₦airaland Forum

sainttwist1:
is this vl3ly or writerrng?

Vic2023:
if we no dey show you pictures of USA drone shot down by houthi,I know you no go believe, but when did USA ever says houthi have shot down 6 of their drones?

WritterNg:
⚡Images released by the French Armed Forces show the Serious Damage sustained by the Marshall Islands-Flagged and Greek-Owned Cargo Ship, M/V Laax after it was Struck yesterday in the Southern Red Sea by at least 3 Houthi Anti-Ship Ballistic Missiles.

Most of the Damage appears to have been to the Ship’s Cargo Hold, which was filled with Grain.

OkpaNsukkaisBae:
Name given by Lugard wife
Anthem written by a Briton.

Vic2023:
.

DystopianMuse:
Yes everyone should have nuke. Until it gets to the hands of no state actors and they nuke your dumb Brain out..

DystopianMuse:
Spot on. The major Achilles heel of South Korea in a war with N. Korea is Seoul. As that is the main population center and also the main CBD amongst, seat of power etc. but the S. korea have an upper hand. Especially in Air power

Alamkir:
Forget that one, most of this powerful leaders make threat like that this days, it doesn't necessarily translate to action, those threat are mostly for deterrent purposes.
NK deserve all military tech they want just as US


Don't NK have nuke, what's worse than that?

Balogunodua:
Firstly, there was no treaty between the USA and South Korea till after the war.

Vietnam war ended with a USA failure.

Until USA enact those treaty against a nuclear state...






Let them make a move that will provoke Russia and see what happens.



Until then

Alamkir:
Dude It's a subtle 'shade' not an insult, and it could have been meant for anybody but you came and claim it immediately.

BentizilL0:
It's a two way stuff, hope you also know Russia subs are station in the Pacific and can turn US into a wasteland..

You talk as if those guy will look on and allow a nuclear attack without retaliation..

Balogunodua:
Lol...tha so called nuclear umbrella is not a guarantee of survive but a deterrence in doubt and does not mean anything as long as said nation is being pounded by a nuclear state.


Now it will be left for USA to decides it fate base on home call which we all know won't buy into the idea of getting killed for someone far Asia.




Your question should be will the USA engage a nuclear state for any of the Baltic state?



Not having an offensive capability is simply their choice made by Abe for USA protection.

The question we all asking is will the USA attack the state of China for Japan in any case of engagement? This is far from simulation, but actual reality, western citizens are not ready for that.



Until this treaty are put to test, then it just a mere paper.




And in the advent of that, I guess the USA cities will be shiny with more beautiful claded glass structure right?

The USA wont just be radioactive wasteland...but it will also turn a biologically infected atmosphere.



Let go there...it has always been proven.

Balogunodua:
Nah!!! The USA so called treaties has never been used against a nuclear nation before...perhaps we will get to see how foolish a possible USA govt will be willing to sacrifice one of it cities to defend SK

I repeat defense pact is meant for weak nations not a nuclear armed state.


Remind me what year was it and what was the state of NK military asernal.



Against world power Japan will be on their own.



Technology advanced weapons will be determined by it performance on the battlefield not paper as we have seen with over hyped Abram tank

Alamkir:
Nawao.... This thread must be very addictive! Someone came to this thread to take a quick look and got hooked for months now. Now I wonder if they've quit their job (if they had one) to focus on this thread and defend the West

Balogunodua:
You implying wrong, in any war scenario between NK and SK...SK wi be on the high table of the most bleeped.



If you think US and NATO will be so stupid to attack NK because of SK then you can believe anything.

Tiopii:
if Putin couldn't pressure Xi to be more active in the Russia/Ukraine war, why do you think he would intervene in the case of NK/SK war? Xi might be vocal and against the US intervention, but I doubt they would want to intervene militarily.

In any War scenario, NK is at a disadvantage against SK.

OkpaNsukkaisBae:
So Trump was in office till 2022?

OkpaNsukkaisBae:
Such a man was also a very good friend with Trump and they related very well.

OkpaNsukkaisBae:
How is it dangerous?

Dayokunu1:
We that are in civilian rule what impact has it made? Abeg if the can develop under military regime the better for them. And by the way have u advise Saudi us ally too conduct election.

Dayokunu1:
So u agree Russian have good tech? Thought they were fighting with shovel

elvisgaga:
you are saying two things at the same time. Try to stay in one place.
How can you say the above? and still go ahead to say this
smh

Alamkir:
Why won't you love it here when we have beautiful people on this thread.
When you first came I was the first to welcome your opinion with admiration, but then you started insulting not only the person you're arguing with but calling everyone on this thread dumb.



What's the irony here? you are literally all over the place trolling. How would anyone not notice?



Tinubu doesn't stop my pay check neither does the economy affect my investment. Why dont you come and invest in Nigeria, that's if you still have anything left after paying taxes

assholemods:
The aim is to start the usual talk that Igbos are good in business. They think all these thrash will give them presidency.

Michaeltreasure:
Civilian rule? How did the former civilian rule fare? The same Blaise Campore that was a Western puppet who orchestrated the assassination of Sankara?
Look, military rule truly isn't the best, but the case of Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger and Guinea Bissau is a case of necessary evil. These countries were ruled by very wicked civilian dictators, who were serving the interests of foreigners rather than their own country.
Little wonder the people aren't complaining of the military dictatorship, they're already used to civilian dictatorship. At least, the military has shown more patriotism than the puppet civilians...

Dvdpity:
Go to hell 😅... slave...nigger.

lanre316:
I assume this is just a tip of the iceberg. Thomas Sankara invested a lot in the grassroot agriculture, amongst other great government policies and the set his nation on a good path before he was betrayed.




Let me ask: Do think it's impossible for a military ruler to deliver good governance?

WrriterNg:
⚡North Korea said its recent attempt to launch a new rocket, reportedly carrying its second military spy satellite, failed after an engine exploded midflight and crashed into the nearby water.

lanre316:
More grease to your elbow.

Follow the good steps of Thomas Sankara.

Alamkir:
At least you accepted that you are everything I wrote. Just stop deceiving yourself, you were even more active before than you are today. WriterNg might as well just hand over the thread to you. Jobless clown

Fash20:
Even though I do not like to solemnly blame the underdevelopement of Africa on colonialism, it would be incredibly wrong to also omit the effects of colonialism on Africa's failure to complete with the rest of the world in terms of development.

Did you say Japan colonised China? How?