Janosky:

The same defamatory allegations for which the American court of law awarded $15,000 dollars damages in favour of Mr Russell against the Washington Post newspaper.
You are a bigot, period!

Emusan:


They are hypocritical and cunning people.

They can sugarcoat anything just to promote their demonic doctrines forgotten that all what they accused other for, are also found within their organization.

You can see how their trying to defend their founder and Rutherford. When it's obvious that the way their founder treated his wife is show shameful that even unbelievers can't treat a woman such way.

Firstly, the they lied that Russell never pushed for separation whereas it's Russell himself who first brought up the issue of separation.

Secondly, their publications lied & provide half info many times just to cover up their founder's evil towards his wife the same way they're doing on this thread.

Lastly, the wife fell seriously sick during that period, imagine what their founder says "It's a judgement from his God" I wonder what their hypocritical mouth will say if it's another person that says something like this to a bedridden wife.

Here is just few statement at the trial of the marriage in court by the wife.

---

Q. Mrs. Russell, after you separated from your husband in November, 1897, where did you go live?

A. I went to my sister's. [80/1006 Cedar Avenue]

Q. And how long did you live with your sister?

A. A year and a half.

Q. Did you receive any support from your husband during that year and a half?

A. None whatever.

Q. At the expiration of the year and a half, which would be about April, 1899, where did you go live?

A. The house next door to my sister [79/1004 Cedar Avenue], which was owned by my husband, which was left vacant, the tenant moved out and I went in and took possession of it and notified Mr. Russell I was there.

Q. How long did you live in that house?

A. I remained there for four years.

Q. During those four years, did Mr. Russell contribute anything to your support, outside of permitting you to live in this house?

A. Nothing.

Q. And during those four years, how did you make a livelihood?

A. I rented furnished rooms.

Q. I believe during this time Mr. Russell gave you some furniture?

A. Yes, Sir.

Q. And that would bring us down now to April, 1903?

A. Yes, Sir.

Q. And did you leave that house on Cedar?

A. On April 16, 1903, Mr. Russell and these men who are with him today came over to my house, and with some others from the office, they were persons connected with the Watch Tower Society and also the [United States] Investment Company and they came over and took possession of the house, and turned me out of the house; he kept the furniture and even retained my pocket book which carried the money that I had received from the rent of rooms.

EDITORS NOTE: Maria Russell either misspoke when she said, "April 16, 1903", or the court reporter got it wrong. The correct date was Monday, March 16, 1903. See Section below to see what all occurred during the week of March 16, 1903 between Maria and Taze Russell.

OBJECTION

Q. And then I believe shortly after that eviction from this house you instituted these proceedings for divorce? And also proceedings in the [C]ourt of Quarter Sessions for non-support. (See following section.)

A. Yes. Sir.

Q. In which the court sentenced him to pay $40 a month?

A. Yes, Sir.

Q. Which has been done from that time down until the present?

A. Yes, Sir.

Q. Have you had any financial aid from your husband except this $40 a month which you have received since about April 1, 1903, down to the present time?

A. None whatever.

Q. Mrs. Russell, have you any means of your own?

A. I have no means of my own, excepting a very small legacy from my mother, just a few hundred dollars, and that has helped to eke out life with that $40 a month which I have been living on since that time. Mother just died just before I was evicted from that house.

Q. Mrs. Russell, prior to the time you left your husband, did he ever propose a separation?

A. Yes, Sir.

Q. When was that?

A. That was just before we moved down to the Bible House. It was in 1895.

Q. And at that time you were living on Clifton Avenue, Allegheny?

A. Yes, Sir.

Q. Did or did not Mr. Russell at that time make any threat as to what he would do with his property unless you acceded to his demands?

A. Yes, Sir.

Q. What were they?

A. He proposed that on the ground of incompatibility that we agree to separate, and if I would do so he would give me that house in which we were living, and when I broke down at the suggestion, he said if I did not agree to it, that I would not get anything.

Q. After this proposed separation and threat, Mrs. Russell, where did you go to live, you and your husband?

A. We moved down to the Bible House.

Q. At whose suggestion?

A. Mr. Russell's.

Q. And I believe you continued to live there until the final separation in November, 1897?

A. Yes, Sir.

Q. And I believe you continued to do work in the Bible House for Mr. Russell?

A. Yes, Sir, down to the time I took sick; and after that I kept on with the work all the time I was there.

You can read the full details HERE

Janosky:

The same defamatory allegations for which the American court of law awarded $15,000 dollars damages in favour of Mr Russell against the Washington Post newspaper.
You are a bigot, period!

Maestro21:


Don't be too stupid. The allegations were in relation to adultery which Mrs. Russell negated. You tried to be clever by half by hiding the earlier aspects of the transcript where she mentioned how she was maltreated and threatened to agree to the divorce.

She also mentioned that he was the one who pushed for the separation.

Have some shame.

Maestro21:


See expose...

So Mr. Russell maltreated his wife, threatened her and even forced the separation.

And the gang of shameless hypocrites are trying to defend this.

Shameless trolls.

Maestro21:


You guys are stupidly shameless.

Posers were raised for you above, go and respond to them so we can laugh at you harder.

Stop quoting Jesus, he does not know you and your satanic cult. He told his disciples who he also told about the signs that when they show love to ONE ANOTHER everyone else will know they are of the same fold.

Christians are not of your fold.

JWits are evil - subtle satanic worshippers. Deniers of the power of God, liars, hypocrites, ignorant, wicked, trolls.

Mark 16:9-20 is a fake, DUBIOUS insert alien to the holy scriptures.

Every Bible scholar knows that....
Bigotry no let you see road & receive SENSE.
Just Continue to WAIL.

Janosky:

You should be ashamed for your desperation to soil the name of a man just because you hate his religious beliefs.
When your Pastorpreneur's wife made similar claim, did you ever call him out?

Continue to drink Panadol on a legal matter the court NEVER adjudged Mr Russell to have broken any law .

MaxInDHouse:

Well in reality you just mocked your religion because there's is a difference between the GIFTS of God's Holy Spirit and the FRUIT of God's Holy Spirit.
Jesus never said the GIFTS will be the sign of true Christianity rather it was the FRUIT that Jesus emphasized! Matthew 7:16-23
The book you quoted was not found in older manuscripts of the Bible so the book of Mark ended at Chapter 16 and verse 8.
Do you think Chris can really cure the sick?

Janosky:

You are a bigot.
Your Pastorpreneur's shameless licentiousness was all over the place but you turned a blind eye.
Yeyeh !!!!

Produce the court judgement which found Mr Russell guilty nau or continue DECEIVING yourself.

Bigoted WAILER

Maestro21:


You are inane.

I am not on a thread discussing Mr. Russell or his cult.

I don't care about him.

It is you fools that came here to spew hypocrisy but when the same measure is done to your founder, you start trying to split hairs.

If they ask you to prove Rev. Anita made same claims, you will start bringing stupid blogs where anyone can just type whatever and post it.

You won't take the testimony of the man, his members, his children or even his wife. It will be a stupid blog. lol

You are "not on a thread discussing Mr Russell and his cult" but you are typing GIBBERISH villifying him.

Na so your Pastorpreneurs dey teach you to perfect the art of LYING

Maestro21:


This is beyond stupid it is unconscionable.

You are asking me for a court judgement for one man but are yet to provide one for the other that you are casting aspersions against.

Is your skull not empty?

Janosky:

[b]Mark 16:17 is a fake insert into the holy scriptures.

Janosky:

Your FALSE rants & insults mean you lack home training.

Mark 16:9-20 is a fake, DUBIOUS insert alien to the holy scriptures.

Every Bible scholar knows that....
Bigotry no let you see road & receive SENSE.
Just Continue to WAIL.

Janosky:


You are "not on a thread discussing Mr Russell and his cult" but you are typing GIBBERISH villifying him.

Na so your Pastorpreneurs dey teach you to perfect the art of LYING

Janosky:

Who be this clown wey dey mumu?
When you already know he is no longer married to Anita & she never turned up for their daughter's wedding.

Maestro21:


See expose...

So Mr. Russell maltreated his wife, threatened her and even forced the separation.

And the gang of shameless hypocrites are trying to defend this.

Shameless trolls.

Janosky:

Who be this clown wey dey mumu?
When you already know he is no longer married to Anita & she never turned up for their daughter's wedding.

Janosky:


You are "not on a thread discussing Mr Russell and his cult" but you are typing GIBBERISH villifying him.

Na so your Pastorpreneurs dey teach you to perfect the art of LYING

Janosky:

Your FALSE rants & insults mean you lack home training.

Mark 16:9-20 is a fake, DUBIOUS insert alien to the holy scriptures.

Every Bible scholar knows that....
Bigotry no let you see road & receive SENSE.
Just Continue to WAIL.

Maestro21:


See expose...

So Mr. Russell maltreated his wife, threatened her and even forced the separation.

And the gang of shameless hypocrites are trying to defend this.

Shameless trolls.

Maestro21:


Straw clutching, off point, no correlation to anything. You don't even know the man or the ministry you want to discuss.

How shameless of you. After you went on and on about separation and divorce, you immediately want to change the topic because you have been found out.

Petra1, I would not have this conversation with this person. What does light have to do with darkness? What does good have to do with evil?

This person should first express here how his leader and founder is a clown, hobnocker, shameless divorcee, failure and undeserving of speaking or leading people.

Until he says that, there is no point in conversing with him.

petra1:

Case close ni yen

Maestro21:


Which proves she divorced him. Ok.

Where is the proof for licentiousness? Proof for asking for the separation?


We have the transcript for your founder's wife saying she was threatened to comply with the divorce or risk being homeless.

We have the transcript for her saying he asked her to leave the marriage and was refusing to take care of her until she complied.

Where is Rev. Anita's transcript saying she was barred from attending her daughter's marriage?

Where is her transcript saying Rev Chris asked her for a divorce?

You have tied yourself into torturous knots.

You have been ranting upandan accusing Mr Russell of wrongdoing in his marriage.
Ogbeni, did Mrs Anita Oyas take your Pastorpreneur to court for humble, exemplary living and marital fidelity?

You are too dull

Maestro21:


LOL

I am typing gibberish vilifying him or asking you satanists to reconcile your hypocrisy concerning Pastor Chris with your dead and rotten founder?

I see you are pained by my use of words. I am astonished you would be considering that your fellow brother in shame was doing exactly that not too long ago. He is now pretending not to be interested in discussing failures again. lol

Maestro21:


Every bible scholar and JWit in the same breath.

You won't know a scholar if he walked by you with a red hat and a red jacket screaming "I am a scholar".

[s]Just stick to all your false predictions and constant corrections of fake doctrines when time exposes the earlier ones as fake. lol
[/s]
Irenaeus is known to have cited those verses in his article "against heresies".

Nothing in those verses contradicts anything we saw from the other synoptic gospels as well as the happenings in the book of Acts.

Only vagabonds, who are not of the spirit will couch under this fake excuse of "the verses are awkward and some of the earlier transcripts did not have it". Who will determine what is awkward? Dumb JWits who think Jesus is archangel Michael? lol

Stop this foolish rant exposure of your luminous ignorance & daft mentality

Got questions is a popular website of your renowned Trinitarian mentors.
Go there and receive tutorials and thank me later.

More so, your Trinitarian Bibles confirmed that Jesus Christ is an angel, Genesis 16:7 & Malachi 3:1, (Geneva Bible & Amplified Bible plus others).
The million dollar question is:
Why is the same ghost giving conflicting revelations to Maestro21 & his fellow Trinitarian devotees who translated the Bible?

They knew what Maestro21 and his Pastorpreneurs do not know.
Jesus Christ the angel @Genesis 16:7 leads other angels @ Matthew 25:31 & 2Thess 1:7-9.
Pronto!

Janosky:
According to the irrefutable evidence,

Who paid damages for making defamatory, unfounded and libelous allegations against an innocent man serving Jehovah God?

Emusan LIENUS is a sifia pained bigot!

Janosky:
You have been ranting upandan accusing Mr Russell of wrongdoing in his marriage.

Ogbeni, did Mrs Anita Oyas take your Pastorpreneur to court for humble, exemplary living and marital fidelity?

You are too dull

Janosky:

[s]Stop this foolish rant exposure of your luminous ignorance & daft mentality

Got questions is a popular website of your renowned Trinitarian mentors.
Go there and receive tutorials and thank me later.

More so, your Trinitarian Bibles confirmed that Jesus Christ is an angel, Genesis 16:7 & Malachi 3:1, (Geneva Bible & Amplified Bible plus others).
The million dollar question is:
Why is the same ghost giving conflicting revelations to Maestro21 & his fellow Trinitarian devotees who translated the Bible?

They knew what Maestro21 and his Pastorpreneurs do not know.
Jesus Christ the angel @Genesis 16:7 leads other angels @ Matthew 25:31 & 2Thess 1:7-9.
Pronto! [/s]

Janosky:

You have been ranting upandan accusing Mr Russell of wrongdoing in his marriage.
Ogbeni, did Mrs Anita Oyas take your Pastorpreneur to court for humble, exemplary living and marital fidelity?

You are too dull

Janosky:


You knew both men were divorcees , yet you dey ask me to give you transcripts of who requested for your Pastorpreneurs divorce
Your desperation to console yourself is luminous

Janosky:

Stop this foolish rant exposure of your luminous ignorance & daft mentality

Got questions is a popular website of your renowned Trinitarian mentors.
Go there and receive tutorials and thank me later.

More so, your Trinitarian Bibles confirmed that Jesus Christ is an angel, Genesis 16:7 & Malachi 3:1, (Geneva Bible & Amplified Bible plus others).
The million dollar question is:
Why is the same ghost giving conflicting revelations to Maestro21 & his fellow Trinitarian devotees who translated the Bible?

They knew what Maestro21 and his Pastorpreneurs do not know.
Jesus Christ the angel @Genesis 16:7 leads other angels @ Matthew 25:31 & 2Thess 1:7-9.
Pronto!