₦airaland Forum

budaatum:
Bad teachers tend to make the mistake of spending more time with class disruptors than their learning students. The consequence is that no teaching occurs.

Spending more time with class disruptors is also learning. Sometimes teaching is not needed, just observe.

budaatum:
Wikipedia pretty much defines it as all that exists.

The universe is all of space and time[a] and their contents,[10] including planets, stars, galaxies, and all other forms of matter and energy.

So the whole of existence?

triplechoice:
Don't bother to ask him

He doesn't know what it means.

Even the atheist label he has given himself ,he cannot explain it clearly without running to Wikipedia like his friends .

It is better to go on Wikipedia than assuming jargons from my ass and saying “buddism” believes in “god” but not external 😂😂

An agnostic that does not know what “god” means, you are sha Agnostic

budaatum:
No we can't. Unless we wish to subscribe to humptydumptyism where words mean whatever you want them to mean.

What then is Universe?

budaatum:
This is illogical. The statement "a “creator” that created everything", implies the existence of a "creator" that created something, since a creator that is "non existing" can not have created anything that exists.

Perhaps the creator created itself first, though I can't yet figure how it would or could.

I don’t care if the thread is derailed. It is all for fun.

That’s EXACTLY where i am going, the idea of a Creator creating universe/existence is illogical.

Sand2022:
No, you get punished if you misuse your freedom. And your misusing it was done freely without being coerced. There are 99% things you could do within your freewill without any punishment, why do the 1% you were restricted from? It means that you FREELY decided to fall into a ditch.

God didn't issue absolute freedom. That would in fact be disastrous and unloving. It means that one might decide to kill another or burn another's building cos he feels it's the right thing.

Who decides how you use your own freewill?
If you get punished for “misusing” your freewill, you never had freewill.

Exactly your god didn’t give you freewill. He gave you laws that limits your freewill.

We see how israelites were killing other tribes, even taking their lands.

Workch:
How is agnosticism a joke?

Why are you not agnostic to a dragon why “god”?

jaephoenix:
I was deeply hurt. seriously butt hurt that some beings doubt the existence of my Dragon

Just Try call it “deistic god”, workch Will believe it.

Workch:
I see atheists are here already causing problems.

And here comes the believer that is agnostic about a “Creator” called “god” but not agnostic about a Creator call “dragon” 😂

Sand2022:
Freewill is just right to do whatever you want. That's all. What you do might have consequences, either good or bad. Whichever one you chose, no one force you to do it, you did it of your own volition. That's freewill.

You can’t say someone have freewill and you are still the same person punishing them for using that freewill.

Sand2022:
But what if the kid goes on to defecate on the chocolate? Or goes on to pick an orange meant for someone else? Or what if the kid picks the chocolate and inserts it into his anus or poke his eyes with the stick? Will he suffer for it?

Please read
Free will is when you tell a kid to pick whatever chocolate flavors she likes without consequence of punishment or reward.

When you attach a reward or punishment to it, the kid is not choosing freely, the kid is only reacting to the consequences.

Workch:
If you had provided evidence and not trying to run from pillar to post, we would have ended this debate.

Where is the evidence of your belief?

LordReed:
Like that time Zeus turned into a bull and Sango obliterated that tree.

Funny thing is workch is a deist, and the root word of Deism is one and same with Zeus.
Sky father 😂

Workch:
just substantiate your position with evidence 😂😂
Stop the distraction or agree that you lack any evidence

Listen to your advice and substantiate your beliefs, laughing stock 😂

Workch:
Just leave the red herring. Please focus

Haaaaa Superior arguments 😂😂

Workch:
I'm going to be justified for always following the evidence where it leads and not making things up in my head.

Evidence for a word called “god” 😂😂

Workch:
No I can't, that's why the topic is correct 😂

So what’s now the business of atheism?

Workch:
You are not touching it because you don't have any scientific backing for it. I dare you to prove me wrong 🤣

Scientific backing for a word called god 😂

Workch:
Do you have sufficient evidence to disbelief it?

Like we did when we found sufficient evidence against phlogiston?

Back to square one 😂😂

Workch:
it's like explaining basic things to a theist 😂😂
You guys are same thing

Says a believer

Workch:
you explain how to ended up not believing it.
On what ground?

Because i am not a believer 😂😂

Workch:
Focus on giving evidence. Stop asking too much questions 😅

It seems you have gone too deep and too ashamed to back out 😂😂

I should Give evidence why i don’t believe in a word called god 😂

Workch:
We both know this 🤣

We both know you not laughing

Workch:
Evidence for your position "I do not believe in God".

Why did you reach such conclusions with demonstrable evidence?

You are lost and confused 😂😂

Workch:
he knows what he's doing, LordReed is trying to create a strawman that he will attack so we can stop asking him to substantiate his disbelief, unbelief or non-belief (whatever he calls it) with an evidence.

Superior argument in mud 😂😂

Universe means EVERYTHING that exists.
The root word of University is Universe.
The term "university" in our modern scholastic sense dates to the 14th century, and Universities aim to gather all knowledge in one place

https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=universe

Workch:
whether disbeliever, unbeliever or non-believer, they all mean someone who doesn't believe in God.

Which god?

Workch:
LordReed, at the end of this your back and forth, all of them means someone who doesn't believe in God in this context.

Stop grabbing the straw and give us evidence 😂

Its Getting clearer now

I’m glad everyone is seeing how triplechoice is empty and barren just like his father.
In case you want to play victim, remember it was you that brought parents into the discussion.

The common sense your grandparents didn’t teach your parents which affected you, will be taught here.

WriterNig:
https://www.spaceflightinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/ChD2jxTUYAEBnV-e1461812718929.jpg

@Bowes Chay tweeted;



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqBqIX3nQVU





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQB_4WVlWbU

Is youtube not western media?

Do russia media posts western achievements and feats?

triplechoice:
Just imagine the talk

The prefix -dis before belief means ,not ,a negation ,

So, the word ,disbelief it's the same with the phrase lack of belief.

Leave Reed . He wants to confuse you because he is stuck .

He is the same person in the other thread who wanted to mock with

The half statement ,

"I don't believe '

With the full one ,


'I neither believe nor disbelieve '

He wanted to play some mental abracadabra ,but he failed woefully

For you to learn more.

Non-Belief: Imagine someone who has never heard about aliens before. They haven't formed an opinion either way. If they say, "I lack a belief in aliens," they are expressing that they haven't accepted the idea of aliens due to a lack of information or exposure.

Disbelief: Now, consider someone who is well-versed in astronomy and understands the improbability of extraterrestrial life. If they say, "I disbelieve in aliens," they are actively negating the idea based on their knowledge and assessment of the evidence.