₦airaland Forum

Negroid001:
Me i no dey argue.
I believe in a higher authority.
Higher intelligence.

You not agreeing is none of my business.

Please explain what you mean by “higher authority” and “higher intelligence”?

Negroid001:
That's why it's called Agnosticism. I learn everyday. My head is like a sponge. My views are open to corrections. I'm not rigid like an Atheist or Religious fanatic.
The fact you used a negative word shows your core belief was questioned. The principles i believe in work for me.
I don't give a damn about your beliefs. I even encouraged yours that it inspired me to share my views.

Agnosticism is based on ignorance, you are already sympathetic to the word “god”, you are just looking for ways to justify it, the fact that you think there’s anything like a creator or designer points to such.

I told you only theists have such beliefs, i am not joining in that beliefs that is why i am an atheist.

Negroid001:
Each to his own beliefs.

Only theists do such.
You are still using your monotheistic beliefs and hiding under agnosticism.

Theist sympathizers.

Image123:
Two confused children of a more confused devil.

Funny thing is devil and deist mean same thing 😂

Workch:
Funny atheists, 15 pages on back and forth.

Even theists that are reading this thread will be laughing at you guys. 😂

After all said and done, their school of thought is still based on crass ignorance

Any Theists that understands that theism is about belief and faith will see the folly you have been displaying..

Workch:
If you don't believe in God, then you have to bring evidence for it else your disbelief is an ad ignoratiam.

As far as I'm concerned, I don't know anything 😂😂

Fool can’t see his folly.

When we replace god with dragon that’s when your common sense will come back.

Workch:
I'm confused, I don't know anything. I have not taken a position yet.

That's why I'm asking atheists who have taken a position to substantiate it but they are on the defensive 😂.

I am not claiming to know anything. I don't know if a god exist or not. There's nothing lkk evidence for "I don't know"

I'm proving to you that atheists also can not substitiate their position with evidence. Thru position is based on ignorance, just like theists 😂

Laughing stock 😂😂

Workch:
But I don't disbelieve as well.
I don't know anything. It is you that claim to know. I not claiming to have any knowledge, you re the one claiming to have knowledge.

If you say god does not exist, how did you know?

Illiterate, go look up what “atheism” means.

triplechoice:
Off point and wayward as usual.

You are the dullard that doesn’t understand the logic you are using.

When mendy was accused by those women, didn’t they provide a form of evidence to the court, do you think if it was random women that mendy has never met, police would have “believed” them?

Illiterate!

triplechoice:
If you are taken to court for an offence you didn't commit, you will need to defend yourself.

You don't just plead innocence and expect the judge to rule in your favour.

Illiterate, before you take someone to court you have to tender an explanation on oath on what the said person did, and your explanations have to match with current reality.
Even if you are raped you still have to provide some form of EVIDENCE.

Who brought the claim that “gods” exist and we should believe they exist?

triplechoice:
Go ask your father you insult everyday.

I don't want to consort anymore with nairaland latest madman, sorry Maynman

My father is not a dunce like yours, if not that you are worthless like your father; will you be “neutral” to what you lack knowledge on?
When we replace “god” with “dragon” you see how ridiculous you sound but you are sympathetic to the word “god”.
Son of a dummy Triplechoice

triplechoice:
How ?

I Judge should side with you over something that doesn't concern him?

I don't think I understand you yet.

Who brought the claim that “gods” exist and we should believe they exist?

triplechoice:
Then present your facts and knowledge for the judges to decide in your favour without biases or shut up .

It's because the analogy is lost on your dead brain, you are insulting yourself.

When will yahweh worshippers provide facts and knowledge on why they don’t believe in Allah, the judge should also decide that too na

triplechoice:
Then present your facts and knowledge for the judges to decide in your favour without biases or shut up .

It's because the analogy is lost on your dead brain, you are insulting yourself.

Decide what in my favour?
That I don’t believe in gods?
Facts and knowledge on why I don’t believe in “gods” 😂

You are a dullard and you don’t even know it.

triplechoice:
I think he didn't put it well.

Both you and the theist are the ones to present your case for judgement by the agnostic who is acting like a Judge now.
Judges are expected to be neutral .Is that not so?

You are a dullard; a judge does not work on belief but facts and knowledge.
How will you explain to the judge why you don’t BELIEVE in a word called “god”?
If you are a reasonable judge, won’t you be asking the theist why someone has to BELIEVE in it, why can’t we KNOW?

triplechoice:
You can only provide that when you have taken a position.

I neither believe or disbelieve you means neutrality zero. Nothing to give until I can be sure

You have taken 2 positions.
You disbelieve it and you also don’t believe it, according to workch, if you don't believe it bring an evidence against it.

Workch:
I don't disbelieve or believe it.

Why is it hard to understand?

That’s why you need to provide 2 evidence.
Why you don’t believe it, and why you disbelieve it.

According to you “if you don't believe it bring an evidence against it. ”
And since you also disbelieve you have to bring another evidence for it.

triplechoice:
When loonies like you continue to report it everywhere.

So the “overwhelming evidence” science needs is just for people to be reporting it, is that what they taught you numbskull?

triplechoice:
You are losing your mind .

Go meet the quack doctor to treat you.

Labeling others ignorant doesn't make them that.

It's what you say and do.

So look to yourself.

🥱
What does this mean “ By the time millions of people worldwide starts reporting the same thing, then it's time for science to intervene.”?

where did they gather enough data and evidences to work with?

Your ignorance will be exposed here, dullard.

Stop saying things you lack knowledge on, you are obviously empty.

Workch:
Stop replying tk him.
You won't regret it.

He has psychological problems. Respond to saner people

Says someone that believes in a deistic god, you are the mad fellow that doesn’t realize it.

Everything the west has thought you about “god” is a sham!

triplechoice:
I have strong reasons to believe my house was burgled by a thief, but not certain who exactly is the thief, and that's because no evidence to confirm.

If I have no evidence it's wrong to accuse and arrest anyone as being responsible, but people do that all the time.

No one is telling you to accuse anyone, the question is do you believe or have facts that your house was burgled into?

What facts do we have of the word “god” to start with?

Your ignorance will be exposed!

triplechoice:
No it doesn't. And where did I say so?


I said before scientists starts to investigate anything,, they most have gather enough data, evidences, to work with.

I never said the data is prove already. The data they collect is what they interpret to know the truth.

You like to overreach yourself yet you know nothing.

What does this mean “ By the time millions of people worldwide starts reporting the same thing, then it's time for science to intervene.”?

where did they gather enough data and evidences to work with?

Your ignorance will be exposed here, dullard.

triplechoice:
For instance, If my house is burgled in my absence, I have strong reasons to believe a thief did it, but no evidences to immediately know who exactly is the thief. So I remain neutral and don't suspect anyone until I know the truth because the person I strongly suspect may turn out not to be responsible or is responsible in the end.

You are a dullard, your house is burgled is that a belief or a established fact?
So when it comes to the word “god”, what is the established fact in it, then we will know the EXACT GOD that created the world.
Illiterate!

triplechoice:
Scientists don't just go about investigating every single claim people make . It's only when the evidence becomes overwhelming they look into.

People reporting the same thing worldwide does not make it an overwhelming evidence.

triplechoice:
Can invisible beings be scientifically proven to exist?

Science says no.

Wtf is “invisible beings”?
You are a dullard. Sit down and think it through does “invisible being” make sense.
You are watching too many nollywoods.

When did science say anything about “invisible beings “?
Which professor said it,Triplechoice?

triplechoice:
By the time millions of people worldwide starts reporting the same thing, then it's time for science to intervene.

That's how it works in the sciences.

When will science work to find out if Santa exist?

Negroid001:
What are you saying. Stop confusing yourself

Okay, yahweh worshipper.

Negroid001:
Obviously who else?

It is to be used among the Israelites ONLY. Face your own culture deity.

Negroid001:
Bro funny thing be say part of 10 commandments na thou shall not bow down to any other God except me.

Who was this god referring to, is it the isrealites?

KnownUnknown:
Then the Leprechaun said, “that is fucking retarded; why would you ask someone to provide “evidence against”, shouldn’t you be the one providing evidence that I’m sitting on your shoulder?!”

And the dummy says you have to demonstrate the “evidence against” through practical experiment 😂

Workch:
They don't have to say it that they don't know, whether or not they say it l, if evidence for or against warmholes don't exist, they don't know it.

Atheism is odd, it's like theism

Atheism don’t “believe” in gods.

It has nothing to do with what you are saying.