Appleyard:


Your excuse doesn't hold water, brother. Even if there is a slow arms race ongoing, is that why you should waste such ridiculous amount of taxpayers money on a floating house that even one single submarine can send to the button of the sea? Don't let any side fool you; aircraft careers are the most vulnerable of all military assets. And come to think of it: you already got 12, what is the strategic need behind this one?

I will tell you: NOTHING, other than showmanship and hype. The MIC controlled by the establishment is slowly killing off America

Extreme ignorance.

Everyone is a blogger

NYT retracts claim that ‘17 US intelligence agencies’ verified Russian DNC email hack

Correction: June 29, 2017

A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.

Democrats talking point: "17 intelligence agencies agrees" blown out of the water

ValerianSteel, Are you still for minimum wage increase? Looks like it failed in Seattle


In January 2016, Seattle’s minimum wage jumped from $11 an hour to $13 for large employers, the second big increase in less than a year. New research released Monday by a team of economists at the University of Washington suggests the wage hike may have come at a significant cost: The increase led to steep declines in employment for low-wage workers, and a drop in hours for those who kept their jobs. Crucially, the negative impact of lost jobs and hours more than offset the benefits of higher wages


Monday’s report looks at the impact of the second wage increase under the law: the January 2016 hike to $13 an hour for large employers. This time, the findings look very different: Compared to a counterfactual in which Seattle didn’t raise its minimum wage, the number of hours worked by low-wage workers (those earning less than $19 an hour) fell by 9.4 percent over the first nine months of 2016, and the number of low-wage jobs fell by 6.8 percent. Cumulatively, those add up to the losses of 5,000 jobs and 3.5 million hours of work. The average low-wage employee, they found, saw his or her monthly paycheck shrink by $125, or 6.6 percent.

Lol. Liberal tears

Now we know why the sea levels are rising

stanech:
Breaking: Supreme Court will hear appeal of Trump travel ban block and allows partial enforcement of the ban in the meantime

9-0 decision

Delicious!

schwarzkopf:


Priceless coming from a never do well, whose only life achievement is living in the yank. Take several sit back loser.

Ha

Gayboy still obsessed with my post.
Living in your head rent free.

PDPGuy:
So I just discovered that Symone Sanders is only 27, and she was made the national press secretary for Bernie Sanders presidential campaign at age 25!

That's a rare feat in itself, being trusted with such a high profile position at such a tender age (in the world of politics).

Press secretary of a commie.

Sad!

stanech:
Breaking:

Bernie and Jane Sanders are under FBI investigation for bank fraud and have hired prominent defense attorneys - CBS News

feel the fraud

ValerianSteel:
Missy89 do you buy the whole story about USS Fitzgerald Collusion? Your take?

Hard to get the whole truth from any military incident. Cloak and dagger

ValerianSteel:
Never has a special election been this important as today's races in Georgia and South Carolina. Two red districts facing their most competitive races ever. Tonight we'll see if the Resistance makes progress at the ballots.

I told you so

Another moral victory

Losers

Maga must pay

Left wing terrorists are now targeting republicans.

Wow. What a bloody foool

happney65:


And bill was the current US President at the time?Hunnnnnn..A Chance meeting that was done in the full glare of the public witg no secrecy or whatsoever like ur master calling on Comey every now and then..Hypocrites

Since it was in the "full glare of the public" with no secrecy whatsoever.

Do you mind sharing the transcript of the conversation?

obixcel:
If they, the libtards were so interested in "collusion", "obstruction", whatever, why couldn't they advocate for Bill and lynch to be investigated? That, for me, is a classic collusion and obstruction of justice.

Matt Lauer claims that if Trump isn't guilty of legal obstruction of justice, he's guilty of emotional obstruction.

Liberals making up a new crime smh

In his prepared statement, James Comey admits that President Trump was not being investigated, that Comey told the president and Congress as much, and that Comey deliberately refused to inform the public of those facts. His excuse? "because the circumstance might change"

This is the same guy that did a press conference about Hilary emails and came to a conclusion only to send a letter to congress few days before the election when the fact changed.

This is CNN

rakish:
Like seriously? How did I conclude? Again, Comey told Congress that he is not personally Investigating him. We all know that. But we also know that Trump was in control of his campaign team, so he can't be left out of the investigation. It is a Trump campaign that led to his victory. The FBI is an independent body here Missy, and President needs to be careful when it deals with an independent agency. Asking an employee if he likes his job before telling him you expect loyalty speaks volumes, it rattles an employee who loves his job and wants to keep it. Telling him to let an investigation go speaks volumes. To clear the Russian cloud while voicing out your displeasure of what is going on is indirectly telling a employee your want the probe to end in your favor and it goes on.

Again read the full context

Trump asked how he could lift the Russia cloud since he is not under investigation and Comey said this :

I explained that we had briefed the leadership of Congress on
exactly which individuals we were investigating and that we had told those
Congressional leaders that we were not personally investigating President Trump.
I reminded him I had previously told him that. He repeatedly told me, “We need
to get that fact out.

Meaning the Russia investigation has nothing to do with Trump.

Trump agreed that if there are members of his team that work with Russia, It should be investigated. Comey confirmed that when he said this :

The President went on to say that if there were some "satellite" associates of his who did something wrong, it would be good to find that out, but that he hadn't done anything wrong and hoped I would find a way to get it out that we weren't investigating him.

rakish:
You do not expect Comey to jump into conclusion do you? Ofcourse, Comey expressly told Congress that he is not investing Trump personally. We all know that. I need loyalty, I expect loyalty. Those are the notable words of Trump to an FBI director who is investigating his campaign.

You do not expect someone in the center of the controversy to jump into conclusions but you are.

Comey told Trump 3 times is he not under investigation
Comey wont say it in public and Trump was frustrated
Trump wanted Comey to investigate the pee tape
Trump wanted to know if members of his campaign colluded with Russia
Trump never pressured Comey about dropping the Russian collusion investigation

Those are the facts.

You can keep spinning it if you want

rakish:
Do not forget Trump told Comey he wants the Russian cloud on the white house to go away as it is impeding on his governance.

Read the full context

He asked what we could do to “lift the cloud.” I responded that
we were investigating the matter as quickly as we could, and that there would be
great benefit, if we didn’t find anything, to our having done the work well. He
agreed, but then re-emphasized the problems this was causing him.
Then the President asked why there had been a congressional hearing about
Russia the previous week – at which I had, as the Department of Justice directed,
confirmed the investigation into possible coordination between Russia and the
Trump campaign. I explained the demands from the leadership of both parties in
Congress for more information, and that Senator Grassley had even held up the
confirmation of the Deputy Attorney General until we briefed him in detail on the
investigation. I explained that we had briefed the leadership of Congress on
exactly which individuals we were investigating and that we had told those
Congressional leaders that we were not personally investigating President Trump.
I reminded him I had previously told him that. He repeatedly told me, “We need
to get that fact out.

rakish:
Trump invited Comey for dinner. He first asked him if he wants and likes his job. Then as the conversation progresses he asked for comey's loyalty. Comey promised to give him honesty. Trump changed his words to honest loyalty. He invited Comey to the white house, had a one on one conversation with Comey. Trump asked Comey to let the Michael Flynn investigation go calling Flynn a good guy. Comey promised to hasten the investigation. Trump called Comey and asked him to make the cloud surrounding his Russian campaign probe go away. He assured Comey he did nothing wrong even though his campaign staff might. Trump fired Comey.

You conveniently left out this part where Comey said

I did not understand the President to be talking about the broader investigation into Russia or possible links to his campaign.

I explained that we had briefed the leadership of Congress on exactly which individuals we were investigating and that we had told those Congressional leaders that we were not personally investigating President Trump. I reminded him I had previously told him that. He repeatedly told me, "We need to get that fact out."

The President went on to say that if there were some "satellite" associates of his who did something wrong, it would be good to find that out, but that he hadn't done anything wrong and hoped I would find a way to get it out that we weren't investigating him.

January 6, and, as he had done previously, expressed his disgust for the allegations and strongly denied them. He said he was considering ordering me to investigate the alleged incident to prove it didn't happen. I replied that he should give that careful thought because it might create a narrative that we were investigating him personally, which we weren't, and because it was very difficult to prove a negative. He said he would think about it and asked me to think about it.

So Trump wanted Comey to investigate the so called pee tape and never asked Comey to stop any Russian collusion investigation (in fact he wanted to know if someone in his team was complicit). He was frustrated Comey told him multiple times he is not under investigation but wont say it in public. The only bad part from Trump in these statement is the Micheal Flynn investigation but Comey isnt even saying Trump obstructed that investigation

Comey's statement destroys democrats narrative of Russian collusion

Comey's opening statement tomorrow released by the Senate intel committee

stanech:
Hmmmm

I think THE FIVE is the best show on cable tv thou. Havent seen it in a while

happney65:


Some legal experts told ABC News that Trump's requests as detailed in the memo, which ABC News has not seen, could meet the legal definition of obstruction.

How can the details of something you haven't seen meet a legal definition of anything? Lol

Exclusive: Comey will stop short of saying Trump obstructed justice in Flynn probe, source says - ABC News

rakish:
I am using logic and present day reality my friend. Moreover, Google is your friend.

Since you claim to be using logic,ever heard of burden of proof? Your reversed responsibility response defies logic

US-backed force enters IS-held Raqa from East

rakish:
What I said is no lie. Go and read the history with an open mind. Mohammed and his followers left mecca to Medina because of persecution by the pagans. The jihad against the pagans of mecca was to entirely defend themselves, their religion, and protect its followers that still live in mecca under persecution. Again I repeat, this, just like the other Abrahamic religions were engage in such practices In order to further enhance their religion.

Your claim requires evidence. Let me know when you have any

schwarzkopf:


May you die a shameful death, If your reasons for saying show us where Christians do so and so wasn't to show how Christianity is lesser violent alternative to Islam.

You are the one trying to compare religions. I only pressed you to show me evidence of equal violence in the name of Christianity since you brought it up. Still waiting for it

Rabid dog

vedaxcool:


Ah your ignorance and its convenient awe when confronted with the truth.

Like I said you are ignorant you prefer to stand with pagans who buried their daughters for bbeig female and were rightly criticized for such odious practice. .. the same meccans who killed a woman and all her children because she was a muslim the same meccans that blockaded the family of the prophet pbuh leading to the death of his uncle and his wife etc and eventually forced majority of Muslims out of their home to seek refuge in Medina? You stand with the pagans and you will stand with the devil if it allows you disparage Islam. I don't need to check your piecemeal understanding of Islam.

I am not standing with the pagans. I am debunking the myth that Muhammad fought a defensive war against them and was prosecuted by them.

Looks like you are justifying Mohammed's war against the pagans because of their practices and I have no problem with that logic.

But I have to ask you, why are some of the practices in Islam copied from those pagans? I have sources to back up the claim.