₦airaland Forum

I was going thru some trading journals of some "show-off twarts" lol at fxfactory, then i realized dat swing-traders somehow makes or basket in more profits during d week...hmm! Just a thought and i observed dey exit all positions b4 friday close or cut-down dia losing trades early, just when d market shifts and invalidates dia setup.. Demo trading is d "only safety mattress" to try-out dz acrobatic-swing moves should one be willing to try dz out lol.

OfficialP:
Sent

seen and appreciated.

Galleryeasy:
No the premium one about 250pgs, you can send your mail to people I have sent to.

pls bro, i need d 250pages book pls. Somebody shuld help with a full copy. Send to dz e-mail addr: sylviacreative234@gmail.com

charly20:
Hello,
if you could send me a mail, I'll send you the PDF.

pls bro, help a broda with the best loser wins book, my email; sylviacreative234@gmail.com thank you sir.

History shows that the cross was used centuries before Christ. For example, in the British Museum is a statue of the Assyrian king Samsi-Vul, son of Shalmaneser. Around his neck is an almost perfect Maltese cross. On an accompanying figure, that of Ashur-nasir-pal, is a similar cross.

The ancient Greek goddess Diana is pictured with a cross over her head, in much the same way the "Virgin Mary" is represented by many medieval artists. Bacchus, the Greek god of wine, is often pictured wearing a headdress adorned with crosses. Different types of crosses were used in Mexico centuries before the Spaniards arrived. The Egyptians used cross symbols in abundance, as did the Hindus.

The surprising thing is that the "Christian" use of the cross did not begin until the time of Constantine, three centuries after Christ. Archaeologists have not found any Christian use of the symbol before that time. According to one writer (W. E. Vine, Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words, article "Cross", the cross as a "Christian" symbol was taken directly from the pagans.

The New Testament does not specifically describe the instrument upon which Christ died, though Acts 5:30; 10:39; and 13:28-29 refer to it as a "tree." The Greek word xulon, translated "tree" in these verses, can mean a stick, club, tree, stake, or other wooden articles.

There is absolutely no evidence that God's true church ever used the cross symbol for any purpose. Nowhere does the Bible command its use. It surely would if God expected this of Christians.




Jesus had to be crucified for our sins. Crucifixion, not uncommon in New Testament times, was a horrible execution reserved for slaves and hardened criminals. Roman conquerors kept their subjects in line by openly exhibiting this …
More
CGG Weekly
Is the Symbol of the Cross Idolatry? (Part One)
by Mike Ford


Most of us have watched a baseball game. Chances are we have all seen a batter about to enter the batter's box make the sign of the cross. Or perhaps we are basketball fans. We have seen it there too: As certain players prepare to …
More
Bible Q & A
Was Jesus Crucified on a Cross or Stake (Matthew 27:35)?

The Romans, the ones who crucified Christ, are known to have used instruments of various shapes. Some were simply upright timbers, others had crosspieces attached either at the top or just a little below the top. The word "cross" in …
More
Commentary
The Origin of the Christian Cross
by Martin G. Collins


The most important and sacred symbol of mainstream "Christianity" (made up of Catholics, Protestants, and other Sunday-keeping churches) is the cross. It is used on Bibles and on church signs, altars, and rooftops. The floor plans …

Related
The Cross: Christian Banner or Pagan Relic?
Why Did Jesus Have to Die by Crucifixion?
Are You Bearing Your Cross?
Is the Symbol of the Cross Idolatry? (Part One)
Was Jesus Crucified on a Cross or Stake (Matthew 27:35)?
The Origin of the Christian Cross
The Woman Atop the Beast (Part 1)
Topics
Tags line....

Baccus
Constantine
Cross, Symbol of
Diana/Artemis
Pagan Religious Practices
Paganism
xulon
© Copyright 1992-2022 by Church of the Great God. All Rights Reserved.

MrCodeSolo:
av been bird watching dz fox business from a dog-eat-dog country after having traded it first-hand som few years ago. Left crypto trading to revamp my fx journey...d re-education has been fun and grumpy...paying my dues on fta via going thru some older posts... Page 1 to 110 read so far.

now on page 202. It's like listening to a fta open podcast where there is free entry and exit for everyone. No bi small ting.

av been bird watching dz fox business from a dog-eat-dog country after having traded it first-hand som few years ago. Left crypto trading to revamp my fx journey...d re-education has been fun and grumpy...paying my dues on fta via going thru some older posts... Page 1 to 110 read so far.

behold! All christians, the perfect image of God. And he looks exactly like one hollywood actor - jim caviezel. Even d actor don complain tire, still chesting "sign of d cross" people no gree hear at all.

paul of tarsus, was a former bounty hunter, executioner and jewish (judaism scholar who claimed jesus revealed himself to him? Then went ahead and started writing letters and epistles which d early church fathers used, added and combined other non-pauline epistles to create christianity...and dz very d 'origin' christology is split into two factional belief systems. One believing in the divinity of Jesus christ(that jesus is God himself and part of d holy trinity and the other faction that adopts d golden ideal of Jesus being a merely saviour and son of God, nothing more. But today, all christians from catholic, pentecostal, seventh adventis, jehovah's witness, church of mormor; i.e, jesus christ church of d latter days saint, etc., messianic jews, i.e "jesus for d jews", presbyterians, ..i have lost count already...all are different, but claiming to belong to the same body of christ? Each denomination claiming to be d right and only church 'ritualistic' way of fellowship. What a mixture of madness today.

Maynnmann:
Arius is not a “bishop”
You don’t even know what “arianism” is, why don’t you research and help yourself?
Arius rejected trinity and the nicene council termed him heresy.
Trinity is Tertulian idea.
The early church fathers didn’t interpret the scriptures, they CREATED the scriptures, look up PAULINE EPISTLES.

i m not talking about or interested in how d pauline epistles or some "controversial" non-pauline epistles are created. I m talking about the series of council meetings held over the centuaries that collectively shapen d bible into what it is today. Wetin concern me with christianity self. Who created pauline epistles or what nut is far from what one would see as the truth here. There is no direct answer that would point one to d fact dat pauline epistles were created by so so and so. Bcuz if you are to tell a christian today that d early church fathers did create d pauline epistles, he would say you are not a believer and U are speaking jargons too

Maynnmann:
Remember they were first called “Chrestian” in antioch by Agrippa.
Arianism has nothing to do with “emperor.
Arian is one of the church fathers that set up Christianity, he argued against the concept of trinity, created by tertulian.

ok, 'em exactly. But was popularized by bishop arius himself when d trinity concept started coming a thing. D christological belief system quickly swerved to a different direction and d roman emperor constantine gathered all the early church bishops to arrive at a common ground and Dz old ancient balded fart Arius was invited to the council of niceae held at d bithynia city of Nicaea; some place in modern day Turkey. Arianism may have nothing to do with d roman emperor, but d early church fathers all-together no doubt played a major role in interpreting scriptures, debating on what goes in and what nut and evenually forming a theological construction template based on biblical exegesis. I m not a "pan-taker" of a confused nuts!

contd..that's why today, you all christians may read from d same re-packaged, abrogated and stardardised book bcuz some bunch of old and acient farts debated and agreed on what to be added or removed to shapen their own imposed christological belief systems after putting everything about the scriptures to a council vote and despite; 4th century historic bishops' believable facts with proofs from same scriptural texts that formed d base collection of the very reason christian denominations (sects) existed today and more on way with separate confused belief systems. I.e; jehovah witness, presbyterians' etc. Whose doctrines are more like the true form of arianism (bishop arius' belief system) no doubt. If d body of christ is not scattered and mixed-mash, why do we today have catholicism, presbyterians, jow, mormors, protestants, seventh adventists, d white garment ppl, messianic judaism aka the "jews of jesus" churches dat go by various names, etc. all u guys do is to read from dat agreed instructional manual.

contd.. Before d reign of d roman emperor constantine there was another roman emperor Diocletian who reigned from 284-305AD, menh, dz dude hated christians like mad and was busy filling pile-full roman jails with christians, it was during d reign of emperor constantine christianity started to come alive enmass, and so was mixed-mash doctrines of various christologies were becoming so loud, like roman soldiers praying differently, arguing what to belief and not to belief; and this brought some sense of weakness to the roman empire in a broader way. After d reign of emperor constantine, other pro-arianism emperors were installed and bishop arius' christology which was a mixture of adoptionism and logos theology spreaded like wildfire. Now, my point is dat under the authority of king james in 1611, the total books translated to english was 80 books to be used in churches, etc. Until another council of "oh! No, i m losing count since i can't remember" in 1648, 14 books were removed; dz way, bringing d count to 66

contd..who is not self existent cannot therefore be the self-existent and inmutable God, bcuz d Godhead is unique, it cannot be shared or communicated. Then bishop st nicholas in an outrage left his sit and came over to punch bishop arius in the face. And called him d heretic bishop. Nicholas will in many generations to come be celebrated with a feast day that marks "punch a heretic day" Then d nicene creed was formulated that affirmed the deity and eternality of Jesus christ and defined the relationship btw d Father and the Son. Arius lost position at his church at syria and was deroped. the bible began to take shape collectively all thru each council like about what scriptural book was to be debated on and then added. There was d council of hippo (393 AD), Carthage (in 397AD), like at d council of Laodicea in 363 AD the verdict was reached and decided dat d western church (romans) and the eastern church (greeks) should use d 26 new testaments + d first 5 books (Torah) of d hebrew bible + 1 apocrypha book.

At op, you need to understand the canonization timelines of the bible, the early church fathers were at some point spreading teachings and reading also from d lost books like; d gospel of thomas, mary .m, philip, along with the hebrew bible etc, until the first council of nicea, there was already the muratorian canon in AD 200 comprising a collection of new testament scriptures. at the first council under d authority of d roman emperor constantine, that brought together the gathering of church bishops, to finally address and solve the theological disputations about d divinity of Jesus christ, etc. As debate got heated after bishop arius won his augment against bishop athanasius whose belief was dat jesus was a saviour and no creature possessed the ability or prerogative to save from sin. When it was arius turned to defend his position and share his own belief, he argued that the uniqueness of God alone is self-exitent ( not dependent for its existence on anything else) and immutable, the son, jesus who ...

advocatejare:
You can be be pre-destined and still have a freewill.

To be predestined means your fate has already been sealed, decreed, determined, appointed, or settledbeforehand it’s not your choice to decide to do whatever you like it’s like you have been programmed to follow road A, but to have freewill means you can choose what to do whatever you like. You can go through any of roads A-Z

That was what Allah claimed to have done to Adam, he programmed Adam to sin and still punished him for doing what he was programmed to do!


The emboldened words show that your Quran is full of contradictions cos the same Allah says that he has decided to fill hell with Men and Jinn. Meaning he had destined them for destruction no matter what

Allah said that if he willed he could have guided everyone but no, he wouldn’t:

“ We had so willed, We could certainly have brought every soul its true guidance: but the Word from Me will come true, “I will fill Hell with Jinns and men all together.”
-Surah 32:13


Packing everyone inside fire is the mission of Satan/Allah. There is no where Yahweh ever said that his desire is for hell to be filled with jinns and men.

Yahweh keeps emphasizing the freewill that man has to choose between good and evil and he enjoins (not force them) to choose good.

Deuteronomy 30:15
“Now listen! Today I am giving you a choice between life and death, between prosperity and disaster”

Surah Anbiya, Ayat 35 is self-explanatory enough...

Kobojunkie:
I think you are mixed up.

Man fell only after he chose disobedience not before. So, your aisha is wrong to believe this to be man's nature form his onset. He was created "good" to God's specification, this as is written in scripture, but then chose to abandon God so He could go it alone - of his own will- without God hence the fall.

lets be logical here, you said, "after he chose disobedience" now, my question to you; is'nt disobedience an act of freewill on it own?

advocatejare:
Who was Aisha quoting? Or did she receive inspiration from jinn Jibreel like her husband?

If your Allah programmed (predestined, made man without freewill to choose not to sin) then why did he punish Man for doing what he made him do?

you are mixing stuff up man! pre-destined and freewill are two different sides of a coin. Dz what i believe in , i believe that life itself is a test from Allah. Therefore, all humans must make their own decisions on which they will be judged by Allah. In reference to your above-mentioned bolded statement, if for example; had all human affairs been pre-destined and decided or "programmed" like you put it, then it seems to me that the appointment or callings of Prophets would be useless? U have freewill and so does every man on earth and the Qur'an is a testament to the fact. "Indeed we have guided him to the way, be he grateful or ungrateful." surah al-insan 76:3

all what you have just highlighted here are not far from the explanations below. In other words or in simpler terms it means "the fallen nature of man has been from the onset; designed to be inherently rebellious against God. Only God almighty is pure and no man is, was and will ever be and that's why man depend on God's divine guidiance. Aisha (peace be upon her) was no apostle paul but she knew and understood the complexity surrounding the fallen nature of man. See Rom7:15-25

If you truly explore the exact meaning revealed in the deuteronomy 32:8-9, and psalm 82. from d original masoretic text. Not your numerous bible translations as kjv originate from the latin vulgate, latin vulgate from greek septugints, etc. You won't be saying all these. For it is clear yahweh was worshipped beforehand as a lesser canaanite god. Go and read; "Yahweh in the canaanite Pantheon" and stop being an agnostic that hides under the christianity skirt.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahweh
http://www.ldsscriptureteachings.org/2018/05/03/deuteronomy-328-9-and-the-sons-of-god/
https://www.worldhistory.org/Yahweh/

@Op, which one is shalom alaikum again? I could relate to d brief rundown, we are more alike than u knw but somewhat different, since we both presently stand on separate side of d spiritual fence, hence; our journey continues but on separate paths. At 9, d christians' world engulfed me, thou was originally born a muslim. Then, christianity conversion happened, what does a 9yr old know if not only to ask questions, and getting tagged along with d christian business. At 25, after d whole essence of d christianity doctrines started to dawn on me. Then i sanked deeper, and just one day i stopped going to church, or listening to anything doctrinal related as such. For d next 10yrs, I was in d phase i called "existensial limbo".B4 returng to my predestined... No one ever asked why king Solomon; despite his gift of infinite wisdom, still showed compassion n accepted people for what they are and truly believed in. 4get abt what quantified him, love was more evolved to him than war. Afterall, Jesus ate with sinners!

Experts from d market intelligence firm, Glassnode - are saying the market may have to fall further "to fully test investor resolve, and enable the market to establish a resilient bottom." d bears are trying to flip support to resistance, CPI reports ATH hikes, incoming fomc meetings july 26th, some majors(eth, leo, sol, etc.) shifting out of their bullish symmetrical angles chart setup. We should be aware of bull traps! In the coming days, just saying...

At $papers, i have been wanting to say dz 4 long since everybody dey sing hm praises por here all thru out last year. That token still dey learn work. No clear development road map, its official site looks wacky like something designed by a 6th grade pupil. Gaming token for mouth, no be only. Dem no even enlist am por CEX, CEO no dey show hm face actively and vibrantly compare to verasity, uos, naka, tcp, etc. All i see is, some unknwn person created dat token, sold eveytin off to cash out on d market masses. Even some alrdy listed gaming tokens are still working and coding to get dia platform and engine launched let alone dz. Should it give u money in the next bull cruise, know dz today say everything about $papers naa shitcoin business. If you want to buy a shitcoin, buy $papers and pray you blow up in riches in da nearest future. Who knows?

some crypto firms insolvencies don't worry me, what troubles me is the incoming U.S Fed Reserve (fomc meeting) again on july 26-27th. Yes, they meet once in every 6wks and 8 times in a year. The outcome of d meeting may either okay or invalidate our entire bullish setup. And if i should see plenty long tails(candlesticks) with some large volumes confirmation on the 4hr TF Chart immediately and for a few days after d meeting, indicating a strong continuous demand at lower levels. Everywher don begin stew small small be dat. Buh if tins should go south? Naa to set pending buy-limit at critical points;i.e, Dot at 5, avax at 13, shiba at 0.000009, etc. (to the investors) Do you know d critical support points of the coins you are hodling on your portifolio? For it pays more to DCA at dz critical points than to DCA randomly and sporadically.

naa how bull runn wan take start? Even microstrategy still bought d dip yesterday about 480btc. Bringing its current DCA level to 30k+ ish price per btc. D crypto investment firm is now holding over 124,000 ish btc. Anyway, i still dey wait patiently for btc to drop to 17k. If it doesn't? Buh overcome, naa straight to 26k be dat o.h. Buh check d volumes, d fuds, who dey fool who? The drop or drops are near. Naa thru eth i go take know dz dream rise no go possible yet. Eth wan switch to d beacon chain proof of bla bla bla, trust me, it's going to get bumpy with technicalities,i.e bugs, performance stability and dz don dey alrdy worry investors worldwide and b4 everything to balance e go take time. Eth fit go $650! No doubt am mate. We fall and rise all over again.

i m bored waiting crypto soar, if btc no hit 17k, i no buy any coin again. Pdex, i bought as an investor at 1.86 still dey dat way or near dat amt for a month and 3wks, and counting despite btc fell off from 27k to 20k ish; dz way dragging my coin to 1.42. D idiot don go back to 1.80+ ish and hibernating dia, naa him sabi. I m back to my self-taught mode. My love for online side hustle lol, I don't like forex trading, bin dia, don dat! Buh I m keenly interested in trading synthetic indices by deriv. Back to the school of the internet of things once again. If i m successful at increasing my winning rates, after 10mnths (1mnth for intensive demo) + 9mnths for active trading by God's willingly, i shall open a thread sharing my experiences, method, withdrawals, and losses etc. May Allah spare our lives -ameen)

ibizgirl:
Scammers have taken over kucoin.
I placed a buy order on kucoin after sending the guy money, he claimed he did not see it.

He appealed. And immediately the order was cancelled.
I called him to find out immediately he cut the call and blocked me.
5 mins after I posted this here he called to say he has received the money.

hahaha, the seller wanted to move on too fast so as to free up his locked usdt ordered and initiated by u, and was impatient to await and confirm ur bank transfer. i ordered usdt from merchant lyk royal, alh masarari etc. Dz are big boy merchants. I dont press them to release usdt sharp sharp, i just go to sleep and wake up to see my usdt sent to my account. At kucoin, no merchant will defraud u dat easily, dia acct is fully vetted and regulated. D seller was new, inexperienced and was avoiding u reporting him first, so dat kucoin wont flag him off outrightly. He did it to protect his side. And was 'nt communicating with you. Poor handling

Only bear traders are bold and solid investors with strong holding hands, they embrace whatever FUD that may pop up and remain strong in their positions.
But majority of the bull traders are nothing like the bear, they are just interested in securing gains and exiting their positions with their hands holding 'FUD ish' cocktail facial mask and smiling wolfishly behind it; they are indeed the wolf of the crypto wall street.

With d crypto price crash due to rising macroeconomic concerns, that has now ushered in a new mini btc whale army today.
All it takes to be part of the "new btc whale order" is to hold at least 1btc.
As at last year, the number of wallets holding 1btc was roughly 13,437. But today,
that number has grown to 863,000 wallets and counting; thus giving rise to the new "mini btc whale army level ".
That could collectively move and disrupt d entire market since they are naturally 'bullish intended'. Just send one solid FUD missile, they will throw away their "badge honors" and caaboom! $100k is ...

It is now you will hear some financial fatCats like; scaramucci would argue that, "btc is technically Oversold."
What T.A chart is he reading from? I get the fact that this dude currently sits on mad money.
They will say things that would seem to be in your best interest to promote theirs, and if we are to factor in every crypto influential news, overall btc market volatility and price history in the last 6yrs, one would clearly see; it has all been an euphoria landmine waiting to blow up and rewrite chart history all over again.

Few weeks ago, some crypto analysts with same school of thought raised the warning alarm that bottom floor was still not in sight as btc fell and was trading below its 200-weekly moving average at [below $22.4k which it's still currently at it].
And now, if we are to look into these two case scenarios; a falling one which its floor level is not in sight and determined yet while the other scenario which is "technically oversold"? Sounds like whale-tabletalks and bulltrap to me. Journey to $17k is near.

just observing ....with keen eyes