What really happened to the Bani Qurayza Jews? Were they traitors or they were betrayed? Why did Prophet Muhammad massacre the Bani Qurayza Jews in Arabia?

Muhammad was trying to get the Jews in Arabia peninsula to believe him as a prophet and accept Islam , but no matter how had he tried the Jews couldn't believe him. This lead to several battles between Prophet Muhammad and the Jews. The battle of Trench, the Battle of Badr, The battle of The Battle of Al-Khandaq.
No matter how hard Mohammed tried to convince them that he is a prophet he just couldn't. There was a time he even barged into a Jewish Synagogue in Yathrib (Al-Madina Al-Munawwarah) and said that if only twelve Jews would believe in him then Allah would spare them his wrath Musnad Ahmad - 23464

Quraysh and Ghatfan, encouraged by the Bani Al-Nadheer Jews who were exiled by Muhammad, wanted to eliminate Mohammed once and for all. They gathered up a great army and put Yathrib under siege [Saheeh Bukhari - 4103].
Mohammed , based on a suggestion by Salman Al-Farisi, dug a trench around Yathrib [Saheeh Bukhari - 2837], except for the Bani Quraytha side that is, because they had great fortresses and it would be practically impossible for the Pagan Arabs to get through their fortresses unless Bani Quraytha allowed it.

Now since Mohammed and Bani Quraytha had a treaty, Mohammed had nothing to fear [Saheeh Muslim - 1766 and Sunan Abi Dawood - 3004]. Therefore all was set.

Full details on the video...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBkNA2XvqAY

1. Were the Jews natives of Arabia?

2. What were the Jews doing in Arabia?

3. Was Arabia part of Cannan that Yahweh/Jehovah promised them?

4. What exactly were the Jews of Yathrib looking for in Yathrib? Remember Yathrib was not Jerusalem nor Judea.

I can go on and on but answer those questions and let us move from there.

innotutorial:
What really happened to the Bani Qurayza Jews? Were they traitors or they were betrayed? Why did Prophet Muhammad massacre the Bani Qurayza Jews in Arabia?

Muhammad was trying to get the Jews in Arabia peninsula to believe him as a prophet and accept Islam , but no matter how had he tried the Jews couldn't believe him. This lead to several battles between Prophet Muhammad and the Jews. The battle of Trench, the Battle of Badr, The battle of The Battle of Al-Khandaq.
No matter how hard Mohammed tried to convince them that he is a prophet he just couldn't. There was a time he even barged into a Jewish Synagogue in Yathrib (Al-Madina Al-Munawwarah) and said that if only twelve Jews would believe in him then Allah would spare them his wrath Musnad Ahmad - 23464

Quraysh and Ghatfan, encouraged by the Bani Al-Nadheer Jews who were exiled by Muhammad, wanted to eliminate Mohammed once and for all. They gathered up a great army and put Yathrib under siege [Saheeh Bukhari - 4103].
Mohammed , based on a suggestion by Salman Al-Farisi, dug a trench around Yathrib [Saheeh Bukhari - 2837], except for the Bani Quraytha side that is, because they had great fortresses and it would be practically impossible for the Pagan Arabs to get through their fortresses unless Bani Quraytha allowed it.

Now since Mohammed and Bani Quraytha had a treaty, Mohammed had nothing to fear [Saheeh Muslim - 1766 and Sunan Abi Dawood - 3004]. Therefore all was set.

Full details on the video...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBkNA2XvqAY

1. Were the Jews natives of Arabia?

2. What were the Jews doing in Arabia?

3. Was Arabia part of Cannan that Yahweh/Jehovah promised them?

4. What exactly were the Jews of Yathrib looking for in Yathrib? Remember Yathrib was not Jerusalem nor Judea.

I can go on and on but answer those questions and let us move from there.

This is interesting...

innotutorial:
What really happened to the Bani Qurayza Jews? Were they traitors or they were betrayed? Why did Prophet Muhammad massacre the Bani Qurayza Jews in Arabia?

Muhammad was trying to get the Jews in Arabia peninsula to believe him as a prophet and accept Islam , but no matter how had he tried the Jews couldn't believe him. This lead to several battles between Prophet Muhammad and the Jews. The battle of Trench, the Battle of Badr, The battle of The Battle of Al-Khandaq.
No matter how hard Mohammed tried to convince them that he is a prophet he just couldn't. There was a time he even barged into a Jewish Synagogue in Yathrib (Al-Madina Al-Munawwarah) and said that if only twelve Jews would believe in him then Allah would spare them his wrath Musnad Ahmad - 23464

Quraysh and Ghatfan, encouraged by the Bani Al-Nadheer Jews who were exiled by Muhammad, wanted to eliminate Mohammed once and for all. They gathered up a great army and put Yathrib under siege [Saheeh Bukhari - 4103].
Mohammed , based on a suggestion by Salman Al-Farisi, dug a trench around Yathrib [Saheeh Bukhari - 2837], except for the Bani Quraytha side that is, because they had great fortresses and it would be practically impossible for the Pagan Arabs to get through their fortresses unless Bani Quraytha allowed it.

Now since Mohammed and Bani Quraytha had a treaty, Mohammed had nothing to fear [Saheeh Muslim - 1766 and Sunan Abi Dawood - 3004]. Therefore all was set.

Full details on the video...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBkNA2XvqAY

Why do you like to lie like this? You mentioned battle of Badr where the Muslims fought their enemies that were over three times more than them!

Which kind lie be all this all just to spite Islam for Christians to believe?

Christianity is now synonymous to lies now!

A question is due here: 'What did Banu Quraythah do in order to deserve this fate? The answer is that they betrayed the Muslims and breached the covenant which was concluded with the Muslims at a crucial time when they were besieged by 10,000 non-Muslim fighters. Thus, they exposed the life of all the Muslims (men, women, children and elders) to danger if it was not for the Mercy and Grace of Allaah The Almighty Who repelled those who disbelieved in their rage.

One of the contemporary writers said, “If those who criticize the ruling of Sa'd on Banu Quraythah were to study the current laws efficiently and applied them on Banu Quraythah, they would conclude that the laws of the 20th century are no different than the ruling of Sa'd Ibn Mu'aath." The writer clarified that the Jews committed three crimes, which are:

1- Lifting arms along with the enemy invader against the ruler of Madeenah.

2- Conspiring with the enemy against the Muslims.

3- Facilitating the entrance of the enemy to the country.

Then the writer said, ''Contemporary criminal laws apply the death punishment to each of the above three crimes.''

It is worth mentioning here Deuteronomy chapter 20 which reads:

"10 When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against it, then proclaim peace unto it. 11. And it shall be, if it make thee answer of peace, and open unto thee, then it shall be, that all the people that is found therein shall be tributaries unto thee, and they shall serve thee. 12. And if it will make no peace with thee, but will make war against thee, then thou shalt besiege it: 13. And when the LORD thy God hath delivered it into thine hands, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword: 14. But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself; and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies, which the LORD thy God hath given thee. 15. Thus shalt thou do unto all the cities which are very far off from thee, which are not of the cities of these nations. 16. But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth: 17. But thou shalt utterly destroy them.''

Why tell lies of this magnitude innotutorial?

Show me where it says they betrayed the Muslim and what did they do to betray the Muslim to break the peace treaty? I literary gave you evidence from your book but you can't see. show me the actions the Bani Quraytha Jews did to break the treaty with Muslim.

AntiChristian:


Why do you like to lie like this? You mentioned battle of Badr where the Muslims fought their enemies that were over three times more than them!

Which kind lie be all this all just to spite Islam for Christians to believe?

Christianity is now synonymous to lies now!

A question is due here: 'What did Banu Quraythah do in order to deserve this fate? The answer is that they betrayed the Muslims and breached the covenant which was concluded with the Muslims at a crucial time when they were besieged by 10,000 non-Muslim fighters. Thus, they exposed the life of all the Muslims (men, women, children and elders) to danger if it was not for the Mercy and Grace of Allaah The Almighty Who repelled those who disbelieved in their rage.

One of the contemporary writers said, “If those who criticize the ruling of Sa'd on Banu Quraythah were to study the current laws efficiently and applied them on Banu Quraythah, they would conclude that the laws of the 20th century are no different than the ruling of Sa'd Ibn Mu'aath." The writer clarified that the Jews committed three crimes, which are:

1- Lifting arms along with the enemy invader against the ruler of Madeenah.

2- Conspiring with the enemy against the Muslims.

3- Facilitating the entrance of the enemy to the country.

Then the writer said, ''Contemporary criminal laws apply the death punishment to each of the above three crimes.''

It is worth mentioning here Deuteronomy chapter 20 which reads:

"10 When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against it, then proclaim peace unto it. 11. And it shall be, if it make thee answer of peace, and open unto thee, then it shall be, that all the people that is found therein shall be tributaries unto thee, and they shall serve thee. 12. And if it will make no peace with thee, but will make war against thee, then thou shalt besiege it: 13. And when the LORD thy God hath delivered it into thine hands, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword: 14. But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself; and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies, which the LORD thy God hath given thee. 15. Thus shalt thou do unto all the cities which are very far off from thee, which are not of the cities of these nations. 16. But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth: 17. But thou shalt utterly destroy them.''

Why tell lies of this magnitude innotutorial?

You speaking off key. What does that has to do with the topic.
Did Muhammad killed the Bani Quraytha Jews or not?
Did the Bani Quraytha Jews break the peace treaty with Muhammad or not?
If yes show me where it says they did and the action those took which goes against the treaty.

Lukuluku69:


1. Were the Jews natives of Arabia?

2. What were the Jews doing in Arabia?

3. Was Arabia part of Cannan that Yahweh/Jehovah promised them?

4. What exactly were the Jews of Yathrib looking for in Yathrib? Remember Yathrib was not Jerusalem nor Judea.

I can go on and on but answer those questions and let us move from there.

Yes

TIMSE:
This is interesting...

innotutorial:
Yes

You're a blatant and unapologetic liar!

Muhammad was trying to get the Jews in Arabia peninsula to believe him as a prophet and accept Islam , but no matter how had he tried the Jews couldn't believe him. This lead to several battles between Prophet Muhammad and the Jews. The battle of Trench, the Battle of Badr, The battle of The Battle of Al-Khandaq.

The battles were either defensive or offensive and there were not only Jews. Idol worshippers were there and some were not initiated by the Muslims.

You are a LIAR for Christ!

innotutorial:
Show me where it says they betrayed the Muslim and what did they do to betray the Muslim to break the peace treaty? I literary gave you evidence from your book but you can't see. show me the actions the Bani Quraytha Jews did to break the treaty with Muslim.

Two million evidences won't suffice a LIAR like you!

The Prophet (s) was in conflict with some specific Jewish tribes in Medina due to their aiding the Meccan aristocracy in a war of extermination against the Muslim community. After the battle, the Prophet chose Sa’d ibn Mu’adh to pass judgment upon the fighting men, which Sa’d did according to the law of the Torah.

Ibn Umar reported:

أَنَّ يَهُودَ بَنِي النَّضِيرِ وَقُرَيْظَةَ حَارَبُوا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَأَجْلَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ بَنِي النَّضِيرِ وَأَقَرَّ قُرَيْظَةَ وَمَنَّ عَلَيْهِمْ حَتَّى حَارَبَتْ قُرَيْظَةُ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ

The Jews of Banu Nadeer and Banu Quraiza waged war against the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, so he expelled Banu Nadeer but he allowed Banu Quraiza to stay and he granted them favor until they also waged war after that.

Source: Sahih Muslim 1766, Grade: Sahih

, not simply because they were Jewish. This is clear in another tradition in which the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, told his companion:

خُذْ عَلَيْكَ سِلاَحَكَ فَإِنِّي أَخْشَى عَلَيْكَ قُرَيْظَةَ

Take your weapons, for I fear the tribe of Quraiza.

Source: Sahih Muslim 2236, Grade: Sahih

The Prophet told his companion to carry his weapons, not to commit aggression against Quraiza, but rather to defend himself against them.

This fact is confirmed by Dr. Marco Schöller:

The Muslim attack and siege of the Qurayẓa was a response to their open, probably active support of the Meccan pagans and their allies during the battle (of the trench).

Source: Schöller, Marco. “Qurayẓa (Banū al-).” Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān.

The judgment against them upon their defeat was that the fighting men who participated in the battle were killed and the women and children were taken into the custody of the Muslims.

Sa’d ibn Mu’adh passed judgment saying:

قَالَ تَقْتُلُ مُقَاتِلَتَهُمْ وَتَسْبِي ذُرِّيَّتَهُمْ

Their combatants will be killed and their progeny taken as captives.

Source: Source: Sahih Muslim, 1768 Grade: Sahih

Sa’d judged only that “their fighting men” (muqatilatahum) should be executed as an act of self-defense for the Muslim community. The women and children were taken into custody due to the fact that they would have no one to care for them; to abandon them would have itself been a death sentence. This ruling was based upon the Torah, the Jewish holy book, which reads:

וְאִם לֹ֤א תַשְׁלִים֙ עִמָּ֔ךְ וְעָשְׂתָ֥ה עִמְּךָ֖ מִלְחָמָ֑ה וְצַרְתָּ֖ עָלֶֽיהָ וּנְתָנָ֛הּ יְהוָ֥ה אֱלֹהֶ֖יךָ בְּיָדֶ֑ךָ וְהִכִּיתָ֥ אֶת כָּל זְכוּרָ֖הּ לְפִי חָֽרֶב רַ֣ק הַ֠נָּשִׁים וְהַטַּ֨ף וְהַבְּהֵמָ֜ה וְכֹל֩ אֲשֶׁ֨ר יִהְיֶ֥ה בָעִ֛יר כָּל־ שְׁלָלָ֖הּ תָּבֹ֣ז לָ֑ךְ וְאָֽכַלְתָּ֙ אֶת שְׁלַ֣ל אֹיְבֶ֔יךָ אֲשֶׁ֥ר נָתַ֛ן יְהוָ֥ה אֱלֹהֶ֖יךָ לָֽךְ

But if the city makes no peace with you, but makes war against you, then you shall besiege it; and when the Lord your God gives it into your hand you shall put all its males to the sword, but the women and the little ones, the cattle, and everything else in the city, all its spoil, you shall take as booty for yourselves; and you shall enjoy the spoil of your enemies, which the Lord your God has given you.

Source: Deuteronomy 20:12-14

This judgment might seem very harsh and unmerciful, but in the context of ancient Arabia this action was necessary for the Muslim community due to the threat of extermination they faced.

Scholars of history understand that such was the nature of justice in a rough desert environment:

Most scholars of this episode agree that neither party acted outside the bounds of normal relations in 7th century Arabia. The new order brought by Muhammad was viewed by many as a threat to the age-old system of tribal alliances, as it certainly proved to be. For the Banu Qurayza, the end of this system seemed to bring with it many risks. At the same time, the Muslims faced the threat of total extermination, and needed to send a message to all those groups in Medina that might try to betray their society in the future. It is doubtful that either party could have behaved differently under the circumstances.

Source: PBS “Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet.”

Furthermore, as only the fighting men were killed, there were several male members of the Banu Quraiza tribe who survived because they did not participate in the battle, either because they were too young or they surrendered before the fighting began.

Ibn Umar reported:

فَقَتَلَ رِجَالَهُمْ وَقَسَمَ نِسَاءَهُمْ وَأَوْلَادَهُمْ وَأَمْوَالَهُمْ بَيْنَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ إِلَّا أَنَّ بَعْضَهُمْ لَحِقُوا بِرَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَآمَنَهُمْ وَأَسْلَمُوا

Thus, the Prophet killed their fighting men and he distributed their women, children, and property among the Muslims except for some of them who had joined the Messenger of Allah and so he granted them protection and they embraced Islam.

Many of the male descendants of Quraiza lived, some of them embracing Islam, which is proof that the Prophet did not commit genocide (extermination of an entire race), but rather he only approved the execution of their combatants as an act of self-defense.

This fact is confirmed by Dr. Marco Schöller:

The Islamic tradition knows a number of descendants from the Qurayẓa by name, most famous among them being the traditionist Muḥammad b. Kaʿb al-Quraẓī, who was born a Muslim and died in Medina in 120/738 or some years before. Others include his father Kaʿb ibn Asad ibn Sulaym and his brother Isḥāq, as well as ʿAṭiyya al-Quraẓī, al-Zubayr ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn al-Zabīr, ʿAlī ibn Rifāʿa and the progeny of Abū Malik al-Quraẓī. This suggests that… several male persons of the Qurayẓa did survive the conflict in Medina, probably because of their young age at the time.

Source: Schöller, Marco. “Qurayẓa (Banū al-).” Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān.

In addition, even though the Muslims suffered this bitter conflict with the Jewish tribes of Medina, this did not diminish the Prophet’s teachings of kindness and good character toward Jewish neighbors. In fact, the Prophet died will in the middle of a business contract with a Jew.

Aisha reported:

تُوُفِّيَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَدِرْعُهُ مَرْهُونَةٌ عِنْدَ يَهُودِيٍّ بِثَلَاثِينَ صَاعًا مِنْ شَعِيرٍ

The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, passed away while his armor was mortgaged to a Jew for thirty units of barley.

Source: Sahih Bukhari 2759, Grade: Sahih

This tradition is proof that the Prophet continued to maintain friendly relations with Jews even after the incident with Qurayza and until his death. Likewise, the Prophet’s companions continued this tradition of amicability after him.

Mujahid reported: I was with Abdullah ibn Amr while his servant was skinning a sheep. He said, “O boy, when you finish up, then start with the Jewish neighbor.” A man there exclaimed, “Jewish? May Allah correct you!” He replied:

إِنِّي سَمِعْتُ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم يُوصِي بِالْجَارِ حَتَّى خَشِينَا أَوْ رُئِينَا أَنَّهُ سَيُوَرِّثُهُ

I heard the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, recommending that we treat our neighbors well until we thought that he would order us to make them our heirs.

Source: Source: Al-Adab Al-Mufrad 128, Grade: Hasan

In conclusion, the Prophet did not commit genocide against the Jews of Medina, nor did he intend for bad relations between Jews and Muslims in general. The conflict with the Banu Qurayza tribe was only due to the specific aggression suffered by the Muslims and not merely because they were Jews. The Prophet continued to maintain friendly relations with Jews even after this bitter conflict and this tradition was continued by his companions.

Success comes from Allah, and Allah knows best.

Show me where it says the Bani Qurayza broke the peace treaty and they did an action that go against the peace treaty with Muhammad.

You see how you muslim never read to understand but to memorize.
If you can show me any where in the hadiths, I will become Muslim. You just type a full essay with full key and no meaning regarding where it says the Bani Qurayza did an action that goes against the peace treaty with the Muslims.

AntiChristian:


Two million evidences won't suffice a LIAR like you!

The Prophet (s) was in conflict with some specific Jewish tribes in Medina due to their aiding the Meccan aristocracy in a war of extermination against the Muslim community. After the battle, the Prophet chose Sa’d ibn Mu’adh to pass judgment upon the fighting men, which Sa’d did according to the law of the Torah.

Ibn Umar reported:

أَنَّ يَهُودَ بَنِي النَّضِيرِ وَقُرَيْظَةَ حَارَبُوا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَأَجْلَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ بَنِي النَّضِيرِ وَأَقَرَّ قُرَيْظَةَ وَمَنَّ عَلَيْهِمْ حَتَّى حَارَبَتْ قُرَيْظَةُ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ

The Jews of Banu Nadeer and Banu Quraiza waged war against the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, so he expelled Banu Nadeer but he allowed Banu Quraiza to stay and he granted them favor until they also waged war after that.

Source: Sahih Muslim 1766, Grade: Sahih

, not simply because they were Jewish. This is clear in another tradition in which the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, told his companion:

خُذْ عَلَيْكَ سِلاَحَكَ فَإِنِّي أَخْشَى عَلَيْكَ قُرَيْظَةَ

Take your weapons, for I fear the tribe of Quraiza.

Source: Sahih Muslim 2236, Grade: Sahih

The Prophet told his companion to carry his weapons, not to commit aggression against Quraiza, but rather to defend himself against them.

This fact is confirmed by Dr. Marco Schöller:

The Muslim attack and siege of the Qurayẓa was a response to their open, probably active support of the Meccan pagans and their allies during the battle (of the trench).

Source: Schöller, Marco. “Qurayẓa (Banū al-).” Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān.

The judgment against them upon their defeat was that the fighting men who participated in the battle were killed and the women and children were taken into the custody of the Muslims.

Sa’d ibn Mu’adh passed judgment saying:

قَالَ تَقْتُلُ مُقَاتِلَتَهُمْ وَتَسْبِي ذُرِّيَّتَهُمْ

Their combatants will be killed and their progeny taken as captives.

Source: Source: Sahih Muslim, 1768 Grade: Sahih

Sa’d judged only that “their fighting men” (muqatilatahum) should be executed as an act of self-defense for the Muslim community. The women and children were taken into custody due to the fact that they would have no one to care for them; to abandon them would have itself been a death sentence. This ruling was based upon the Torah, the Jewish holy book, which reads:

וְאִם לֹ֤א תַשְׁלִים֙ עִמָּ֔ךְ וְעָשְׂתָ֥ה עִמְּךָ֖ מִלְחָמָ֑ה וְצַרְתָּ֖ עָלֶֽיהָ וּנְתָנָ֛הּ יְהוָ֥ה אֱלֹהֶ֖יךָ בְּיָדֶ֑ךָ וְהִכִּיתָ֥ אֶת כָּל זְכוּרָ֖הּ לְפִי חָֽרֶב רַ֣ק הַ֠נָּשִׁים וְהַטַּ֨ף וְהַבְּהֵמָ֜ה וְכֹל֩ אֲשֶׁ֨ר יִהְיֶ֥ה בָעִ֛יר כָּל־ שְׁלָלָ֖הּ תָּבֹ֣ז לָ֑ךְ וְאָֽכַלְתָּ֙ אֶת שְׁלַ֣ל אֹיְבֶ֔יךָ אֲשֶׁ֥ר נָתַ֛ן יְהוָ֥ה אֱלֹהֶ֖יךָ לָֽךְ

But if the city makes no peace with you, but makes war against you, then you shall besiege it; and when the Lord your God gives it into your hand you shall put all its males to the sword, but the women and the little ones, the cattle, and everything else in the city, all its spoil, you shall take as booty for yourselves; and you shall enjoy the spoil of your enemies, which the Lord your God has given you.

Source: Deuteronomy 20:12-14

This judgment might seem very harsh and unmerciful, but in the context of ancient Arabia this action was necessary for the Muslim community due to the threat of extermination they faced.

Scholars of history understand that such was the nature of justice in a rough desert environment:

Most scholars of this episode agree that neither party acted outside the bounds of normal relations in 7th century Arabia. The new order brought by Muhammad was viewed by many as a threat to the age-old system of tribal alliances, as it certainly proved to be. For the Banu Qurayza, the end of this system seemed to bring with it many risks. At the same time, the Muslims faced the threat of total extermination, and needed to send a message to all those groups in Medina that might try to betray their society in the future. It is doubtful that either party could have behaved differently under the circumstances.

Source: PBS “Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet.”

Furthermore, as only the fighting men were killed, there were several male members of the Banu Quraiza tribe who survived because they did not participate in the battle, either because they were too young or they surrendered before the fighting began.

Ibn Umar reported:

فَقَتَلَ رِجَالَهُمْ وَقَسَمَ نِسَاءَهُمْ وَأَوْلَادَهُمْ وَأَمْوَالَهُمْ بَيْنَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ إِلَّا أَنَّ بَعْضَهُمْ لَحِقُوا بِرَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَآمَنَهُمْ وَأَسْلَمُوا

Thus, the Prophet killed their fighting men and he distributed their women, children, and property among the Muslims except for some of them who had joined the Messenger of Allah and so he granted them protection and they embraced Islam.

Many of the male descendants of Quraiza lived, some of them embracing Islam, which is proof that the Prophet did not commit genocide (extermination of an entire race), but rather he only approved the execution of their combatants as an act of self-defense.

This fact is confirmed by Dr. Marco Schöller:

The Islamic tradition knows a number of descendants from the Qurayẓa by name, most famous among them being the traditionist Muḥammad b. Kaʿb al-Quraẓī, who was born a Muslim and died in Medina in 120/738 or some years before. Others include his father Kaʿb ibn Asad ibn Sulaym and his brother Isḥāq, as well as ʿAṭiyya al-Quraẓī, al-Zubayr ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn al-Zabīr, ʿAlī ibn Rifāʿa and the progeny of Abū Malik al-Quraẓī. This suggests that… several male persons of the Qurayẓa did survive the conflict in Medina, probably because of their young age at the time.

Source: Schöller, Marco. “Qurayẓa (Banū al-).” Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān.

In addition, even though the Muslims suffered this bitter conflict with the Jewish tribes of Medina, this did not diminish the Prophet’s teachings of kindness and good character toward Jewish neighbors. In fact, the Prophet died will in the middle of a business contract with a Jew.

Aisha reported:

تُوُفِّيَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَدِرْعُهُ مَرْهُونَةٌ عِنْدَ يَهُودِيٍّ بِثَلَاثِينَ صَاعًا مِنْ شَعِيرٍ

The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, passed away while his armor was mortgaged to a Jew for thirty units of barley.

Source: Sahih Bukhari 2759, Grade: Sahih

This tradition is proof that the Prophet continued to maintain friendly relations with Jews even after the incident with Qurayza and until his death. Likewise, the Prophet’s companions continued this tradition of amicability after him.

Mujahid reported: I was with Abdullah ibn Amr while his servant was skinning a sheep. He said, “O boy, when you finish up, then start with the Jewish neighbor.” A man there exclaimed, “Jewish? May Allah correct you!” He replied:

إِنِّي سَمِعْتُ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم يُوصِي بِالْجَارِ حَتَّى خَشِينَا أَوْ رُئِينَا أَنَّهُ سَيُوَرِّثُهُ

I heard the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, recommending that we treat our neighbors well until we thought that he would order us to make them our heirs.

Source: Source: Al-Adab Al-Mufrad 128, Grade: Hasan

In conclusion, the Prophet did not commit genocide against the Jews of Medina, nor did he intend for bad relations between Jews and Muslims in general. The conflict with the Banu Qurayza tribe was only due to the specific aggression suffered by the Muslims and not merely because they were Jews. The Prophet continued to maintain friendly relations with Jews even after this bitter conflict and this tradition was continued by his companions.

Success comes from Allah, and Allah knows best.

innotutorial:
Show me where it says the Bani Qurayza broke the peace treaty and they did an action that go against the peace treaty with Muhammad.

You see how you muslim never read to understand but to memorize.
If you can show me any where in the hadiths, I will become Muslim. You just type a full essay with full key and no meaning regarding where it says the Bani Qurayza did an action that goes against the peace treaty with the Muslims.

I don't think I have any explanation to give you again. Any sane and holistically incline person will see the liar here!

Even with your Bible verse you still dey lie?

True2god, zoer come and see a Christian liar here o! Where is it in the Bible to lie to win souls for Jesus?

Sahih Muslim 1767a Grade: Sahih
It has been narrated by 'Umar b. al-Khattib that he heard the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) say:

I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim.
Who is the liar now? Hmm! Who is the liar now?

AntiChristian:



I don't think I have any explanation to give you again. Any sane and holistically incline person will see the liar here!

Even with your Bible verse you still dey lie?

True2god, zoer come and see a Christian liar here o! Where is it in the Bible to lie to win souls for Jesus?

Sahih Muslim 1767 Grade:Sahih
It has been narrated by 'Umar b. al-Khattib that he heard the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) say:

I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim.
Who is the liar now? hmm! Who is the liar now?

AntiChristian:


You're a blatant and unapologetic liar!



The battles were either defensive or offensive and there were not only Jews. Idol worshippers were there and some were not initiated by the Muslims.

You are a LIAR for Christ!

innotutorial:
Sahih Muslim 1767 Grade:Sahih
It has been narrated by 'Umar b. al-Khattib that he heard the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) say:

I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim.
Who is the liar now? hmm! Who is the liar now?

Which Jews and Christians are being expelled?

Is it all Jews and Christians or those fighting the Muslims?

Christians and Jews were not expelled totally till the death of the Prophet. The evidence abound above but you won't read!

Stop telling lies for Jesus!

AntiChristian:


Which Jews and Christians are being expelled?

Is it all Jews and Christians or those fighting the Muslims?

Christians and Jews were not expelled totally till the death of the Prophet. The evidence abound above but you won't read!

Stop telling lies for Jesus!

Taqqiya master, you too much even at seeing the hadith you are still lying for allah and late messenger muhammad the paedophile master himself all because of 72 virgins abi.. Keep it up

Leave him alone. These people can't see. The Hadith is clearly in front of him and he his still saying off point.

ANTIlSLAM:


Taqqiya master, you too much even at seeing the hadith you are still lying for allah and late messenger muhammad the paedophile master himself all because of 72 virgins abi.. Keep it up

innotutorial:
Leave him alone. These people can't see. The Hadith is clearly in front of him and he his still saying off point.

AntiChristian is under the same demons that tormented his late messenger in cave..

innotutorial:
You speaking off key. What does that has to do with the topic.
Did Muhammad killed the Bani Quraytha Jews or not?
Did the Bani Quraytha Jews break the peace treaty with Muhammad or not?
If yes show me where it says they did and the action those took which goes against the treaty.

Those questions I asked will lead you to many things but you are not ready to learn those stuff.

Yathrib was not Jerusalem nor Judea or the whole of Israel that Jehovah promised those reprobates, so what were they doing in a land they considered a barren land, the land of Ishmaelites: the one they considered an illegitimate son of father Abraham?

Yathrib as well as the whole of Arabia was the land of Ishmaelites, so what are the Jews doing/looking for it Arabia?

And yes some 600 Jews: Fighting men were executed for crime against the State during the time of The Prophet.

The Jews are not complaining why are you the Christians complaining?

You see, I can help you unravel that incident with your Bible if only you will quit your hatred for Islam and Muslims.

If you use your brain very well and you study history, you will know that in 70AD Jerusalem fell completely under Roman rule which was prophesied by Jesus to happen(Mathew 24:1-2).

The Jews then fled away and the temple was destroyed. Ask your self this question 'do you think they went north into Asia Minor where there was a strong roman rule? Or do you think they will more likely flee south away from roman rule?
History shows that they many jews civilisation in Africa in what we call the middle east. Thousands of Jews flew to Egypt and Arabia where they are no roman rules.

During the 1st to 5th centuries, Judaism was powerful in Arabia. This power was predicated around Trades. There were many Jew Kings. We have (King Abu Kariba, King Masruk Abraha, king Dhu Nuwas etc.) Yemen at one time was a stronghold of Jewish kings.

They were conducting international trades of commodities with the east and west. During that time there was a number of Arab converts to Judaism that inter marry with the original jews. King Dhu Nuwas was one of this Arabs who converted to Judaism.

So study first before you talk.

Study 'the Jewsish war by flavius Josephus) and ' from Babylon to Timbuktu by Rudolph Windsor).

Lukuluku69:


Those questions I asked will lead you to many things but you are not ready to learn those stuff.

Yathrib was not Jerusalem nor Judea or the whole of Israel that Jehovah promised those reprobates, so what were they doing in a land they considered a barren land, the land of Ishmaelites: the one they considered an illegitimate son of father Abraham?

Yathrib as well as the whole of Arabia was the land of Ishmaelites, so what are the Jews doing/looking for it Arabia?

And yes some 600 Jews: Fighting men were executed for crime against the State during the time of The Prophet.

The Jews are not complaining why are you the Christians complaining?

You see, I can help you unravel that incident with your Bible if only you will quit your hatred for Islam and Muslims.

innotutorial:
If you use your brain very well and you study history, you will know that in 70AD Jerusalem fell completely under Roman rule which was prophesied by Jesus to happen(Mathew 24:1-2).

The Jews then fled away and the temple was destroyed. Ask your self this question 'do you think they went north into Asia Minor where there was a strong roman rule? Or do you think they will more likely flee south away from roman rule?
History shows that they many jews civilisation in Africa in what we call the middle east. Thousands of Jews flew to Egypt and Arabia where they are no roman rules.

During the 1st to 5th centuries, Judaism was powerful in Arabia. This power was predicated around Trades. There were many Jew Kings. We have (King Abu Kariba, King Masruk Abraha, king Dhu Nuwas etc.) Yemen at one time was a stronghold of Jewish kings.

They were conducting international trades of commodities with the east and west. During that time there was a number of Arab converts to Judaism that inter marry with the original jews. King Dhu Nuwas was one of this Arabs who converted to Judaism.

So study first before you talk.

Study 'the Jewsish war by flavius Josephus) and ' from Babylon to Timbuktu by Rudolph Windsor).

Now you one to start the abuse before the real stuff start? Alright then

If your brain Cells are working properly, you will know from the cold hard facts of history that the Jews when dispersed from their old haunt moved in many different direction. Europe, Asia minor and many other places. And why was this so? A just punishment for their rejection of Jesus.

Interestingly, a group among this Reprobates favoured Arabia: a land they openly vilify. A Land they called barren yet they choose to settle therein.

Do you know why? They know from their scripture that the Last Prophet will rise from that Land. But they were mistaken believing that that prophet would be a Jew.

Read your Bible and you will see many references about the Lord rising from Pharan. That was what they went for hoping that the last of them would rise among the Jews but when an Arab claimed that Prophethood they went berserk. Some believe while majority plot and plan.

They mock, lie, make attempt on his life and some many other stuff and ultimately, they went against a commitment they made in defending the state that offered them protection and they were executed.

You said the Romans pursued them, why don't they fight for Jerusalem and Israel but had to run to Arabia, was Jehovah on holiday on their matter?

It is a known Law, go against the State, you will be treat as an enemy.

Use Google and read up on what happened to Quisling during the Second World War.

There is different between a religion and business organization...
One worship God everyday with 5daily prayers.
The other just go dance every Sunday and pay money to the business vendor,lying that someone die for there sin...
Even the jesus never goes to church nor dance,but bow down to is Lord (God)...
Stop answering this people, they should continue with there business!

Islámists doesn't deserve mercy of Allah

Lukuluku69:


1. Were the Jews natives of Arabia?

2. What were the Jews doing in Arabia?

3. Was Arabia part of Cannan that Yahweh/Jehovah promised them?

4. What exactly were the Jews of Yathrib looking for in Yathrib? Remember Yathrib was not Jerusalem nor Judea.

I can go on and on but answer those questions and let us move from there.

Then you v no reason to question the act of IDF to Hamas. Since you and Muhammad are wicked, it's time you know some are more wicked.
Nuke on ya head.

AntiChristian:


Why do you like to lie like this? You mentioned battle of Badr where the Muslims fought their enemies that were over three times more than them!

Which kind lie be all this all just to spite Islam for Christians to believe?

Christianity is now synonymous to lies now!

A question is due here: 'What did Banu Quraythah do in order to deserve this fate? The answer is that they betrayed the Muslims and breached the covenant which was concluded with the Muslims at a crucial time when they were besieged by 10,000 non-Muslim fighters. Thus, they exposed the life of all the Muslims (men, women, children and elders) to danger if it was not for the Mercy and Grace of Allaah The Almighty Who repelled those who disbelieved in their rage.

One of the contemporary writers said, “If those who criticize the ruling of Sa'd on Banu Quraythah were to study the current laws efficiently and applied them on Banu Quraythah, they would conclude that the laws of the 20th century are no different than the ruling of Sa'd Ibn Mu'aath." The writer clarified that the Jews committed three crimes, which are:

1- Lifting arms along with the enemy invader against the ruler of Madeenah.

2- Conspiring with the enemy against the Muslims.

3- Facilitating the entrance of the enemy to the country.

Then the writer said, ''Contemporary criminal laws apply the death punishment to each of the above three crimes.''

It is worth mentioning here Deuteronomy chapter 20 which reads:

"10 When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against it, then proclaim peace unto it. 11. And it shall be, if it make thee answer of peace, and open unto thee, then it shall be, that all the people that is found therein shall be tributaries unto thee, and they shall serve thee. 12. And if it will make no peace with thee, but will make war against thee, then thou shalt besiege it: 13. And when the LORD thy God hath delivered it into thine hands, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword: 14. But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself; and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies, which the LORD thy God hath given thee. 15. Thus shalt thou do unto all the cities which are very far off from thee, which are not of the cities of these nations. 16. But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth: 17. But thou shalt utterly destroy them.''

Why tell lies of this magnitude innotutorial?

Muhammad lied. He said if he's not the true prophet of Allah, God should cut his aorta. Guess what?
Muhammad died from lamenting pains of his aorta has cut!
You too, to cut ya aorta with IDF nuke dey hungry them.

innotutorial:
What really happened to the Bani Qurayza Jews? Were they traitors or they were betrayed? Why did Prophet Muhammad massacre the Bani Qurayza Jews in Arabia?

Muhammad was trying to get the Jews in Arabia peninsula to believe him as a prophet and accept Islam , but no matter how had he tried the Jews couldn't believe him. This lead to several battles between Prophet Muhammad and the Jews. The battle of Trench, the Battle of Badr, The battle of The Battle of Al-Khandaq.
No matter how hard Mohammed tried to convince them that he is a prophet he just couldn't. There was a time he even barged into a Jewish Synagogue in Yathrib (Al-Madina Al-Munawwarah) and said that if only twelve Jews would believe in him then Allah would spare them his wrath Musnad Ahmad - 23464

Quraysh and Ghatfan, encouraged by the Bani Al-Nadheer Jews who were exiled by Muhammad, wanted to eliminate Mohammed once and for all. They gathered up a great army and put Yathrib under siege [Saheeh Bukhari - 4103].
Mohammed , based on a suggestion by Salman Al-Farisi, dug a trench around Yathrib [Saheeh Bukhari - 2837], except for the Bani Quraytha side that is, because they had great fortresses and it would be practically impossible for the Pagan Arabs to get through their fortresses unless Bani Quraytha allowed it.

Now since Mohammed and Bani Quraytha had a treaty, Mohammed had nothing to fear [Saheeh Muslim - 1766 and Sunan Abi Dawood - 3004]. Therefore all was set.

Full details on the video...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBkNA2XvqAY

Peace be upon you for sharing this.
Muslims are demonic.

uthlaw:
There is different between a religion and business organization...
One worship God everyday with 5daily prayers.
The other just go dance every Sunday and pay money to the business vendor,lying that someone die for there sin...
Even the jesus never goes to church nor dance,but bow down to is Lord (God)...
Stop answering this people, they should continue with there business!

Religion is a political system --- business --- created by men by which men posing as religious leaders --- middle men--- assert themselves as administrators/managers between God and ordinary men. So whether the religion pretends to worship God every day or not, the fact that the movement is driven by the political ideas and greed of the middle-men --- gods of men --- makes them all the same... business and nothing else.

Padipadi:

Then you v no reason to question the act of IDF to Hamas. Since you and Muhammad are wicked, it's time you know some are more wicked.
Nuke on ya head.

Alright Jew Worshiper

Lukuluku69:


Alright Jew Worshiper

Firstly, I don't give a fûck about Jews or Arabs.
It's cretins like you that decided to be arabian gays
I v been looking for you, AntiChristian, biodun556 and other janjaweêds to nuke you all. Declare location and receive ya nukes.
Or don't you wanna meet ya 72 phantom olosho virgins so quick?
Lastly, what do you v to say about the following
1. Massacre of Banu-Quryaza Jews, is it right?
2. Blasphemous killings in Islam? Case study of Deborah Samuel. Is it right?
3. Disturbance of Isese traditional worshippers by muslims in Ilorin
4. Ethnic killings of fulani herdsmen.

Padipadi:

Firstly, I don't give a fûck about Jews or Arabs.
It's cretins like you that decided to be arabian gays
I v been looking for you, AntiChristian, biodun556 and other janjaweêds to nuke you all. Declare location and receive ya nukes.
Or don't you wanna meet ya 72 phantom olosho virgins so quick?
Lastly, what do you v to say about the following
1. Massacre of Banu-Quryaza Jews, is it right?
2. Blasphemous killings in Islam? Case study of Deborah Samuel. Is it right?
3. Disturbance of Isese traditional worshippers by muslims in Ilorin
4. Ethnic killings of fulani herdsmen.

Alright Jew Worshiper

Padipadi:

Firstly, I don't give a fûck about Jews or Arabs.
It's cretins like you that decided to be arabian gays
I v been looking for you, AntiChristian, biodun556 and other janjaweêds to nuke you all. Declare location and receive ya nukes.
Or don't you wanna meet ya 72 phantom olosho virgins so quick?
Lastly, what do you v to say about the following
1. Massacre of Banu-Quryaza Jews, is it right?
2. Blasphemous killings in Islam? Case study of Deborah Samuel. Is it right?
3. Disturbance of Isese traditional worshippers by muslims in Ilorin
4. Ethnic killings of fulani herdsmen.

Since you don't give a Fuk about Jews and Arabs why not shut your gob and just jog on?

Lukuluku69:


Since you don't give a Fuk about Jews and Arabs why not shut your gob and just jog on?

Askiya! Never!
How can a sane person keep quiet to the carnage of Islam. From Mahomet's deeds to what terrorists are doing in present day?
Are you ashamed all terror groups have affiliations with Islam?
From Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Hezbollah, Hamas, Taliban, Boko Haram Ansaru, Al-Shabaab etc?
You want people that are Jews to keep quiet, you want Christians to keep quiet. Cos you know they are the main obstacles of the evil of Islam.
Dear terrorist, you should go to hell asap!