₦airaland Forum

omar22: Its called obeying the law, its not that they seize the bikes willy Nilly, this is done all over the world


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNLQ86Cg1FE&feature=player_embedded

nenergy: I total understand your point of view,that's why i asked; "is situation making you vulnerable?". Anyways,her pass won't matter,only her future with me will. Dreams come true you know :-D

nenergy: This is not just a random thought because I find myself thinking about it every now and then.
I grew up fantasying that I will marry my childhood friend. You know someone I “played” mummy and daddy with. We would lose touch and fate will bring us back together and chemistry will happen. This fantasy was fuel by my desire to witness at least a minute of my future wife’s early years. The idea of meeting a total stranger and having them “tell” me about their past scares me. What if they aren’t completely truthful, like the American who recently discovered that his pretty wife use to be a man.lol Anyways, boyz have become men and all my childhood friends are married or “seriously” engaged (girls mature faster than boys shey?lol), so good bye fantasy!
I am currently single and looking (not searching, because ground never level-romANCE without finANCE is nuisANCE.lol) and every day as I pass by the many gorgeous 9ja ladies I ask myself; “is that her”?
Hmmn,I know you are out there, somewhere out there. So I ask, how are doing right now?
•Is life treating you well?
•Are you eating healthy?
•Are you caring for your (my) body?
•Are you overcoming your challenges?
•Are you getting the necessary resources to power your dreams?
•Are you working at developing yourself daily?
•Are you mixing with the right people?
•Are you happy?
•Is love making you cry?
•Is situation making you vulnerable?
•Do you think of me?
•Do you pray for me?
Whatever your answers are or will be, I will surely find you. And when I do, your past will not matter; only your future with me will. My gaze will captivate you, my lips will whisper joy, my touch will heal you, my hands will hold and caress you, and my heart will love you.
Mon amour, how are you doing?

.....Every military exercise the west have been involved with, are for the same reasons anyone has ever gone to war- money, influence, power, and greed. I wish the herded masses would wake up to this obvious tactic in the form of propaganda, that is blasted through the mainstream media.

I am not sure who actually gave the order but yes, there was no way that Britain anf France would have allowed Gadaffi to live and talk. NO WAY.

AjanleKoko: Dem don comot Nnaji for setting.
Na wa. Well played

AjanleKoko: Dem don comot Nnaji for setting.
Na wa. Well played

Jarus: Good one. You read me well.
Couple of months back, I was discussing with a friend, who like me also has a soft spot for SLS. I told him I'm somehow regretting becoming too close to SLS. Now, it's difficult for me to hit him in the public.

On the currency restructuring proposal, I wasn't so convinced with the arguments for the exercise. It may not take away anything from the economy (it wont lead to inflation as widely believed), but the fact that it doesn't add much to it makes it something ill-advised to me. The coin part is especially difficult to accept. You can see I was unusually quiet in the debate. I was forced to call SLS and asked him to convince me on the exercise. He sounded optimistic and passionate about the exercise, but I still wasn't convinced, but I felt we can give him benefit of doubt. That was why I just pasted his clarifications on NL here and never made any further comment - because it was hard to defend.

That said, tens of articles have been written on this currency restructuring exercise, but I picked Dele's for response because of his reference to the sacked bank chiefs. I had wanted to reply Dele since I read an article he wrote in 2009 on the 'sacked 5', justifying the ridiculous. His reference to the same issue again actually ignited my response.

Pukkah: Dele Momodu's write-up is a good one at least from a literary perspective although most of the issues raised therein are not new. There is hardly any of it that has not been debated on this forum. Just a few days ago, I had cause to comment on Sanusi's love for controversy and attention in addition to unbridled arrogance, brashness and rudeness. Sanusi is his own enemy and many people, especially his public admirers, don't really 'know' him very well.

This is why I find it curious that 'Suraj Oyewale' is sticking out his neck all because of a controversial figure like Sanusi. My advice for you is to defend policies/issues and not be a fanatical follower of any public figure. There is more to all this that meets the eye than your pen can see. Recall that I pointed out to you on another thread to stop beating your chest that Sanusi is not interested in politics?

In trying to defend Sanusi, you went a bit too far and became guilty of what Momodu himself was guilty of - personal attacks or argumentum ad hominem. Why voluntarily and freely enmesh yourself in a fight which 'real reasons' you may not know? Why go to the extent of taking potshots at Babangida, Abacha and those 'brilliant' bankers because of Sanusi? Out there, the plot of what you are seeing is thick and the web is complex and I think you should not plunge into it except you want to dive into it because of yourself (convictions, principles, etc) and not because of anybody.

If you wish to be an activist, whether on Twitter or wherever, carve your own niche and be your own man. Unless there is also more to this, I wonder what you stand to gain by being known as Sanusi's man.

Pukkah: Dele Momodu's write-up is a good one at least from a literary perspective although most of the issues raised therein are not new. There is hardly any of it that has not been debated on this forum. Just a few days ago, I had cause to comment on Sanusi's love for controversy and attention in addition to unbridled arrogance, brashness and rudeness. Sanusi is his own enemy and many people, especially his public admirers, don't really 'know' him very well.

This is why I find it curious that 'Suraj Oyewale' is sticking out his neck all because of a controversial figure like Sanusi. My advice for you is to defend policies/issues and not be a fanatical follower of any public figure. There is more to all this that meets the eye than your pen can see. Recall that I pointed out to you on another thread to stop beating your chest that Sanusi is not interested in politics?

In trying to defend Sanusi, you went a bit too far and became guilty of what Momodu himself was guilty of - personal attacks or argumentum ad hominem. Why voluntarily and freely enmesh yourself in a fight which 'real reasons' you may not know? Why go to the extent of taking potshots at Babangida, Abacha and those 'brilliant' bankers because of Sanusi? Out there, the plot of what you are seeing is thick and the web is complex and I think you should not plunge into it except you want to dive into it because of yourself (convictions, principles, etc) and not because of anybody.

If you wish to be an activist, whether on Twitter or wherever, carve your own niche and be your own man. Unless there is also more to this, I wonder what you stand to gain by being known as Sanusi's man.

Sagamite: I feel the same way too.

Bloody fcking BLACK baboon moorons of the Federal Banana Republic of Nigeria.

Utter cretins!

They will pray for those destroying their lives while piling up like proper mugus to find salvation from their miseries in Churches where the pastors milk their dumb arsses and buys a private jet and live in utter luxury.

Bunch of sub-human mooorons! No wonder the other races look down on them.