₦airaland Forum

shakol91:
My advice for everyone is to Stop using naijapredict/9japredict. It really pained me to see my only winning ticket from the beginning of this year voided. Evidence below. Vicenza v Cittadella
SOCCER, Serie B
2016-12-24 17:30:00
1X2 - 1 [2.35]
VOID
V. naijapredict.com or 9japredict.com is fast liquidating. They're SCAMMER matches that has been completed since 5pm they're still pending them and voided the last game without any problem from the match venue

Chiefheywhy:
nah..ur money dissaPear immediately you click withdraw

claremont:
yup, I was doing £1000 and above on single bets.

emmayayodeji:
ticket or adonbilivit

Phi001:
Boluspor-Yeni Malatyaspor: BTTS
Entella-Novara: 1-0 H 1
Alloa Athletic -Brechin City: 0-2 H 2



Total Odds: 3.33

Phi001:
Motherwell-Aberdeen: BTTS
Arouca-Vitoria: 0-1 H 2
Kilmarnock-St Johnston's: 2-0 H 1




Total odds: 2.59

SirHouloo:
Flat bottom flasks....
Are we in a chemistry lab?

sawhite:
oga u did not lose any 50k , the only money you lost was your staked amount

sunday478:
just look at me

B940WSSZACQZE-3126034

small change. all the games I predicted played. the one I added from a prediction site spoilt the game.

ademusiwa2r:

Obikush:
Arouca - Vitoria Guimaraes

Away wins 1st period

monemsis:
tondela na italian team

keandre:
tondela match, same player scored own goal twice

BraniacX:
So according to you, the onus to correct a technical error from the schools website admin rests solely on the student especially after she has filled and submitted her e-form constrained by limitations created by the schools e-portal? are you for real? At what point does the school take responsibility then?

BraniacX:
Check the twitter conversation in the post following yours, one of the courses she was supposed to fill wasn't available on the e-portal site the day she filled and submitted her form forcing her to fill seven subjects only so that can hardly be her fault that is, if her account of events are accurate

BraniacX:
I would say it goes further to buttress my point as to avoid any semantic disambiguity i wouldn't claim to know what upload results (No. 2) means in this case whether filling an e-form or uploading a scanned copy
Also No 3. Which is what will be used to validate No. 2 if it is filling of forms would also place the omission at the schools doorstep for that is the actual valid legal tender

BraniacX:
There's another thread on the actual computation of her scores right now and on it ife students and others who went through the admissions process say that o'level results are scanned and uploaded online, not filled in a form and submitted, i hope this settles this

toothyGrin:
I'm waiting for it

BraniacX:
While filling a jamb form you fill in all your passed courses including the ones relevant to your course of study (check and confirm it) and the subjects the school chooses to use in its compilations in addition to the compulsory five are at the schools discretion, what this means is that in absence of a post UTME form filled with deficit of one subject by the student seeing as there is no longer a post UTME, the school uses what the student filled in their jamb forms and as such the error of omission can not be from the student.
What we're discussing is a probability theory, and this theory in the absence of proof to back either our suspicions skews higher to the omission coming from the school.

baum1:
No, but you must also take the last course and earn a ZERO=F for the course to be used to divide your GPA. We have all seen instances where people in the same class did different number of courses...Some did 7, some did 8 and some did 9..If you divide the GPA of someone that did 7 by 8 or 8 by nine, you would be assuming they did the additional course and failed, and that is wrong.

There is definitely an issue with what IFE has done. I cannot see why there is no issue. They have assumed the girl took the 8th subject and failed and hence they divided by 8. That is wrong! If anything, the computation should be based on 5 relevant subjects because this is what I suppose JAMB explicitly has in its brochure...

EhisChelsea1:
*I took the pain to go through her result and the analysis done by the PROVOST and I discover a lot of discrepancy. Either the PROVOST is desperately trying to cover up something, or he doesn't know simple calculations or both....
Her O'level result:
Civil Education A1 = 8 marks
English A1 = 8 marks
further Maths B2 = 7 marks
Maths B3 = 6 marks
Biology C4 = 5 marks
Chemistry B3 = 6 marks
Physics C4 = 5marks
Computer A1 = 8 marks
Painting & Dec B3 = 6 marks

Total = 59 marks / 72× 100 = 81.94
Add this to her jamb which d provost says is 80 marks and u have
81.94+80 = 161.94
50% of 161.94 = 82%.

Her total score is 81% and not 75.31 % as stated by the PROVOST*

MaziOmenuko:
What concerned Further Maths with Medicine? The prof included further maths score of B2 for her and left out Computer Studies of A1, is that not voluntary wikedness? Then xometed his computation with Physics being repeated twice, why did they neglect her Computer Studies score of A1?

Transparency my left ball!

BraniacX:
She's already a student in the system and was just bidding her time to get her preferred course

That F would've disqualified her from applying and she knows that too, like i said, she's already a student in ife and as such no stranger to the admission process and requirements

baum1:
Even if she submitted only 7 subjects but submitted more than the required 5 o'level subjects as required by JAMB, she would have to make an F in the 8th subject for it to be used to compute her overall O'level GPA. I have told that to OGA pHi001 and even used example of real university courses.

BraniacX:
No, but her submitting nly seven subjects has not been proven

BraniacX:
And whose word do we take for it that she submitted only seven?

baum1:
So IFE also assumed she made an F in the last subject and hence they used it to compute her O'level GPA? No?

See my above post to Phi001.

The admission process has lots of weaknesses and loopholes and I say this with all due respect to the respectable people in charge

sirmose:
Mr reader, how come with your slow reading you still could not see the wrong computations presented to you?

"It could only be convincing to people like you without reasoning cap.

You are damn wrong as the OAU you thought to have known has just disappointed you with wrong computation. How do you explain the repeating of physics twice but single counting? Where is her eighth subject?
With the eighth subject assuming a score of C, she should have a total of 50, instead of 44. That is, 78.13%. Plus the 80% in UTME, divided by 2, she should have an average of 79%, which qualifies her for admission under merit.
The so called highly rated OAU has crashed the supposedly howbeit self-acclaimed high standard. Knowing this now, are you not disappointed?"

baum1:
Bro, this is spot on and clears the air, thanks. Admission process in somewhat weak (I don't want to use condescending word against the great IFE) and both parties are to blame..Isn't the school supposed to request the candidates O'level results which normally should show all of the subjects done and grades obtained? Why submit 7, 8 or 9. This yields inconsistency which the young lady has fallen in, unfortunately. That was her own mistake, for failing to provide the required number of results that the school required.

In a saner and more open scenario, students should be asked to submit their O'level or statement of results, not a part of the results which open room for manipulation or even inconsistency. It would even be much better if the universities can access the scores of these candidates directly from the examining bodies or candidates' schools. This is how it is done in the good universities that OAU is try to become like somebody.

Painful, painful, painful. An archaic, inconsistent technique has cost a very brilliant candidate a place that she so much merited. I want to mentor that girl if I have the time and chance.

BraniacX:
According to who?

I don't think she could have made that type of mistake! I could be wrong though but for her to raise an alarm on social media will point that she feels cheated and that is not the case!

But why did the provost type physics twice without calculating it twice?

Many questions need answers