₦airaland Forum

Rubbish!

This is some attempt to cause disunity among the people. It is beyond an ethnic clash, and there are some forces at work here.

However, whether political or not, ethnic or not, religious or not, it takes an irresponsible leadership for such level of insecurity to persist for so long. What is there in protecting the lives of citizens?

Nor be Jonathan put am there?

fortsierafino:
Seriake Dickson should be blamed

I just wonder

Yes o, it was Islam that allocated TY Danjuma and co all the oil blocs at the detriment of the country

efighter:
Yes, it was Islam that stopped Goatluck Jonathan from constructing the 2nd Niger Bridge.
Yes, it was Islam that stopped Olusegun Obasanjo from constructing the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway.
Yes, it was Islam that stopped Obasanjo, Yar'Adua, Goatluck Jonathan from cleaning the oil spill in Ogoni
Yes, it was Islam that sent Chief James Ibori to jail in UK
Yes, it was Islam that deposited billions of Naira in imPatience Jonathan's accounts, Tinubu's accounts, Kwakwaso's accounts, Diezaini Alisson-Maduekwe's accounts, james Ibori's account, Bala Mohammed's accounts, Sani Abacha's accounts

Reaction?

Hmmmn. God dey sha

Both

Agent of unity. Man of God indeed.

EkunKekere:
Your slave master in Aso Rock is too stupid to understand the danger of what he is doing.

What are we talking and what is this one talking? Better wake up.

Please forget about the divisive hypocrites. Why do they pretend not to notice when BH is killing muslims in NE. They even killed Sheikh Jaafar (and it made no headline). A whole Sheikh Jaafar, yet they pretend it is a war against Christians.

When bandits kill an entire community in Katsina and Kebbi, the look the other way. When a single Christian is killed they begin to address press conferences, just to give religious coloration. If it were a pastor killed, they'll carry his picture and be attaching to every post and crying that since inception Christians have being the target while muslims are spared.

Just imagine, Leah Sharibu's case, as painful as it is to us all, simply because there refusal to denounce fait in her story, they elevated it and made the face of BH crime as if there are no other scores of Christians and muslims in captivity.

Divisive hypocrites.

dukeprince50:
Its simple, everyone or maybe most people hate terrorism, but whenever a terrorist kills someone, there are some person's who felt PMB send those terrorists, No matter how PMB supporters explain, those guys won't listen instead will call them zombie.
How can you explain to someone that terrorism is not just in Nigeria but most places where Muslims dominate and such person won't understand, its sickening to continue explaining That or whatever his name is, he is someone who sometimes do not defend looters even in APC but some people have made it a duty to always insult him even when he says something not related to politics and we all know he I saying the truth.


Same thing happens when looted finds was found in Patience account.

modified: I noticed the only time you called them APC supporters in this thread was in the title.
You now refer to them as zombies lol.

You're abusing Naija soldiers just like dat, if they handle you don't start complaining of human right o

ghettokid1:
Is Hisbah not Northern Amotekun?

Hisbah is within a state while Amotekun is regional. The man is asking for something regional not like Hisbah restricted to a state.

Qualityfootwear:
Kk

Oga, come and pay last respect to Momsy and Popsy

Osho Baba, carry go

Didn't he know the way to the court before he chose street protests? By the way, initial street protests do not necessarily twist the arms of judges.

If there is no fake news or falsehood involved, then this is a shame. The man should be allowed to live his life and express himself.

For your education beyond propaganda, see which of the states voted for Abiola, including his opponent's state.

Also, follow history to find out the state of origin of Tofa's deputy, and you'll see who has been playing ethnic politics from the word go.

Note:
Abiola - Ogun
Kingibe- Adamawa
Tofa - Kano
Ugoh - Former Governor, Central Bank of Biafra

Social media bill is coming

yarimo:
we are already alive seeing light taken over darkness . This judgement is 100 % victory for democracy

Don't mind these courts o.
That was how they handed over the entire Zamfara State to PDP

israelmao:
The Independence of the judiciary is right in the pocket of the executive as long as Buhari rules.

Buhari why are you like this?
That was how the other time you commanded the judiciary to hand over APC's victory in the entire Zamfara State to PDP. Why na?

Neoteny:
Are you talking about the same supreme court that handed over Zamfara to PDP?

Thanks for asking the question. Some people suffer from what the whiteman calls "cognitive dissonance".

Apart from Okorocha, other people's claps and dances don't look natural. Like they have been given a script to act

Only God will save us from this borrow-borrow

We thank God. But government must do more.

THE IMO GUBERNATORIAL JUDGMENT - A PAINFUL BUT LEGALLY CORRECT VERDICT!

It is indeed a perplexing paradox: Hope Uzodinma may not have won the 2019 Imo State gubernatorial election, yet the Supreme Court, on the facts, was right in declaring him the winner of that election in law. The error was not the Supreme Court's, but that of Governor Emeka Ihedioha's legal team; and it was a crucially fatal error.

What happened was this: during the governorship election in Imo State, apparently concocted results, perhaps not having any basis whatsoever in reality, BUT SIGNED BY INEC PRESIDING OFFICERS, were turned in from more than 350 polling units, giving Hope Uzodinma of the APC an incredibly unassailable lead. When those results were transmitted to the wards collation centres, the collation officers, who had no power in law to cancel or reject them, rejected the said polling units results, and refused to collate them, thereby effectively excluding them from the total tally of the governorship result that was eventually declared by the Returning Officer. In the aftermath of the said exclusion, the Independent National Electoral Commission declared Governor Ihedioha the winner of the election.

The exclusion of the results of those polling units was the fulcrum of the petition presented at the Tribunal by Hope Uzodinma. Ever since David Mark V. ABUBAKAR USMAN, and DOMA V. INEC, the law has been settled that neither collation officers nor a returning officer, has the power in law to exclude a polling unit result duly signed by the presiding officer at the polling unit; only the election tribunal possesses the power to cancel or exclude such a result. So, at the point of its presentation, Senator Uzodinma's petition was potentially viable, in spite of the apparent dubiousness of the polling units results on which it was anchored, there being a REBUTTABLE presumption of regularity and correctness, by virtue of both the Electoral Act and Evidence Act, enuring in favour of any result declared by a presiding officer.

The backbreaking and fatal error made by Ihedioha's legal team was in not filing a CROSS PETITION fiercely challenging the integrity of the suspect polling units results upon which Uzodinma was relying, and praying the election tribunal to formally nullify the said results. Without a cross petition, none of the grounds under section 138 (1) of the Electoral Act for questioning the elections conducted in those polling units in which Uzodinma "won" could have been competently raised by Governor Ihedioha in his defence to Uzodinma's petition. This was the ratio decidendi of the old Court of Appeal decision in IDRIS V. A.N.P.P.(2008)8 NWLR(PT.1088) Page 1. In the recent Court of Appeal decision in ATIKU ABUBAKAR V. BUHARI, the Court of Appeal again invoked the principle in dismissing Buhari's contention that Atiku ABUBAKAR was born in Cameroun to parents who originally were Camerounians, and thus disqualified from contesting the election. Dismissing the contention, the Court of Appeal held that the issue was incompetent, since Buhari did not file a cross petition.

Ihedioha indeed did set up facts in his Reply to the petition rehashing the serial infractions that led to the exclusion of the results of the said 300 plus polling units. But that was legally not enough, in the absence of a cross petition. Besides, such renditions by a Respondent in a mere Reply or Statement of Defence are clearly incompetent. The reason for the incompetence was was made clear by the Court of Appeal in NATIONAL JUDICIAL COUNCIL & ORS V. HON. JUSTICE JUBRIL BABAJIDE ALADEJANA & ORS(2014) LPELR - 2413 (CA) Page 31, paras C - F, at ratio 3 thus -

"The law is that it is a plaintiff who by his statement of claim primarily nominates issues to be tried in a suit and which he relies on to have the judgment of the Court. For a defendant, it is only necessary to resist the plaintiff's claim on the facts pleaded. It is not for a defendant to set up facts which would convey that it is not just setting up a defence but setting up a new case of his own. He can only do so by way of a counter claim..."

Shorn of the legalese, what the above authority is simply saying is that since the issue nominated for trial by Hope Uzodinma was the unlawfulfulness or otherwise of the exclusion of the results of the 300 plus polling units by the ward collation officers, Ihedioha's defence was therefore necessarily restricted by law to showing that those who excluded the results had the power in law to exclude them. Without a cross petition praying for the nullification of those results, the law forbade Governor Ihedioha as respondent from raising the issue of the alleged serial corrupt practices and irregularities marring the said results, in a mere statement of defence; that was a new issue not nominated by Uzodinma as petitioner. Ihedioha, being a Respondent, could only have competently raised them via a cross petition, being a new issue not nominated by Uzodinma, the petitioner.

Tragically, Ihedioha's legal team forgot to include the pivotal cross petition. And in the absence of a cross petition, the Supreme Court was right in law, painfully though it may seem, to rely on the presumption of regularity and correctness enshrined by both the Electoral Act and Evidence Act in favour of the said results, and to reckon with them and add them up to the final result, since Ihedioha's legal team had woefully failed to effectively attack the results and rebut that presumption. For the Supreme Court, this was the legally correct conclusion to come to, having found that INEC had no power in law to exclude polling units results duly affirmed by the various polling units presiding officers!

Kenneth Ikonne

goodnessme1:
Enemies of Biafra will always put to shame.




God bless Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

God bless Ipob members worldwide.

God bless All lovers of freedom.

God bless 2023 presidency

Ikemba007:
please include a picture of the body close shot to show the colour pattern, shape of scales and whether they are lying on each other and the direction they point. also what is the average length of the snakes so far?

Good! Would have been nice to also see the direction of the phangs and whether they point backwards or if they are hinged and if they are like syringes with a tiny hole in the middle.. Please be careful how you handle the head o, if the phangs prick they could be poisonous.

Numerouno94:
Ur right. Jux lyk our islam brodas re still luvin Buhari despite d loopholes in is Government.
Nd how they see notin wrong in Fulani killing nd ravagin xtain communities.

Above is a typical example of how religion takes away the ability to be circumspect. Sorry o