raumdeuter:


I think taking out Sancho for Ronaldo at that time was wrong. Ronaldo cannot play the sufferhead football Carrick set out to play today

They were tired by then. None of them was making any impact. Rashford had a one v one with a defender and he couldn’t beat his marker.

When you set up the way the player, the ball carrier has to be sharp and be able to beat his marker or pass the ball vertically to a team mate.

We did none of that. Chelsea took huge risks and every time we broke, it looked like we had a chance but the ball carriers were woeful.

Illimitable:


This is just nonsense talk.

Ronaldo is stronger than any player in United squad. I don’t know what you people expected. That Ronaldo should have scored a hat trick after coming on for 23 minutes?



Don’t mind the agenda people.

Rashford that is miles younger than Ronaldo did nothing with all the counter attacks we had. Rashford couldn’t beat his man at any point in the game but Ronaldo is too old to cope with the PL?

Ronaldo = PL!!!

Carrick set out to defend and just lump balls forward to chase.

Is that what you want Ronaldo doing? Chasing hopeless balls and have Rudiger Silva and Chalobah toy and pass him around

Leyqute:


Everybody in the frontline has more stamina and strength than this current Ronaldo.

I disagree.

So Lingard had more impact?

Even the big Rom didn't torment our defense. Ronaldo played as a striker, we didn't play well up front, so how do you expect him to shine?

Make una free our GOAT o.. no be him be Carrick.

Even Black Ronaldo no do anything throughout. Chelsea dominated.

Which troubles did Sancho and Rashford cause? lol..

Let’s not even fool ourselves, we were very very lucky to come away with a draw. We were absolutely dominated.

Karleb:


Anyone making this statement is blinded by hate.

So AWB, Fred, Matic and Co are more physical than Ronaldo.

I don't blame you guys sha. Many of you even insulted him because rumour had it he was going to City.

Did you see the run he made for that offside ball?

Even a "physical" Lukaku had less impact compared to Ronaldo.

Ronaldo may be a better fit physically, but you're missing it. Will he be willing to use that energy to help the team when we're not with the ball? Chelsea was always going to have the ball for major parts of the game, what would Ronaldo be doing?

elampiro:
It think McTomiay is unjustly criticized here. I saw many times that if not he raced back, we would have been dealt with severely from the left back. Just showing up prevented Chelsea from smooth build up in some instances. In a particular instance, he must have had the speed of Usain Bolt to have been able to return so fast to shield the left back

McTominay and Fred are in contention for Man of the Match

CapitalCee:
Bruno should not try this nonsense again oo, he was determined to give away a goal

Bruno was very poor tbh.

Too poor.

He should’ve been hauled off way before the 80 minute.

weedtaker:
Which troubles did Sancho and Rashford cause? lol..

Let’s not even fool ourselves, we were very very lucky to come away with a draw. We were absolutely dominated.

The strategy was to concede possession get dominated but not concede while waiting for hopeful long balls upfront for Rashford and Sancho to chase

Illimitable:


This is just nonsense talk.

Ronaldo is stronger than any player in United squad. I don’t know what you people expected. That Ronaldo should have scored a hat trick after coming on for 23 minutes?



Don’t mind the agenda people.

Rashford that is miles younger than Ronaldo did nothing with all the counter attacks we had. Rashford couldn’t beat his man at any point in the game but Ronaldo is too old to cope with the PL?

Ronaldo = PL!!!

If this was offline, I'd be screaming at some people here.

If you didn't watch the match you'd end up hating some players because of their bias comments.

raumdeuter:


Carrick set out to defend and just lump balls forward to chase.

Is that what you want Ronaldo doing? Chasing hopeless balls and have Rudiger Silva and Chalobah toy and pass his around

That’s what Ronaldo can do. He had only 20 minutes to do it and if the ball was more accurate, you would have seen how such game suits him.

I wish we had Mata on the pitch.

nitrogen:


Does this even make sense to you? Stoke City’s striker will anyway expect one or two services in every game, but man utd strikers should not expect service in some games.

You guys are just impossible!

A stoke city striker will not be so anonymous in pressing, tackling, chasing, involving in build-up play. Today, Ronaldo was a short one player. We would have done ourselves a favour if we played Sancho for 90 minutes. Every game is different.

nitrogen:


That was a triple decker. 4 defenders, 3 defensive midfielders, and Bruno was even withdrawing to support dem. That’s not double decker.

Ridiculous!

Sir, to be fair, I don't think anyone is expecting this kind of result. People were skeptical and couldn't afford to carry Manchester United to draw not to a draw. We'd have been trailing by 3 goals of it's Olè.

It's not as if we've not used this formation before self.

raumdeuter:


Carrick set out to defend and just lump balls forward to chase.

Is that what you want Ronaldo doing? Chasing hopeless balls and have Rudiger Silva and Chalobah toy and pass him around

Gbam

eph12:

Ronaldo may be a better fit physically, but you're missing it.[b] Will he be willing to use that energy to help the team when we're not with the ball? [/b]Chelsea was always going to have the ball for major parts of the game, what would Ronaldo be doing?

What sort of question is this?

If you didn't see what Ronaldo did when we didn't have the ball, I'd advice you watch the highlight.

nitrogen:


That was a triple decker. 4 defenders, 3 defensive midfielders, and Bruno was even withdrawing to support dem. That’s not double decker.

Ridiculous!

Champions league have been won this way. I am very sure you praised Mourinho for this years ago when he won his champions league this way. We could go on and on.

elampiro:


A stoke city striker will not be so anonymous in pressing, tackling, chasing, involving in build-up play. Today, Ronaldo was a short one player. We would have done ourselves a favour if we played Sancho for 90 minutes. Every game is different.

Play Sancho for 90 mins?

Sancho that was running out of breath after having to chase and close down Chelsea players. You people watch the back of your TV during games. I am 100% sure now.

Lukaku came in for a team that 100% dominated the game, what impact did he make in the game but somehow Ronaldo should have scored a hat trick in the game we barely had a sniff in Chelsea’s box.

raumdeuter:


The strategy was to concede possession get dominated but not concede while waiting for hopeful long balls upfront for Rashford and Sancho to chase

So what happened all those times they won the ball by pressing Chelsea?

Better go and watch your Bayern.

eph12:

Champions league have been won this way. I am very sure you praised Mourinho for this years ago when he won his champions league this way. We could go on and on.

1-1 is better than losing 5-0

If not for Fred we could have stolen a victory

Leyqute:


Because Ronaldo is pressing stationary strikers and midfielders Abi? The shame is on you.

Lool, you should just listen to yourself and hear how how ridiculous you sound.

…..and I will be waiting for you lots to celebrate any of Ronaldo’s goals going forward.

weedtaker:
Which troubles did Sancho and Rashford cause? lol..

Let’s not even fool ourselves, we were very very lucky to come away with a draw. We were absolutely dominated.

Don’t mind the dolts!

raumdeuter:


The strategy was to concede possession get dominated but not concede while waiting for hopeful long balls upfront for Rashford and Sancho to chase

And you think Ronaldo is not a better ‘chaser’? How many balls did Sancho and Rashford chase today?

Karleb:


What sort of question is this?

If you didn't see what Ronaldo did when we didn't have the ball, I'd advice you watch the highlight.

If you didn't see what Sancho and Rashford did when we didn't have the ball, I'd advice you watch the highlight

I think it's only fair Carrick is given a permanent contract

elampiro:


A stoke city striker will not be so anonymous in pressing, tackling, chasing, involving in build-up play. Today, Ronaldo was a short one player. We would have done ourselves a favour if we played Sancho for 90 minutes. Every game is different.

Yours is always pawa. You have never supported any intelligent player on this thread. Your favourites are McTom, Fred, and Jones.

I should stop quoting you.

nitrogen:


Lool, you should just listen to yourself and hear how how ridiculous you sound.

…..and I will be waiting for you lots to celebrate any of Ronaldo’s goals going forward.

A lot of them are closet Ronaldo hater.

They'd do their best to hate him if he's not scoring or if he scored a penalty.

Lukaku, their supposed best striker came on without any meaningful impact even though he's younger and his team was dominating.

Arm chair soccer analysts.

E dey vex me sha.

elampiro:


1-1 is better than losing 5-0

If not for Fred we could have stolen a victory

LOL please don't forget that Fred actually intercepted that ball. You are talking like he was passed to

kokanepyramid:
I think it's only fair Carrick is given a permanent contract

kokanepyramid:
I think it's only fair Carrick is given a permanent contract

Tell Arsenal Board to act fast.

elampiro:


1-1 is better than losing 5-0

If not for Fred we could have stolen a victory

If Ronaldo had started this game, that forward line press wouldn’t be organized.

eph12:

If you didn't see what Sancho and Rashford did when we didn't have the ball, I'd advice you watch the highlight

I don't get.

Where did I talk about Sancho and Rashford?

Comrades... Why can't we just rest and look forward to the next match??