Adeniyi33:


Noted! what about all these ladies have crazy high initial interest that always be the first to initiate chatting, should someone chat with them back or ignore them (chat).
And what's your view on viewing eachother's WhatsApp status(stories). ubunja , Do you suggest blocking to maintain mystery? Kindly illuminate.

Lightway:


Your want to get married and date girls because of Hormones, biology, oxytocin, dopamine, serotonin; something about man being a social being and all that.



What??

ubunja:

Okay, what I'm going to say will have many variables and question marks and holes,, but I'm just putting it out there to give a general idea of things. It must not be taken as a complete, ironclad theory or set of principles.

Bro you're on point on this.

Never invest in a woman because you're just improving her SMV (sexual market value). Which will activate her hypergamy. Keep her where you found her and use your money in such a way that if she disconnects from you and goes, she'll find herself where you found her.

There's a huge difference between marrying a beautiful woman whose hair, nails and makeup are top notch AND marrying a plain woman then making her beautiful with good hair, nails and makeup. The first is you getting what you deserve or can afford. While the second is you INVESTING in a woman - Which is what men must avoid. You can use your money to maintain a slay queen. But if you find an average girl and turn her into a slay queen then you're investing in her. Which will backfire spectacularly, Because after you're done with her, her SMV will be higher than when she started, which means she's now considering you BELOW HER - nevermind you yourself improved her said SMV.

Investing in a woman includes things improving a woman's education, helping her start her own business (which will inevitably lead to her independence from you) etc. You must keep her dependent. Supply her needs and wants without putting her in a position where she can replace you. She must not own anything but be happy. (Hard but not impossible) . You must be her provider, not investor. You can very well give a woman a good life, a nice home, fun trips and good experiences without investing in her. But just showing her how much you love her.

Pïmps mastered this game ages ago. They keep all the money but make sure their women get the best of anything - the best accommodation, the best food and the best outfits. The women get everything they ask for - except for cold hard cash. That's always a no. These pïmps even do the shopping on behalf of their women to stay ahead of the game. Cause give a woman cash, no matter how little - she'll find a way to grow it. It's their gift. Pïmps prevent this and keep cash away from women.

This may seem unfair, cruel or extreme in this day and age; but women do play the same game with men as regards to sex. A Woman always keeps a man dependent and relying on her and her alone for sex. A man is not allowed to even masturbate. If a married man services himself you'll hear all the wailings from women shaming him and demanding to know if his wife is not enough for him!! He'll be Condemned for destroying his wife's self-esteem and confidence. He must always get his sex from the wife. If she's not in the mood, he must wait for her. Not go elsewhere. Not even to a prostitute.

Now, because women are masters of the game, they monopolized the sex and also monopolized men's money:
Did not our elders, fathers and uncles hand over their own hard-earned money to their women, the WOMEN who would then give the men money bit by bit on a daily basis as the needs arise, eg every morning he's given transport money and every weekend he's given beer money. This was the norm a few generations ago in many places. This is how cunning women have been. Pïmps merely give women a taste of their own medicine - with brilliant results. It needs be that men start looking closely at how those flesh peddlers mastered women.

But many men are intent on achieving women's growth. They'll take a woman from the bottom and keep pouring money into her growth until she outgrows him. Then she leaves. Men are out here educating their wives, getting their women plastic surgery, buying investments and the like. Which is foolish.
All that money and effort and even plastic surgery must have been for themselves. For the men. To keep their own SMV ever so high. And yes I said it, men must not shy away from plastic surgery. If you've something about your face that you don't like, save money and go get it fixed. Leave the scratches and scars, they add to your masculine beauty. But that nose, that eye, those ears - get them fixed if you ain't happy. Same goes for teeth: if yours are discolored, go whiten them. If they're crooked, consider investing in braces to straighten them. If a front tooth is missing, move heaven and earth to replace it. All this may sound all too shallow and even feminine... But it will pay dividends. Cause combine this with the body game (gym) and you're an Adonis. women will come. And you won't be invested in any of them because you invested, instead, in yourself.

seanwilliam:
What we see everyday

CaveAdullam:


Especially these days, young men wearing wedding rings/bands are so ubiquitous that as if it is an ultimate prerequisite to achieve something better and greater.

What I've observed among them is that in an attempt to colonize 1 pvssy, they end up colonizing themselves.

Sigh!

leetylee:
Y'all can guess how it went

Lightheaded:
Pics Mic
The Red pill is like a large tree with several branches yielding various fruits. However, I'd say it has a single root - The enlightenment of men .

Taking us back memory lane, we'd notice in the past, there was no redpill, no MGTOW, no this or that, why? There was no need to. Society was rock solid , it held the family together as the family reciprocated. Until things took a turn and voilà here we are.

Are we going back to the past? By the past I mean the fairy tale love we were sold in Titanic, Yemi my lover, and the 3 hours long Indian movies we watched when we were younger (those guys took romance over the top if you asked me) . NO WE ARE NOT, maybe it existed maybe it never did, I don't know. Just come to peace with it and lower your expectations mate.

Marriage has existed for centuries and may probably exist for centuries more, Cave, Martinez and other contributors have done more than enough justice to the pros and cons of marriages, why people sign the contracts and why they exit the building. But then life is a game, a game is an activity controlled by laid down rules and played using well thought out decisions by the players. Your immediate society you find yourself in and nature has laid down the rules , the decisions you take are in your hands.

You have society and the hypergamous nature of women to contend with (already tempered by other factors). Are you still willing to play the game?

I've said it before that the redpill can be compared to a guide book, some games come with guidebooks, but the redpill adds an extra, it makes it feel like the guidebook is a cheat book. You're not surprised by the new levels the game manifests, you've seen it before (or read it), it becomes expected. But can you shield yourself from the effects of the game, probably not, you can only dampen it, hence be wise.

Like I said the redpill has different branches and marriage is one of them, if you want to get married please do , we're all built or in this case our society and differing communities (including our families) have all built us differently. If you are willing to take your chances don't let people on a forum tell you otherwise (as much as they mean well) , even with a hundred failed marriages there's also a thousand functioning ( I didn't say perfect, some require some jump starting and spark plug replacement if you know what I mean ) unions. However don't expect a fairly tale bliss, be prepared to face reality. I'd recommend the redpill. Every ying has an accompanying yang, if you've decided to compare the good and bad sides of marriage it favours you, it's a personal choice.

Somebody recommend studying the Philosophy of morality as a hobby and I'd take that up. Cave and doing justice to topics, 5 and 6. Cave what did you study? I want to check something.

We might say redpill is amoral and all but then think about where the society stands without morality. We'd talk about women being hypergamous without remorse, more like them lacking conscience but then it's just being amoral, so why the fuss if they're indirectly doing what we're preaching, they put themselves first innit. You just happened to be on the other side of the 2 by 2 plank .
Society will crumble without morality, I'm not here to preach about morality, but not everybody will be moral and not everyone will be "amoral" or "immoral".

Machiavellianism will introduce you to the perks of morality and amorality and the ways of using them, don't shoot yourself in the leg by screaming redpill is amoral everywhere you go. Know control.

But I suggest everyone should know that you being moral doesn't sideline you from the consequences of the actions of the amoral or immoral. Just like saying because you're good means you won't be duped. Life doesn't work that way.

One of my friends was bullied as a kid and it did quite a score on him till today, he asked me why "nemesis" doesn't catch up with bad people (this case his bullies), despite him being a good person. His bullies are still doing good according to him, but he was expecting some fvxked up shvt to have happened, well life happens and I didn't make the law of karma and nemesis.

There's this intersection between what's right, morality (moral, amoral, immoral), what favours one (selfishness). Not everyone will get the intersection and make the best decision. It's dicey but let's think about it.

Sharing memes and stories is a major way of keeping the thread alive and continuous reminder that we shouldn't lower frame and not exactly complaining, I think Tonny might have misconstrued it. However, if you're still complaining about the female nature, just go back to page 1 of this thread and start all over, you should be beyond that by this time.
My hands in the the air for those that keep posting , heartofcity you too much.

Why are women women? Think about this.

"A lion in the wild is primed for preying, it's jaws, claws, muscles, athletism all incorporated into every nucleotide in its DNA.
However a lion cub, unexposed to the wild, groomed and trained in the house, behaves as a house cat, until its very basic nature is triggered knowingly or unknowingly and from there there's no going back."

This might be a rant, but it's just my thoughts.
Drops mic.

Ketapu:
It seems many here are practicing selective ignoring.

You ignore monikers with the f gender but can't ignore others who are more of a troll than red piller.

I've noticed kiiing000g to be a troll a long time ago and since then, I've never read any of his post. In fact, I don't read posts from anyone I've noticed to be a troll here. I always first check the moniker before reading any post here. Once I see the name of the moniker and it's one of the trolls here, I move on to the next post.

By giving attentions to trolls, you give them existence and credibility.

While not consign them to oblivion and let them fade away by ignoring them?

Lightheaded:
Pics Mic
The Red pill is like a large tree with several branches yielding various fruits. However, I'd say it has a single root - The enlightenment of men .

Taking us back memory lane, we'd notice in the past, there was no redpill, no MGTOW, no this or that, why? There was no need to. Society was rock solid , it held the family together as the family reciprocated. Until things took a turn and voilà here we are.

Are we going back to the past? By the past I mean the fairy tale love we were sold in Titanic, Yemi my lover, and the 3 hours long Indian movies we watched when we were younger (those guys took romance over the top if you asked me) . NO WE ARE NOT, maybe it existed maybe it never did, I don't know. Just come to peace with it and lower your expectations mate.

Marriage has existed for centuries and may probably exist for centuries more, Cave, Martinez and other contributors have done more than enough justice to the pros and cons of marriages, why people sign the contracts and why they exit the building. But then life is a game, a game is an activity controlled by laid down rules and played using well thought out decisions by the players. Your immediate society you find yourself in and nature has laid down the rules , the decisions you take are in your hands.

You have society and the hypergamous nature of women to contend with (already tempered by other factors). Are you still willing to play the game?

I've said it before that the redpill can be compared to a guide book, some games come with guidebooks, but the redpill adds an extra, it makes it feel like the guidebook is a cheat book. You're not surprised by the new levels the game manifests, you've seen it before (or read it), it becomes expected. But can you shield yourself from the effects of the game, probably not, you can only dampen it, hence be wise.

Like I said the redpill has different branches and marriage is one of them, if you want to get married please do , we're all built or in this case our society and differing communities (including our families) have all built us differently. If you are willing to take your chances don't let people on a forum tell you otherwise (as much as they mean well) , even with a hundred failed marriages there's also a thousand functioning ( I didn't say perfect, some require some jump starting and spark plug replacement if you know what I mean ) unions. However don't expect a fairly tale bliss, be prepared to face reality. I'd recommend the redpill. Every ying has an accompanying yang, if you've decided to compare the good and bad sides of marriage it favours you, it's a personal choice.

Somebody recommend studying the Philosophy of morality as a hobby and I'd take that up. Cave and doing justice to topics, 5 and 6. Cave what did you study? I want to check something.

We might say redpill is amoral and all but then think about where the society stands without morality. We'd talk about women being hypergamous without remorse, more like them lacking conscience but then it's just being amoral, so why the fuss if they're indirectly doing what we're preaching, they put themselves first innit. You just happened to be on the other side of the 2 by 2 plank .
Society will crumble without morality, I'm not here to preach about morality, but not everybody will be moral and not everyone will be "amoral" or "immoral".

Machiavellianism will introduce you to the perks of morality and amorality and the ways of using them, don't shoot yourself in the leg by screaming redpill is amoral everywhere you go. Know control.

But I suggest everyone should know that you being moral doesn't sideline you from the consequences of the actions of the amoral or immoral. Just like saying because you're good means you won't be duped. Life doesn't work that way.

One of my friends was bullied as a kid and it did quite a score on him till today, he asked me why "nemesis" doesn't catch up with bad people (this case his bullies), despite him being a good person. His bullies are still doing good according to him, but he was expecting some fvxked up shvt to have happened, well life happens and I didn't make the law of karma and nemesis.

There's this intersection between what's right, morality (moral, amoral, immoral), what favours one (selfishness). Not everyone will get the intersection and make the best decision. It's dicey but let's think about it.

Sharing memes and stories is a major way of keeping the thread alive and continuous reminder that we shouldn't lower frame and not exactly complaining, I think Tonny might have misconstrued it. However, if you're still complaining about the female nature, just go back to page 1 of this thread and start all over, you should be beyond that by this time.
My hands in the the air for those that keep posting , heartofcity you too much.

Why are women women? Think about this.

"A lion in the wild is primed for preying, it's jaws, claws, muscles, athletism all incorporated into every nucleotide in its DNA.
However a lion cub, unexposed to the wild, groomed and trained in the house, behaves as a house cat, until its very basic nature is triggered knowingly or unknowingly and from there there's no going back."

This might be a rant, but it's just my thoughts.
Drops mic.

Lightheaded:
However, if you're still complaining about the female nature, just go back to page 1 of this thread and start all over, you should be beyond that by this time.

Lightheaded:
This might be a rant, but it's just my thoughts.
Drops mic.

ichidodo:
Please be well advised...Not everyone that post here is really redpilled, some like that individual you quoted are 'redpill aware' but the aspect of being neck deep in the redpill doesn't just fly with them, small wonder they lose guard only to drop off blue pillled drivel here and there...I mean...Let us analyse the crap he spouted...So you helped a guy from generational poverty only to merge him with a lose-lose situation of a depreciating item,that has almost hit the wall, who wouldn't have given a rat's ass whether he lived or died back in the day....and you feeling very cool with yourself??...The motherf**er didn't realise that he just screwed his dear friend over..

heartofcity12:
Continuation

luminouz:


Don't worry, a little biatchhh will marry her and feed her ego.

No way a girl says this to me and won't receive a crested 'K'

CaveAdullam:


Solid!

Even Rollo Tomassi has this to say:

Junnior:

I disagree with you.

People should get married if they want to. There are always pros and cons of any choice we make. It is left for each man to pick his own poison.

The thing with Tonnyray is he is open-minded and not just another redpill junky like many of us here.

Now, how exactly did he screw his friend over?



We all know these things, but some of us refuse to come to terms with them and be at peace.

CaveAdullam:

Solid!
Even Rollo Tomassi has this to say:

Tonnyray:
I believe you know this sure ain't me. I understood and have accepted the peculiarities of the female nature a long time ago. I hardly ever bother myself about what I have absolutely no control whatsoever over. It's the wailers that should take a cue and take dressing.
This is far from being a rant. It's pristine words of wisdom.
Kudos brah.

heartofcity12:


Hmmn.
Best response for those leaches

Smartb0y:

I don't blame them, as long as simps exist , their mentality will remain the same.

CaveAdullam:


Especially these days, young men wearing wedding rings/bands are so ubiquitous that as if it is an ultimate prerequisite to achieve something better and greater.

What I've observed among them is that in an attempt to colonize 1 pvssy, they end up colonizing themselves.

Sigh!

Lightheaded:

Lol sure ain't for you, it's for our brothers who haven't come to terms with how life works. I'm just saying majorly posting about some things isn't complaining, I'd say awareness. Cheers boss

Lightheaded:

Alike minds bro, you too sabi.

ThomasShelby:


Exactly. If redpill is too harsh for some people, they can simply leave the thread.

ThomasShelby:


Exactly. When people are posting about stuffs here, that does not mean they are complaining, this is a redpill thread for heaven’s sake and people will post stuffs related to female nature and what the redpill entails. This is a redpill thread, not bluepill, not purple pill, not black pill. I feel some guys are feeling the posts are too harsh on women, it’s not by force to be on a redpill thread o. If discussing about the things happening in the society is now termed ‘complaining’, then I don’t see any reason why anyone has to be here. If redpill is too harsh for some people, they can simply leave the thread.

heartofcity12:


True. Las las it’s the simps that will learn the hard way, women are playing their games smarter.