₦airaland Forum

budaatum:
I'm beginning to think you have a comprehension problem.

So, in your own reading, what I am saying is that the previous books that were compiled and translated and which has gone through numerous rewrites, redacts, additions, translations, syncretisms, omissions, etc etc, etc, is not the Tanakh?

If so stand corrected that I am saying the exact opposite of what you seem to understand, that the previous books that were compiled and translated and which has gone through numerous rewrites, redacts, additions, translations, syncretisms, omissions, etc etc, etc, is the Tanakh, and which is only a part of what I am reading.

budaatum:
See mine above, then Google "editing the tanakh" download pdf and come tell me what you see.

budaatum:
And was there no before they were written in first temples anywhere?

Go seek please.

budaatum:
Please provide evidence for the above.

budaatum:
I see you edited your post with the addition, lol. Is there a Jesus in the Tanakh?

What I meant was I am not reading the Tanakh but the Tanakh plus what you say "the early church fathers did a great work of interpolations and forgery" and which does include a Jesus Christ which I would not read about if I only read the Tanakh.

Basically, I am reading a translation of the Tanakh with the interpolations and forgery of the early church fathers which includes a Jesus Christ and at least one or two of the early church fathers who may have forged it and interpolated what I am reading.

budaatum:
I never said anything of the sort Mayn, that the Holy Bible has nothing to do with the Tanakh!

Everyone knows the Holy Bible evolved from the Tanakh which evolved from various other sources, and you yourself drum that fact down everyone's throat in almost all your posts.


In their homes and their houses or in a temple or a library, perhaps?

To you, all I am saying is "still bordering on New Testament created by the early church fathers". Some may have better eyes than you.

budaatum:
The 70 who translated one book to another, those who wrote what the 70 translated, those who verbally transmitted what they'd heard and those who verbalised it in the first place, each of who over many centuries left their own interpolations and forgery and some.

KnownUnknown:
Maynmann is either insane or a bot. Lol

tctrills:
You would be fine one day.

budaatum:
Damn! I fail at ignoring you already.

Didn't those before them too not do a great work of interpolation and forgery too?

Those early church fathers must have learnt well.

budaatum:
I have given you my answers to these questions with references to aid you in your understanding of my answers but it seems my subjective answers do not satisfy you - as they mustn't, mind, which is precisely why each must seek for themselves instead of just accepting the answers one is given.

I am now going to try really very hard from letting you further make me derail this thread.

tctrills:
I am not the cause of your problem please take your fight to someone else.

budaatum:
One of my top ten reads, I must say.

budaatum:
Psalm 86:2 is a verse from the Psalms allegedly written by numerous people over centuries who are putting words into the mouth of what they call God, so I guess the writers are the one's doing the talking like an artist talks through art. And the art, Psalm 86:2, is talking to the reader just as the Mona Lisa talks to its observer and as I am talking to you the reader of that which I say.


Superpower beings like Superman, Thor, Obatala, some Pharaohs and Caesars and Zeus, and I presume, the yahweh of the tribe of shasu, and for me, you my fellow human being.

It is a very subjectively defined word after all, with everyone creating their god in their own image or according to their own understanding and know how.

For a more comprehensive list see here.


I do not know how many times I have to tell you that buda does not believe, but I do know that one day you will know instead of believing what you want to believe.

tctrills:
This one came here to fight.

tctrills:
What point are you trying to make?

tctrills:
I don't understand

Templee333:
Ok.Well done @maxindhouse. But u'r switching sides b/w Jesus & word rulers. U ignored Jesus who taught u 2 turn the other cheek & side with world rulers to take ur enemies 2 court. Did Jesus teach u dat? Again, u ignored Jesus word abt signs that follow believers in Mark 16:17,18. U r now telling me dat Jesus is against signs & miracles,was he lying in d above verses? Its like u quote Jesus when it suits u, but ignore him when it's against JW doctrine. U see ur life?

budaatum:
Your first question should have been, do you believe in a book, but you did what you usually do and created crap in your head to believe without knowing you believe the crap you created in your own head.

No Maynman, I do not believe books nor anything actually. I ask and knock and seek with my own heart and soul and mind and being until I actually know. That's probably why I don't believe your "reading about yahweh of the tribe of shasu". After all, if I were to accept that's what I am reading about I would merely be believing you which buda does not do, and that's apart from the fact that I would be letting your own heart and soul and mind and being do the knocking and seeking and asking for pot.

Cultists are neither pots nor supposed potters.

budaatum:
Your first question should have been, do you believe in a book, but you did what you usually do and created crap in your head to believe without knowing you believe the crap you created in your own head.

No Maynman, I do not believe books nor anything actually. I ask and knock and seek with my own heart and soul and mind and being until I actually know. That's probably why I don't believe your "reading about yahweh of the tribe of shasu". After all, if I were to accept that's what I am reading about I would merely be believing you which buda does not do, and that's apart from the fact that I would be letting your own heart and soul and mind and being do the knocking and seeking and asking for pot.

Cultists are neither pots nor supposed potters.

tctrills:
All men are offsprings of God with the ability to become like our Father in heaven.
The child of a God is a God.

freshboi88:
Imagine, doctrines determined by the Governing body, a body made up of mere mortals, ordinary men. Chai!!!!!!.....who do these people this thing nah.....I weep for them all

MaxInDHouse:
Good!
So you've satisfied your anxiety even though your call was ignored by those you think will join you criticizing God's people. Exodus 23:1-2



Meanwhile the man you're quoting strongly upheld the view that you're brainwashed for thinking Jesus has anything tangible to teach!



So i congratulate you for finding someone who is interested in supporting your criticism against God's people even though both of you are at loggerheads regarding faith at least you both fulfilled Jesus' words when he told us:

"And you will be hated by all people on account of my name, but the one who has endured to the end will be saved" Matthew 10:22

Thanks for your time. Goodbye!

Is jesus not same as angel michael?

elated177:
You are yet to state your mission here.