₦airaland Forum

Stoplying:
Then condemn terrorism done by Israeli soldiers as well !
You and the other side are like Ying and Yang, you exist for each other, and you are both terrorist sympathiser.
You are doing the same thing, but on opposite sides.

Perfect

WritterNig:
⚡Israel faces a war on five fronts: with Hamas, Lebanon, Syria, Iran and Palestinian militants in the West Bank, - Bild, citing experts from the Middle East center Le Bec.

"Iran and its allies have made the Palestinian issue a pillar of their ideology and therefore cannot simply stand aside." Attacks from Syria or even Iraq and Yemen should not be written off. Israel (believe it or not) refrains from blaming Iran. knowing that this will further back him into a corner and lead to a multilateral war," experts say.

It is argued that Iran has already demonstrated the ability to start a war on multiple fronts.

This West should not sugar coat this. This is a war between Palestine and Israel. Hezbollah has not join yet. There has been exchange of fire though. But Hezbollahh has not joined.

Palestine, Hezbollah and other militant groups are not peer competitorss to Israel.

WritterNig:
⚡The 🇬🇧 UK plans to send the R08 Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier to the Eastern Mediterranean. It is expected that the exercises off the coast of 🇳🇴 Norway with his participation will be completed in the near future.

If this continues, it could be said that a NATO task force is being assembled against Palestine and Lebanon, similar to the intervention in Libya in 2011, which could expand to include 🇸🇾 Syria.

This is ridiculous. All this show of force against group of people that has no standing army.

WrriterNig:
⚡🇷🇺 Russia to place Topol missile launchers in Cuba.

Russia will place 200 Topol-M intercontinental ballistic missile launchers capable of carrying nuclear warheads in 🇨🇺 Cuba.

This is a big lie. Russia can deploy tactical missile capable of carrying nuclear warheads (Iskander-M etc.) to Cuba. But not a strategic weapon like the Topol-M.

WriteerNig:
⚡️The 🇺🇸 US is ready to provide 🇮🇱 Israel with intercontinental ballistic missiles - CNN

Imagine this foolishness. Russia is being threaten and the US is telling Putin not to use nuclear weapon. Palestine has no military of it own and the US wants to give ICBM to Israel to deal with her. Is it not foolishness?

WriteerNig:
⚡🇮🇱 Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant:

What was, is not what will be.

We will change the face of reality in Gaza years ahead.

Empty threat.

The Palestinians have seen the worst. They will survive any Iaraelis aggression.

WriteerNig:
⚡🇮🇱 Benjamin Netanyahu was transferred to Sheba Hospital in Tel Shomer, and the reasons are not yet clear.

Strong man is no longer strong.

WriteerNig:
⚡️🇮🇱 Israel bombed and razed the tallest tower in Gaza, Palestine Tower, which houses 100 families, press office and media

This is a waste of missile.

seunny4lif:

According to Ukrainian government Putin may have ordered the Russian military command to hold all Russia’s initial defensive positions to create the illusion that Ukrainian counteroffensives have not achieved any tactical or operational effects despite substantial Western support.

This is very stupid. They are holding the line because they can. It is as simple as that.

The strategy is ‘hold the line and inflict as much casualties on the enemy as possible’.

WriterNigg:
⚡️🇮🇳 India had offered Air India One aircraft services to Canada for the use of the Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his delegation so that he could fly back immediately yesterday.

🍁 Canada declined the offer.

Canada is one of the countries fighting Russia. They often talk about sending Russia back to the stone age.

Now a whole president is stranded in a foreign land.

Badassniggga:
This stüpid news is meant for those with a weak brain power like your self. Russia never enlist those from neighboring ex Soviets country finish them go con dey go far away Cuba to steal kids?

Wagner recruited some Cubans.

WrriterNig:
⚡️🇻🇦 Pope Francis heaps praise on Russian youths:

“Never forget your heritage. You are the descendants of great 🇷🇺 Russia: the great Russia of saints, rulers, the great Russia of Peter the Great, Catherine the Great, that empire of great culture and great humanity,” Pope Francis said in his address to the Russian youth. “Never give up this heritage. You are the descendants of the great Mother Russia, so go forward with it. And thank you for your way of being, for your way of being Russian.”

I love this

dvkot:
what type of rubbish is this nah? How we deal with Boko Haram finish?

Lol! US could not defeat the Taliban. But that does not she can defeat a well armed country.

barojana:
It depends on who is fighting a defensive war because Israel has no real capacity to wage offensive war against Russia.

If Russia attacks Israel, it's army could only be deployed via Syria. Egypt, Jordan, are not possible entry points due to treaties signed with Israel. Russia's navy would be deployed from Isreal's western sea front.

Russia's attack from Syria would be utterly difficult. The Israeli have a cutting edge land and airforce force armed with the latest defensive and offensive assets Merkava tanks, Patriot, Arrow3, Arrow2, David Sling, Iron Done, Spike anti armour, trophy protection, Jericho 1,2,3 and a plethora of EW systems. In addition. Importantly, Israel has three squadrons of f35s for air superiority. This would blow out any Russian air asset. In addition to a fleet of f15s with advanced avionics. Plus the Russians would have to spend great time with logistics of airlifting resources into Syria.

The Israelis on the other hand would be fighting on home advantage. It's military is specially built to wage war on the rocky deserts of the middle east. Knowing exactly the route of the Russian army means Israel can extensively lay mines.

On the Syrian front, Israel would destroy Russia.



On a naval front is where Israel would suffer enourmously. Israel is extremely outclassed in naval warfare. I don't see how Israel can successfully ward off a Russian naval assault. Perhaps if it can keep it's submarine fleet functional it could do some deterrence.

Nice comment

Israelis and Russian military were primarily built to protect their individual territory.

Russia got comfortable when her military was modernize and upgraded. She was able to send troops to Syria to wage successful war against Western led coalition groups. The West started paying attention to Russia, when it military turn around the Syrian conflict. At first Russia deployed huge amount of military equipments to Syria with the hope of competing with the West on the battlefield. But the West were not interested in competing with Russia. So Russia had to scale back it capabilities in Ukraine. It troops were downsized after few weeks.

Russia was able to perform wonders in Syria. But I don’t think they can do the same with Israel. Israel air force is very strong. It air force will cause a lots of problem for Russia. Russian troops will need massive air defense assets to engage Israel. Although Her group troops are not really good. Israelis forces were bled dry in Lebanon in urban combat by Hebollah fighters.

The bottomline is Russia can go on an offensive against Israel, while Israel can not do the same to Russia. Israel can inflict heavy damage on Russia military if Russia is on offensive against Israel. In fact, it will be difficult for Russia to defeat Israel on it soil. If Russia can survive Israel air assault. Then they have a chance.

Regex:
Better question jareh.

It is a mere assumption.

Putin never gave anyone a time table.

donjazzet:
You guys are just absolutely deluded.

You call Putin a "strategist" but this same "strategist" has already failed in his original sole mission which was to swiftly conquer Ukraine the way he illegally did in Crimea, Georgia, Chechnya.

Putin is a big fool who has been ostracized globally. A wanted criminal that can no longer leave Russia lest he's arrested.

Did Putin tell you is primary goals?

okeysoninv:
oga move we know ur type here. Nonsense is this the ist s400 to destroyed . You will have to bring head let HiMARS test it to ascertain if it's on the range.

S-400 is a very expensive system. There is no single S-400 in Ukraine. It was deployed to Belarus and due to it high detection range, it has shot down fighter jets and missiles on Ukrainian territory. If Russia looses a single part of it S-400 systems. It will be all over the News.

Russia only uses S-300, Tor, Pantsir, Orca e.t.c to protect it troops in Ukraine. S-400 & S-350 are stationed on Russian territory.

The West is far richer than Russia. The US alone has an economy that is multiple times bigger and stronger than Russian economy.

Militarily, they have more troops and military equipments (especially aircrafts) than Russia.

So if they fail eventually to push Russian troops out of Donbas and Crimea. Then, it will be a disgrace on their part.

I don’t see that happening anyway. Russian troops will never leave Ukraine.

[quote author=orion7 post=123991857]Inside Russia ? Putin will just roll over this one [/quote..

SangoOlukosoOba:
Afghan deal with the most powerful nation In the entire universe? 🤣🤣🤣 That’s an exaggeration! Afghan cannot even defeat the US navy in a full scale all out war.


Russia prepared for months, surrounded Ukraine boarders with tanks, and acted like it got all mapped out, only to go out up a show of shame.

With what the world have seen, even Nigeria stands a chance of defeating Russia of the nuclear option is taken away from the table.

Russia just living on the glory of old Soviet Union. It is practically empty! Just another North Korea, only nuclear weapons makes them powerful.

Afghanistan has no navy.

SangoOlukosoOba:
So Russians are not dying and youths fleeing the country?

Remind please, how many Russian soldiers have been killed in the war? I want to compare it to what the US lost in 20 years of Afghan war. 🤣🤣🤣

You want to compare Afgan war with Ukraine war?

Afghanistan had no S-300/BUK anti-air defense systems/ORCA anti-drone/patriot defense system/geopard/IRIS T defense system.

They had no Turkish baraktar drone, HIMAR and Western military vehicle and tanks.

Give the Taliban all the support Ukraine is getting and you will see how the Taliban will deal with them.

SangoOlukosoOba:
War that was suppose to end in 2 weeks🤣🤣🤣

June 2024, Russia is still struggling in Ukraine!

Who gave you time table?

WrriterNig:
⚡Russian attack on 🇸🇪 Sweden 'cannot be ruled out', says defence report.

A Russian military attack against Sweden "cannot be ruled out".

That's the conclusion of a report by the Scandinavian country's parliamentary defence committee, according to public broadcaster SVT.

Citing sources, it says the report - due to be published on Monday - warns 🇷🇺 Moscow may carry out operations "with air forces, naval forces, long-range weapons or nuclear weapons".

"Russia has also further lowered its threshold for the use of military force and exhibits a high political and military risk appetite," it says.

According to SVT, the report also outlines a new defence doctrine for 🇸🇪 Sweden based on membership of NATO.

I think these countries are just looking for opportunity to reduce the fund they spend on welfare for their citizens. In other to spend more money on their military.

Russia is still struggling in Ukraine. I don't see getting involve in another war at least for the next 8-10 years. Unless if it necessary.

Ibime:
Ukrainians chased Putin from Kiev because they were dug in, he didn't have supply lines nor logistics to feed and fuel his army. His army only actually packed few days food supply as they were expecting a blitzkrieg.

Counteroffensive Vs defending are two different ball games. In Kiev, Ukraine were defending. In counteroffensive, Ukraine's main problem is land mines which force you into a corridor where the enemy will train its fire, so casualty rate is higher till you breach the line.

The Himars and co have chased Russia out of Kharkiv and Kherson before they had a chance to dig in and lay mines everywhere.

And the counteroffensive is only few days old. Don't go singing Victoria like Putards on this very thread were singing in the early days of the offensives against Kharkiv and Kherson.

Russia didn't have enough troops in Ukraine at a time when her troops were forced to retreat from Kharkiv. Troops were moved from Kharkiv to Kherson to strengthened the Kherson front. Ukraine found out about the shortage of troops in Kharkiv and they launched counter offensive. The Russian troops in Kahrkiv were not more than 5,000 troops. Ukraine used about 30k troops in it Kharkiv counter offensive. 30k against 5k. HIMARS didn't play any role in the Kharkiv offensive.

HIMARS played a role in the Kherson offensive. It was used to destroy the bridge linking east and west Kherson together. This really disrupt Russian logistics. Couple with the Crimea bridge they was damaged at a time. The Russians couldn't sustain the defense of Kherson, and they moved their troops to the other side of Kherson intact.

Russia used about 20k troops to seize Mariupol. Ukraine had minimum of 30k troops in Mariupol. They used 30k troops in an attempt to seize Kiev. Imagine the number of troops defending Kiev at a time. Remember also that Ukraine gave fire arms to it citizens to defend Kiev. I don't think Russia wanted to take Kiev (at least not with 30k troops). They want to intimidate and put pressure on Zelensky to surrender. But that didn't work. The troops were insufficient, but they surprised everyone. Because they were closed. They made it to Kiev gate, that was impressive. I don't know what Putin's Gola was in Kiev. But I am 100% that the goal was not to take Kiev.

Gbadebo19:
You are right but the problem is that china and Russia have limited submarines plus the fact that US knows the exact location of their submarines anytime anyday. I got this info too:

The aircraft carrier is vulnerable to gunfire, submarine attack, and air attack, and aircraft carriers have been sunk in this war by all three of these means. There is no excuse for an aircraft carrier being sunk by either gunfire or submarine attack and any carrier so sunk was being very poorly operated at the time

Russia has enough submarines to protect it territory.

In the wwIi military aircrafts struggle to find aircraft carriers. But nowadays, drones, satellite and surveillance aircraft can find and track aircraft carriers with ease.

Gbadebo19:
My dear, when it comes to war it will not. I am not just hyping the US but if you read about the abilities of these machines, China and Russia are nothing less than 30 years behind.
But then, you may be right in your opinion concerning their loss because a defending nation is always at an advantage. But again, the sheer number of these machines operated by US (11 out of 41 in the world and they are spread across every continent) is a very big problem for any country cos you don't know where the next attack will come from.
Did I mention that only the US operates nuclear powered aircraft carriers? Those machines can work for 15 years without refueling.

The biggest threat to aircraft carriers/battle strike group are missile and submarines. Superpowers like China and Russia have enough missile and submarines to deal with them.

They can be tracked and they can be knocked out of operations.

Gbadebo19:
You getting it wrong. Aircraft carriers have the license to enter any territorial waters in the absence of hostilities between the two nations. In fact, US aircraft carriers are ever present on south China seas.

I am talking about war between super powers.

Gbadebo19:
Lmaooo!!!!
An aircraft carrier is useless in battle
So, you don't know that a destroyer does not even have the ability of an aircraft carrier? China and Russia have various missiles that they can use to destroy the entire US strike group Oh my God!!!
We are not talking of Nigerian army here. We are talking about the most experienced and battle tested military on planet earth and you are comparing China, whose army has NOT been battle tested in the last 50 years.
The only advantage China has over US is manpower (population) and that is even relatively useless considering the fact that 75% of US citizens know how to use a gun.
Please don't say what you just said here in an oratory debate.

The US may be able to use it strike group to defend itself. But using them in an offensive against China in South China sea or Russia, will result in the lost of those expensive ships.

The US naval power won't make it to the Chinese shore, incase of a war between the two. Likewise if the Chinese navy is on the offensive, her navy won't make it to the US shore/shores.

Gbadebo19:
Of course, they can build their own weapons. The problem is that they are yet to reach the level of technology of US. Thus, their weapons always remain inferior to US. Let me burst your bubble. It is not just by building the biggest nonsense military hardware, it is by building the most effective. China unveiled its aircraft carrier about two or three years ago with amazing abilities but the fact remains that stuff is still inferior to the US Nimitz class that were built in 1975, talk less of the USS Gerald Ford. No country except US has been able to build a NUCLEAR POWERED aircraft carrier. If you know the advantage that it gives, you won't compare US military technology with Chinese rust machine. Let me tell you one: A nuclear powered aircraft carrier can stay in operation for up to 15 years without needing to refuel. All that is needed will be food for those operating it. Compare that with Chinese nonsense and you will see that it does not stand a chance with a military technology built in 1975. All that is needed to ground that Chinese rust is to destroy its supply chain and then it stops working when fuel finishes. I hope you can see why US is a second to none when it comes to military technology.

The US most expensive weapon (aircraft carriers) are useless against Russia and China.
It can be used against Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan and the likes. But not against other super power/powers.

Russia and China have varieties of missiles that they can use to destroy the entire US strike group.

In a world war, missiles and submarines will play the major role. The billion dollar Zumwalt destroyer and other very expensive US weapon may not see battle.

A new world war is going to be a missile war. Nothing more and nothing less. This is the reason Russia invests more on defense systems. The US on the other side invests heavily on offensive weapon, strictly because it wants to be able to project power outside it territory. Majority of those weapons will not see battle in a new world war.

Ibime:
Are you being intentionally dumb?

I never called it fake, I said its foolish

Demanding Ukraine keep less than 250k soldiers, less than certain amount of equipment etc. It is not a treaty, it's a surrender document and Ukraine never signed any such document to turn themselves into slaves, they chased Putin from Kiev. Putin is a barefaced liar to claim this document is the reason he retreated from Kiev. This is his foolish proposal which he was told to stick up his ãrse.

Putin don't lie.

Turkey Foreign minister and other Turkish officials have mentioned it several times, that the West sabotaged the agreement to diffuse the war.

Kingsnairaland:
But do you think China will be wicked as USA.

This is nonsense. In the history of China. How many blacks have been killed due to racism?

Blacks were killed in the US by the KKK and other racism group in large number. This never happened in China.

Ibime:
Poland know what they saw in the hands of the USSR

Foolish kids of nowadays that don't know history

Clowns forgot that Stalin invaded Poland from the East 6 days after Hitler invaded from the West in a deal that Stalin and Hitler made to partition the country. It was only 2 years later that Hitler attacked Stalin that Stalin left Poland. Hundreds of thousands of Poles had already been killed and deported to Siberia by then. That was then followed by decades of suffering, internments and mass deportations under Soviet system.

Na who wear shoe know where e dey pinch am. The Poles have been warning the EU of Putin's 1930s style of disregard for national sovereignty for decades, while Angela Merkel was cozying up to Russia and feeding the beast.

So which country later liberated Poland when it was seized by Germany?