seunny4lif:

Even the British government knows it’s can’t survive a nuke strikes.
Russia will still survive due to its massive land mass but UK
Haba, you and I know the British can’t survive as most people will jakpa back to there countries If they see that war is about to start
The British has so many enemies

seunny4lif:
Abeg which state in the Baltic region can last 1 days with Russia.
You have never been to those places, I can see .
Do you know Baltic state under NATO has more Russians than anywhere
Lativa, Estonia and Lit 40% of their citizens are also Russians.
Just a bridge separated Estonia from Russia and a very small bridge.
Most people living there are Russians
Take USA away.
You think the French will go on war against Russia

frankson1:





It's more like; 'I no send una message o'

Really, these guys can't afford to release 'monsters' called weapons in this life.

Almajoon:
Trash!
Russia will destroy those british miscreants in a war.
Power has moved to the east.
A Sino-Russian alliance has rendered the western axis of evil powerless.
[s][/s]

emae009:


No NATO MEMBER has a choice when one of them is attacked. I really don't know why you're laughing your ignorance.
Why do you think the same US is trying to form QUAD to contain China?.
Unlike like Russia alliance with Iran where they can choose to come to their rescue or not, NATO defense clause stipulate that once a member is attacked by an outside enemy, the rest of the member MUST come to its rescue.
Sure Latvia is no match for Russia but can it contain the might of the rest 28 members??

seunny4lif:

Even the British government knows it’s can’t survive a nuke strikes.
Russia will still survive due to its massive land mass but UK
Haba, you and I know the British can’t survive as most people will jakpa back to there countries If they see that war is about to start
The British has so many enemies


Bro a big landmass doesn't mean the Russian population is evenly distributed over the vast landmass.......most of those land Mass are mainly non-utilized lands that maybe used for military drills or forests with no much population dwelling there

The vast of Russian population is concentrated in their major cities which will be decimated in event of a nuclear strike

Bro I know say all these arguments sweet for mouth but Russia won't take that risk of attacking a nuclear-armed country, cos it's a war where both parties will be incur heavy loss that'll take the world back to stone age

BigBashiru:


You are right UK can't survive not just nukes but also serious war. royal navy is overhyped.

seunny4lif:
Choice you said yet left Turkey to the bear �.

UndilutedFaxt:


You have zero tolerance

noisy45:


I don't need all these your CNN and BBC military analyst. Uk with the 30 Nato European states won't last a month full blown war with Russia if the USA remains neutral.

Profayo:
None of them can afford to attack each other.No one wants nuclear attack

emae009:


Are you going to be serious or you just want to be laughing ignorantly. Pick one so I don't waste my time schooling you.
Turkey first enquired about the Patriot defense system but the USA refused to sell to them because of their provocation against Greece which is another NATO member and that's something that's frown upon.
They went an purchased the S-400 because they needed to beef up their defense systems. Got sanctioned by the US and deprived of the F-35 fighter jets. Now Turkey and US are in negotiations to come to a common ground. The Russian engineers that were in Turkey to operate the S-400 has been kicked back to Russia by Turkey. Read up so you won't have to be parading stale news

BigBashiru:


the west has bullied Africa for so long. Thank God for Putin.

Yenefer:
Is all propaganda and capitalism. They can't start war with countries that are armed with nuclear weapons. Russia is playing a spoiler while China is taking over. Climate change will finish us all. Anyways

seunny4lif:
You don’t answer my questions, do think the Baltic will go on war against Russia because the last time I checked, Russia don’t need to invade those countries as there are more Russians there to fight.
For your mind you think the USA will risk NY, CA and WC to be nuke for Baltic? You think this is a Video game.
When Bush supplied Georgia weapons and said USA will come to their aids, if Russia attack back 2008.
The USA disappeared when Russia started carpet bombing of Georgia after Georgia have killed Russia peace keepers.
Which makes the Georgia President to say it on live TV, that USA betray them .
Georgia was luck former French president was a good friend of Medven and Putin been PM then was close friend of Angela M of Germany

seunny4lif:
Choice you said yet left Turkey to the bear �.
Tell me one country that is ready to be nuked because of UK?
German is facing population problems as in the next 30 years, Germany will be filled up with non Germans.
82M people but only around 45M are real German as the rest are Turks.
You think Germany will go to war against Russia

seunny4lif:
Choice you said yet left Turkey to the bear �.
Tell me one country that is ready to be nuked because of UK?
German is facing population problems as in the next 30 years, Germany will be filled up with non Germans.
82M people but only around 45M are real German as the rest are Turks.
You think Germany will go to war against Russia

emae009:


smh, you just jumped on a thread without knowing what it was about. Dude said Russia can conquer Europe in one week if the US stays neutral. In that scenario Russia is the aggressor so your question makes no sense. Focusing on your question, why would Latvia or Estonia want to attack Russia in the first place? Reason those small states joined NATO was to avoid Russia imposing attitude, same reason Ukraine is trying to become a NATO member state.
If Russia declare war on NATO, today, there fight will be in the Baltic region for sure so yes the likes of Estonia will join the fight by offering up their state to act as the first line of defense. Poland just recently installed the Aegis Ashore Defense system. Something Russia was wailing that the US shouldn't do is now a reality. Russia like China is a regional power, most countries surrounding Russia don't have the might of Russia, that's a fact but saying Russia can defeat NATO minus the US is total BS or you just being sarcastic which in that case, the jokes is on me

henryobinna:
wetine be this?

So you think Putin is your friend

emae009:


Dude you lack what to argue about. if I want to come down to your level, I'd say Russia are struggling to some extend economically, do you think Russia will want to fight NATO, then put a laughing emoji next to that because we're all comedian.
ciao

BigBashiru:


Yes he is Africa's friend though the friendship is not free.

Mossadd:
U.S.A tormentor

emae009:


UK is a nuclear armed state. Part of NATO (an attack on UK, is an attack on the 30 states that makes up NATO and its allies). Their air defense is well condensed. One of the world's only blue navy countries.
Britains are very stubborn peeps, they never give up.

noisy45:


I don't need all these your CNN and BBC military analyst. Uk with the 30 Nato European states won't last a month full blown war with Russia if the USA remains neutral.

Eagba:
na him Japan shi Dem during during ww2

henryobinna:
You people are quick to mention nukes each and every time international conflict is talked about.

To the best of my knowledge most countries with nuclear capabiliyies signed a 'no-first-use policy'. Meaning, not every conflict would lead to use of nuclear weapons. In fact, any country to be the first to break the signed agreement might be obliterated by others for breaking the agreement. No country no matter how big or powerful they are would be dumb enough to quickly run to using nuclear weapons on their enemies. It is usually a last resort.

So, stop making noise as though nuclear weapons are fire crackers and bangers. No country wants to use their's because they may never live to tell the story.

seunny4lif:
Says a guy who know nothing about NATO.
I asked you do you think USA will trade NY, WDC and CA for any Baltic state.
You are shouting Russia is struggling economically

seunny4lif:
Says a guy who know nothing about NATO.
I asked you do you think USA will trade NY, WDC and CA for any Baltic state.
You are shouting Russia is struggling economically

ibedun:


Your comment is depressing! Why life no sweet us? Because we are stupid and foolish. And suffering from inferiority complex.

HellVictorinho:



Are you Putin's online warrior


That man won't praise you for the noise you are making.


Russia is not invincible.

emae009:


If I ignore a question, that implies that I think you just asking them to be hilarious and not actually serious about it.
Since it seems you're serious:
Answer: Like I said previously which I'm sure you didn't read. Latvia and its ilk don't have any reason whatsoever to attack Russia. They only joined NATO to avoid Russia imposing influence on them. Same reason Ukraine is trying to be a NATO member. Same reason more South China Sea states are signing defense agreement with the US.
The Baltic countries are not joining NATO to stand against Russia, they are trying to avoid Russia's influence. So if war ever occur in the Baltic Region, then Russia is the aggressor and yes NATO will come to those countries Defense.
It erroneous of you to assume that because Russia has nuclear weapons they are going to use it all willy nilly. Nuclear war is no joke. Most countries only have it as a deterrence not first use basis. If Russia fires nuke against any country, then Russian will be nuked by any country or countries with Nuclear weapon. That's a clause in the treaty signed by the UN Security Council of which Russia is a founding member.
You can't use chemical weapons in wars nowadays or you'll be targeted too.
so you assuming that Russia can nuke the US and errthing will be alright is one of the reasons I didn't care to respond to the question. It lacks substance