₦airaland Forum

How can someone who is been led through at the same time get to lead people through... It's ain't possible na

Doja2000:
Another rubbish thread again.
I wonder when una go get sense.
Women are this, women are that,blah blah blah.
If u don't like the way women are,then go create your own.
Na man dey lead Nigeria but nothing dey change.

Nigeria is not destined to change whether man, woman or goat lead na still the same thing....

Lilpen3758:
Nigeria is not destined to change whether man, woman or goat lead na still the same thing....

you are right,boss.
Wisdom no go kill u ooo.
Please join me.

Women are too hormonal

Women are not builders by nature, they are nurturers

Angela Markel won't agree with you

pansophist:
Angela Markel won't agree with you

I work with generalizations and not outliers, the exceptions doesn't disprove the rule, evolutionary speaking, women are not equipped for hardship, risk taking, leadership, Markel is an outlier, infact she chose not to give birth to pursue her political ambitions, most men in leadership positions can balance it with family, most women can't, Okonjo Iweala is another exception

Most of the time women will always lead with their Emotions rather than with pragmatism

You think blowing big grammar and backing it up with biased facts is going to make you sound sensible?

I've noticed when men say women are emotional, they are talking about how women cry easily. But in case you didn't know, anger is an emotion too. Now tell me what gender tend to cause drama when they are angry?

Now take back seat joor. You don't sound logical, you just sound angry.

siofra:
You think blowing big grammar and backing it up with biased facts is going to make you sound sensible?

I've noticed when men say women are emotional, they are talking about how women cry easily. But in case you didn't know, anger is an emotion too. Now tell me what gender tend to cause drama when they are angry?

Now take back seat joor. You don't sound logical, you just sound angry.

Do you know women are suceptible to all negative Emotions including anger and their is sound scientific literature to back these, look up the big 5 personality traits of both genders

Dapcity007:
Do you know women are suceptible to all negative Emotions including anger and their is sound scientific literature to back these, look up the big 5 personality traits

Of course women are equally susceptible to anger. But men tend to be more aggressive when angry than women. And women cry more when sad than men.

Says the person with no working experience.

qtguru:
Says the person with no working experience.

Dummy, Biology is irreversible, me working or not is irrelevant, I'm just stating natural facts, whether you like it or not doesn't change it

siofra:
Of course women are equally susceptible to anger. But men tend to be more aggressive when angry than women. And women cry more when sad than men.

Us having more extreme in just one negative Emotion can't be compared to women whose default state is Emotion whether positive or negative as their inherent Nature, your ovulatory realities makes your hormonal, your estrogen makes you experience mood changes, these just basic Biology

MrBrownJay1:
- you mean, not even in the kitchen?
- Trump was worse than a woman.
- the above is the definition of BORED UNEMPLOYED HOUSEWIVES, not possible leaders like that mean biatch Hillary Clinton etc.

A strong independent ambitious Masculine is not attractive to men, men look for youth,sexy , fertility,beauty and feminity, no matter your job, intelligence, degree, if you don't have any of the following no serious man of substance will take you seriously, even you being ambitious and an high earning lowers your pool of options for men since women date their equals or better, but it's the reverse for a man, as he becomes more successful, he's pool of options widens, because he doesn't give a fvck about a woman's success, a man's money is families money, a woman's money is her money for her to be independent of men

Dapcity007:
Dummy, Biology is irreversible, me working or not is irrelevant, I'm just stating natural facts, whether you like it or not doesn't change it

Bro we live in a capitalist market, power is power , the more money you have and competency you show the more leadership authority you wield. Your trash writwup doesn't change the fact that there are more women occupying leadership position. Drop Rollo book and enter the real labour market. Its how I know you have no working experience to say this.

Dapcity007:
Us having more extreme in just one negative Emotion can't be compared to women whose default state is Emotion whether positive or negative as their inherent Nature, your ovulatory realities makes your hormonal, your estrogen makes you experience mood changes, these just basic Biology

This is fallacious. A woman's default state isn't emotion.

For instance, in a study of sex differences in reactions to pleasant and unpleasant slides (Gomez, Gunten, & Danuser, 2013), researchers found women reacted more negatively to unpleasant slides (e.g., mutilated bodies, physical violence, and suffering or dead animals), a sex difference that persisted in size from ages 20 to 81. Gong et al. (2018) found these sex differences persisted across young and old in both China and Germany. Kring and Gordon (1998) found women react with more sadness to sad films than men do (d = -0.78) and women react with more fear-disgust to fearful-disgusting films than men do (d = -0.40). In contrast, men reacted with greater happiness to happy films (d = +0.31).

In a positive emotion, happiness, men reacted more than women.

siofra:
This is fallacious. A woman's default state isn't emotion.

In a positive emotion, happiness, men reacted more than women.

Note I'm not arguing that men aren't emotional at all, don't misinterprete what I'm saying, both genders are emotional,men have a greater propensity to control their emotions and apply logic than women , but women on an average are more neurotic ( prone to negative emotions) than men , the scientific literature is very clear about that, you bringing men's emotional response via aggressions which I agree with you that men on an average are more anger prone than women, but your citations validating men's happiness based on that specific experiment doesn't cover many other scenarios that women exhibit happiness far greater than men


You didn't even debunk the critical points of my argument on women's estrogenious and ovulatory realities but rather you gave a contradiction which still didn't debunk my argument

qtguru:
Bro we live in a capitalist market, power is power , the more money you have and competency you show the more leadership authority you wield. Your trash writwup doesn't change the fact that there are more women occupying leadership position. Drop Rollo book and enter the real labour market. Its how I know you have no working experience to say this.

If you want to argue, state facts and evidence, statistically majority of Fortune company CEOs and even most billionaires are Men, statistically majority of successful women specifically multimillionaires and billionaires earned their money through divorce or inheritance from a man, statistically majority of alimony ( spousal support) is paid from the man to the woman during divorce, statistically majority of inventors of the 21st century after women became educated globally and joined the workforce are men, statistically majority of student loan debts are owned by women, majority of the consumer base are women

Bro's don't be Solipsisitic, women are no where economically, intellectually, in terms of leadership, in terms of building when compared to their male folks, even the so-called women entering leadership positions is because of quota policies and affirmative actions rather than meritocracy based capitalism which you asserted

Dapcity007:
If you want to argue, state facts and evidence, statistically majority of Fortune company CEOs and even most billionaires are Men, statistically majority of successful women specifically multimillionaires and billionaires earned their money through divorce or inheritance from a man, statistically majority of alimony ( spousal support) is paid from the man to the woman during divorce, statistically majority of inventors of the 21st century after women became educated globally and joined the workforce are men, statistically majority of student loan debts are owned by women, majority of the consumer base are women

Bro's don't be Solipsisitic, women are no where economically, intellectually, in terms of leadership, in terms of building when compared to their male folks, even the so-called women entering leadership positions is because of quota policies and affirmative actions rather than meritocracy based capitalism which you asserted

BS 8 years in the industry and I've seen what I've seen vs what you think it is, any gender has leadership qualities as long as they can prove competency not because of affirmative action. I don't care about fortune, I'm saying leadership position is not tied to a gender. Don't discredit ladies who worked hard genuinely to be in that position because of your hate towards women

qtguru:
BS 8 years in the industry and I've seen what I've seen vs what you think it is, any gender has leadership qualities as long as they can prove competency not because of affirmative action. I don't care about fortune, I'm saying leadership position is not tied to a gender. Don't discredit ladies who worked hard genuinely to be in that position because of your hate towards women

I'm not against hardworking women, my main contention is that many women think that these makes them attractive to men, it doesn't, their intelligence, degree, money is good for them but when it's comes to relationship value between men and women it's secondary compared to the main things beauty, fertility, youth and feminity, leadership qualities in women is very rare, most aren't Biologically not equipped for it, even the ones that can are not attractive especially to high valued men because they tend to be Masculine, combative, quarrelsome, argumentative, and assertive, all negative traits that give men headache in marriage, be hardworking and maintain your feminity, how do I hate women, I'm just stating obvious realities with empirical evidence, saying women can't be leaders is rooted in evolutionary science, that's not their default state, and damn well they don't find sissy men who can't lead attractive, the reverse is the same for men

pansophist:
Angela Markel won't agree with you

Merkel is solidifying what men have built.

pansophist:
Angela Markel won't agree with you

Besides half of Germany don't agree with her immigration policies, opening the gates to rapists and murderers, No great leader would put their people and culture at risk Merkel did that.

Dapcity007:
Note I'm not arguing that men aren't emotional at all, don't misinterprete what I'm saying, both genders are emotional,men have a greater propensity to control their emotions and apply logic than women , but women on an average are more neurotic ( prone to negative emotions) than men , the scientific literature is very clear about that, you bringing men's emotional response via aggressions which I agree with you that men on an average are more anger prone than women, but your citations validating men's happiness based on that specific experiment doesn't cover many other scenarios that women exhibit happiness far greater than men


You didn't even debunk the critical points of my argument on women's estrogenious and ovulatory realities but rather you gave a contradiction which still didn't debunk my argument

And all the facts you've listed here still haven't proved that women are lesser than men. Being emotional is not a weakness as you are trying to show here.

Women being emotional and sensitive is very important in evolution. For instance imagine if women were not sensitive to the children they gave birth to, civilisation would have collapsed a long time ago.


They are still equal. They complement each other, whether you like it or not.