₦airaland Forum

Beverlyjean:
Shut ur trap ....ass.hole... is it a must to comment... At least his being celebrated all over the world... Wetin ur papa achieve...other than 4kin ur mama to produce a shame of a child like u

The nigger made me cringe

He was a shameless foul mouthed ape.

Extremely unfunny .

Good riddance to bad rubbish

This vulgar nigger will not be missed

He was the joke and not his fowl mouthed crap

Alaniyiokorausa:
I want to be a Jew, thy are smart and have supernatural backing of supreme powers.

Yes they do and their powers are from Satan himself
they rejected Jesus and fell temptation to Satan's offer of material wealth

Fowler covering his tracks

We all know of Saul's conversion but fail to see how Saul did all he could to turn Christianity to Judaism by introducing Jewish rituals such as circumcision and the creation of the levite class within it.

The Pauline sect will see to the origins of priesthood in Christianity and from there the instutionalization of a spiritual individual movement .

Paul was an assh0le.

The Church and the Jews

After seeing to Jesus' murder the Jews will turn on the adherents of Jesus including the Essene sect which Jesus belonged to.

The Pharasies and Sadduces will disagree over their satanic doctrine but will unite against the Essene sect which condemned them for their satanic worship and sacrifice to Baal. Jesus so happened to be the most vocal and ferrocious critic from the Essene sect and it is from this sect of reformed Torah adherants that Christianity was derived

Not satisfied with murdering Jesus, the Jews will label every follower of Christ and of the Essene sect as both heretics and enemies of Caeser and Rome.

Rome fearing an insurgency from the docile Essene sect will clampdown hard and viscious on all followers of Christ on the behest of the Jews .

The Sanhedrin even appointed a special counsel to identify , arrest and persecute followers of Jesus. The Jew they chose was Saul who will later become known as Paul.

Perceptor:
Their story is far more connected to the fulanis than igbos.
Would you love them if your nation had been a victim?

The fulanis are direct descendants of Canaan

They share more similarities with Jews than the Igbos.

Why anybody will want to identify with Jews beats my imagination

About 20yrs ago, bitter rivals Feyenourd of Rotherdam coined the nick name "the Jews" for Ajax.

Ajax players and fans are usually greeted with hissing sss sound by their rivals in reference to leaking gas. The Nazi salute and anthem is regularly echoed by Feyonound during match day. I wondered why and it didn't take much effort to find out the root of this deregoratoury .

For centuries Jews were expelled and banned accross Europe with the exception of Amsterdam which most European Jews flocked to. King Edward expelled Jews from Britiain in the 14th century and they remained banned for 350yrs until Oliver Crommwell's sedition and treason that was financed by Amsterdam Jews

The Puritan movement led by Cromwell not only saw to the temporaral abolishment of the monarchy , regicide of King Charles I but also a brutal civil war. All thanks to Crommwell's treason financed by Jewish merchants of Amsterdam.

The zealousness of Crommwell's treason can be seen when the newly innugurated parliament sought not only to lift the ban on Jews on the kingdom but also sought to change the official language from English to Hebrew. The bill failed to pass by just 4 votes.

The dark period saw to England getting into the sordid opium trade in the far East and also slavery which Dutch Jews based in Amsterdam were heavily into.

Crommwell's treason and regicide will see to the establishment of the House of Rothschild and the endless senseless wars it has bankrolled ever since.

I believe Charles Dickson's Oliver Twist was a veil reference to Cromwell with Fagin being the corrupting Jew.

Ssssssssd

Alexandria was the intellectual center of the late Greek Empire, and its library was the greatest in the world. It was here, as Kastein says, that the Jews brought about the disintegration of Hellenic civilization. They later burned the great library, because it contained hundreds of historical references of the destructive activities of the Jews.

With Greek civilization on the decline, the Jews now began to infect Rome. From the very onset of Jewish influence in the
empire, the Romans were aware of the danger, but they seemed powerless to counteract the insidious effect of the Jews. The Roman historian Diodorus wrote, "The Jews, alone of all peoples,
utterly refuse to have dealings with any other people, and regard all men as enemies."

This was not entirely accurate. The Jews regarded all other men as a species apart from themselves, in which they seem to be
correct. They also regarded other men as ignorant beasts who could be used like cattle and slaughtered for the profit of the
Jews. The Roman scholar Williamson comments in this regard,

"The separation was not between races; it was between those who gave their allegiance to the Law of Moses and those who rejected it . . . a man of any race might be accepted (by the Jews).
The one essential was the acceptance of circumcision, for which they were held in contempt by the Romans."

Thus one finds that the Jews did not exclude anyone from their gang who could accept the barbarous Law of Moses, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. As an international underworld, the Jew needed one irrefutable sign of recognition, a physical password which would identify at once those who were with them. This identification, one on which the Jews have always insisted for this very reason, was that of circumcision. Not only did it identify those who were active Jews, but it also identified those gentiles whom the Jews had enslaved; it was the badge of Jewry.
Consequently, as the Jews rose to power in the Roman Empire, and began to possess many slaves, the first thing they did was to circumcise their gentile slaves as the badge of possession. This circumcision of the gentiles roused the Romans against them. In the year 315 A.D., Emperor Constantine issued the first edict
against the Jews, whom he described as "that disgraceful sect". This edict forbade the Jews to circumcise their gentile slaves,
and it also limited Jewish self-rule by forbidding them to punish members of their own race. Up to this time, the Jews had considered themselves above the Roman law, and held their own courts. Jews who rebelled against the rule of the Elders were severely punished. At this intrusion into their government, the
Jews turned against Constantine, and forced him to leave Rome. He went to Constantinople, where he set up the Byzantine Empire.

One of the greatest historians of ancient Rome was Tacitus. He wrote of the Jews,

"The customs of the Jews are base and abominable and owe their persistence to their depravity. Jews are extremely loyal
to one another, always ready to show compassion, but towards every other people they feel only hate and enmity. As a race, they are prone to lust; among themselves nothing is unlawful."

As Tacitus' comments show, the Romans were well aware of the nature of the Jews as a criminal and immoral group. Why
then were the Romans, a proud and ambitious people, unable to
withstand the insidious effect of the Jews? The answer, oddly enough, lies in the Roman nature. A strong race, the Romans had conquered the world, including the desert of Palestine. But Rome
had no defense against the Jews, who had formed their usual parasitic community in the heart of Rome. The Romans tried
again and again to get rid of them. Each time, the Jews came back. Rome was the center of wealth of the world. It was impossible to keep the Jews away from such wealth. Historians refer to the expulsion of the Jews by Emperor Tiberius as the "first known example of religious intolerance in international affairs". This is also the first known example of the Jewish adaptation of their favorite excuse for themselves, "religious intolerance".

The Roman historian, Valerius Maximus, wrote in 139 B.C. that the Praetor of Rome forced the Jews to go back to their homeland because they had tried to corrupt Roman morals. The Roman historian Marcus says that Emperor Trajan greeted a Jewish delegation in Rome most cordially, "having already been won over to their side by the Empress Poltina". Is not this the story of Esther once again? Like most stories about Jews, the same themes recur over and over again throughout five thousand years of recorded history.

In a papyrus found in Oxyhynchus, Egypt, a Roman named Hermaiscus is tried for treason, apparently because, like Haman
in the Persian Empire, he protested against the growing power of the Jews. The papyrus states that in his defense, Hermaiscus said to the Emperor Trajan, "It distresses me to see your cabinet and your privy council filled with Jews." Of course he was executed, having pronounced his own death sentence with this daring statement. How many other gentiles have died for like
offenses during the past centuries?

Scholars and historians have offered many reasons for the downfall of the Roman Empire. One leading theory is that "the
Fall of Rome stemmed from a gradual dissolution of old values".
This theory fails to state just who dissolved these values, but the record speaks for itself. Another theory is that the barbarians swept over Rome. True, this happened, but why? Why did the
finest army in the world lose its will to fight, and allow naked tribesmen to take Rome without a fight? It is the same story
that we find in the fall of Egypt, in the fall of Babylon, in the fall of Persia.

And here too, as in the case of the previous civilizations, we find that the parasitic community of Jews had developed a ter-
rible pathological hatred of their gentile host. In his "History of the Jews," Kastein says, page 192,

"To the Jews, Rome constituted the quintessence of all that was odious and should be swept away from off the face of the earth. They hated Rome and her device, arma et leges, with an inhuman hatred. True, Rome had leges, laws, like the Jews. But in their very resemblance lay their difference; for the Roman laws were merely the practical application of the arma, the arms ,. but without the arms, the leges were empty formulae."

In this extraordinary paragraph, Kastein admits the feeling which the Jewish parasite always feels for the gentile host, "an inhuman hatred". So terrible is this hatred that the most important thing for the Jew is to mask his feelings. Consequently, he always appears bearing an olive branch. His first word is "Shalom or Peace". It is this necessity to conceal his true feelings which leads the Jew to conduct his affairs and his meetings in
secret.

We have already seen how the Jew continues to hate the people he has destroyed. Centuries after Babylon is no more, the Jew fulminates again "the LovePeddler of Babylon". But of all nations, the Jew hated Rome the most, and even today, the favorite epithet of the Jew for his opponent is "fascist". What does the word "fascist" mean? It refers to the fasces, or rods bound together, which the Roman jurist carried to implement his punishment of the wrong-doer. It means simply the rule of law, that is, gentile law, as opposed to the bloodthirsty Jewish Law of Moses. Yet there is not a university in the world today
where the student can learn this simple and accurate definition of Fascism. The Jewish professors tell the students that a "Fascist beast" is the most terrible and evil thing that anyone can be, but they never explain it any further.

Few historians make any reference to the part played by the Jews in the fall of Rome, and even fewer give any indication of
the power which the Jews achieved in the empire. It is only in books published by the Jews themselves that one discovers
these little-known facts. And here too, one finds the facts about the assassination of Julius Caesar. How did this come about?

First of all, the Romans had made attempt after attempt to get the Jews out of Rome, but they always came back. In his
book, "Jews of Ancient Rome, " Harry J. Leon of the University of Texas says, page 3,

"The praetor Hispanus compelled the Jews, who attempted to contaminate the Romans, to go back to their own homes."


"According to Philo (Legatio 23.155), the nucleus of the Jewish community of Rome was made up chiefly of enslaved prisoners of war. Ransomed by fellow-Jews or freed by their owners, who must have found them intractable as slaves because of their
insistence on observing their dietary laws, abstaining from work on the Sabbath, and practicing their exotic religious rites ... by
the year 59 A.D. the Jews of the city were already a formidable element in Roman politics. "

The politically ambitious Julius Caesar recognized the power of the Jews, which stemmed from one incontrovertible fact —
Rome was made up of many opposing political groups and sects.
In order to win, the politician needed the support of one group which would stick by him steadfastly, and thus influence other
groups to support him. Just as in our present-day democracies, this group was the Jews. They would guarantee their support to any politician who in turn would do what they asked.

When Caesar discovered this simple truth, he sought out the Jews, and won their support. On page 8 of "Jews of Ancient
Rome", Leon says,

"The Jews in the 'Populares', the liberal-democratic or people's party, supported Caesar and he issued verdicts in their favor."

Things have not changed much in two thousand years. We still have the liberal-democratic party in every country, and
it always represents the ambition of the Jews.

With the Jews behind him, Caesar soon became the dictator of Rome and the unchallenged ruler of the world. Alarmed by his increasing subservience to the Jews, a group of loyal Senators,
led by Brutus, a former friend of Caesar's in his pre-Jewish period, resolved to assassinate him. On page 9, Leon says,

"In return for the support which he had received from the Jews, Caesar showed them his favor conspicuously, and his decrees in their behalf, which, fortunately, were recorded by Josephus, have been called the Magna Carta of the Jews. Caesar exempted them from compulsory military service, allowed them to send shipments of gold to the Temple in Jerusalem, and recognized the authority of the special Jewish courts."

Thus we find that Caesar made the Jews a privileged group who were above the laws of Rome. The traffic in gold between
nations was the cornerstone of Jewish international power two thousand years ago, just as it is today. It was carried on under the guise of being a "religious" occupation, and if we understand
that the religion of the Jews was and is gold, this was an accurate description. The Jewish Temple in Jerusalem was still the headquarters of Baal, the Golden Calf, although he was now called Jehovah. Several Roman Senators tried to ban the traffic in gold, only to be overthrown by Jewish power.

On page 10 of "Jews of AncientRome," Leon says, "For many nights after Caesar's murder, groups of Jews came to weep at
the site of his funeral pyre."

Here too, nothing has changed. We saw the Jews weeping at the funeral of Roosevelt, at the funeral of Kennedy, at the funeral of Churchill. They will always be weeping when a politician who has committed himself to the machinations of world Jewry meets his end.

Leon states that Emperor Augustus, who inherited the empire after Caesar's generals fell out among themselves, restored the special privileges of the Jews. This probably explains why he emerged stronger than the other factions which divided Rome after Caesar's death. As Jewish decay continued, the empire
rapidly weakened. After the death of Domitian in 96 A . D . , the emperors of Rome were no longer of Roman birth; henceforward, they were all foreigners.

The power of the Jews was such that no Roman politician dared to attack them. Leon quotes the speech of Cicero in Octo-
ber, 59, before a Roman jury. Cicero was defending Lucius Valerius Flaccus, a Roman aristocrat and the former governor of Asia. Flaccus had tried to enforce the ban on the Jewish shipments of gold, with the result that the Jews of Rome had him
removed from office and brought back to face a trumped-up charge of embezzlement. Cicero said,

"We come now to the libel involving the gold, the Jewish gold. This is obviously why the present case is being tried close
to the Aurelian Steps. It is because of this particular charge that you have sought out this location, Laelius (the prosecutor),
and that mob (referring to the noisy crowd of Jews whom Laelius had assembled to create a commotion at the trial). You
know how large a group they (the Jews) are, and how influential they are in politics. I will lower my voice and speak just
loudly enough for the jury to hear me; for there are plenty of individuals to stir up those Jews against me and against every
good Roman, and I don't intend to make it any easier for them to do this. Since gold was regularly exported each year in the name of the Jews from Italy and all our provinces to Jerusalem, Flaccus issued an edict forbidding its exportation from Asia. Who is there, gentlemen of the jury, who cannot sincerely commend this action? The exportation of gold had been forbidden by the Senate on many previous occasions, and most strictly of all during
my consulship. Further, that Flaccus was opposed to this barbarous Jewish superstition was proof of his strong character: that he defended the Republic by frequently denying the aggressiveness of the Jewish mobs at political gatherings was an evidence of his high sense of responsibility."

This speech of Cicero's is one of the few revelations of Jewish subversion which survived the burning of libraries. The great
consul of Rome, Cicero, had to lower his voice to avoid stirring up the Jews. A Roman aristocrat, Flaccus, was removed from office and dragged back to Rome to face a false charge. Why? Because he had tried to enforce the Roman law banning the
Jewish traffic in gold. The outcome of this trial was that Flaccus was acquitted of the charge of embezzlement, but the Senate
ban on the shipping of gold was removed. Thus the Jews won their objective, and Flaccus was lucky to escape with his life
after he had opposed them.

In the face of this power of the Jews, the Roman aristocrats were no longer able to keep order in the empire, and Rome fell
to the barbarians.

orunto27:
Be an Apostle of Christ Jesus.

And shun the Jew rat

Although ancient history tells us of desperate battles between nations and
sieges of cities which lasted for many years, when a city had a significant Jewish community, these battles did not seem to take place. No doubt the Jews did not wish to see their homes and businesses damaged by an attack.

Kastein continues on page 65, The History of the Jews,

"The Jews welcomed Cyrus with open arms." Here is another theme which is repeated throughout the history of the Jews. In every nation which falls without a struggle, the Jews rush out to welcome the invaders. Kastein tells us that Cyrus allowed the Jews to return to their own country, but many of them preferred
to remain in Babylon. Under the protection of Cyrus, the Jews were allowed to despoil the natives of Babylon, and what riches
Cyrus did not carry off to Persia became the property of the Jews. Consequently, the Jews formed a wealthy and powerful
ruling class in Babylon, and they devoted their time and money to formulating a Jewish ethic, which was written down as the Babylonian Talmud. In the English edition, published in London
in 1935 as the Soncino Talmud, Rabbi Hertz says, page XXI ,

"When we come to the Babylonian Gemara, we are dealing with what most people understand when they speak or write of
the Talmud. Its birthplace, Babylonia, was an autonomous Jewish centre for a longer period than any other land; namely, from
soon after 586 before the Christian era to the year 1040 after the Christian era — 1626 years." Note that Rabbi Hertz proudly
states that after being conquered by Cyrus, Babylonia became an autonomous, or self-governing Jewish centre! No statement
could be more revealing of the role played by the Jews in betraying the nation to Cyrus.

Not only did the Jews take over the Babylonian Empire, they also went home with Cyrus and formed large colonies in Persia.
Max Radin, in "The Jews among the Greeks and Romans," says page 61,

"The virtual autonomy of the Persian period allowed the development of a well-organized ruling class of priests, the Soferim or Scribes, men learned in the law, who had no definite priestly functions."

What Radin does not tell us is that these scribes were not priests, they were the rulers of the autonomous Jewish commun-
ity. It was Scribes of this type who met to condemn Jesus Christ to be crucified.

The influence of the Jews in the Persian Empire soon caused it to go the way of earlier civilizations. One of the shortest books of the Bible is the Book of Esther, the most Jewish of the books, and the only one in which God is not mentioned. The story of Esther gave rise to the Jews' most important religious ceremony, the Purim festival which celebrates the victory of the Jews over the gentiles, when Esther succeeded in having Haman executed.

At this time, Ahasuerus was King of Persia, and his prime minister was a conscientious, hard-working gentile named Haman. Haman had been troubled about the growing power and insolence of the Persian Jews. Thus Esther III ; 8 -9 :

"Haman said unto King Ahasuerus: There is a certain people scattered abroad and dispersed among thy people in all the pro-
vinces of thy kingdom; and their laws are diverse from those of every people; neither keep they the king's laws; therefore it is
not fit for the King's profit to suffer them. If it please the King, let it be written that they be destroyed."

This request seemed reasonable enough to King Ahasuerus, and he authorized Haman to prepare for a day in the near future when the Jewish problem could be solved. Unbeknownst to them, the king's favorite wife, Esther, was a secret Jew named Hadassah. She was the niece of a Jewish leader named Mordecai, and
he had had her smuggled into the palace to give her charms to the King, and so the Jewish harlot became Queen.

The Jews soon learned of King Ahasuerus' plan, and Mordecai hurried to the palace, where he informed Esther of the peril of
the Jews. Esther boldly went to the King, said that she was a Jewess, and dared him to carry out Hainan's request. The King
was unable to resist her charms, and he agreed to do anything she asked. Esther asked only that the gallows which Haman was building to hang Mordecai and the other Jewish conspirators should be completed, and then that the King should have Haman hung there instead.

The King agreed, and when Haman had been hung, Esther forced the King to inaugurate a reign of terror against his gentile subjects. Esther VIII:7, "Then the King Ahasuerus said unto Esther the Queen and to Mordecai, the Jew, Behold, I have given Esther the house of Haman, and him they have hanged on the
gallows, because he laid his hands upon the Jews."

The Jews made further demands, and again the King agreed, because he was unable to deny Esther anything. Esther VIII; 1 1 :

"Wherein the King granted the Jews which were in every city to gather themselves together, and to stand for their life, to de-
stroy, to slay, and to cause to perish, all the power of the people and province that would assault them, both little ones and women, and to take the spoil of them for a prey."

This verse reveals the innate bloodthirstiness of the Jews, in
their demand to be allowed to massacre women and children who had done them no harm. Hainan's action against them had been planned as a governmental program, but the Jewish counter-attack became a wild slaughter of the innocents. The massacre begins, as described in Esther VIII: 17. "And in every province, and in every city, whithersoever the King's commandment and his decree came, the Jews had joy and gladness, a feast and a
good day. And many of the people of the land became Jews; for the fear of the Jews fell upon them. "

At Esther's request, King Ahasuerus now hung all of Hainan's Ten sons, their only crime having been that Haman had been their father, and his house and goods were given to Esther's relatives. The massacres of the gentiles were carried out throughout the Persian Empire, and the bloodletting of the native leaders so weakened the nation that soon afterwards the empire was easily
conquered by Alexander the Great. Because Haman had cast the Lot, or Pur, to attack the Jews, the victorious Jews took the name of Purim, or Day of the Lot, to celebrate their victory over the gentiles. The, last verse of Esther describes their happy Jewish community; Esther X: 3, "For Mordecai the Jew was next to King Ahasuerus, and great among the Jews, and accepted of the multitude of his brethren, seeking the wealth of his people, and speaking peace to all his seed."

The civilizations of Egypt, Babylon and Persia had now fallen because of Jewish subversion. Next to bear the brunt of Jewish parasitism was Greece. In all history, no two peoples have been
more diametrically opposed than the Jews and the Greeks, and the Jews have always borne great hatred for Greek culture. The
Greeks represented the refinement of the civilized gentleman and individual, while the Jew continued to be a brutalized, earth-
bound, non-creative, unartistic and nameless member of a bandit tribe.

Ralph Marcus writes, in Great Ideas of the Jewish People, page 103,

"We know from recent architectural discoveries that the Hellenistic cities on the borders of Judea were rich in Greek architecture and art."

Greek culture extended to the edge of the wilderness, and it stopped where the Jewish bandits began.

In his History of the Jews, Kastein says, page 92,

"The Greeks had had vast experience in this world, their imagination had been fertile and they had created much . . . that,
in these circumstances, they should fall in with a people imbued with a calm and sometimes stolid and bucolic certainty where its spiritual possessions were concerned, barbarians with no sculp-
ture or breeding, necessarily tinged their contempt with impotent wrath. The inevitably logical result of this attitude on the part of the Greeks was the growth of anti-Semitism, of hatred of the Jews."

Thus Kastein attributes anti-Semitism to the Jews, but says nothing of the Jewish hatred for Greek culture. On page 88 of his
History of the Jews, he gives a more plausible reason for anti-Semitism:

"Judea paralyzed the Greek attack while the Alexandrian Jews brought about the disintegration of Hellenic civilization. "

This is the most startling admission which a Jewish historian has ever made about the destructive impact of the Jews.

Nebuchadnezzar, the mightiest ruler of the ancient world, had received many complaints about the Jewish bandits operating in Palestine that he marched
against them. The Babylonian armies pursued the Jews relentlessly into the deserts and wildernesses until they had killed or captured all of them. This took place in the year 586 B.C. As
was customary at that time, Nebuchadnezzar took the survivors
home with him as slaves. These 30,000 Jewish captives were settled in the Babylonian Empire and they were allowed to form their own settlements. The Jewish historian Gerson Cohen, writes that "Many a locality in Babylon had an exclusively Jewish population."

Within less than five decades, Babylon was no more. Despite the freedom they enjoyed, the Jews began to plot the overthrow of the empire. At that time, Cyrus, leader of the Persians, wished
to attack Babylon and seize its riches, but he knew that his army was not strong enough. Jewish emissaries came to him and declared that they were willing to open the gates for him. At first, Cyrus suspected a trap, and he is said to have put the first such Jewish messenger to death, but the Jews later convinced him that they were sincere. They asked in return that he restore to them their land in Palestine.

In the year 539 B.C., the army of Cyrus appeared before Babylon. On page 65, The History of the Jews, Kastein says,
"The conquest of Babylon was achieved without difficulty; the city fell without a fight." What a coincidence! That is exactly
what Manetho wrote about the fall of Egypt to the Hyksos invaders. There was no battle.

Many historians of the ancient world noted the Jewish phenomenon, and commented upon it, but most of these works have
since been destroyed. Among the few comments on the Jews which have survived the Jewish destruction of libraries are those of Philo and Strabo. Philo, an important historian, wrote that "Jewish communities have spread out over all the continents and Islands."

Strabo's comments upon the Jews, written in the time of the Emperor Augustus of Rome, is even more revealing. He wrote,

"There were four classes in the state of Cyrene. The first consisted of citizens, the second of farmers, the third of resident
aliens, and the fourth of Jews. This people has already made its way into every city, and it is not easy to find any place in
the habitable world which has not received this nation and in which it has not made its power felt."

Strabo's observation is probably the most illuminating comment on the Jewish problem in the ancient world. He takes care to point out that the Jews occupied a lower status than that of resident aliens — in other words, they were a group of resident aliens who were considered so dangerous that they were regarded
as a group in themselves. The Jews had already become known as the destroyers of nations, and they were allowed to exercise little or no political power, but they still managed to make their power felt, as Strabo points out. They did this through their trade in precious stones and gold, and through their international connections as bankers, and as fences for stolen goods. The lending of money was a basic enterprise of this people, because it
gave them power over spendthrift aristocrats, who could then be
used to enslave the people for Jewish purposes.

Although the Jews tended to settle in the larger cities, they were found in the most remote outposts of the empire. The Rev.
Chas. H. H. Wright, in his book "Light from Egyptian Papyri," London 1908, page 3, says,

"Not many years after the destruction of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar, a colony of Jews found their way to Assuan, the
southern frontiers of Egypt. There they acquired for themselves houses and fields. Some of them carried on traffic as money-
lenders, and one might say, even as bankers. This is proven from
the papyrus marked L, in which a regular bargain for a loan of money is duly recorded. Careful stipulations were made for interest to be paid monthly for the money so lent. Five witnesses affixed their signatures to the document. In those papyri there is mention of the House of Yahu (Jehovah), and of an altar upon
which sacrifices were daily offered."

Thus the Jews, thousands of years ago, were carrying on money-lending activities in the remote province of Assuan, and
these activities were an integral part of the economic and religious life of the Jewish community. In those days, the Jews open-
ly worshiped Baal, their God of Gold, but so vile and obscene were the orgies which they practiced before his altar that the
Jewish religion was forced to go underground because of popular
resentment. The idols of Baal were melted down, and the Jews renamed him Yahu, or Jehovah, and they concealed many of
their religious observations in his honor.

Despite the Jews' claims to having been the most important civilization of the ancient world, in fact the Jewish tribe in
Palestine was given scant notice in ancient records. On page 54, Kastein says, in The History of the Jews:

"The insignificant little state of Palestine was a vassal of Assyria and on account of its very minuteness, was left to its
own resources. All about it colossal powers had sprung up who
desired empire."

Jews in Babylon

The Jews will repeat their treachery again in Babylon where they had become assimilated after nearly 4 centuries .

The Jews had risen well from their original slave status and had become to occupy high office. A citizen warned the king of elevating Jews and with a mix of cunning , slander and sorcery, the Jew Mordechi sent his jewess daughter to seduce the king and have his trusted advicer put to death.

That jewess was Esther and till this day Jews celebrate the senseless massacre of Babylonian citizens at the hand of their own soverign king as Purim or day of the lot.

Sooner , the Jews became powerful in all of Babylon and fearing their impending ouater just as in Egypt, they will conive with the Persian King Xerxes to invade Babylon.

The Jews sent up to 3 emmisaries to Xerxes laying down their plot to have Babylon invaded . All three were beheaded as spies but still the Jews persisted until Xerxes agreed to their demands in restiring Palestine as their Homeland in return for betraying Babylon.

Xerxes met an open city and took it without any ressistance all thank to Jewish treachery and treason.

The Jewish Homeland, just like her people had nothing to offer the Great Empires of antiquity. It was strategically located in between great civilizations . Egypt to the west, Greece and Rome to the north and the Assyrian-Babylonian civilizations to the east.

Most of what we consider as Jewish theology and writtings were plagairazed from these Empires. The Ten Commandments or Decalogue were lifted from the Egyptian book of the dead. Psalms was originally from ancient Babylonian writtings and Job was from an obscure Greek tragedy. The monotheisim of Abraham was originally from ancient Zorotarism and modern day Talmudic Judaism was formulated during Jewish exile in Babylon hence the name Babylonian Talmudism. If the very essence of Jewish culture being theology was stolen then what exactly has the Jew offered the world? We know their language which they are often to boast of is nothing more than a colloquail pidgen of Egyptian, Persian, Greek, Aramic and Arabic , hence the term Yidsish meaning rubbish.

One of the great sources of Egyptology is Manetho's History of Egypt. He describes the downfall of the empire as follows:

"A people of ignoble origin from the East, who had the audacity to invade the country, which they mastered by main force, without difficulty or even a battle."

Although incredible, this happened again and again in the ancient world. How did it happen to the most powerful empire
ever known? It has already happened in Babylon. The Jews paved the way for the conquerors. These conquerors of Egypt
were the Hyksos, or Shepherd Kings, who won Egypt without a battle and maintained an iron dictatorship over the people for
511 years. Some scholars believe that the Hyksos were the Jews, because the Egyptian word amu is occasionally used to refer to the Hyksos, although in most papyri it refers to the Jews. This
confusion existed even among some of the later Egyptian historians of the Hyksos period, and it came about because the Jews, who had opened the gates of the land to the conquerors, became a favored minority during their rule. Manetho says, "The Hyksos were known as the protectors of the Jews."

During this 511 year period, the Jews were princes in Egypt, taking what they wanted from the enslaved Egyptians, and in-
curring their enmity by their vicious arrogance over the betrayed
population. At last, the native leaders of the Egyptians led a successful revolt, and expelled the Hyksos forever. Manetho
writes that after the Hyksos were driven out, the Egyptians punished the Jews for their treachery, and enslaved them for life at hard labor.

This brings us to the period of Moses, when the Jews were complaining about their hard lot in Egypt. Before they betrayed
the nation to the Hyksos, they had enjoyed every freedom in Egypt, and it was only natural that they should be punished for
their treason. Rather than endure this slavery, they petitioned the Pharaoh to let them return to Palestine, and, resume their
life of nomadic banditry. But the outraged Egyptian people demanded that they serve out their punishment, and the Pharaoh
was forced to agree. Now the Jews used every device to obtain their freedom, bringing plagues upon the Egyptian people
through the use of poisons and contaminating the water. They were finally allowed to depart from Egypt.

Although these are the facts of the Jewish sojourn in Egypt, a sordid record of treachery and destruction, these facts are
related here for the first time in English, although these sources have been known for centuries. The true origin of the Jews, and the definition of Habiru and sa-gaz as it describes the nature of
this people, have long been known to Biblical scholars. Why did they deliberately withhold all mention of the fact that throughoutt the ancient world, the Jews were known and feared as cutthroats and bandits? First of all, they believed the Jewish lie that Christ was a Jew. If they published their findings, about the origin of the Jews, they would be identifying Christ as a descendant of bloodthirsty outlaws. Obviously, this could not be true. Consequently, they omitted all references to Habiru and sa-gaz from their works. Literally thousands of scholars have withheld this vital information in the thousands of books published about
ancient history during past centuries. Now we must re-evaluate the entire history of the early civilizations in the light of what
we know about the Jews.

[s]

PoliticalWitch:
Yes, yes, and you are just like the same Jews you despise, with all you just wrote.

What even amuses me is that all you have said has been said before, by white people who look down on blacks like you and me.

Yet you want to copy them.

Anyway, go on. Be like your god Adolf. Millions paid for entertaining the same fantasies you pour out here.

It must not happen again. No more hatred on the basis or race or tribe or religion.

[/s]

Go and worship in Canaan land

Redeem fool

There is no other race on the planet that has a history of migration and expulsion more than the Jew. Expelled from 109 nations/Kingdoms, the Jew has shown with history their ignoble and uncharacteristically ingratitude. If a student has been expelled from every institutions he has ever attended do we blame the school ?

The Egyptians embraced them during a time of famine but what did the Jew do? Backstab and betray the very Egyptians that welcomed them.

We read of a lowly Joseph who after being sold by his brothers will later find Fame and fortune with Pharaoh as an interpreter of dreams. Joessph will use his new authority to help Jews migrate and settle into Egypt. The Jews will continue to prosper and be elevated into powerful positions until they dared to seek the throne themselves . The Egyptians charity and accommodation of the Jews was seen as weakness and foolishess by the Jew. Try as the may the Jews were denied the ultimate power -the throne of Egypt as they were reminded of their migrant status and the dynastical monarchy in place.

The Jew rather than accept his place and appreciate his very welcoming host will plot to bring an invading force to seize power from the very Egyptians and serve the foriegn Invaders .

PoliticalWitch:
Yes, says the guy who thinks lucifer actually has descendants on earth...( an eldritch abomination reporducing with humans is a nigh impossibility).

Okay.....

Keep hating the jews. Just as there are people who hate the blacks and call them kids of cain (you are a black man, aren't you)...so you must agree with them too.

Nigger, the Jewish Talmuld considers blacks aka Akum worse than dogs.

In their satanic moloch worshipping book they claim that blacks were created as a result of a goyim sleeping with a monkey .

Waka

[s]

PoliticalWitch:
A word of advice TO the OP

Stop blaming your problems on the Jews, or whoever.

Human beings are responsible for their own problems. The Jews , or in some isntances, the blacks, the whites, whatever, are not responsible for any problems here on planet Earth.

[/s]

By the time I finish this thread you go get sense.

Let us suppose that we could assemble one thousand gentiles
who did not like Jews, and who would be willing to state publicly that they did not like Jews. We would ask each one of them — what do you know about the Jewish religion? And each one of them would have to answer, I do not know anything about the Jewish religion.

The only thing that gentiles know about the Jewish practice of religion is that they meet in synagogues. In view of this lack of
knowledge, how could any gentile hate the Jews because of their religion? If gentiles could read the Jewish holy book, their Tal-
mud, and find out something about the Jewish religion, they would really become anti-Semitic, because this book is filled with vile names for Jesus Christ, descriptions of weird sexual rites, and
formulas for cursing the gentiles. Consequently, the Jews for centuries have had a rule that any gentile who found out the contents of the Talmud, or who possessed a copy of it, must be instantly killed.

The real reason for anti-Jewism among the gentiles is explained in the Bible, in numerous references to the Jews. Thus,
Ezekiel, 36, verses 31-32:

"Then shall you remember your own evil ways, and your doings that were not good, and shall loathe yourselves in your own sight for your iniquities, and for your abominations.

"Not for your sakes do I do this, saith the Lord God, be it Known unto you: be ashamed and confounded for your own ways, O House of Israel."

Anti-Semitism, then, throughout history has been the reaction of the gentiles to the deeds of the Jews in their midst. Who are
the Jews and what are they doing living in the midst of the gentiles? For this knowledge, we again must revert to the biological facts. The Jews are a parasitic people whose members roam the
civilized world, seeking any spot where they can settle down in the midst of an established community, and where they can remain and prosper at the expense of others.

As a parasitic people, the Jews can only survive by living on the work of others. They bring nothing with them, and they
exist by appropriating the property of their hosts. Perhaps the memories of our readers are not too short. They may remember in 1948, when, so we are told, brave Jewish pioneers went out into
the wilderness and founded the State of Israel. At least, that is the way they tell it. But, in fact, didn't the Jews invade a peaceful Arab country and, with the aid of millions of dollars' worth of arms from Jewish bankers in many countries, seize the towns and farms and businesses of a hard-working Arab nation? The very origin of the only Jewish nation in the history of the world identifies this people as a tribe of bandits.

Since the Jews bring nothing with them, how is it that the host nations allow them to remain? Why do they let the Jews
appropriate their goods, and even their lives? In reality, the Jew does bring something with him. He brings his wits, and he brings his determination to remain in the host country, in spite of all
efforts to dislodge him. Using his wits, the Jew pretends to offer something that the host people want or need. The Jew offers
trade connections with foreign lands, information about enemies or potential enemies; or he appears as a comedian or a magician offering entertainment; or he appears as an occult being, offering
new roads to heaven and guaranteed passports to paradise. If the host people needs money, he offers that, or the promise of money. In any case, if the Jew is allowed to remain, even for a short
while, he sinks his tentacles into the host people, and it is soon impossible to dislodge him.

When the host people comes to its senses, and realizes that it has allowed a dangerous parasite to enter its being, and to threaten its continued health and prosperity, does the host people pause to calmly analyze the problem? Of course not. The host People reacts biologically. Throughout nature, one can see ani-
mals and fish darting about erratically, flinging themselves into the air, and making wild gyrations. In many cases, these are hosts who are attempting to dislodge parasites.

Among humans, the host acts no less desperately and unthinkingly. The first reaction of the gentile community to the
Jew is panic. Then comes anger, and finally, violence. The panic ensues when the community discovers that it harbors a dangerous and unknown quantity, one which obviously means it no good.

THE BIOLOGICAL JEW.

We have already referred to the role of the Jew in civilization, and the presence of the Synagogue of Satan. But man, as a phil-
osophical being, as a creature of God, if you will, occupies on earth a biological body. What is the biological relationship of the gentile and the Jew? We stated, without fear of contradiction, that no writer has ever faced this Jewish problem at its source. Why is this? The answer is clear. No writer has ever been able to face the
Jewish problem honestly because of an emotional or biological reaction either for or against the Jews. Logically, there must be an explanation of the conflict between Jews and gentiles over thousands of years, and logically, a writer should be able to write about it. Nevertheless, no gentile writer has ever been able to deal with this problem. No Jewish writer has ever been able to write logically about the Jews, but this has not prevented them from writing hundreds of books on the subject.

Interestingly enough, every book written by a Jew to explain anti-Semitism comes up with the same answer — "The gentiles
don't like us because of our religion." From the beginning of time, this is the only answer that the Jews have ever been able
to offer to the problem of anti-Semitism. Is it not strange that so clever and resourceful a people, who have managed to survive for thousands of years in hostile environments, can offer so illogical an answer?

While Abraham is the known patriach of the Jews one must remember that Abraham originally from present day Iran, will settle in Canaan land.

Abraham had refused to take a wife among the Canaanites for his son Isaac but went to Aryan Land (Iran) to get a wife for his son. This was because the Canaanites were a wicked people.

In later years the sons of Jacob will intermarry with the seed of Lucifer and from there produce the Jews - a stiffed necked people prone to evil and wickedness .