth up in MEGA-MONEY

RikoduoSennin: @bolded section: your words not mine. I don't remember using such words to describe the bible neither do I see any relevance to the thread topic.Do you think the existence of God/a Creator depends solely on if the bible contains error or not?Send me a link to a thread- containing to supposed error scriptures and I will gladly do that. Threads bordering on the bible's credibility best fits. God having or not having a creator, God existing or not existing does not depend "solely" on what the bible says.So let's leave the bible for another thread.

Monin sir,
i NEVER said you used "omniperfect.pls read/understand what i wrote.
you the first and ONLY chriatian have heard saying something of theological relevance doesnt depend "solely" on bible.
"the scripture describes the TOTALITY of God"--Ron kenolly
"the bible is God and God is the bible,WHATSOEVER the bible doesnot say about God is not of God"--pastor EA Adeboye.
Stop insisting thisnt the proper thread,have explaind.

bushdoc9919: It came about after the seven days, that the water of the flood came upon the earth. In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on the same day all the fountains of the great deep burst open, and the floodgates of the sky were opened. The rain fell upon the earth for forty days and forty nights.…

Genesis 7 vs 10-12.

Interesting......

"floodgates of the sky" hahaha.The naive writters of the great book assumed their was an accumulation of water behind the sky.infact,NIV calls it gates of heaven,because they thought(like every other naive acient man)that the gods reside above the farmerment..LOL

eleojo23: Science keeps discovering more and more. Methinks there are still many things science doesn't know yet. There is definitely a creator somewhere who masterfully designed the universe.

so,what you saying is "no beautiful thing that exist without a creator",is that?

RikoduoSennin: Don't get me wrong, I believe in the bible, I am a christian. 2 Timothy 3:16,17 mentioned the things the bible is perfect for. Ofcourse there are somethings in the bible that are hard to understand, but that doesn't mean they are wrong upon further analysis.

gmonin sir.....seriously,your moniker comes to me like "ruky(rukewe)useini,but then,this are incompatible nomenclatures.lol.
Right,one thing is CERTAIN,as a christian,you definatly agree the holy bible is omni-perfect.
Those passages i referd you to are not "hard to understand",even my nusery 3 son will understand it,they only display ERROR.
Why did i bring that passage?because you were insinuating that since science/scientist are not free from error the big-bang could equally not be error free.Honestly,its a splendid logic by you.Now,drawing from your logic,if ANY part of the holy bible can contain error then the idea of "God doesnot have a creator"could equaly be an error.thats why you should explain those passages

RikoduoSennin: Thank you very much for your courtesy, very remarkable! Examples, you ask? Well, if you are in touch with any published scientist, be it a Professor in any university, Just ask him about the length some scientist go to get funding for their research.



True, and I did not say they were.



That is just it, big bang still haven't make sense to me. What caused it (big bang) and WHY?



Who said anything about the Bible being omin-perfect? The rest is not related to this thread. There exist a thread for that.

"who said anything about the bible being omni-perfect"?you dont blv in the......sorry i thought you a christian.sincerely am so sorry.sir,pls which of the religion/faith do you profess?

@Rikoduosennin,monin sir,
you said "some sceintist falsify records and data to get funds"?please give two examples so that i will not refere you to go check the defination of "reckless-statement.
sir,please dont loss touch of the fact that scientist has NEVER claimed to be omni-science nor omnipotent.
What is sceince:sceince simply means the aplication of common sence in resolving natural intricacies.
Yes,scientist are very much prone to errors.am sure you understand the meaning of hypothesis,emperical etc.you see why the onus falls on you to keep proving omni-science even when its apparent you(or ur god)are far behind this sceintist.
Now,back to the topic,if it makes sense to you that nobody created god,then,big-bang,evolution etc should make greater sense.
finally,if i tell you your omni-perferct bible is full of errors(like sceintist,lol)i know you will shout NO!
sir please explain these following passages for me;(2kings 16:2,20 and 2kings 18:1-2) also (2chroni 21:20 and 2chroni 22:1-2).pls am wait

van gaal n moyes attended same tactical....?seun,management of old traford must see this post asap,so that they will either sack new coach or forget europ next season again

but for the almost-unclothedness of wife in photo 4,photo 3 wouldnt have been bad cept the wife is "longer" than hubby.well,i gib it to poto lamba 2 wallahi

but for the almost-unclothedness of wife in photo 4,photo 3 wouldnt have been bad cept the wife is "longer" than hubby.well,i gib it to poto lamba 2 wallahi.

The whites aint just happy with the way they lost human soldiers in the battle field,am so sure these "metallic-humans" will one day totally replace humans in war.i love robots

kolawaxxy: bro, I never admitted that God was the creator. I only tried to attempt his question from that perspective.

I believe some things are not to be known by man among which is the answer to question of the originator.

I'm more confused than you are

what
you "never admitted that god was the creator?" i.e you believe(like the atheist)that god IS NOT THE CREATOR?
Also "some things are not to be known by man"?dear,this kind of mind-set is what makes me detest religion.this type of thinking is what delayed the scientific development we enjoying today.chief,EVERTHING,i repeat, EVERYTHING MUST be known.lol

@Rikoduosennin,first,the concept of "energy cannot be created nor destroyed" is out-date,so pls dont use it to defend "god".secondly,just like every religous dude,you reject scentific proofs where it goes contrary to ur blv but accept it hook-line-and-sinker where it "explains your "god".finally,i blv u blv in the arguement of "perfect design",pls why are you finding it a difficult task blvin that this "perfect designer" should also have a designer?

@Rikoduosennin,first,the concept of "energy cannot be created nor destroyed" is out-date,so pls dont use it to defend "god".secondly,just like every religous dude,you reject scentific proofs where it goes contrary to ur blv but accept it hook-line-and-sinker where it "explains your "god".finally,i blv u blv in the arguement of "perfect design",pls why are you finding it a difficult task blvin that this "perfect designer" should also have a designer?lol

UrbanMystique: if you present more sound big bang theory to a christian, he will be quick to ask how possible is it for something to explode out of nothing, but will ask me to believe in god that comes from nothing. how crazy is that?

@op god is just an idea to explain things we are too lazy to look for answers to. that's why we have many god(s), and many theories trying to explain how all these happened.
so there is no god anywhere.. it's all in your head.. they created it for you in your head, same way they create other fictional characters.

100 LIKES

kolawaxxy: Bro, don't waste your time seeking answer to that question just like I did.

Let's assume we finally found out that it was a flying spaghetti monster that created god, another question will arise to also know who or what created the flying spaghetti monster.

We would keep going on and on if we are to ascertain the originator or the real creator.

Since we do not know who or what created god, it's better we apply the logic behind Pascal's wager. See God as an 'end and not a means to an end'

sir,i like ur attempt,but pls dont get the question convoluted.
If you can come to conclusion that "God created the universe,because a perfect universe cannot just come by chance/not to have been created" you must equally be intelligent enough to explain the origin of this "God",because me i think this god is "too-perfect" not to have been created/originated.pls sir