₦airaland Forum

Because he is not delusional

Mad woman that calls herself Chrestian, you were the one that quoted me in the first place about your “fact”, now who is forcing conversation between me and you? And you still went further to abuse your father age mate because i also gave you my “fact”
Did I hurt you that much? Why you so intolerant?

Sweetplum:
This is no longer amount religion.
Christians don't force conversions.
Let's assume an an atheist.
It's btw me and you this rude idio t.
If you are my dad's mate then you are a foo l for your age.
Very annoying good for nothing never to do well troll roaming on Nairaland without focus arguing as a demented soul set for condemnation.
You v been affected by the effect of poverty ravaging Nigeria. Instead of venting your anger on people and those you think are Christians just drink a sniper.
If you quote me again and talk about religion, you ll waste like a pig.

You this low life sex slave.
Your dad is an animal and a bigger fool for given birth to a cheap dog like you.
Very worthless little piece of shit, senile dog quoting people and abusing them when they don’t support your deity.

Your worthlessness as a cheap female dog as affected you that’s why you think you can just insult people that don’t support your deity, the home training your parents lack that they did not give you, you’ll learn.
Instead of abusing people that don’t support your deity why not become a cheap sex slave and get trafficked to libya?

I was on my own when you quoted me first, if you quote me again on my posts you’ll die like a cheap stray dog with no trace

Because I don’t worship your deity you have resulted to ad hominem, you are going to get what you are worth, you quoted me with your “facts” and i also gave you mine, why so pained and emotional about it?
you this worthless female dog.

Sweetplum:
A worthless piece of a boy calling his sister's mate names that befits himself.
Stupid mofo forming atheism here.
If them born you well carry your atheism reach street.
I quoted you, gave you facts but here you are repeating same rubbish, same screenshots n repeating same madness.
It's so obvious mental medications don't work on you.

A useless piece of shi.t calling his father mate names that befits herself.
Retar,ded sex slave forming theist.
If them born you well carry your theism reach street.
I replied to your quote and ALSO gave you fact on the yahweh deity you are worshipping but you’ve been so indoctrinated you can’t think for yourself but behaving like the worthless sex slave you are.
It’s very obvious you are a Emotional mad woman, worthless and good for nothing, even your jesus Chrestus can’t help you.
I don’t understand, you quoted me with your facts i also gave you mine, why did you result to insult?


When was Pentecostal Christianity created? You know what “Pentecostal” means?
I think it was created during the great schism,
Pentecostal Christianity is a DOCTRINE DIFFERENT FROM ORTHODOX CHRISTIANITY AND CATHOLIC. Learn Chrestian.
The way you worship yahweh deity makes you look a irredeemable reta,rd.
Judaism and Christianity doesn’t have similar origin, judaism is the ORIGIN OF CHRISTIANITY.

I didn’t call you a mad woman, if you call yourself one, you may be right.

you are a reta,rd, were you not the one that quoted me first, you this miserable good for looking middle east SEX slave.
Even with your Jesus Chrestus you are still a worthless being.

You are worshipping a LIE, Chrestian

Sweetplum:
What's your focus?
Who you be?
What's your achievement?
What give you joy?
What's your purpose?
Why are you just miserable?
All these you can't answer.
Let's leave religion. Let's talk human to human.
You are the most miserable, unfortunate good for nothing creature I v ever seen.
Your purpose of existence is a waste.
It's better you belong to the asylum. You don't fit in to where normal human being are.
Very useless, tasteless and hopeless boy.
I ran a check on your posts and I discovered al you do is to ramble about Christianity like a useless man that lavished his savings of gambling & alcohol.
Yet you v the temerity to call me names. It ll not be well with you. I m all out for you.
You ll twist statements, attach stupid images to posts thinking you are making points but you are just displaying your madness.
You life is filled with lies and misery.
For your life, don't ever quote me again.

When was Pentecostal Christianity created? You know what “Pentecostal” means?
I think it was created during the great schism,
Pentecostal Christianity is a DOCTRINE DIFFERENT FROM ORTHODOX CHRISTIANITY AND CATHOLIC. Learn Chrestian.
The way you worship yahweh deity makes you look a irredeemable reta,rd.
Judaism and Christianity doesn’t have similar origin, judaism is the ORIGIN OF CHRISTIANITY.

I didn’t call you a mad woman, if you call yourself one, you may be right.

Sweetplum:
Heresy is a contrary teaching or belief.
You are mixing Pentecostal Christianity with Judaism. Even though both has similar origin. But you forgot totally the practice are now different. And the way you just attach pics n type Yahweh worshipper makes you look senile. But you are actually telling me and others that quote you that you are God worshipper.
You also claimed doctrine. I don't live by doctrines alone. Jesus brought the Pentecostal Christianity. It's more flexible.
Then you called me a mad woman.
No problem o. Mad woman go bite you for real life.

When was Pentecostal Christianity created? You know what “Pentecostal” means?
I think it was created during the great schism,
Pentecostal Christianity is a DOCTRINE DIFFERENT FROM ORTHODOX CHRISTIANITY AND CATHOLIC. Learn Chrestian.
The way you worship yahweh deity makes you look a irredeemable reta,rd.
Judaism and Christianity doesn’t have similar origin, judaism is the ORIGIN OR CHRISTIANITY.

I didn’t call you a mad woman, if you call yourself one, you may be right.

Kobojunkie:
can humans, an imperfect species, really ever derive or achieve perfection?

Before oyinbo came to the shores of Nigerians, Manu of you olodumare worshippers didn't really concern yourselves with the science of the white man and his many accomplishments up until that point in time, but here you now tell us that Olodumare's plan is for men to achieve perfection in what is really been majorly the science of the oyinbo, how come?

Ignorant fool, the first industry was in africa. Look up oldowan industry.
The first people that ruled europe was black.

Sweetplum:
Thank you.

You are welcome yahweh worshipper

A mad woman thinks everyone is mad like her.

Sweetplum:
I asked why are you like this?
It's a question you need to answer.
I need to be sure of your sanity.

You need to be sure of your sanity first and ask yourself if you understand what you are saying or just regurgitating what you are told like a sheep.



What’s the origin and what do you understand by the word “heresy”?
Or you just say words you don’t know their meaning, is that how you REASON?

Sweetplum:
Ok thanks.

You are welcome Chrestian.

Sweetplum:
Is this how you go about spewing heresy. Bros why are you like this?

What’s the origin and what do you understand by the word “heresy”?

Indoctrinated Yahweh worshipper.

Sweetplum:
Bros. You are entitled to your opinion.
You aren't as wise as the majority that rated Bible.
Tanakh is same as the Bible. Torah & other Jewish books v similarities with Bible. This should tell you the book is indeed loaded. It's the most freely given out book in history.

Sometimes the m is silent in masses.

Tanakh is a bible.
Bible LITERALLY means BOOK.
Tanakh is not an English word, the english word for tanakh is JEWISH BIBLE.
Chrestians likes to call the tanakh(jewish bible), the Old Testament.
Learn Chrestian, You are ignorant of your deity, yahweh worshipper.

Kobojunkie:
I don't understand. Why does perfection have to be about these advancements ? Why not something better or more meaningful??

You are not making sense.

Sweetplum:
Be calming down. There's a book called Bible. Its spiritual and helpful. Even if it's not what you claim it is, it's indeed the best book ever written, the most generally acceptable, interpreted in diverse languages and most popular ever.
It get why.
Majority of the world ll not just do follow, follow.

Learn, bible literally mean books.
We have jewish bible called tanakh and Christian bible called new testaments.

It’s the best book to Chrestians. The early church fathers did alot of work of interpolation, forgery and plagiarism.

Codex sinaiticus, the earliest new testaments is the most edited and corrected book in history.
What are they correcting in yahweh spiritual words?

When and Where did the evolution happen?

Show us where tanakh was interpolated, edited BEFORE it was cannonised, why are you changing your statements?

budaatum:
The myths were not fabricated in one single go. They were created over centuries with different people adding their own bits until they got to a point when they wrote something down.

That something then went through numerous edits etc to get to what is read today. They after all had to add punctuation marks and remove some of the more nastier bits like human sacrifice to their God.

Oh, and ps. Did you not say the Europeans, Romans to be precise, fabricated the myths of Jesus? Were Romans Semites too?

Stale, keep learning Bud.


Where did you read that church fathers edit tanakh?
Where did the church fathers forge and interpolate from?
Jesus is not mentioned in the “tanakh”, so how did “holy bible” evolve from tanakh?

Where did you read that church fathers edit tanakh?
Where did the church fathers forge and interpolate from?
Jesus is not mentioned in the “tanakh”, so how did “holy bible” evolve from tanakh?

Olodo claims

When and where did the evolution start, from yahweh of shasu tribe to god of abraham to god of Jacob bwahahahah
Jews don’t speak english
Ignorant stool

When and where did the “evolution” start?

budaatum:
Oh. I almost missed that. Are you admitting that the Masoretic text was edited?

too cheap, what do you understand by “masoteric text” was it church fathers that edited it, like you claim? Well bud, keep feeding on your claims.
You are just learning about this today, calm down and learn!
Too desperate you will say anything. Your ignorance is glaring.


Show us where tanakh was interpolated, edited BEFORE it was cannonised, why are you changing your statements?

When and where did the “evolution” happen?

budaatum:
So your opinions are the same as your beliefs? No wonder you make up opinions and believe them instead of seeking evidence to confirm if your belief/opinion is valid or not.

No one knows "When and Where" any evolution began, mayn. and asking for my opinion on the matter is asking to be fed my (subjective) belief/opinion instead of doing your own research so you could stop believing and instead know.

And yes I do just want to talk. You may not see anything in what I say but you are not the only one reading what I have to say and some may chose to seek further than you may be willing to.

Do know that it is not my belief or opinion but an obvious fact that the Tanakh you read today was "interpolated and forged" and "compiled and translated and gone through numerous rewrites, redacts, additions, translations, syncretisms, omissions" from whatever its original may have been.

Don't you dare take my word for it though. Do your own research.

Belief literally comes from Doxa and it means opinions. That’s what i said, stop assuming dumbly.

You are too poor and a waste of time.
“Evolution” that started in your house? Petty liar.
Keep feeding on your lies/claims

When and Where did the “Evolution” happen?

budaatum:
Thank you for pointing out that I am ignorant Mayn. Ignorance is the reason one should feed oneself instead of waiting for buda to feed you.

Warning to anyone reading.

See and knock and ask for yourself with your own heart and mind and soul and being so buda does not fed you lies.

Belief comes from Doxa and it means opinions.
Who doesn’t have opinions?

Too poor, you just want to talk and ignorantly shout “buda” it’s stale already bwahahhaha, stool

When and Where did the “Evolution” happen?

budaatum:
Thank you for pointing out that I am ignorant Mayn. Ignorance is the reason one should feed oneself instead of waiting for buda to feed you.

Warning to anyone reading.

See and knock and ask for yourself with your own heart and mind and soul and being so buda does not fed you lies.

Bud, Buda can’t feed me, I’m currently sitting on my buda, that’s is only use.
Words can mean different things to different people right? bwahahhaha

I didn’t know you are this poor, zero knowledge!
You are just learning about this today so you can come argue, that’s how desperate you are.

Where did you read that church fathers edit tanakh?
Where did the church fathers forge and interpolate from?
Jesus is not mentioned in the “tanakh”, so how did “holy bible” evolve from tanakh?

When and Where did the “Evolution” start?

budaatum:
I think my claim is beyond what you know.

Tell me, is the Tanakh today in its original form?

In fact, what is the oldest extant Tanakh and how old is it?

Your claim are lies that you feed yourself. You’ve shown you are ignorant of the book and “logos” you carry around.


Show us where tanakh was interpolated, edited BEFORE it was cannonised, why are you changing your statements?

Tell me Bud, Where did you read that church fathers edit tanakh?
Where did the church fathers forge and interpolate from?
Jesus is not mentioned in the “tanakh”, so how did “holy bible” evolve from tanakh?

budaatum:
No. I will not show you. Stop being lazy and go do your own research.

But You can post random screenshot that proves nothing.


Bud stop lying and getting desperate, also stop assuming.


Show us where tanakh was edited and interpolated BEFORE it was canonized
Your claim are lies!

budaatum:
No Mayn, I will not show you where the Tanakh was interpolated and edited before it was cannonised. You might believe me if I told you.

Go do your own research if you think the Tanakh you read today is what was originally written down or what was even passed from mouth to mouth before anything was written down.

You can’t show me bud, because you a desperate liar.
The screenshot proves nothing, desperate bud.

This is what you said earlier
“My claim is that the Tanakh itself had gone through the evolution of edits and interpolations before it was cannonised and even long before it was written down from when it was passed from mouth to ear and which you would at least be able to consider if you bothered to do the Google I told you to do.”

Show us where the tanakh was interpolated and edited BEFORE it was canonized

When and where did the evolution happen?

budaatum:
Stop focusing on my emotions which you see not, and focus in the discussion at hand.

Since you insist on not telling me what you mean by "going through canon", let me help by offering a meaning and you tell me if I am wrong.

"Going through canon" (for our purpose here), means "interpolated and forged" and "compiled and translated and gone through numerous rewrites, redacts, additions, translations, syncretisms, omissions before being accepted, as god's word, some would claim.

Now, do you agree with my definition, and do you agree that the Tanakh is a book and that it too went through canonnization, as in the Tanakh went through interpolations and forgeries and was "compiled and translated and went through numerous rewrites, redacts, additions, translations, syncretisms, omissions, before what evolved was accepted?

The following might help.
Development of the Hebrew Bible canon

You the one that brought in emotions, listen to your advice bud and stop playing victim.


All what you said about canon are lies and BS, stop assuming and read what it means!

This is what you said earlier
“My claim is that the Tanakh itself had gone through the evolution of edits and interpolations before it was cannonised and even long before it was written down from when it was passed from mouth to ear and which you would at least be able to consider if you bothered to do the Google I told you to do.”

Show us where tanakh was interpolated, edited BEFORE it was cannonised, why are you changing your statements?

you are LOST, just saying anything lol
What exactly does the link you provided prove?Posting any link, too desperate

You are just learning about this, learning so you can argue , what a bud.

Listen to your advice and answer my questions too, bud.
Where did you read that church fathers edit tanakh?
Where did the church fathers forge and interpolate from.
Jesus is not mentioned in the “tanakh”, so how did “holy bible” evolve from tanakh?

budaatum:
First, I am not angry. You are way too immature to have any effect on my emotions.

Second, I am not asking you to explain to me what canonical books are, but the process of becoming canonical, hence, What does "going through canon mean", as in, what process does a text undergo before it is considered canon.

Unlike you who assumes I do not know what canonical books are, I am checking to see what you understand by "going through canon". After all, they are words that you used. Should I assume like you do and understand wrong instead of asking you what you mean?


First. It is you who claimed the church fathers forged and interpolated. Are you now saying the Church father's did not edit and interpolate into the Tanakh before adding their forged and interpolated New Testament, no?

As for evolved, I take it you have not bothered to read the Holy Bible or perhaps you misunderstood it more than you miscomprehend less verbial me because if you had bothered to read it you should have notice that whatever may have started as yahweh of the tribe of shasu evolved pretty quickly into the God of Abraham and into the God of Moses and into the God of Isaiah and into the God of Jesus and into the God of Paul with lots of others in between. The stories of Jesus alone were an evolution in understanding and writing from a book to believed into a book to be utilised which went on to be used to the effect we see today.

My claim is that the Tanakh itself had gone through the evolution of edits and interpolations before it was cannonised and even long before it was written down from when it was passed from mouth to ear and which you would at least be able to consider if you bothered to do the Google I told you to do.

Bud you are the one emotional and playing the victim card.

You can get angry lol, that won’t stop me from sitting on my Buda!

If you know what canon means and have a slight knowledge of how it works, you should know how books go through canon but you are just desperately assuming blindly.

It’s common sense the church fathers forge and interpolated the NEW TESTAMENT .Church fathers are chrestians.
It was you that said Tanakh was interpolated and forged by the church fathers, how come?.

there’s nothing like “holy bible”
We have new testaments and Old Testament in the bible. Bible simply means books. We have jewish bible and Christian bible.

Yahweh is clearly written in the “holy bible” you should read it and stop cherry picking. There was no evolution, stop lying.
“God” is a title not a person, God is an english word, jews don’t speak English, the jews use the tanahk and there’s no English word “god” in it, bud but we have YAHWEH in it.

If you have any knowledge on the “holy bible” you are reading you’ll know Yahweh is the god of israelite. All the abraham, Jacob, Isaiah are still worshipping YAHWEH OF SHASU TRIBE. This are basic, bud.
Where and when did this “evolution” happen?


The stories of jesus are the product of early church fathers, the tanakh and jews have no references to it.
When and where was this “evolution”?

Jesus chrestus is different from jesus of nazareth.
Where did you see your own “evolution”?
Your stark ignorance is showing bud.

Your claim are LIES, stop assuming.
the tanahk was created by the “jewish canon”. All the edits and interpolations happened during the CANON. there was no tanakh before it!

Another victim playing, no one said you don’t know what “canonical books” means. Stop assuming, bud.

you should have knowledge on the canonical books you are quoting, that’s common sense.

Listen to your advice and answer my questions too, bud.
Where did you read that church fathers edit tanakh?
Where did the church fathers forge and interpolate from.
Jesus is not mentioned in the “tanakh”, so how did “holy bible” evolve from tanakh?

budaatum:
You don't ever answer questions Mayn, while it is rather obvious to anyone who looks that I have answered very many of the questions you've asked me.

Bud, I’ve been asking you questions and you didnt answer, yet you are getting angry that I didn’t answer yours, that’s hypocrisy and it’s obvious.

you should have knowledge on the canonical books you are quoting, that’s common sense.

Listen to your advice and answer my questions too, bud.
Where did you read that church fathers edit tanakh?
Where did the church fathers forge and interpolate from?
Jesus is not mentioned in the “tanakh”, so how did “holy bible” evolve from tanakh?

budaatum:
And that's why I keep asking you who knows.

Who did you ask before you quoted the canonical books, bud?


Listen to your advice and answer my questions too, bud.
Where did you read that church fathers edit tanakh?
Where did the church fathers forge and interpolate from?
Jesus is not mentioned in the “tanakh”, so how did “holy bible” evolve from tanakh?

budaatum:
Do I need to get permission?
Does someone need to tell me to do anything?


Answer the question!

Then you should have knowledge on the canonical books you are quoting, that’s common sense.

Listen to your advice and answer my questions too, bud.
Where did you read that church fathers edit tanakh?
Where did the church fathers forge and interpolate from.
Jesus is not mentioned in the “tanakh”, so how did “holy bible” evolve from tanakh?

budaatum:
So tell me.

Who told you to quote canonical books in the first place?

budaatum:
What does going through canon mean?

you don’t know Yet you are quoting canonical books?