Mustang44's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Mustang44's Profile › Mustang44's Posts
Nezan: The main tenets of Islam can be very appealing,LET ME TELL YOU, ISLAM DID NOT START MONOTHISM OR CALLING PEOPLE TO THE WORSHIP OF THE ONE TRUE GOD. THE JEWS AND CHRISTIANS STARTED THAT FOR MANY YEARS BEFORE MUHAMMAD WAS BORN AND INVENTED ISLAM. ABRAHA, MOSES, AND JESUS WERE NO MUSLIMS, THEY HAD NO BUSINESS WIT THE ISLAM MUHAMMAD INVENTED. |
Islam is a religion of peace $ the only acceptable religion before God whether anybody likes it or not.It is a pure religion given by God to Prophet Muhammad{S.A.W}.Unlikely other religion that were formed by human e.g Judaism,Budhaism,Christainity etc,Islam stood out among all.No matter how this perfect religion is being tarnished with terrorism,suicide bombing or Al-Qaeda,it will continue to grow because it's not a man-made stuff, That's why all muslims are one i.e they pray together,go for Hajj in Mecca in respective of race,colour,social background,financial status,political status be u president,governor or a common man, They come together to form the largest congregation that any other religion can never beat, Perhaps God has said it all in the Quran that He will be the one to take care of His religion which He will continu to do till the last day.No matter the conspiracy by Jews $ Christains to rubbish Islam,Allah himself will continue to defend His religion by Himself, Surely,I seek refuge from devil & his agent, Ma salamYOU HAVE BEEN SMOKING MARIJUANA OVER DOSE LATELY! IT IS OBVIOUS YOU ARE HALUCINATING. |
Suhaibu: @Viaro. Quran is not a book of history nor book of stories unlike bible where certain stories (most of them false) and erroneous genealogy of a Man, Jesus that has no genealogy (Luke 3:23-38; Matthew 1:1-17) and pornography also in the bible (Ezekiel 23:1-49) among others.DO NOT BE RIDICULLOS! HOW WAS ISLAM THE RELIGION OF JESUS? JESUS LIVED AND LEFT THIS WORLD BEFORE MUHAMMAD INVENTED ISLAM. MUSLIMS ARE VERY FUNNY PEOPLE, THE ONLY THING THEY HAVE TO SAY WHEN THEY ARE ASKED TO PROVE THAT THE QURAN IS TRUE IS TO SAY THAT THE BIBLE IS CUROPT, THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY OTHER THING TO SAY. OR THEY WILL SAY THE CURRENT BIBLE IS NOT ORIGINAL. IF YOU ASK MUSLIMS THE WEAR ABOUT OF THE ORIGINAL BIBLE THE WILL TELL YOU THE JEWS AND CHRISTIANS LOST IT. IF YOU ASK THEM HOW DID THEY KNOW, THEY WILL SAY BECAUSE MUHAMMAD SAID SO. MUSLIM, MAKE UNA STOP TO DEY HALLUCINATE ABEG! |
hayubee: D word jihad means 2 struggle. I am human am not perfect but my religion is so if a d something bad don't blame my religion blame me. U no hitler is a christian he murdered millions of ppl who is blaming christianity for that I no der ar black sheeps in every community don't judge islam by wat muslims bt by d. Glorious Quran nd authentic hadith. Obedience 2 1s parent is jihad, hajj is jihad. And so on killing innocent ppl is not jihad note datEVEN IF HITLER WAS A CHRISTIAN, DID HITLER KILL ANYBODY IN THE NAME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION? DID HITLER KILL ANYBODY SHOUTING PRAISE THE LORD THE WAY MUSLIM TERRORISTS GO ABOUT KILLING IN THE NAME OF ISLAM AND SHOUTING ALLAHU ARKBAR? HITLER WAS FIGHTING FOR HIS OWN SELFISH INTEREST NOT IN THE NAME OF CHRISTIANITY. |
abdulkayus: I can c many hypocrites here. Just cos dis happen in Kano and has some Islamic connotation wit it, every hypocrites is nw spewin his/her venom of hatred here. Imagine dem claimin dat d human right is abuse. LOL, y dont u ppl leave d gays and lesbians alone den instead of criminalizin dem. So, u will all be happy for ur son, brother, father or ur family member to sag his/her trousers and also barb useless hairstyles? Tel me abt it.ITZ BETTER TO BARB MOHAWK AND SAGG YOUR TROUSERS THAN TO LOAD YOUR CAR OR BODY WITH BOMB AND BLOW NONE MUSLIMS UP. |
Magic Bishop: Can't blame me. it's not like I wrote the koran ... it's jus rules we and including you too have to followWHAT RULES ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WE CHRISTIANS DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE THINGS IN THE YOUR QURAN. CHRISTIANS DO NOT FOLLOW THE QURAN, SO KEEP YOUR QURAN TO YOURSELVES. MUSLIMS, YOU ARE FREE TO PRACTISE SHARIA LAWS ANY TIME ANY DAY BUT DO NOT FORCE YOUR SHARIA LAWS ON NONE MUSLIMS. |
Sweetnecta: ^^^ poster must be the most ridiculous mind on nairaland, because the muslims of Muhammad [sa] agree that Islam was revived under Muhammad.STOP HALLUCINATING, ADAM AND OTHER BIBLICAL PROPHETS WERE NOT MUSLIMS. FOR THE FACT THAT MUHAMMAD WOKE UP ONE MORNING IN THE 7TH CENTURY AD AND INVENTED A RELIGION AND CALLED IT ISLAM ( SUBMISSION TO THE WILL OF ALLAH) DOES NOT MEAN THOSE BIBLICAL PROPHETS THAT FOLOWED THE COMMANDMENTS OF GOD WERE MUSLIMS. ISLAM STARTED WITH MUHAMMAD AND MUHAMMAD MADE HIMSELF THE ONLY PROPHET OF ISLAM. |
LagosShia: i believe the greatest weapons against every evil,ignorance and insult is knowledge.seek knowledge and you will be able to stop the missionary christians and their lies and slanders against islam that they have made as their perfect art and their way of life and one of the basis of their faiths.CAN YOU LIST THE LIES YOU SAID CHRISTIANS ARE SPREADING ABOUT ISLAM? MUSLIMS TELL MORE LIES ABOUT THE JEWS, CHRISTIANS, THE BIBLE. MUSLIMS EVEN GO AS FAR AS REWRITING JEWISH AND CHRISTIAN HISTORIES TO FIT ISLAM. |
Sweetnecta: the christians forgot that their bibles spoke about water that God used to save the life of son and mother Ishmael and Hagar. The water still exist; Zam Zam in Makka.THE WELL OF ZAM ZAM WAS NOT MENTIONED IN THE BIBLE. MECCA IS IN THE DESERT, A PLACE OF LITTLE WATER. ARABIANS DUG NANY WELLS FOR WATER, THE WELL OF ZAM ZAM IS ONE OF THOSE WELLS DUG BY ARABIANS. ANGEL GABRIEL AN HAGAR HAVE NO CONECTION WITH ZAM ZAM WELL BECAUSE HAGAR DID NOT GO TO ARABIA (MECCA) WHEN SHE LEFT THE HOUSE OF ABRAHAM. HAGAR WAS AN EGYPTIAN, HAGAR WAS TRYING TO GO BACK TO HER PEOPLE AND THAT WAS WHY HAGAR GOT AN EGYPTIAN WIFE FOR ISHMAEL. MUSLIMS PLEASE GET YOUR RECORDS STRAIGHT AND STOP REWRITING HISTIORY. |
Sweetnecta: before polytheism, what did the first arab practice?YOU MUSLIMS MUST STOP REWRITING HISTORY ABEG! ABRAHAM AND ISHMAEL DID NOT GO TO MECCA WHEN THEY WERE ALIVE SO HOW DID THEY BUILD THE THE KAABAH. THE KAABAH WAS BUILT BY THE PAGANS IN MECCA. MUSLIMS STOP DECEIVING YOURSELVES THAT ABRAHAM AND ISHMAEL BUILT THE KAABAH. IF ABRAHAM AND ISMAEL BUILT THE KAABAH WHY DID'NT ISAAC, JACOB OR BIBLICAL PROPHETS GO TO KAABAH TO WORSHIP? |
tbaba1234: LEGACYHOW WAS MUHAMMAD A MERCY TO THE WHOLE WORLD? IS IT BECAUSE THE QURAN SAID SO? FOR THE FACT THAT THE QURAN SAID SO DOES NOT TRUELY MEAN THAT MUHAMMAD WAS A MERCY TO THE WHOLE WORLD. AS A MATTER OF FACT MUHAMMAD WAS NOT A MERCY TO NONE MUSLIMS. MUHAMMAD WAS A MERCY TO MUSLIMS AND THOSE THAT OBEYED HIM ALONE. DID MUHAMMAD HAVE MERCY ON THE JEWS OF MEDINA THAT REJECTED HIM? ESPECIALY THE JEWISH TRIBE OF BANU QURAYZAH! DID MUHAMMAD HAVE MERCY ON THE PEOPLE THAT CRITICIZE HIM? MANY POETS WERE KILLED FOR CRITICIZING MUHAMMAD. MUSLIMS KEEP YOUR TAKKIYAH TO YOURSELVES ABEG. |
HOW WAS MUHAMMAD A MERCY TO THE WHOLE WORLD? IS IT BECAUSE THE QURAN SAID SO? FOR THE FACT THAT THE QURAN SAID SO DOES NOT TRUELY MEAN THAT MUHAMMAD WAS A MERCY TO THE WHOLE WORLD. AS A MATTER OF FACT MUHAMMAD WAS NOT A MERCY TO NONE MUSLIMS. MUHAMMAD WAS A MERCY TO MUSLIMS AND THOSE THAT OBEYED HIM ALONE. DID MUHAMMAD HAVE MERCY ON THE JEWS OF MEDINA THAT REJECTED HIM? ESPECIALY THE JEWISH TRIBE OF BANU QURAYZAH! DID MUHAMMAD HAVE MERCY ON THE PEOPLE THAT CRITICIZE HIM? MANY POETS WERE KILLED FOR CRITICIZING MUHAMMAD. MUSLIMS KEEP YOUR TAKKIYAH TO YOURSELVES ABEG. |
musakas: muslim face east to pray as follow; prophet abraham build the holy ka,aba at mecca together with his son ismail.the ka,aba is a square building any country located at the west of the ka,aba will face east to pray.(2) any country located at east of the ka,aba will face east to pray.(3) any country located at the north of the ka,aba will face east to pray.(4) any country facind the south also fce the east to pray .FIRST THINGS FIRST, ISHMAEL WAS NOT A PROPHET AND ABOVE ALL ABRAHAM AND ISHMAEL DID NOT BUILD THE KABAAH BECAUSE THEY DID NOT GO ANYWHERE CLOSE TO MECCA WHEN THEY WERE ALIVE. ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY Allah TOLD MUHAMMAD TO PRAY FACING JERUSALEM AND LATER CHANGED HIS MIND AND TOLD MUHAMMAD TO PRAY FACING MECCA? REMEMBER MUSLIMS SAY Allah IS ALL KNOWING. THE GOD OF THE BIBLE IS NOT A FICKLE GOD! |
hauwie3: Muslims face east when praying because the Kaaba is facing the east.FIRST THINGS FIRST, ISHMAEL WAS NOT A PROPHET AND ABOVE ALL ABRAHAM AND ISHMAEL DID NOT BUILD THE KABAAH BECAUSE THEY DID NOT GO ANYWHERE CLOSE TO MECCA WHEN THEY WERE ALIVE. ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY ALLAH TOLD MUHAMMAD TO PRAY FACING JERUSALEM AND LATER CHANGED HIS MIND AND TOLD MUHAMMAD TO PRAY FACING MECCA? REMEMBER MUSLIMS SAY ALLAH IS ALL KNOWING. THE GOD OF THE BIBLE IS NOT A FICKLE GOD! |
Realpoint: Thanks alot for the explaination so far brothers.A lot of points had been made for you guys on why Muslims face Kaaba not East as the initial message wrote.WHAT ARE THE REALITIES IN ISLAM THAT ARE NOT IN OTHER RELIGIONS? PLEASE NAME THEM! |
tpia@:THEIR NEW WORLD ORDER IS TO MARRY MANY WIVES AS POSIBLE AND HAVE MANY MUSLIM CHILDREN AS POSIBLE. because NOBODY IS CONVERTING TO ISLAM AND CONQUEST IS NOT AN OPTION THIS DAYS. |
mahdino: Man in general. the clot is a congeled blood at the early stage of the embryo which clings @ Ure. Wall.DO WE LOOK LIKE BABIES TO YOU? YOU CANNOT DECEIVE ANYBODY HEAR OH! WE ARE ALL TALKING ABOUT THE CREATION OF THE FIRST MAN AND YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT THE FORMATION OF A BABY IN THE WOMB. JUST ACCEPT THAT THE QURAN CONTRADICTED THE BIBLE WHEN IT SAID MAN WAS CREATED FROM A CLOT OF BLOOD AND IT SELF WHEN IT LATER SAID MAN WAS ALSO CREATED FROM DUST TOO. |
miftaudeen: as-salam alaykun,FIRST THINGS FIRST, JUSES WAS NOT A PROPHET OF MUHAMMAD'S INVENTED ISLAM. YOU MUSLIMS KEEP DECEIVING YOURSELVES THAT MUHAMMAD WAS SENT TO THE WHOLE WORD. CAN YOU MUSLIMS TELL US HOW MANY COUNTRIES MUHAMMAD WENT TO PREACH ISLAM BEFORE HE DIED? MUHAMMAD WAS ONLY IN ARABIA FIGHTING PAGANS. MUHAMMAD DID NOT LEAVE ARABIA TO OTHER COUNTRIES OF THE WORLD TO PREACH ISLAM, HOW WAS MUHAMMAD SENT TO THE WHOLE WORLD? |
Let them keep hallucinating about sharia laws in the uk! They should go back to the countries they came from and pratice sharia laws there not in the uk. whats better about sharia laws? If sharia laws were better, they do not have to tell people about it, peole will practice sharia laws without beign told. Itz funny how you want sharia laws to be imposed in the uk when christians are not allowed to practice christianity openly in muslim dominated countries. Does that make any sense to you? |
mustang44: Jihadists who overran Syria's ancient Christian town |
DAMASCUS (AFP) – Jihadists who overran Syria’s ancient Christian town of Maalula last week forced at least one person to convert to Islam at gunpoint and executed another one, residents said Tuesday. “They arrived in our town at dawn on Wednesday and shouted ‘We are from the Al-Nusra Front and have come to make lives miserable for the Crusaders,” an Islamist term for Christians, said a still frightened woman who identified herself as Marie. She spoke to AFP in Damascus, where she was attending the burial with hundreds of others of three Christians from Maalula killed in last week’s fighting, the long line of mourners led by a brass band playing dirges. “Maalula is the wound of Christ,” mourners chanted as they marched through the narrow streets of the capital’s ancient Christian quarter, their voices nearly drowned out by the rattle of automatic gunfire in honour of the dead. There was an irony in that, as the assault on Maalula came only a couple of weeks before a major feast, the Exaltation of the Cross. Maalula, around 55 kilometres (34 miles) from Damascus, is one of the most renowned Christians towns in Syria, and many of its inhabitants speak Aramaic, the language of Jesus. Home to around 5,000 people it is strategically important for rebels, who are trying to tighten their grip around the capital and already have bases south and west of Damascus. Maalula could also be used as a launching point for attacks on the highway between the capital and Homs, a key regime supply route. Clashes first erupted on Wednesday, when Al-Nusra Front fighters and other Islamists attacked an army checkpoint at one entrance to the town. The advance raised fears of attacks on churches or Christians in the town, but on Friday, the opposition Syrian National Coalition said rebels had withdrawn. On Saturday, the Observatory said rebels were fighting pro-regime militias in western Maalula, and were also clashing with Syrian troops on its outskirts. Tuesday night, the Free Syrian Army said rebels had withdrawn from Maalula to spare its people and heritage, but only on the condition that the regime kept its forces out as well. Recalling the events last Wednesday, 62- year-old Adnan Nasrallah said an explosion destroyed an archway just across from his house that leads into the town. “I saw people wearing Al-Nusra headbands who started shooting at crosses,” said Nasrallah. One of them “put a pistol to the head of my neighbour and forced him to convert to Islam by obliging him to repeat ‘there is no God but God.’” “Afterwards they joked, ‘he’s one of ours now.’” Nasrallah, who spent 42 years running a restaurant in the US state of Washington named after his hometown, said he was devastated by what happened in Maalula. “I had a great dream. I came back to my country to promote tourism. I built a guesthouse and spent $2,000 installing a windmill to provide electricity in the town. “My dream has gone up in smoke. Forty- two years of work for nothing,” he lamented. But worse, for him, was what he said was the reaction of his Muslim neighbours when the town was seized by the rebels. “Women came out on their balconies shouting with joy, and children… did the same. I discovered that our friendship was superficial.” But Nasrallah’s sister, Antoinette, refused to condemn everyone. “There are refugees from Harasta and Douma (in the suburbs of Damascus) that we have taken in, and they are spreading the poison of hatred, especially among the younger generation,” she said. The most tragic story was that of Rasha, who recounted how the jihadists had seized her fiance Atef, who belonged to the town’s militia, and brutally murdered him. “I rang his mobile phone and one of them answered,” she said. “Good morning, Rash rush,” the voice said, using her nickname. “We are from the Free Syrian Army. Do you know your fiance was a member of the shabiha (pro-regime militia) who was carrying weapons, and we have slit his throat.” The man told her Atef had been given the option of converting to Islam, but had refused. “Jesus didn’t come to save him,” he taunted. |
Davidylan, you are right! Muslims have no business in Jerusalem. If the longest history favors the Jews, then why do Muslims claim Jerusalem as theirs? Why did they build, for example, the Dome of the Rock or the al-Aqsa or "farthest" Mosque on top of the Temple Mount? Islam’s claim on Jerusalem can be questioned because of two reasons that come too late in history. Islam’s late militant claim on Jerusalem In AD 630, Muhammad led an army of about 30,000 jihadists northward to fight the Byzantines. He stopped in Tabuk, in northern Arabia today, but in the seventh century it sat in a kind of no- man’s land, where northern Arab tribes lived. He had heard a rumor that the Byzantines had assembled a massive army. But the rumor was false because they never showed up. Yet, the prophet’s northward march must have deeply impressed the northern tribes. He was able to extract agreements from them, saying, in effect, that they would be safe from aggression (read: aggression from Muhammad himself) if they paid a tax for the "privilege" of living under his "protection." It is impossible to exaggerate the influence of the Tabuk Crusade. Muhammad showed his followers how to treat peoples that Muslim armies confronted after his death (Sura 9:29). (1) The attacked region or city may fight and die; (2) they may become Muslims and pay a forced charity tax, the zakat; or (3) the Jews and Christians may keep their faith and pay a jizya tax. There was little hope for polytheists and their religious "freedom" under Islam. Muhammad died of a fever in 632. Later Muslims learned well from the example of their founder. To wit— In 634, Muslim armies stormed out of the Arabian Peninsula and began their conquests, which reached Palestine and other nearby regions soon after. In 638, Muslims conquered Jerusalem. Fifty years later, in 688, they began the construction of the Dome of the Rock. In 692, they finished the building project. After Islam took control of Jerusalem, armies have fought over it, but surprisingly, it has been Muslim armies and self-proclaimed leaders of Islam who have battled each other over the city (and Palestine) more often, so it seems, than non-Muslims. For example, Moshe Gil in A History of Palestine: 634-1099 says that the Fatimids, a North African Shi’ite dynasty named after Muhammad’s daughter since the rulers claimed descent from her, invaded Palestine in 970 and destroyed it after a century of unceasing war, especially devastating its Jewish population. The Fatimid army . . . turned toward Palestine . . . Theoretically, this was the outset of about a century of Fatimid rule in Palestine. In fact, the Fatimids were compelled to join battle with not a few of the enemies who stood in their way: the Arabs . . . the Qarmatis; a Turkish army . . . Arab tribes in Syria . . . and in the background the Byzantines were lurking . . . [A]ll in all , it was an almost unceasing war which destroyed Palestine, and especially its Jewish population, even before the Crusaders’ eventuality . (p. 336) To take other examples, in 1071, the Turks besieged Jerusalem, which surrendered in 1073. Thus, Jerusalem came under the control of the Sunnis and out from under the Shi’ite Fatimids. Next, the European Crusaders conquered Jerusalem in 1099, but then in 1187 Saladin took it back. But how strong is a militant claim? What happens when a more powerful army claims Jerusalem as the Jews did in 1967 in response to Arab aggression? A military foundation is strong only for a moment. So what are the right reasons for owning a city or land? Taking a step back to view the big picture clarifies matters. If Islam had not stormed out of the Arabian Peninsula after Muhammad’s death to wage wars of conquest, then no trouble would have emerged. But Islam is imperialistic and is bent on world domination. For a timeline of the Islamic Crusades and for explanations on why Muslims launched their Crusades in the first place and on why people converted to this late religion, go to this article . So besides following Muhammad’s warpath that culminated in the Tabuk Crusade and engaging in sheer conquest, why else do Muslims assert their ownership over Jerusalem? Islam’s late mystical claim on Jerusalem It is a fact that Muhammad never entered Jerusalem in a down-to-earth way, with boots on the ground, as it were. It is also a fact that the Quran never mentions Jerusalem once. However, according to the prolific Muslim scholar Seyyed Hossein Nasr, professor of Islamic Studies at George Washington University, Muhammad transforms Jerusalem into a holy site for Muslims primarily in three ways ("The Spiritual Significance of Jerusalem: The Islamic Vision. The Islamic Quarterly . 4 (1998): pp.233-242). First, while in Mecca the prophet used Syria (i.e. Jerusalem) as his first qiblah (prayer direction); then, after Muhammad emigrated from Mecca to Medina, Allah permitted his prophet to turn towards Mecca in prayer sixteen months after he arrived (Sura 2:144, 149-150). For Nasr, this permission therefore provides a "mystical" link between Mecca and Jerusalem. Second, while Muhammad was still living in Mecca, he reports that he took a Night Journey to a farther location in a vision, even though Jerusalem is never mentioned by name. According to MAS Abdel Haleem’s translation for Oxford University Press (2004), the two passages in the sura (or chapter), itself entitled Night Journey, read: 17:1 Glory to Him who made His servant travel by night from the sacred place of worship [Mecca] to the furthest place of worship [Jerusalem], whose surroundings We have blessed, to show him some of Our signs . . . . 17:59 . . . We send signs only to give warning. 60 Prophet, We have told you that your Lord knows all human beings. The vision We showed you was only a test for people . . . . This non-empirical revelation contains two basic ideas: First, as the context around verses 59 and 60 show, Muhammad was undergoing some persecution in Mecca; the polytheists were asking for a sign of Muhammad’s prophethood. He replies that he is only an ordinary man, so he cannot perform them. The only sign Allah gives him is a vision. Second, this revelation parallels the one in 2:144, which permits Muhammad to take over the Kabah shrine before he actually does. The two passages are mutually supportive. Sura 17:1 reads: . . . "whose surroundings We have blessed" . . . . Allah blesses the location (Jerusalem, though the Quran never says this), as He will bless Mecca a few years later. It should be noted that later tradition says that while in Jerusalem Muhammad was taken up to the seventh heaven from the Temple Mount, giving the vision extra significance for Muslims today. This is why the al-Aqsa or "farthest" Mosque has been built on top of the Jewish Temple— not near the Temple. But is a non-historical revelation that does not mention Jerusalem by name sufficient justification for building the prime symbol of Islamic imperialism on the historically Jewish holy site? So it seems that in the first and second reasons Allah grants a spiritual link to Mecca and (unnamed) Jerusalem—how much better can religious revelations become for Allah’s favorite prophet? The third factor, says Nasr, is the Muslim belief in the Second Coming of Christ to Jerusalem. Therefore the city is sacred to Muslims and to Christians— according to Nasr. But this is misleading, for Muslim theology erroneously says that Jesus will return as a leader of Muslims and break the cross to show how wrong Christians have been, in following their Lord (Bukhari here , here, and here ; and Muslim no. 289 ). Also, these hadiths say nothing about Jerusalem. Rather, traditional belief says that he is supposed to return to Damascus, as this Islamic website asserts. But let us assume, only for the sake of argument, that Nasr is correct about Jerusalem. Then his assertion still fails, for the reasons explained now. The empirical and political implications of these three non-empirical factors (the qiblah , the Night Vision, and the Second Coming) are enormous: Muslim ownership over Jerusalem. With these three factors combined, Jerusalem is now the third holiest site for Muslims and therefore a place of pilgrimage and alleged ownership. According to this dubious epistemology (a term that means the study of how we acquire our knowledge), revelation takes priority over historical facts; indeed, revelation makes or creates history. Even Nasr accepts this disembodied, ephemeral epistemology: Not all the Palestinians nor all the Arabs nor even all the over one billion two hundred million Muslims now living in the world could give Jerusalem away for no matter what amount of wealth, power, land, or any other worldly compensation. The attachment to Jerusalem is permanent and will last as long as human history itself. (p. 234) His inference makes three controversial claims. First, the words "Muslims living all over the world now living could not give Jerusalem away" assume that Jerusalem should naturally be owned by the Muslims. Could it be that Nasr is following the path or sunna of Muhammad as the prophet claimed Mecca before he actually owned it? Second, those same words assume that "Muslims living all over the world" actually worry about Jerusalem and control of it. However, more evidence of this worry needs to be offered. It is doubtful whether the millions in Indonesia or Malaysia, for example, care about not giving it away for any "amount of wealth, power, and, or any other worldly compensation." Nasr speaks for too many people. Third, Nasr brings up "human history" in the last sentence, but it is precisely this element that is missing in his three factors. Jerusalem is sacred to Muslims supposedly all over the world mainly due to non-empirical revelations that not everyone agrees on and that cannot be verified in history. And military conquest, which is embedded in history, is fleeting because another army may take over. Accordingly, Waleed El-Ansary draws this outlandish conclusion about Jerusalem: Perhaps the only ways to achieve peace in the Middle East would be for Jerusalem to be depoliticized. It should not be a political capital of either Israel or Palestine, but be given a unique status as a spiritually sovereign entity under a theocracy of the traditional representatives of the Abrahamic religions . . . . ("The Economics of Terrorism," in Islam, Fundamentalism, and the Betrayal of Tradition, ed. J.E.B Lumbard, Bloomington: World Wisdom, 2004, p. 216). However noble and lofty his conclusion may sound, it has never crossed my mind, as a Christian, that the Jews should relinquish control of Jerusalem and let a representative theocracy rule over it. Why not? |
NO SECT OF PEOPLE SHOULD REWRITE HISTORY TO SUIT THEM! PRAN IS NOT IN MECCA AND ABRAHAM, ISHMEAL, OR HAGAR DID NOT GO ANYWHERE CLOSE TO MECCA. |