₦airaland Forum

joxxy01:
not really Bro, I have always have this good feelings about them... Well let's see how things pan out. Its just my Prediction

charlesemeka85:
and who re u referring as one? You must be sick

JohnBullMySon:
[center]MY TAKE ON THE RECENT LGBT DISCOURSE/DEBATE
[/center]

One thing I do not like about gay advocacy by some Western governments and corporations is the partisan nature and the unnecessary importance attached to it. I don't believe that personal matters should become overly prioritized by governments to the extent that security and crime, poverty and economy, and issues regarding the quality of social and public life become secondary considerations. At most, governments should play a more diplomatic role by ensuring that the rights of gay and religious people are equally fought. For example, anti-gay laws are not the only issue in Qatar. Christians and other religious people face discrimination and imprisonment as well, but little emphasis has been made on it. The same goes for right-wing governments who have made it a priority to attack anything the left supports. Truth is that advocacy should be accompanied by reason and diplomacy. Qatar was never going to change their rules and there is the risk of dividing the World cup along political lines.

However, this is not to say that I am against gay rights and equal marriage rights. No one at all should be made to live a miserable life to please a government or "tradition". I will only support any anti-gay laws if it is established that there is not a single gay person in Qatar. Governments exist for humans. Humans do not exist for the government but the government for humans. As long as a practice does not infringe on the rights and existence of others, no government has the right to subjugate any minority in order to promote a certain definition of "right", "morality" or "national identity". We are all species before citizens.

This has nothing to do with whether I like homosexual practices or not, but my nature is fairness and equity even with people I don't agree with. Whether you like gay people or not, stop imposing punishments and subjugation on them. I find it funny when religious people try to use nature and science to argue against gay people. The same nature and science that has discredited more than half of the events in the scriptures. Another one was comparing gay people to pedophiles. Gay sex is consensual while child sex practices take advantage of a child's vulnerability and inadequate sexual/mental development.

And lastly, y'all should stop blasting gay people as mentally deranged and stupid or with other derogatory names. You are not better than them, and you don't have any right to insult people doing what is frankly not your business. You guys should learn to mind your business FGS. I've never seen gay people gather to insult others. Some say gay people are forcing those practices on them.TBH I have seen many religious people forcing gay people into more "traditional" practices, but I have never seen gay people force someone to become gay. I have seen gay parties attacked and people killed but have never seen any straight parties attacked.

Who exactly is the tormentor? The fundamental Christians who keep talking about a fictional "LGBT agenda" are still the ones looking for how to impose religious revival and practice of Christian nationalism on everyone in their countries. Fundamental Christians do not even believe in the separation of church and state. Diversity is alien to religious fundamentalists. They enforce uniformity by nature. You either buy their narrative or you go to hell. Literally that's what they say.

Please note that my statement is not based on morality or even scientific facts but on common sense. I don't want to define morality for anyone here. Stop defining morality for others. The same Nigerians that have institutionalized corruption, malpractice and tribalism will jump out to preach morality whenever gay people are mentioned. Is that not stupidity?

Biri ka'mbiri. Live and let live. Be matured, diplomatic and stop obsessing over gay people.

comodo:
Give Senegal Osihmen and Iwobi. Netherlands for don collect by now.

comodo:
Netherlands have ran out of ideas.

fabyom:
This Senegal team is average without Mane. With Mane they struggle to score without him ...

Joebie:
Yea let's borrow them Osimhen, then O pari.
Naija nko?

fabyom:
If Holland has Oshimen Senegal would be 3 nil down at this moment. Respect the Super Eagles Victor Osimhen! Aside Koulibally and Mendy none of their starting 11 will make our first 11.

fabyom:
If Holland has Oshimen Senegal would be 3 nil down at this moment. Respect the Super Eagles! Aside Koulibally and Mendy none of their starting 11 will make our first 11.

comodo:
Netherlands have ran out of ideas.

fabyom:
If Holland has Oshimen Senegal would be 3 nil down at this moment. Respect the Super Eagles! Aside Koulibally and Mendy none of their starting 11 will make our first 11.

charlesemeka85:
not even osimhen. What they need most is an iwobi. They lack a ball playing midfielder in their starting eleven

If I were to be the coach after analyzing the first half I will throw in villareal’s Jackson and sub out one of those carpenters from the midfield

charlesemeka85:
they look confused

AndSunGorilla:
Yes because they are facing a formidable opponent in the African Champs.

AndSunGorilla:
Oga no need for all these comparison. SE is not playing, Senegal is the one playing. Enjoy the game sir and what does it profit the Side better than Senegal but are not at the WC and got flogged recently 4-0 (it is even debatable that the goal margin could even have been more had it been that Portugal didn't step off on the gas).

So, let's leave SE for now