₦airaland Forum

aresa:
[s][/s]


Boring iPoD and bigot nonsense..

aresa:
[s][/s]


What you posted was somebody's hearsay and not accurate account from the girl in question.

I posted the audio account from the girl herself so listen and quit confusing yourself..

It's called from the horse's mouth...

mynd1:
Op stop spreading fake news.

marvelck:
Is it true that in Naija, if a guy shows his girlfriend too much love, she's bound to misbehave?

aresa:
[s][/s]




[s]http://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/top-news/199293-exclusive-audio-question-and-answer-with-abducted-bayelsa-girl-ese-oruru.html


Listen to the audio.




Interrogator: Please what is your name?
Ese Oruru: My name is Aisha Chuwas?
Interrogator: From where are you here (sic), come Kano?
Ese Oruru: From Bayelsa State.
Interrogator: How old are you?
Ese Oruru: I am 17 years old.
Interrogator: Ok, what are you doing here in Kano now?
Ese Oruru: I am not doing anything but I came here to be a Muslim and I will stay here.
Interrogator: In your own, own, own choice or….
Ese Oruru: Silence
Interrogator: Ok, Aisha your parent tell us you are (sic) abducted from Bayelsa. It’s true?
Ese Oruru: No. I am not (sic) abducted by anybody.
Interrogator: Ok. Tell us the truth.
Ese Oruru: I am (sic) not abducted by anybody, I came here on my own interest. Nobody forced me to be a Muslim.


Interrogator: That’s all

Ese Oruru: Yes

Interrogator: Ok, Thank you Aisha.



https://www.youtube.com/embed/KLds6e8rj1s

watts75:
A teenager, who was allegedly kidnapped from Bayelsa State to Kano, Ese Oruru, said on Monday she was not interested in reuniting with her family, denying reports that she was abducted from her home in Bayelsa State.
In an exclusive audio recording obtained by PREMIUM TIMES on Monday, the girl also said she eloped with her lover to Kano in order to convert to Islam.
“My name is Aisha Chuwas. I am 17-year-old. I came here to be a Muslim and I will stay here,” she said in the audio.
The recording appeared a conversation between Miss Oruru and a police interrogator in Kano.
A human rights lawyer, Huwaila Mohammed, who was given access to the girl at the Zonal Police Headquarters in Kano, said upon interrogation, she understood the girl was never forced to convert to Islam.
“I was there to protect her rights,” Ms. Mohammed said. “When I approached her initially, she refused to talk to me. Later she opened up to me.
“She is very defiant. She told me she was born in February 1999. I personally wanted her to reunite with her family, but surprisingly she asked me to tell her mother that she will never return to Bayelsa.
“The police should ensure that she is protected and returned to her family. She is still not matured enough to take such a weighty decision without parental consent.”
Ms. Mohammed, who also spoke with Miss Oruru’s lover, Yunusa Yellow, said upon interrogation, she established that he is 18-year-old man “not anywhere above 20”.
“I was surprised when I saw a very small boy. He is just 18-year old. I was enraged thinking that it was an old man involved in the saga. From the way I see it, they eloped not because of religion but love,” she said.
In his reaction, the emir of Kano denied reports that he was holding Miss Oruru.
The emir said on Monday that since September last year, the emirate council handed her over to AIG Zone 1, Tambari Yabo, for onward transportation to her family in Bayelsa.
He said the district head of Kura brought the case to the palace when Mr. Yunusa presented Ms. Oruru to the district office, seeking approval to marry her.
The emir’s Chief of Staff, Munir Sanusi, further shed lights on the matter, saying the emir ordered that she be return to her family as she was too young to take such decision.
“The emir attached the girl with the palace emissary, Jakadan Mallam, and one of her relatives to go to the police headquarters,” Mr. Sanusi said.
“Since she alleged threats from members of his family, we involved the police to provide security.”
Meanwhile, the Bayelsa State governor, Seriake Dickson, said he was on top of the situation as he had spoken to his Kano State counterpart, Abdullahi Ganduje, on the matter.
The governor’s Special Adviser on Media, Francis Agbo, said Mr. Seriake had discussed the matter with Mr. Ganduje on several occasions to ensure a faster resolution of the crisis.
PREMIUM TIMES learnt that Miss Oruru’s “kidnapper” has been arrested and is being detained at the Zone 1 Police Headquarters, Kano.
The spokesman for the zonal police office, Rabilu Ringim, could not be reached to comment for this story.
Mr. Ringim, an assistant superintendent of police, did not answer or return multiple calls and text message.
Audio recording of Miss Oruru to come shortly…

Ejanla07:
Op u 're a liar. Peter obi never contested..


Where is mynd44..


Fake news no source.

Jirate:
It was obviously arranged at the VP's Office last week…..

Alaminz:
muslims are not idol worshipers pls. the black stone is regarded as house of God,n need respect.. it doent hv mouth,hand,nor nose for u to call idol is just a building wrap with black cotton n perfume.

Bigchief46:
LMFAO; this is the best rant you can come up with? You that was boasting about how the Sup. Court will sack Oduah & Co. today with your ignorant analysis. I did warn the Public to ignore half-baked lawyers like you who take delight in coming to the Internet to pontificate and deceive people who don't know that you are probably just a very junior lawyer somewhere with no experience. The same Sup. Court you insisted just days ago will sack Odua & Co are now Corrupt? INEC is now corrupt? All the lawyers are also corrupt? See your smelly mouth & "corrupt". The only thing corrupt thing here is your juvenile brain

Bigchief46:
I am still waiting for those half-baked lawyers who were arguing with me here on NL a few days ago when they were insulting the HON. Justice Gabriel Kolawole & the judiciary. Shebi the Supreme Court has now confirmed the position I canvassed that the issue of who are authentic State Exco of PDP has nothing to do with the election of Oduah & Co? Where is Osyabj hiding?

perilin:
coup

Bigchief46:
If you would just stop insulting Judges who are clearly better than you would ever be then, perhaps one could listen to you although you have no point. You come here, hide under the anonymity of the Internet & call people "brown envelope" Judges. You make other fantastic allegations about Senior lawyers receiving millions of dollars in bribes. ALL WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE. Once a person or the parties he supports loses a decision in Nigeria these days, then the judiciary is corrupt: if he wins, then the judiciary is the last hope of the common man. Some of you who write these trash are useless brigands who cannot tie the shoe laces of the people you open your smelly mouth to abuse. Nairaland better do something about these posters who constantly take pleasure in vilifying our judiciary; no nation that makes nonsense of that important arm of the Republic will go far. Make no mistake: criticism of judgments are allowed AND IN FACT ENCOURAGED; that is how the law develops & grows because no one, not even judges know it all. If it was the days when appeals still lie to WACA or Privy Council, many Supreme Court decisions would be over turned. Judges can and do err in their decisions simply because they are human beings not necessarily because they were bribed. I am not also saying that we do not have bad eggs who take bribe but to just come & publish wild & patently false allegations is unacceptable. Critique of judgments have its rules: stick to canvassing arguments in support of any position you assert & don't push motives that are only subjective & and in respect of which you have no proof. Happily you have informed us that the SC will soon make clarifications so we shall see. Meanwhile, although Nairaland is not the ideal venue to press these arguments, I will briefly respond to the points you made. First of all, Excos & or factions DO NOT conduct primaries so even if a court invalidates the primaries conducted by any "faction", it cannot affect Odua & co because the primaries from which they emerged was conducted by the NEC. I am not at my base, else I would publish the relevant sections of the PDP Constitution. If the "primaries" from which the people you support was conducted by a State Exco, then it has no place in the PDP Constitution. According to you, the SC after allowing the appeal of your group merely reinstated the judgment of the Federal High Court & you have set out what those orders are. It is obvious therefore that as at the time the FHC made its orders, the general elections had not been held nor had anyone been declared winner nor issued Certificates of Return. Therefore the FHC decision allegedly restored by the SC never withdrew anyone's Certificate of Return nor did it order your candidates to be issued said Certificates. Indeed, since neither the FHC, CA & SC ordered the withdrawal of the Certificates of Return of Oduah & Co. & it's issue to their opponents, ON WHAT EXACTLY does your group base its hue & cry for your candidates to be issued said Certificates without which they cannot come near the National Assembly? Which ORDER OF COURT are they seeking to enforce? As at the day, Oduah & Co stood election, they were valid candidates of the PDP by virtue of the subsisting Orders of the Court of Appeal; THEIR ELECTION WAS VALID. You should DISTINGUISH this from a situation where INEC ignored the order of the FHC to allow Oduah & Co contest. That is where There would have been a problem which is not the case here. That difference is vital, think about it because I can't write a full exposition on it here. A certificate of Return can only be withdrawn if there is an EXPRESS order of Court first nullifying the election of the affected candidate & then ordering the Certificate to be withdrawn; that is not the case here. So what the SC settled was really an "ACADEMIC QUESTION" which they would normally refuse to do but also sometimes settle as a guidance, but such questions even if settled hardly confers any benefits on the litigants. Some one mentioned Amaechi's case in another post & my short response is that that case is no longer applicable law in Nigeria. The decision by the SC in the Amaechi case in respect of the 2007 elections was so perverse, that the National Assembly in amending the ELECTORAL ACT in 2010 inserted the provisions of S. 141 for the very first time in our electoral jurisprudence. Read it & let us know how in your wildest imagination, your candidates can be issued Certificates of Return. Remember we are talking about Statutory Law not judicial pronouncements. Someone in another post talked about my earlier reference of names being or not being in the ballot: yes, when we say a person's name is on the ballot on the day of an election, we are not saying it is written on the ballot paper; of course only names of political parties & their logos are there. It is just the expression used to state who is flying the flag of the party. But note that while the name of the authentic candidate is not on the ballot papers, it appears on the MOST IMPORTANT electoral document: the Form EC 8E: Declaration of Results. Without the Form EC 8E bearing the name of a person as having contested an election, INEC BY LAW cannot issue a Certificate of Return to such person. I am sorry to piss on your parade, but your group is barking up the wrong tree. Your candidates do not have any Form EC 8E containing their names as candidates in the election, so no amount of shouting, crying & sentiments can assist you. People do not understand that the Law is very complex whence once issues are above their heads, they resort to insults & unsubstantiated allegations of bribery of Judges. As I said in my earlier post, neither your candidates nor Oduah & her group were parties to the case already decided right from the FHC, CA & SC so how do you think any Court Orders can be made for or against any of them?

WhoRUDeceiving:
Perhaps you are right on what transpired. I'll take your word. Yet, let's face facts. On election day, there names were not on ballot. Period. The common sense thing would be to either have a new election, or disqualify the political party that could not get their act right. If this was the case, Amaechi would not have been "installed" governor without even being on the official ballot to waste 8 years there.

WhoRUDeceiving:
So one bad bunch for another? Even though the other never were voted in by the people, yet they "won" the election eh?

cnsprince76:
Why the desperation if they are confident that the Supreme Court will interpret the judgment in their favour, in two weeks? There is nothing wrong in a citizen seeking interpretation of a judgment; except you can quote a section of any of the laws of the country flouted by such action.

cnsprince76:
SR contradicted themselves in this lopsided report. It is obvious that the Supreme Court judgment is not clear, especially if you consider the grounds raised by Oduah and co. They embattled lawmakers have done the needful by approaching the Supreme Court for interpretation of the judgment. It is thus imperative and conductive that INEC and other relevant parties stay action, pending the interpretation by the apex court.

SR should stop these confusions in their reports.

adeaks:
The problem is that the supreme court declared the Oguebego Executive as the authentic executive but did not say anything on the election of the people tendered by the fake executive who contested and won the elections. People have only been reading their own implications into the judgment.

Inec CANNOT withdraw the certificate given to oduah and co without an express court order directing them to do so.

The Oguebego case was a pre-election matter dealing with in-house primaries. It had nothing to do with the election itself that brought in Stella oduah and co which can only be heard by an election tribunal.

The Suit filed by Awomolo and Co is for the supreme court to direct on which way to proceed. It would bring a final end to all the confusion we have currently. Justice kolawole's order is for INEC to wait until the supreme court gives a judgment one way or another in the current suit.

People will just berate the judge without understanding the issues. Justice kolawole is not a rookie judge not to have considered all the ramificatons of granting the injunction. And finally, he definitely didn't overrule the supreme court. The person who wrote the title is just being mischievous.

adeaks:
The problem is that the supreme court declared the Oguebego Executive as the authentic executive but did not say anything on the election of the people tendered by the fake executive who contested and won the elections. People have only been reading their own implications into the judgment.

Inec CANNOT withdraw the certificate given to oduah and co without an express court order directing them to do so.

The Oguebego case was a pre-election matter dealing with in-house primaries. It had nothing to do with the election itself that brought in Stella oduah and co which can only be heard by an election tribunal.

The Suit filed by Awomolo and Co is for the supreme court to direct on which way to proceed. It would bring a final end to all the confusion we have currently. Justice kolawole's order is for INEC to wait until the supreme court gives a judgment one way or another in the current suit.

People will just berate the judge without understanding the issues. Justice kolawole is not a rookie judge not to have considered all the ramificatons of granting the injunction. And finally, he definitely didn't overrule the supreme court. The person who wrote the title is just being mischievous.

Jacko1:
Do something in umuahia as well no projects at all goin on in umuahia dahs bad

Eluwilussit:
By tomorrow!