Mojeer678's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Mojeer678's Profile › Mojeer678's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 26 pages)
stanech:Exactly, that's correct. The Wal-Mart pic I posted is a Jade Helm Wal-Mart, it makes little difference if Obama ran that for a couple months when the majority of it's existence was under Trump. The Wal-Mart is an improvement over what was used previously. The best times ever on the immigration detainment scene were under Trump, he does not deserve the rap for this. Obviously they are going to milk this as horribly as possible for Trump, that's just the way they are. No honesty AT ALL. |
stanech:The derangement is real! TIME MAGAZINE FAKE NEWS COVER Time Magazine ran this cover, claiming the little girl was separated from her mother by Trump: As it turns out, this particular baby was never separated from her mom, and was looking up at her mom crying when the photo was taken, this was conveniently edited out. So people got ahold of the family where this woman came from. The dad was fairly well paid and saw no reason for his wife to run off to the U.S. and he told her not to go to the U.S. and especially not to take the kids. Yet she took this one daughter. The dad is upset because "her life was already fine, but she wanted a "dream job" in the U.S." So, 1. Her asylum claim is fake, 2. The kid was never separated from the mom, and 3. Time Magazine presented it as an "evil bad Trump episode," like any GOOD FAKE NEWS OUTLET WOULD. Consider that in the future - Time Magazine used the photo not because it was real, but because it was "so powerful" and current. FAKE NEWS STRIKES AGAIN! Time Magazine is BUSTED. I will update this post with details, links, fallout, the whole 9 yards tomorrow but put this up before bed because Time Magazine bit it big time over this, and even the federal government already knows they faked it.
|
stanech:You're welcome sir. ![]()
|
Lucasbalo:What an ignoramus!!! Smh |
stanech:LIBERAL MEDIA HYPOCRISY They were JUST FINE with child separation at the border when Clinton, Bush 2, and Obama did it, but now that Trump is president, he gets the bash? YEAH RIGHT!!! They just NEVER GIVE UP. Child separation policy is not a Trump policy It was Bill Clinton that started it, this has been going on for a long time. Trump just went along with "established policy". So if they try to burn him with the question "Where did all the girls and babies go", it will be difficult to nail Trump for it without explaining all the other years it was in place. So two decades of this crap went by, you can bet the systems of child trafficking are well entrenched. One thing I noticed is it appears they have lots of trolls out there, posting comments about "why does everyone suddenly care about the children" and "The Democrats need to stop whining" and "The Republicans never cared about them before, they are hypocrites for caring now" and yada yada. Every excuse possible to diminish how people react to what is going on. And that by itself speaks volumes. I can't think of anyone with a normal brain that could look at that Wal-mart picture and think it is OK, and not be shocked that it is an improvement over what Obama ran - I can't believe anyone with a normal brain would think it is OK that it cannot be immediately answered where the girls and babies are, - people posting as if they are all upset that people "suddenly care" definitely have something to hide and come off as nothing but naked trolls that are trying to diminish the fact that they have been BUSTED. The troll reactions alone are strong evidence not everything is on the up and up, they probably really are selling off at least a fair number of the girls and babies. Into what? There is plenty to guess.
|
Eagba:You almost nailed it but your conclusion deviated from the premise: Let’s follow this through. North Korea is now and has been for decades, a CIA “project nation,” the “Hermit Kingdom” has been a “front” for covert US activities in the region as Gaddafi’s Libya was. Gaddafi hosted US “Gladio” training centers and arms depots from the late 70’s onward with rogue CIA operatives and “Irish terrorists” in fact those who ran the Gladio “stay behind” program from Libya’s “safe haven.” After 9/11, Gaddafi let the CIA take over, running torture prisons in Libya for thousands and using Libya as a waystation for Afghan drugs under the “rendition” program. Later, Gaddafi offered Libya as home for Israel’s chemical weapons program and allowed Israel to house nuclear weapons there. Eventually, Israel, according to sources at the IAEA, moved their nuclear arsenal to the Polisario separatist region of Mali. Our sources say the weapons used on 9/11 came from Mali stockpiles. North Korea, however, is quite a story. This was a Russian client state as was Cuba. When the Soviet empire crashed, this left Cuba with an agricultural economy and no patron. North Korea was far worse, totally vulnerable, starvation, few trade partners other than Israel and South Africa, a nation “circling the drain.” Then came the CIA. If you wondered why Mike Pompeo, as CIA director, found it so easy to fly to North Korea for secret meetings, something Trump bragged about in a Tweet, frankly Trump should have kept his mouth shut. The CIA and other agencies have gone in and out of North Korea for years, a safe haven for projects of all kinds that could exist nowhere else on earth. North Korea, with no surveillance, no spies, no media, is a dream come true, placed in the middle of Asia’s trade routes, overseeing Japan, China and Asian Russian ports. What we do know is that North Korea’s economy totally crashed 27 years ago. They were no longer able to buy fertilizer from Ukraine, urea carbide 47% and ammonium nitrate, without which their depleted soil puts out “nothing.” The corporate world came to North Korea’s rescue as they did with Cuba. In Cuba, the drug mobs and Bain Capital propped up the economy, laundering the world’s drug cash through the Cuba/Cayman Islands/Mexico triad. For North Korea, it is something far more sinister with security briefings for a very few and those “read in” leaving astonished or skeptical. Is “X Files” playing out in North Korea or is it something worse? What we do know, is that North Korea, like Osama bin Laden, is a “branded boondoggle” for “cardboard Lotharios.” Bin Laden had been dead since 2001 when he was “re-killed” just before totally unreliable, meaning “honest” General Petraeus took over the CIA. If Petraeus had taken credit for “re-killing” bin Laden, he might be president. Oh. Wait, he isn’t a mobster, slowpoke and Israeli shill, so he had to be destroyed. If only he were here now, ready to enter the oval office, how many would choose him over Hillary or “light loafer’ed Donald?” What we do know is that “burning down” North Korea as a secret CIA asset is a move of desperation by those who run Trump. North Korea was invaluable, whatever the reason. South Korea had just jailed their US controlled mobster president, the last of the Yakusa “Park” family, that pushed Korea to a civil war in the late 1940’s, culminating in what we call the “Korean War,” which was, in reality, a civil uprising against US occupation of South Korea on behalf of former Japanese collaborators. 300,000 South Koreans were killed by the US backed dictatorship between 1946 and 1950, before war “broke out.” Korea was the real “Vietnam” and every word we were told of it is a lie, just like today. Two years ago, North Korea couldn’t get a missile over Japan without it blowing up. Then, all of a sudden, they have ICBM’s with up to 11,000km (this is classified) range. With not quite enough cash to design a really good 9mm pistol, North Korea built a hydrogen bomb and modern ICBM assembly facility with the requisite industrial base, an end cost over a 2 year period of nearly $800 billion dollars, all done on a budget of $25 million a year. You gotta respect that kind of math. These missiles have advanced engines, best in the world, fuel systems and guidance, not “best” but pretty darn good, and they are build in a country that doesn’t have the industrial base to produce, now wait for it, any of the components for building modern ICBMs. Even Iran, and they have engineering that rival’s Israel and the US, can’t build things like this, but North Korea, in 18 months, suddenly became capable of putting a man on the moon. Here’s where the lies start. The CIA claims North Korea has a GNP of $40 billion. This is insane. Other skewed estimates go as far as $20 billion. More realistic estimates are around $8-10 billion. The GNP of the US is around $20 trillion, slightly smaller than China and double that of India. Russia’s real GNP is around $2 trillion, about the same as Britain. The point? The entire GNP of North Korea would not finance a nuclear and missile program if every cent in the entire nation was spent on these projects. Typically, 2 percent of GNP is “sustainable” for a highly militarized and efficient economy. The US spends 3.36 percent, which is entirely “borrowed” cash. This means, at the highest estimate, the military budget of North Korea could be $200 million with around $25 million to finance a missile and nuclear weapons program. Here is what we knew a decade ago: North Korea’s first nuclear weapon had been built in South Africa. Between 1975 and 1990, South Africa built 10 nukes, testing the first one in September 1979. They ended their program in negotiations with Britain run by Dr. David Kelly (murdered by MI 6 as told in TV show “Deep State”) and a young David Cameron, later to be Prime Minister. The US got 6 of the nukes to disassemble, Britain got 3. One of them exploded in North Korea in 2006, according to VELA, Katanga uranium, Pelandaba processing, 80 millisecond “double-flash.” Their next nuke as a used American plutonium “pit,” largely PU 240 “decayed” set on a thousand or more tons of ammonium nitrate fertilizer. It “signaled” a “fizzle.” Now, North Korea is to be our friends, unless Mike Pompeo’s mouth gets in the way. Either way, they never existed. We have 28 thousand troops in the South. How many do we have in the North? Estimates are 5,000 or more there too. Too many to bring home, too many to kill in helicopter crashes. Ah, the problems we have running a free and open democracy with so much to hide. Source: Gordon Duff https://www.veteranstoday.com/2018/05/03/intel-drop-north-korea-as-fake-as-trump/ |
aiir2303:The Skripal poisoning case has always been pretty ludicrous, an old man and his daughter, total non-entities, poisoned with a military grade nerve agent happen to survive and recover. Not likely, nerve agents kill in seconds, and the Russians had no interest in poisoning an old spy who had served his time in prison a long time ago. Now we have the first concrete proof that the whole sorry narrative is a fraud perpetrated by the British. BZ is a nasty substance developed by the British and Americans, it was tested in Angola and other places, it is a hallucinogen that decapacitates, it is not a fatal nerve agent. Today the OPCW begin their investigation in Douma, where we are sure they will find no evidence of Assad having gassed anyone. We should not be surprised if the OPCW investigation in Douma torpedos the ‘Assad the gassing monster’ narrative, just as the Swiss lab tests have sunk the Skripal fairytale. Furthermore, we would not be surprised if the OPCW findings are ignored and disputed by the US, lest they interfere in the plans for war that appear to be rolling inexorably forward. Lavrov: Swiss lab says ‘BZ toxin’ used in Salisbury, not produced in Russia, was in US & UK service The substance used on Sergei Skripal was an agent called BZ, according to Swiss state Spiez lab, the Russian foreign minister said. The toxin was never produced in Russia, but was in service in the US, UK, and other NATO states. Sergei Skripal, a former Russian double agent, and his daughter Yulia were poisoned with an incapacitating toxin known as 3-Quinuclidinyl benzilate or BZ, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said, citing the results of the examination conducted by a Swiss chemical lab that worked with the samples that London handed over to the Organisation for the Prohibition of the Chemical Weapons (OPCW). The Swiss center sent the results to the OPCW. However, the UN chemical watchdog limited itself only to confirming the formula of the substance used to poison the Skripals in its final report without mentioning anything about the other facts presented in the Swiss document, the Russian foreign minister added. He went on to say that Moscow would ask the OPCW about its decision to not include any other information provided by the Swiss in its report. The Swiss center mentioned by Lavrov is the Spiez Laboratory controlled by the Swiss Federal Office for Civil Protection and ultimately by the country’s defense minister. The lab is also an internationally recognized center of excellence in the field of the nuclear, biological, and chemical protection and is one of the five centers permanently authorized by the OPCW. The Russian foreign minister said that London refused to answer dozens of “very specific” questions asked by Moscow about the Salisbury case, as well as to provide any substantial evidence that could shed light on the incident. Instead, the UK accused Russia of failing to answer its own questions, he said, adding that, in fact, London did not ask any questions but wanted Moscow to admit that it was responsible for the delivery of the chemical agent to the UK. The scandal erupted in early March, when former double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia were found in critical condition in the town of Salisbury. Top UK officials almost immediately pinned the blame on Russia. Moscow believes that the entire Skripal case lacks transparency and that the UK is in fact not interested in an independent inquiry. “We get the impression that the British government is deliberately pursuing the policy of destroying all possible evidence, classifying all remaining materials and making a transparent investigation impossible,” the Russian ambassador to the UK, Alexander Yakovenko, said during a press conference on Friday. |
Zoharariel:The Perfumed Princes of the Pentagon are in soup, if there's any justice in the world. The Russians are very good at counting; and everyone knows, including the US coalition, that the Moscow has the technical ability to track every launch from beginning to end. On the flip side, I am still a little shocked at this morning’s Pentagon report that “no missiles were intercepted” This claim is beyond shocking. Maybe what is left of the downed missiles can be collected and shipped to the US to be put on display for a day on the street outside the UN so Nikki Haley can see them on the way in to work. Or maybe they could be put on the Pentagon lawn for a day… Reuters quoted an unnamed Syrian official as saying that the targeted sites had earlier been evacuated upon Russia’s warning. “We have absorbed the strike,” he said. “We had an early warning of the strike from the Russians … and all military bases were evacuated a few days ago.” So we are left with US’ silly claim that it destroyed the Syrian chemical weapons program, which Syria did not have and does not need, with the result being that the Pentagon opened the door for Russia moving S-300s into Syria, with virtual US permission, as it claims the Syrians have zero air defense. Dear Pentagon, who shot down the Israeli plane, then? Please riddle me that. And last, the OPCW announced it will continue its work of trying to verify if there was a chemical attack and where it was posed as happening. The Pentagon has already hinted as to how it would spin a “no evidence exists” finding. It said that “after all this time any evidence could have dissipated”. It should have talked to the Ghouta hospital medical people first and remembered the OPCW, as they are skilled in picking up trace elements. I had a mass spectograph in my prep school chemistry lab back in 1966. The lame Pentagon attempt also showed its ignoring the video evidence and the testimony of the medics who treated the smoke-and-dust inhalation victims from a bombing that night. This is the usual pattern of the US spin machine, where it simply treats all evidence that conflicts with its version as though it does not exist. This would not be possible without the assistance of the US media in not asking the right questions like we do here at VT. Maybe that is because they do not want to be banned from Fakebook Russian radar and air defense systems in the bases of Hameimim and Tartus were used to detect the American and British missiles and follow their course from the moment of launch of aircraft and warships and British warplanes Tornado above the average and from US aircraft F15 , F16 and strategic bombers B1-B from above the base Altnp occupied by US forces on Syrian territory (which I demanded the bombing started immediately after the start of the aggression on us with land-to-ground missiles) and Tomahawk missiles from warships in the Red Sea Labon & Montarie. (French aircraft did not participate in the aggression) The strikes were directed at the military airports, the scientific center and the manufacturing sites. According to the data, there are no casualties between civilians and military personnel. 103 rockets were fired at these Tomahawk and JB 38 sites and British warplanes fired eight SCALP & JEI The Syrian air defenses dropped 71 missiles and used the following systems to drop them: S-125, S-200, Bock, Kfadrat, Usa Russian Federation has recently helped the Syrian Arab Republic rebuild its air defense systems, which have largely destroyed the Takfiri terror and at the urging of our Western partners, we have asked Syria to provide it with S-300 air defense systems. But today, we will reconsider this issue not only with regard to To supply Syria with this system, but to provide other countries (sleep, our strategic allies) …….. Four rockets were fired at the international airport, all of which were dropped. Twelve rockets were fired at Al-Dameer Airport, all of which were dropped. 18 rockets were fired at Bli airport and all were dropped. Twelve rockets were fired at al-Shaerat airport. 9 rockets were fired at the unmanned Mezze airport, 5 of which were dropped. 16 rockets were fired at Homs, 13 of which were dropped. There were no significant losses to these two aircraft and were limited to material. 30 missiles were fired at the residential areas of Barzeh and Jirmana on facilities that the aggression states claimed had research centers and chemical weapons production plants. Seven of these rockets were dropped and the targeted places of equipment and persons were vacated for a long time. We confirm that there are no weapons centers or factories. No rockets were fired into the Russian air defenses at the Hameimim and Tartous … Our base was established in Hameim and Tartous in the state of alert and war and our warplane is flying in the Syrian airspace. The Russian Ministry of Defense believes that this British-American aggression, which coincided with the arrival of the experts of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons to verify what happened in Duma, aims to disrupt the work of this committee and prevent it from uncovering the truth. On the other hand, it is a response to the successes achieved by the Syrian Arab Army in eradicating savage Tkfiri terrorism The armed man supported by these two countries … The general situation in Damascus is calm and you can be sure through our screens that convey the picture directly from there. |
tellmemore15:Let America be the "victor" in Syria if it stops the conflict. America got it's tech handed to it in an old oil pan from bob's garage, there are endless videos of America's missiles being shot down and everyone knows it, yet the Pentagon is claiming complete success. FACT: Pentagon propaganda won't fool Russia, intact targets are the proof and Syria is off the hook largely unscathed. At this point the best thing to do is let the Pentagon be the "five year old that beat uncle at chess" and forget it. For the first time America attacked a nation that was actually able to bring a gun to the fight There are claims that Russia was hitting nothing because all the missiles they fired went too high for cruise missiles that "fly 100 feet off the ground". But the missiles were dropped from aircraft this time around, and approached from above, which means the videos everyone saw with high air bursts were consistent with actual shoot downs. Syria had no trouble with posting pictures of a university research facility that got hit, why are there no photos of anything else? That's your answer in a hand basket. |
o42austino:Let America be the "victor" in Syria if it stops the conflict. America got it's tech handed to it in an old oil pan from bob's garage, there are endless videos of America's missiles being shot down and everyone knows it, yet the Pentagon is claiming complete success. FACT: Pentagon propaganda won't fool Russia, intact targets are the proof and Syria is off the hook largely unscathed. At this point the best thing to do is let the Pentagon be the "five year old that beat uncle at chess" and forget it. For the first time America attacked a nation that was actually able to bring a gun to the fight There are claims that Russia was hitting nothing because all the missiles they fired went too high for cruise missiles that "fly 100 feet off the ground". But the missiles were dropped from aircraft this time around, and approached from above, which means the videos everyone saw with high air bursts were consistent with actual shoot downs. Syria had no trouble with posting pictures of a university research facility that got hit, why are there no photos of anything else? That's your answer in a hand basket. |
bennyann:Let America be the "victor" in Syria if it stops the conflict. America got it's tech handed to it in an old oil pan from bob's garage, there are endless videos of America's missiles being shot down and everyone knows it, yet the Pentagon is claiming complete success. FACT: Pentagon propaganda won't fool Russia, intact targets are the proof and Syria is off the hook largely unscathed. At this point the best thing to do is let the Pentagon be the "five year old that beat uncle at chess" and forget it. For the first time America attacked a nation that was actually able to bring a gun to the fight There are claims that Russia was hitting nothing because all the missiles they fired went too high for cruise missiles that "fly 100 feet off the ground". But the missiles were dropped from aircraft this time around, and approached from above, which means the videos everyone saw with high air bursts were consistent with actual shoot downs. Syria had no trouble with posting pictures of a university research facility that got hit, why are there no photos of anything else? That's your answer in a hand basket. |
malele:My initial conclusion last night, based on social media, was (mostly) correct The only mistake is I thought S-400 missiles were used. Instead, S-200 and less expensive missiles were used. There is a false claim that only 12 cruise missiles were hit. In fact, 12 cruise missiles were shot down defending ONE base, which equaled 100 percent of what was fired at it. Sub sonic cruise missiles are obviously useless against Russia's missiles. I am going to stick with my assessment that something big was going to happen that caused the U.S. to stop the attack. All the cruise missiles could report their status to the launch site, and the U.S. was sitting there watching them vanish before they reached their targets. "reporting back" was early 90's tech, that the cruise missiles had even then. So it would have been ominous to watch them vanish, And then suddenly, Russian planes were in the air, preparing to attack. That did happen, regardless of whatever any claims are. And within 20 minutes (before they reached their targets) it was suddenly announced that the attack which was supposed to last for days was suddenly over, after only about an hour. Something big happened, and no one is saying what. My guess is that Russia made the right threat. Here is the next day report from RT: "The majority of rockets fired in Syria by the UK, US, and France were intercepted by Syrian air defense systems, the Russian Defense Ministry said. Russian air defense units were not involved in repelling the attack. The warplanes and vessels of the US and its allies launched over 100 cruise missiles and air-surface missiles on Syrian civil and military facilities, the ministry stated. The strikes were conducted by two US ships stationed in the Red Sea, with tactical air support from the Mediterranean and Rockwell B-1 Lancer bombers from Al-Tanf coalition airbase in Syria's Homs province, according to the statement. Syrian Al-Dumayr Military Airport, located 40 km north-east from Damascus, was attacked by 12 cruise missiles, the Russian MoD confirmed, adding that all missiles were intercepted by Syrian air defense systems. To repel the attack, Damascus deployed Soviet-made surface-to-air missile systems, including S-125 (NATO reporting name: SA-3 Goa), S-200 (SA-5 Gammon), 2K12 Kub (SA-6 Gainful) and Buk. Russia did not deploy its air defense systems located in Syria to intercept the American, British, and French missiles. Earlier, the ministry issued a statement saying that none of the missiles launched by the US and its allies reached the Russian air defense zones that shield facilities in the port city of Tartus and Khmeimim Air Base. MY SALIENT COMMENT THAT I HAVE MADE BEFORE: Gee, if all those trillions did not go missing from the Pentagon on 911, trillions of dollars, which were hit by that "plane" that impacted right where the records were kept maybe old Russian tech would not have had such a high kill rate against American missiles, which would have been a LOT BETTER if those trillions stayed in the budget! The U.S. military can talk all it wants about blowing destroyed or totally weak nations away, and talk all about how great it is and how invincible it is, but if Russian tech even hit half the incoming missiles the U.S. military had better start thinking twice, and all the war hawks had better figure out where all that money went! Syria hit 70 plus percent of America's "nice, new, "smart" missiles with 15+ years outdated Russian crap! Syria did not even use anything "good, " and it was Syria, not Russia, that repelled the attack. That dear folks equals DOOM. You can't win if a relatively small economy nation who bought old Russian toys was able to repel you with no help from Russia, and partied the next day! The bottom line is that unlike the gulf war, where America had real superiority, this time around America went against technology that happened to be "enough". All it takes is "enough", it really does not matter if your missiles have 128 bit tech when 16 bit is "enough". The game has changed. It appears Russia was going to attack, and the U.S. was threatened into stopping the attack This is probably the case. When this started, it was "going to be sustained, lasting days". Then a large number of Russian planes took off, and suddenly America stopped attacking after only about an hour. Here's what that adds up to: A threat was made that a 7000 MPH hypersonic missile was going to go into the center of the U.S. fleet with a megaton warhead. This is pure speculation, but think about it - How do you go from "we are going to attack in waves, for days" to "an hour into the battle let's call it quits"? And it is now confirmed that the Russian missile systems knocked out virtually ALL American cruise missiles, resulting in a totally failed missile attack. A few planes dropped bombs and then went home, with nothing returning. I think America quit because: 1. Russian defenses worked perfect, and America was watching it's missiles go POOF on computer screens before they reached their targets, and 2. Russian war planes took off after the air defenses were very well proven, with confirmed destruction of practically all cruise missiles. That alone would not stop an American attack, but if any planes were carrying nukes it sure would, if it was proven Russian air defenses would escort those planes to their targets unscathed. The big proof: the "days long attack" lasted about an hour. SOMETHING HAPPENED. |
Dannyset:the way they want it, NOT! My initial conclusion last night, based on social media, was (mostly) correct The only mistake is I thought S-400 missiles were used. Instead, S-200 and less expensive missiles were used. There is a false claim that only 12 cruise missiles were hit. In fact, 12 cruise missiles were shot down defending ONE base, which equaled 100 percent of what was fired at it. Sub sonic cruise missiles are obviously useless against Russia's missiles. I am going to stick with my assessment that something big was going to happen that caused the U.S. to stop the attack. All the cruise missiles could report their status to the launch site, and the U.S. was sitting there watching them vanish before they reached their targets. "reporting back" was early 90's tech, that the cruise missiles had even then. So it would have been ominous to watch them vanish, And then suddenly, Russian planes were in the air, preparing to attack. That did happen, regardless of whatever any claims are. And within 20 minutes (before they reached their targets) it was suddenly announced that the attack which was supposed to last for days was suddenly over, after only about an hour. Something big happened, and no one is saying what. My guess is that Russia made the right threat. Here is the next day report from RT: "The majority of rockets fired in Syria by the UK, US, and France were intercepted by Syrian air defense systems, the Russian Defense Ministry said. Russian air defense units were not involved in repelling the attack. The warplanes and vessels of the US and its allies launched over 100 cruise missiles and air-surface missiles on Syrian civil and military facilities, the ministry stated. The strikes were conducted by two US ships stationed in the Red Sea, with tactical air support from the Mediterranean and Rockwell B-1 Lancer bombers from Al-Tanf coalition airbase in Syria's Homs province, according to the statement. Syrian Al-Dumayr Military Airport, located 40 km north-east from Damascus, was attacked by 12 cruise missiles, the Russian MoD confirmed, adding that all missiles were intercepted by Syrian air defense systems. To repel the attack, Damascus deployed Soviet-made surface-to-air missile systems, including S-125 (NATO reporting name: SA-3 Goa), S-200 (SA-5 Gammon), 2K12 Kub (SA-6 Gainful) and Buk. Russia did not deploy its air defense systems located in Syria to intercept the American, British, and French missiles. Earlier, the ministry issued a statement saying that none of the missiles launched by the US and its allies reached the Russian air defense zones that shield facilities in the port city of Tartus and Khmeimim Air Base. MY SALIENT COMMENT THAT I HAVE MADE BEFORE: Gee, if all those trillions did not go missing from the Pentagon on 911, trillions of dollars, which were hit by that "plane" that impacted right where the records were kept maybe old Russian tech would not have had such a high kill rate against American missiles, which would have been a LOT BETTER if those trillions stayed in the budget! The U.S. military can talk all it wants about blowing destroyed or totally weak nations away, and talk all about how great it is and how invincible it is, but if Russian tech even hit half the incoming missiles the U.S. military had better start thinking twice, and all the war hawks had better figure out where all that money went! Syria hit 70 plus percent of America's "nice, new, "smart" missiles with 15+ years outdated Russian crap! Syria did not even use anything "good, " and it was Syria, not Russia, that repelled the attack. That dear folks equals DOOM. You can't win if a relatively small economy nation who bought old Russian toys was able to repel you with no help from Russia, and partied the next day! The bottom line is that unlike the gulf war, where America had real superiority, this time around America went against technology that happened to be "enough". All it takes is "enough", it really does not matter if your missiles have 128 bit tech when 16 bit is "enough". The game has changed. It appears Russia was going to attack, and the U.S. was threatened into stopping the attack This is probably the case. When this started, it was "going to be sustained, lasting days". Then a large number of Russian planes took off, and suddenly America stopped attacking after only about an hour. Here's what that adds up to: A threat was made that a 7000 MPH hypersonic missile was going to go into the center of the U.S. fleet with a megaton warhead. This is pure speculation, but think about it - How do you go from "we are going to attack in waves, for days" to "an hour into the battle let's call it quits"? And it is now confirmed that the Russian missile systems knocked out virtually ALL American cruise missiles, resulting in a totally failed missile attack. A few planes dropped bombs and then went home, with nothing returning. I think America quit because: 1. Russian defenses worked perfect, and America was watching it's missiles go POOF on computer screens before they reached their targets, and 2. Russian war planes took off after the air defenses were very well proven, with confirmed destruction of practically all cruise missiles. That alone would not stop an American attack, but if any planes were carrying nukes it sure would, if it was proven Russian air defenses would escort those planes to their targets unscathed. The big proof: the "days long attack" lasted about an hour. SOMETHING HAPPENED. |
sdindan:False flag! ![]() |
Litmus:The question is: Did America ever put a man on the moon in the first place? Don't swallow whatever is shovelled out there, do your own research!! |
JeffreyJamez:Making such a generalised statement without proof is irresponsible. We all know it's a false statement hence cannot be supported. Those living beside telecom masts suffer and they know it! The few cash you're collecting now won't be enough to treat yourself and others around you from the irreversible afflictions definitely associated with radiation from masts/phones or in the event of its collapsing without warning! Just google mast collapses in Nigeria. A word is enough for the smart. |
[quote author=Jflex07 post=62609493]Shut up[/quote\] The truth is quite painful, eh? Not as painful as the tumours that grow all over after exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) from telecom masts transmitters in close proximity to humans and animals. Denying such a notorious fact qualifies you to be in the latter category! ![]() See: https://www.nairaland.com/2971894/telecommunications-masts-dr-bode-olajumoke |
stanech:BUSTED: STEVEN PADDOCK IS MOST LIKELY ALIVE Someone claims to have shot a clandestine video of him gambling at Hurrah's in Atlantic City New Jersy on October 6, and I gotta say, this deserves some attention. His brother slipped up on national television and said he is alive. THAT COULD BE A SLIP UP, BUT WHAT ABOUT THIS: CONTEXT: A man at the same gambling table with him noticed who he was and carefully recorded a crystal clear 18 second video of him gambling with his philipino girlfriend. "Paddock and his girlfriend" were seated side by side, across the table from him at an angle. I'd say that philipino chick next to him certainly adds some perspective. The guy shooting the video was smart about it, and at the same time got the Casino's activity schedule with a date of October 6 in the video also, to tag a known date on the video. I was skeptical about what people were posting until I finally got ahold of the video, and I have to say, this should be posted. So how deep does the rabbit hole go? YOU DECIDE I GUESS Take a look at this photo and explain it. Seriously. Explain that. I HAVE NOT MADE A SPECIFIC CLAIM PADDOCK IS ALIVE. HOWEVER, I WOULD LIKE AN EXPLANATION OF THIS, PLEASE
|
stanech: ![]()
|
hakim92:Gbam! You captured it all. BTW, Ibadan is still the largest city in West Africa, I wonder where the OP schooled ![]() |
mojeer678:USE KASPERSKY REMEMBER, IT WAS KASPERSKY THAT DISCOVERED AND DECODED STUXNET This following quote is obviously from Sorcha, but it is also absolutely correct: "On 12 May of this year, this report details, the international whistle blowing organization WikiLeaks released the latest installment in their Vault7 Series that detailed two CIA hacking tools dubbed 'AfterMidnight' and 'Assassin' that target the Microsoft Windows platform providing these US spies with total access to anyone's computer or cell phone they so choose. Upon Kaspersky Lab experts examining these CIA hacking tools, this report explains, they discovered a backdoor embedded in all Microsoft software named PsSetLoadImageNotifyRoutin that sadistically prevents antivirus software from finding computer virus malware - and that Microsoft refused to issue a security patch for with their stunningly stating: "Our engineers reviewed the information and determined this does not pose a security threat and we do not plan to address it with a security update." With Microsoft failing to protect their software from this CIA backdoor, this report continues, Kaspersky Lab created their own fix for it, this past June, which they then placed in their global anti-virus software product called Kaspersky Total Security. My comment, worth repeating again: Years ago, (2012 or so) a Norton programmer contacted me and told me that both Norton and McAfee had people permanently stationed at Microsoft, and their only job was to cooperate with Microsoft and make sure their system security products did not close any NSA / US intelligence backdoors that Microsoft put there on purpose. This is cold hard irrefutable fact, not internet rumor. So do you think I am going to listen when American intelligence tells me to avoid Kaspersky, WHICH HAS NO PEOPLE SITTING AT MICROSOFT, cooperating to make sure no holes get plugged? Also of note: This programmer made no mention of Trend Micro, so maybe Trend Micro products actually work too. REMEMBER: WITHOUT KASPERSKY WE WOULD HAVE NEVER, EVER, IN A MILLION YEARS BEEN TOLD ABOUT STUXNET. THAT BY ITSELF MEANS KASPERSKY IS NOT ONLY QUALIFIED BECAUSE THEY FOUND SUCH A BEAST, THEY ARE ALSO FAR MORE TRUSTWORTHY THAN NORTON AND MCAFEE BECAUSE THEY DID NOT KEEP IT SECRET. I'd like to thank American intelligence for confirming this even further by issuing such an accusatory statement that even Best Buy dropped Kaspersky, like newbies at a scrimmage drop a football. Best Buy is either stupid or cooperatively malicious. Remember that past report about the Geek Squad planting bugs for American intelligence? YEAH, THAT DEAL. It figures they'd cooperate and drop a security product that actually works! http://fortune.com/2017/03/12/rbi-best-buy-geek-squad/ |
mojeer678:You can get 12 great software tools (including antivirus) from Kaspersky for free now Kaspersky responded to slander from the U.S. government by releasing 12 great tools including antivirus for ABSOLUTELY FREE, and on top of that, they released their source code to prove there were no back doors that favor Russian intelligence. LETS SEE MICROSOFT DO THAT!!! People are wondering how to get to the actual Kaspersky page that is not sabotaged or crap (because all the search engines are diverting people) HERE IT IS: https://www.kaspersky.com/downloads On top are the pay products (that is what I would go for and you can try them free for a month), and all the way down at the bottom there are 12 completely free tools that appear to be great, including virus scanners, hard drive recovery and more. Have fun! |
It has been discovered that Bluetooth is wide open and even disabling it will not secure it My prefacing comment: It has now been shown that bluetooth is an open gateway into any device that has it, which allows full administrative control by default, and even if you turn off bluetooth completely it stays on and allows anyone (originally American intelligence, OBVIOUSLY, but now anyone) to access your bluetooth at will and get complete access to whatever device has it, plus all devices around it that have it. By complete access, I mean top level privileges that allow bypassing of passwords and permissions to install whatever app the attacker wants on your device, and to stream everything from the camera and all other sensors to the attacker. Obviously full file access, keylogging, EVERYTHING is part of the deal, which the NSA no doubt made happen. This vulnerability is present on all bluetooth enabled devices, and can even be used to hop from one bluetooth connection to another until the attacker finds yours, an unlimited number of hops in. It is obviously an intentionally set up vulnerability. The vulnerability is so bad it basically destroys the viability of bluetooth. See this: "Researchers disclosed a bevy of Bluetooth vulnerabilities Tuesday that threaten billions of devices from Android and Apple smartphones to millions of printers, smart TVs and IoT devices that us the short-range wireless protocol. Worse, according to researchers at IoT security firm Armis that found the attack vector, the so-called "BlueBorn" attacks can jump from one nearby Bluetooth device to another wirelessly. It estimates that there are 5.3 billion devices at risk. If exploited, the vulnerabilities could enable an attacker to take over devices, spread malware, or establish a man-in-the-middle to gain access to critical data and networks without user interaction, according to the company. The attack does not require the targeted device to be paired to the attacker's device, or even to be set on discoverable mode... since the Bluetooth process has high privileges on all operating systems, exploiting it provides virtually full control over the device." My comment: It is claimed that Google and Microsoft are already issuing patches, but I DOUBT THEY ARE MEANINGFUL. Seriously. Who would trust them? Drooling Bob? All devices from Apple, Microsoft, Google, and those running Linux are vulnerable. Even with the patch, android devices will not be fixed 55 percent of the time, and Linux devices will not be fixed 80 percent of the time. Microsoft is not saying how effective their patch is, which means they don't want this patched as far as I see it, they probably worked with Norton and MCafee on this to ensure no holes would be plugged!. A very detailed report on this: https://threatpost.com/wireless-blueborne-attacks-target-billions-of-bluetooth-devices/127921/
|
Lucasbalo:And you are a Bolsheviks supporter? Do you even understand what it is that you're cheering for? Do you? Vote Fraud Vote fraud: The minute Colorado agreed to hand over it's voter registration logs, hundreds of people in every district canceled their voter registrations. Obviously because they did not want to get caught scamming multiple votes through. Unfortunately this did not make it to the MSM, unfortunately and very unsurprisingly. ADDITIONALLY, LAST ELECTION CALIFORNIA HAD 60 PERCENT OF ALL REGISTERED VOTERS VOTE BY MAIL IN, WITH 50 PERCENT OF ALL REGISTERED VOTERS SET TO VOTE BY MAIL IN PERMANENTLY. There is no way the truth will prevail with that much fraud potential. But I doubt that you'll get it. The programming, as evident on this thread is just too strong. You've been brainwashed but that won't stop me from posting the truth. There has been speculation on the topic of voter fraud swirling over the last presidential election. Recent news of voter fraud in an overwhelming dominant Hillary-won state has many officials and voters alike scratching their heads. As it would turn out, the ACLU is suing the state of California because of the fact that they trashed upwards of 45,000 ballots on the day of the election. “Why?” you might ask Well, according to the official ACLU website, officials were throwing away vote-by-mail ballots if they weren’t sure if the handwriting didn’t match the signature on file for the voter. In other words, they are very easy to manipulate. Michael Risher, senior staff attorney at ACLU of California, had this to say: “People should not be denied their right to vote because a government official doesn’t like their penmanship, but that’s exactly what is happening in California. He went on to explain that one vote that was tossed in the trash when it was correct is too many. With that in mind, tens of thousands were thrown away in one state, during one election. The kicker here is that there is nothing in the law that specifically states that voters need to sign their ballot envelopes a special way. At the same time, officials in charge of the voting process are not obligated to tell voters that their votes are being thrown away. This is a big problem because in this case, voters never even knew that their ballots were tossed and had no chance to fix their mistake. Many people cast their vote, and they were never accounted for, one way or the other. A stunning 60 percent of California's votes in 2016 during the general election cycle were sent in by mail. Furthermore, over half of the state's voters set their status to vote-by-mail for life. This means that across the board, there is room for voter fraud if over half of all ballots can be simply tossed in the trash. The elections can be manipulated to go either way." MY COMMENT: If 60 percent are set to vote by mail in, it means that 50 percent (or so) of the vote is entirely fake. That matches the number "permanently set to vote by mail in" perfectly. I had no idea California was frauded that badly, and in reality then, California's population probably always votes against the leftists but you'd never know it. All the leftists will do is sub out the legitimate votes with their frauded mail in votes. I am convinced at this point that any blue state is a rigged state. There are probably no blue states. I'm sorry for you (in Lagbaja's voice) |
Ghana launched its first radio astronomy observatory on Thursday in an effort to widen knowledge of African skies, catalyze skills development, and attract scientists. A 32-meter wide (104-foot) radio telescope, converted from an old telecommunications dish, forms the heart of the observatory, which is in Kuntunse, about an hour from the capital Accra. Previously a mainstay of communication on and from the continent, large telecommunications dishes have been made redundant since the introduction of undersea cables down Africa’s coasts. Astronomers are eyeing these dishes with plans to turn them into radio telescopes. Ghana’s dish, donated to the government by Vodafone, is the first of a number of planned conversions. Ultimately, these dishes will form a web of telescopes, known as the African VLBI Network. With its widely spaced dishes, the network will be able to observe the skies that straddle the southern and northern hemispheres, and provide a training ground for scientists and engineers on the continent. Until the conversion of the Kuntunse telecoms dish, South Africa was the only African country with radio telescopes that linked to other countries. These telescopes connected to European networks, but there was a gaping hole in coverage over the rest of Africa. With the inclusion of the Ghanaian telescope, global radio astronomy networks will be able to see the universe in greater detail than before. “We’re able to detect activities that are happening in some patches of the sky, and link up with other facilities across the world,” said Dr Bernard Duah Asabere, manager of the new observatory. “Because of our position, we see the northern and southern hemispheres and can tell the world things [the scientific community does] does not know.” Asabere, the country’s first local astronomer, returned to Ghana from South Africa, where he studied, to manage the observatory. “Big science infrastructure projects attract scientific talent,” South Africa’s science and technology minister Naledi Pandor said ahead of the launch. “Initiatives such as this bring our talent back home. They promote brain gain.” South Africa has been the driving force behind the refurbishment of the Kuntunse telescope, and plans for the African VLBI Network. It bankrolled the conversion, which cost about R122-million ($9.2 million), through its African Renaissance and International Cooperation Fund. This move is, in part, fostered by South Africa’s own radio astronomy ambitions. South Africa and Australia will host the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) which, when completed in 2030, will be the largest radio telescope in the world. The telescope will be so sensitive that it will be able to hear faint signals from far corners of the cosmos, and answer some of humanity’s most enigmatic questions: Are we alone in the universe? What is dark matter? How are galaxies born? SKA will also include satellite stations in eight African partner countries: Botswana, Ghana, Kenya, Madagascar, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, and Zambia. Currently, these countries have limited astronomy capabilities. But that is what the African VLBI Network aims to change. Although the refurbished Ghanaian telescope will not form part of the SKA, it has been heralded as a way to develop skills in Ghana and to enable the country to contribute to global science. Talks are currently underway to convert old telecommunications dishes in Madagascar and Zambia. While South Africa has been instrumental in converting the dish, Ghana owns the telescope and is responsible for its operations and maintenance, says Anita Loots, associate director of special projects for SKA South Africa. Ghana will also direct the science undertaken on the telescope. The Ghanaian telescope aims to cut its teeth on methanol masers, which are radio emissions that can arise from a number of celestial phenomena, and pulsar research. Pulsars are stars that emit beams of radiation. The director of the Ghana Space Science and Technology Institute, Dickson Adomako, said that they were pushing to include astronomy in their university curricula to attract students to the discipline. Projects like Kuntunse will hopefully encourage them to stay home, Loots said. “We have brilliant mathematicians, nuclear physicists, engineers. They are theoretically strong, but don’t have laboratories to fiddle in,” she said. “They have an excellent theoretical background, but have never seen a soldering iron, for example.” “Projects like the SKA and African VLBI Network will be able to train young students to write a different story about Africa going forward,” she said. Source: https://qz.com/1061720/ghanas-first-radio-telescope-is-the-start-of-a-continent-wide-project-to-capture-the-complete-african-sky/?utm_source=YPL&yptr=yahoo
|
Lucasbalo:It's really pathetic reading what are clearly lamestream-media spooned rubbish that have been fully digested and regurgitated in various forms of stupidity on this thread. You guys are simply reacting to the conditioning you're being bombarded with and all the insults and abuses you pour on Trump show the gap between your own discernment of the reality and the social engineering manipulation going on. You have all shown that some are incapable of independent thinking and analysis. It's useless debating intelligently with guys with blinkers on and spouting abuse and insults in every sentence, pathetic! ![]() But why not? garbage in, garbage out! BOOM: KKK AND ANTIFA ARRIVING ON SAME BUS TO CHARLOTTESVILLE CONFIRMED At first I blew this off as unconfirmed rumor, but it is FINALLY CONFIRMED. This is being driven by forces of evil that are beyond what normal people can think about - Representative Louis Gomert, (R-TX) In the following clip from Fox News, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) talks about what happened on August 12 in Charlottesville, placing special emphasis on the fact that demonstrators for the Ku Klux Klan and Black Lives Matter arrived at the event on the same bus. He also stresses the need for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate who paid for sending all those different groups to Charlottesville, and who ordered the stand-down of the police. OBVIOUSLY YOUTUBE CENSORED THIS, SO HERE IT IS: Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video: http://vid.me/rBZbW And the mere fact it is censored on Youtube proves Youtube is part of the "forces of evil that are beyond what normal people can think about".
|
mojeer678: |
exlinklodge:
|
Abbeybailey:This is pathetic, a grown-up mouthing this drivel ![]()
|
Appleyard:Something is going on..... NOW PROVEN: LATEST DESTROYER COLLISION NOT AN ACCIDENT The latest destroyer collision has an anomaly that proves it was done on purpose. There are 3 possibilities as to how it was accomplished: 1. Possibility 1: A foreign government has a hack on GPS and the guidance systems, as well as the surveillance electronics on U.S. Navy ships, and is both confusing the GPS and rendering the surveillance systems on the American ships useless, and then directing the collisions via remote. 2. Possibility 2: The Navy is testing a cloaking system, and is allowing the collisions to happen, to prove it works. 3. (Most probable) - Traitors in the U.S. government are working with enemy foreign governments to make the collisions happen on purpose. One of the above is happening, and the photo below proves it. Notice how the damage is perfectly symmetrical. This can only happen if the American ship was completely stationary, not moving at all, and waiting for the collision to happen. This would be done by treasonous Commander Common Core, who can't do the calculus required to set the speed and heading of the ship to ensure a collision while both ships are moving. If the American ship was moving when this happened, the gash would not perfectly match the ship that hit it.
|
blackorange:Hehehehehe!!
|



