₦airaland Forum

budaatum:
You really should reflect, Mayn, and read your past posts again.

Every thread I've seen you in is you arguing, and when you fail to get your way tantrums seem to ensue.

Bud, I do reflect and meditate while sitting on my Buda comfortably.

LilMissFavvy:
The words are the words of Jesus, read it up. Would Jesus give a parable that is different from what would happen on judgement day? Have you not seen other Bible portion which say the same thing Jesus said? (Eg. Rev. 20:10). If there is eternal life, are you not supposed to think and know that what Jesus said in that scriptures is eternal destruction? Eternal punishment is the opposite of eternal life. If you like believe it, if you like continue to fool' yourself.

Only a Big fool takes a parable literally.

LilMissFavvy:
No, it does not mean the soul is dead. You can remember the story of Lazarus who sat on the floor with dogs licking his wounds, he sat to pick crumbs of food from the rich man's table. The rich man wasn't a believer of Christ or had Mercy on Lazarus. Read the passage up, and find out wether when the rich man finally went to hell wether his soul died in hell , or wether his soul stayed there in hell facing pains and eternal damnation. Luke 16:19-31.

A parable.

budaatum:
As I said, I was not aware that those you "darn" are not being blamed. You could after all have been darning socks.

Okay bud. Bwahahahah

Kobojunkie:
Hold it... did God make a Covenant with Nigeria promising that He would fix it if....?

Why would God need to fix Nigeria on behalf of anyone?

Did Nigeria exist when they wrote the Bible? Bwahahahah

budaatum:
As in, not on your "bud" anymore? Didn't know it bothered you. It's not as if I am assuming an origin like you are.

Is that how I offended you perhaps, that makes you assume an origin for mine?

Okay Bud. Bwahahahah

budaatum:
I must have misunderstood you extolling the virtue of the colonisers or you don't even understand yourself.

And how does that translate to this? Bud.
I know you are desperate to argue over anything lol

budaatum:
It is not the colonisers who are to blame for Africans not knowing their "culture and language and traditions", Mayn. And its a pity that you can not appreciate those who promote their deeper (by virtue of the amount of paper they wrote it on and the constant additions and redactions so it evolves) "culture and language and traditions", and learn how to do likewise or better.

Egypt had the deepest "culture and language and traditions" at some point. Egypt's "culture and language and traditions" was once so deep that they wrote it in stone that only the priests could read and the people had to worship the gods as those priests dictated. The priests all eventually died off and the secret of reading the writing died off too such that when the Romans and the Greeks arrived in Egypt and asked what was written in stone, the locals said it was written in the language of the gods that no one knew how to read. And no one learnt to reread it until the Europeans worked out to translate it.

Judaism avoided that mistake by making it their culture that every male child must learn to read the Torah, which was eventually redacted to include every male and female Jewish person, and which Jesus then made to include everybody, which Christians took literally and opened the schools in the name of church to teach people how to read. I got to say, one innovation was tithes, which paid for the upkeep of the 'school'.

We Africans though, West Africa, at least, unfortunately never wrote ours down, so we have nothing to redact or teach to begin with, nor have we found a way to make it pay for itself, except mostly by selling one juju or another to the gullible. And I think its safe to assume we have mostly, in protest, accepted that European "culture and language and traditions" is superior to our ancient "culture and language and traditions", or our parents would have sent us to learn our "culture and language and traditions" instead of the English language we all write in on here.

The tussle of understanding would always be fought, as it is written to have been fought in the Garden of Eden, between those who claim the sense is a serpent and those who would use their serpents. But it is very clear that the serpentless are the ones who remain colonised and enslaved for fear that they shall surely die if they dared while those with serpents would be the colonisers.

P.s. I do not expect this to make any sense to you Mayn, and did not write it for your benefit.

It’s no more may? It’s now mayn. You will still reach “maynman” and I’ll still be here sitting on my buda.

budaatum:
It is not the colonisers who are to blame for Africans not knowing their "culture and language and traditions", Mayn. And its a pity that you can not appreciate those who promote their deeper (by virtue of the amount of paper they wrote it on and the constant additions and redactions so it evolves) "culture and language and traditions", and learn how to do likewise or better.

Egypt had the deepest "culture and language and traditions" at some point. Egypt's "culture and language and traditions" was once so deep that they wrote it in stone that only the priests could read and the people had to worship the gods as those priests dictated. The priests all eventually died off and the secret of reading the writing died off too such that when the Romans and the Greeks arrived in Egypt and asked what was written in stone, the locals said it was written in the language of the gods that no one knew how to read. And no one learnt to reread it until the Europeans worked out to translate it.

Judaism avoided that mistake by making it their culture that every male child must learn to read the Torah, which was eventually redacted to include every male and female Jewish person, and which Jesus then made to include everybody, which Christians took literally and opened the schools in the name of church to teach people how to read. I got to say, one innovation was tithes, which paid for the upkeep of the 'school'.

We Africans though, West Africa, at least, unfortunately never wrote ours down, so we have nothing to redact or teach to begin with, nor have we found a way to make it pay for itself, except mostly by selling one juju or another to the gullible. And I think its safe to assume we have mostly, in protest, accepted that European "culture and language and traditions" is superior to our ancient "culture and language and traditions", or our parents would have sent us to learn our "culture and language and traditions" instead of the English language we all write in on here.

The tussle of understanding would always be fought, as it is written to have been fought in the Garden of Eden, between those who claim the sense is a serpent and those who would use their serpents. But it is very clear that the serpentless are the ones who remain colonised and enslaved for fear that they shall surely die if they dared while those with serpents would be the colonisers.

P.s. I do not expect this to make any sense to you Mayn, and did not write it for your benefit.

Bud I didn’t say it was colonizers that made Africans not to know their tradition and culture, stop assuming bud.
And there was no time in history Egypt has the deepest culture and tradition.
And we have different types of Judaism, which one are you talking about bud?
You don’t know the history of “redaction”, in that same place didn’t you see “canonization” I wish you will learn for yourself and not for argument.
The Torah from tanakh you talk about was created not long ago, what they use back then in Jesus time are called “scrolls”.
African people have a lot of documentation about their culture, if you don’t know about it don’t just assume.
It can’t make sense to me Bud, it’s arrant hogwash.

There are earlier religion before Judaism/Christianity where you got the “Adam garden” story from, you should look em up and find their understanding. Christianity is way too new a religion to start your history from it. And the new type of Judaism we have now is different from the one we had before, instead of you to learn for your sake, you are learning hurriedly so you can come argue, I’ll be here to tutor you though.

Candidlady:
He suffering from strabismus

Bitter hag.

MaxInDHouse:
I also believe you're WRONG!

It's your interpretation against mine so there's no need saying you got it right when you can't prove what you're saying in reality.

Those demons used discernment because Jesus is driving them out of the body of a man who is no relative of Jesus so if they should approach another human Jesus won't allow them have a stay. The pigs saw them coming that's why they all rushed off the cliff.
So what really matters to them is the possession of humans (intelligent beings) note that they're many in just one man because they know how valuable a man is to his maker who created man in His own IMAGE! Genesis 1:26

Once they're able to possess a human they have that satisfaction of being close to the Maker after all they are possessing a creature in His image, that's why Jesus who is also a spirit could say "humans worth much more than a thousand animals" {Matthew 10:31} even though we are all souls! Ecclesiastes 3:19-20

The interpretation is clear, but your agenda as one of the fallen watchers of yaldaboath won’t let you agree.

tribalistdcriti:

"Deeper bro deeper ASUU harder harder ASUU go harder I'm loving it ASUU Fúck me harder ASUU baby uh uh : put it on me". I guess ASUU had unprotected sex with you

Nawa ooo

Blame everyone and everything.

Ken4Christ:
You will know how you look like when you are departing from your body to hell.

At least I still have my human eye and human mouth bwahahahah

Kobojunkie:
Try to spend time reading and grasping that which you have read abeg!
The test was set by the Lord, King of Israel, as a test for gods, so if Mohammed would like to have himself validated as a god then he would need to present his case before God, not men, to be judged.

Christians aren't israelites, so you address, not only the wrong audience but also the wrong judge in this.

Who is the god of Jacob?
Who shared jacob(isreal) as an inheritance to Yahweh
Who is the god of the Semitic bwahahahah

mhmsadyq:
Exactly.
Allah wasn't a creation of Islam.
Islam only came to correct the true worship of Allah, which had been replaced with idols and idolatry.
Allah has never been an idol even in the pre islamic arabia.

Allah is a title not a person, Islam only came to refer to Their own deity as also “Allah”
The stone y’all worship in kabbah is Allah

mhmsadyq:
I don't understand this thing about title.

In Islam Allah has many other names we can call him with. We know them as the names of Allah not titles.

Stop posting junk internet materials on our faces. Anybody can post anything on google or wikipeadia or where ever. Some are just personal opinions.

You are the one saying junk and finding it hard to understand.
Before islam was created, “Allah” has been in use. Is your religion not from Abraham? From the Semitic tribe.

mhmsadyq:
Probably a contraction.

To Muslims Allah is "Allah" and has never meant "the god" whether in english or any other language.

The word “Allah” has been used before Islam and Muslims was created.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia

mhmsadyq:
Probably a contraction.

To Muslims Allah is "Allah" and has never meant "the god" whether in english or any other language.

Where did the Muslim get “allah” from?
Didn’t you see that it is traced to Semitic writings? Who are the Semitics? Are you not of Abrahamic religion again?

mhmsadyq:
I think you should read what you posted slowly and tell us how it relates to what you typed up there.

The Qur'an verse you quoted condenmed the pagans ascribing daughters to Allah.

Allah is a title not a person. Read it now again slowly

Satan is yaldaboath, aka Yahweh.
The fallen watchers changed it to “Jehovah”

Chichigi1990:
Ok but i am still confused, pardon me.
What exactly are you getting at with this?

Allah is a title and it means “the god” or “gods” generally, Allah is from EL.

Chichigi1990:
EL is of semetic origin,

Do you agree?

No it’s not.
Sumerian- “EL” meaning “brightness or shining”.

Akkadian- “ILU” meaning “radiant one”.

Babylonian- “ELLU” meaning “the shining one”.

Old Welsh- “ELLU”- meaning “a shining being”.

Old Irish- “AILLIL” meaning “shining”.

English- “ELF” meaning “shining being”.

Anglo-Saxon- “AELF” meaning “radiant being”.

Chichigi1990:
The screenshot you shared says not about the origin of the name of God in Arabic.
However, the name of God in Arabic comes from the Earliest semetic writings.
If i am missing something, pls enlightenme.

You missed this.

Chichigi1990:
The screenshot you shared says not about the origin of the name of God in Arabic.
However, the name of God in Arabic comes from the Earliest semetic writings.
If i am missing something, pls enlightenme.

God is a title just as Allah is a title. And Allah comes from the word EL

MaxInDHouse:
If you're talking about torments regarding spirit beings (not humans or animals with physical bodies) then it couldn't be anything else but emotional torture!

Spirit have feelings like humans?
Just like the jealous yaldaboath.

Chichigi1990:
Everything you are insinuating concerning daughters and deities and idols are pre islamic.
I have tried to find where it was written from the screenshot you posted that Allah bore/has two daughters but rather all i see is his condemnation of the pre-islamic idol worshiping of idols.

Allah is a title not a person.
What’s the origin of the word, Allah?
The stone you guys worship in Mecca has a name, Allah is just a title.

Allah daughter Al Uzaa and Al Lat. it’s visible to the blind.

mhmsadyq:
How did what you attached a confirmation of what you typed?

Read it slowly.Where does the word “Allah” come from.

Chichigi1990:
Read it properly. In islam, there is no deity or god but Allah. Show me were it says explicitly that Allah had Daughters and win N10,000 now.

Read. https://www.google.com/search?q=pre+islamic+arabia&rlz=1CDGOYI_enNG966NG966&oq=pre+islam&aqs=chrome.0.0i512j69i57j0i512l2j69i60l2.3846j0j7&hl=en-US&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

Tell me the origin of the word “Allah” and win 20000

How can you say you worship a good god and you lie this much, anyways you already said you are a Jehovah witness and you’ve pledge allegiance to the WATCHTOWER, Which means you are part of the fallen watchers waiting for Yaldaboath.
I’m sure you know this. It is glare who you are now.

Sumerian- “EL” meaning “brightness or shining”.

Akkadian- “ILU” meaning “radiant one”.

Babylonian- “ELLU” meaning “the shining one”.

Old Welsh- “ELLU”- meaning “a shining being”.

Old Irish- “AILLIL” meaning “shining”.

English- “ELF” meaning “shining being”.

Anglo-Saxon- “AELF” meaning “radiant being”.

What’s EL?