Dear INEC.

Let Me Try My Best To Explain What The Electoral Act 2022, Section-64(4) is really trying to portray in practical terms.

Just the way we have all learnt how to trust the Presiding Officers at the Polling-units to use their own Pens and WRITE DOWN the Polling-Unit-Results into the Form-EC8As -- Right In-Front-Of Everybody, before carrying the results off for delivery at the collation centers; that is Just The Same Way we would Also TRUST the same Presiding Officers to use their own Fingers and KEY-IN (or Enter the values of) The Same CORRECT Results into the same BVAS-Machines and Transmit them directly to the Decentralized “Edit-Proof” COLLATION-SYSTEM -- Right In-Front-Of All Of Us too.

And then, they should scan the pictures of the results and upload same to the IREV as usual, for reference purposes.
..
The Decentralized COLLATION-SYSTEM should have many computers that are collating their direct results independently at each level of collation, and at the same time working together with all the other computers that are along the same line of communication with each of the independent computers, both at higher and lower levels of collation; and yet, all the computers would have Absolutely NOTHING to do with all the other computers that have no interception of communication with them..

Therefore, a collation system that has a MINIMUM of about 19,500 interconnected computers, is good for a start.
..
The Main thing is this...
Since we have accepted the “writing of results” with human hands right in front of us,, then we can also accept the “entering of results” by humans right in front of us too.
..
Thus,, INEC should re-configure their BVAS-Machines, and then set up a very Strong Collation System, so that Everything Must Be Happening (And Be Concluded With) At The Polling-units ONLY..
..
Every Other Activities that should be happening At The Various Collation Centers would be to Cross-check the Electronically Collated Results which had already started at the Polling-units, and to Approve Them or to flag them for a review.

Therefore, any electronically collated result that is not accepted at any level of collation due to serious disputes (and thus, not approved) would be flagged for a second-level review.
**(Humans should be reviewing machines,, and not machines reviewing humans.)*

Each Level of Collation should have two sets of electronically collated results, which under normal circumstances, is supposed to be exactly the same.

A. The Originally Collated Untampered Results which were done by the Collation System using the directly transmitted results from the various Polling-units. These collated results are “Edit-Proof”, and cannot be changed. These originally collated results would be very helpful whenever there is need for review.

B. The approved collated results which becomes the officially announced results, which should be assumed as the reviewed results. This particular reviewed results can be edited while the review is going on. These results are being transmitted or delivered from the Collation Centers after the reviews had been completed.

Like I mentioned earlier, where there are no issues or reviews, the two results are supposed to be exactly the same.
And where there are discrepancies in the two results due to reviews, The Original unedited results as well as the reviewed results would still all be available for scrutiny at the Tribunals.

In the meantime, we await the 10th national assembly to amend the Electoral Act 2022, and to clearly put the Act in order, so that all the relevant clauses in the relevant sections would properly and succinctly reflect “DIRECT ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION AND COLLATION” without any form of ambiguity or lapses.

Even in the event that the direct electronic transmission and collation fails, the Electoral Act would be able to suggest the best alternative approach..

This will sound like a music to some people's ear

I am not supposed to be doing this..
I had earlier decided to forget about trying to think about how to make our electoral process better







But what INEC is doing is just not what we expected..

Not it At All...

..


The INEC that was supposed to be innovative,, are the same people who are smearing all bright ideas and innovations with mud.



Thus, no need trying to tell them how to do the right things..

Which INEC?

Iyamehi:
This will sound like a music to some people's ear

To be honest with you..
INEC had missed it.

Police is even better than them sef.

No come dey form 'intellectual' here, nothing can be done about your suggestions here. The proper approach is to present this to reps member representing your constituency, who will take it up if it has any merit.


If what you want is a public debate on your proposal, then state it as a proposal and not a finished product.

KanwuliaExtra:
Which INEC?

Wetin you want make I talk again naa??
Na the same INEC naa.

The same INEC that had decided to mess up with all the Results-Management Protocols..

Sangoamadioha1:
No come dey form 'intellectual' here,


If what you want is a public debate on your proposal, then state it as a proposal and not a finished product.

Point-1.. If you go through my previous topics..,, you will notice that I have always raised issues similar to this, even far before 2021..



Point-2.. Whichever way the topic gets presented,, one thing you should know is that “our reps definitely don't see things the way we see”. That's why they gave us an Electoral Act 2022 that still had lots of ambiguity, just in their attempt to make it elastic enough to accommodate some unforseen future possible options.

BluntCrazeMan:
Point-1.. Go through my topics..
I have always raised issues similar to this, even before 2021..



Point-2.. Whichever way it gets presented,, our reps definitely don't see things the way we see. That's why they gave us an Electoral Act 2022 that still had lots of ambiguity, in their attempt to make it elastic enough to accommodate future possible options.

I have no problem with your suggestions, after all we are all looking for a better Nigeria, but the proper way to go is to present this proposal to your rep.
As for the rep issue, this is where you can channel your social media clout by carrying out sustained pressure to see that your proposal is at least read. It is more productive than 'antagonizing' Tinubu and APC.

Sangoamadioha1:



I have no problem with your suggestions, after all we are all looking for a better Nigeria, but the proper way to go is to present this proposal to your rep.
As for the rep issue, this is where you can channel your social media clout by carrying out sustained pressure to see that your proposal is at least read. It is more productive than 'antagonizing' Tinubu and APC.

In the process of wanting things to be done right,, (JUST LIKE WE ARE TRYING TO DO WITH THE INEC),, would you turn left whenever you see things being done wrong without antagonizing??
No naa..

If really you wanted things done the right way,, keeping silence in the face of wrong-doing wouldn't be your best option.


The main reason we wrote-off PDP as a main opposition.. They were too silent in the face of wrong-doing. Thus, they don't know what is right? Can't they speak up.??

As for my reps..
Let the Senate start sitting first..

BluntCrazeMan:
In the process of wanting things to be done right,, (JUST LIKE WE ARE TRYING TO DO WITH THE INEC),, would you turn left whenever you see things being done wrong without antagonizing??
No naa..

If really you wanted things done the right way,, keeping silence in the face of wrong-doing wouldn't be your best option.


The main reason we wrote-off PDP as a main opposition.. They were too silent in the face of wrong-doing. Thus, they don't know what is right? Can't they speak up.??

Every country needs opposition but the manner of opposition is the key factor. I don't see what you guys are doing as opposition but you guys are just trying to ridicule the man and anything APC.
If you disagree with the outcome, go to court, as you guys have done. Wait for the outcome without trying to gaslight Tinubu, INEC, CJN and all perceived opponents. Meanwhile, while awaiting your judgment, you highlight areas the new administration(whoever the court decides) should focus on.
This i believe is more constructive than all these petty mudslinging you guys are doing.


Remember PDP were also playing this type of opposition from 2015 but see where they are now.

You are still a better thinker than those calamities calling themselves youths that come here to rant APC,PDP,CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM.
What we are suppose to be discussing here is the "PROCESS".

Sangoamadioha1:



Every country needs opposition but the manner of opposition is the key factor. I don't see what you guys are doing as opposition but you guys are just trying to ridicule the man and anything APC.
If you disagree with the outcome, go to court, as you guys have done. Wait for the outcome without trying to gaslight Tinubu, INEC, CJN and all perceived opponents. Meanwhile, while awaiting your judgment, you highlight areas the new administration(whoever the court decides) should focus on.
This i believe is more constructive than all these petty mudslinging you guys are doing.


Remember PDP were also playing this type of opposition from 2015 but see where they are now.

The things the new Administration should Focus On..


And the Mistakes of the Incumbent (APC) which MUST be avoided..

Pointing out mistakes,, is not GASLIGHTING..
Is it.??


For the moment,, What we should first learn is how to be an Active, Effective, and Efficient Opposition,, JUST IN CASE....


We definitely won't massacre people the way the CPC did in 2011 after the lost,, neither would our spirits fall, and we would start to wail on every available media,, just like the PDP were doing for the past 8 years..

BluntCrazeMan:
The things the new Administration should Focus On..


And the Mistakes of the Incumbent (APC) which MUST be avoided..

Pointing out mistakes,, is not GASLIGHTING..

Is it.??

I like what you wrote up there, that is a constructive suggestion but now compare that with someone that said Tinubu is a bedwetter. Who would you take seriously. Discuss issues and not personalities. Nobody be saint, even in advanced democracies.

This is funny. The irev have been checked. Tinubu won the election na.. I really don't have time for all the noisemaking going out there.

Tinubu is still the most decorated past governor out there. Apart from fighthing for our democracy, This was Tinubu who did a lot in Lagos (Eko Atlantic, Lekki seaport, Lagos metro, Lekki Free zone etc) as well as improved the economy of Lagos at the time when President Obasanjo was working against Tinubu. Tinubu deserves all accolades. Thus, it's stupid for any riffraff who's done nothing for Nigeria yet spewing trash because of clout chasing. Na madness? Honestly, what has these nonsensical clout chasers done for Nigeria to have the right to be munching out gibberish everyday? The audacity!

Tinubu is a certified first class economic guru. He's a first class graduate of business administration from Chicago state university and also has wealth of experience in building up economy growth. Lagos' economy is the fifth largest in Africa today, thanks to Tinubu! We need such economy guru at the federation.

Secondly, Tinubu is good at working out a model, even when President Obasanjo always worked against him.

Thirdly, I'm hoping Tinubu would work towards the actualisation of federalism. Of course it won't be a full blown out federalism policy since we know some regions aren't yet self sufficient but a semi federalism system would do. The point we should note is every developed country always has a working federalism policy. So if we want the country to develop to a good standard, then little steps need to be taken at least. First, the steps could start with Tinubu appointing indigenous technocrats in each of the 6 regional zones as regional heads. We all know Tinubu can't visit the whole 36 states at once but with regional heads put in place, these regional heads can easily visit the 5-6 states under them in 1-2 months and will continue to keep Tinubu abreast of whatever is happening in each region and solutions to be proffered. Thus Tinubu can easily take the needed action and help as quick as possible.

In taking steps towards federalism, Tinubu could also note at least 2-3 crops prominent in each region and their industrial endproducts, thus could work towards the actualisation of their mechanized and industrialized agricultural production in each of these region. This is to ensure the sustainability and self efficiency of each region. This could start with each region first. Probably 2-3 states in each region at first. Later, it could be done in each state. This is the best way to work towards self sufficiency of each region and also ensure availability of food production in the country.. Also help in diversifying the economy.

Another steps to take towards federalism is assisting in infrastructural development in each region. At least 2-3 in each region..

And so-on..

Aside all these, a brilliant creative model and policy are needed to be put in place and it's only Tinubu who's demonstrated such brilliance so far. A brilliant innovative model put in place and working around the model.

Sangoamadioha1:



I like what you wrote up there, that is a constructive suggestion but now compare that with someone that said Tinubu is a bedwetter. Who would you take seriously. Discuss issues and not personalities. Nobody be saint, even in advanced democracies.

Meanwhile,, people like Keyamo and Lai and all those ones who have lots of excuses...

With people like them still in place,, they are always ready with lots of excuses (mostly lame excuses), rather than being open for constructive discussions, and making amends where necessary..

With people like them, we will continue to find ourselves in a situation of “US-VERSUS-THEM” within the system.
Whereas we are all supposed to be “US”..

BluntCrazeMan:




Meanwhile,, people like Keyamo and Lai and all those ones who have lots of excuses...

With people like them still in place,, always ready with excuses (mostly lame ones), rather than being open for constructive discussions, and making amends where necessary,, then, we will continue to find ourselves in a situation of “US-VERSUS-THEM” within the system.
Whereas we are all supposed to be “US”..

I can tell you for a fact that the APC guys are only counter reacting so as not to lose the social media space to you guys.
The Obidients started the online bullying and insults and the APC guys are responding in kind.

Sangoamadioha1:



I can tell you for a fact that the APC guys are only counter reacting so as not to lose the social media space to you guys.
The Obidients started the online bullying and insults and the APC guys are responding in kind.

Not true..

There were No Obidients in 2015 and 2016.
And that was around the time when the term “Wailing” came into existence..

So, go back and correct yourself..

The tons of bashings and excuses during those days by the so-called Ministers and Advisers were so shameful..


The Reason those excuses and bashings went up recently was because the Obidients came with some other methods of fault-finding and fact-finding which bashings and excuses alone cannot solve.

Thus they were firing on all fronts, and still not getting themselves anywhere yet.


You think it's a lie?
Then, go and read Keyamo’s response to the declining unemployment data.

Heaps of excuses everywhere.!!

Then, about conquering the social media space...
There is no battle on the Social Media..
The Government should even utilize the Social Media as an E-Participation tool, where they hear directly from the people, and get direct feedbacks from the people..

And not where to engage in bashings, and white-washing of failed Policies.


Then,, for the so-called ONLINE BULLYING...
Hahahahahaaaahhahaahahaaaaa...

Take this very truth here to the bank..
The Obidients had always been on the defensive.. We had always been retaliating.
We don't launch attacks,, rather we had always stayed on the defence..

BluntCrazeMan:
Not true..

There were No Obidients in 2015 and 2016.
And that was around the time when the term “Wailing” came into existence..

The tons of bashings and excuses during those days by the so-called Ministers and Advisers were so shameful..


The Reason those excuses and bashings went up recently was because the Obidients came with some other methods of fault-finding and fact-finding which bashings and excuses alone cannot solve.

Thus they were firing on all fronts, and still not getting themselves anywhere yet.


You think it's a lie?
Then, go and read Keyamo’s response to the declining unemployment data.

Heaps of excuses everywhere.!!

That dimension the Obidients added is further creating more problems instead of solving the problem.
If Obidients had concentrated on issues instead of abuses and bullying, they would have gotten more converts now and people would take them more seriously than now that they are being called 'headless mob'.

Sangoamadioha1:



That dimension the Obidients added is further creating more problems instead of solving the problem.
If Obidients had concentrated on issues instead of abuses and bullying, they would have gotten more converts now and people would take them more seriously than now that they are being called 'headless mob'.

Now you wanna fully digress..
I will oblige you.


Name any of the so-called abusive sentiments by the Obidients,, and I will tell you the very action of attack that caused the retaliation from the Obidients,, which you guys are now complaining about as an abuse by the Obidients..


About the HEADLESS MOB thingy,, it's Soludo you should be asking what that means.

Obidients are not A Mob.
And Obidients Are Not Headless.

BluntCrazeMan:




Wetin you want make I talk again naa??
Na the same INEC naa.

The same INEC that had decided to mess up with all the Results-Management Protocols..

You mean EX--CON APCriminals?

BluntCrazeMan:



Now you wanna fully digress..
I will oblige you.


Name any of the so-called abusive sentiments by the Obidients,, and I will tell you the very action of attack that caused the retaliation from the Obidients,, which you guys are now complaining about as an abuse by the Obidients..


About the HEADLESS MOB thingy,, it's Soludo you should be asking what that means.

Obidients are not A Mob.
And Obidients Are Not Headless.

These arguments are counter productive. The issue is that to be taken seriously and also make changes to the system is more than abusing and canceling opposing views.
Change the narratives by concentrating on issues affecting this country, instead of joining others(as claimed by you) in abusing people with opposing views.

Sangoamadioha1:



These arguments are counter productive. The issue is that to be taken seriously and also make changes to the system is more than abusing and canceling opposing views.
Change the narratives by concentrating on issues affecting this country, instead of joining others(as claimed by you) in abusing people with opposing views.

If I tell you to Describe what you understand the term “Obidient” to be, you may just misfire..

But let me help you..
Obidients (at this very moment),,
Could be described as Everyone who Voted For Peter Obi.

Before now, it used to be those who were actively campaigning for Peter Obi, and then, the supporters of Peter Obi.

But now, anybody who voted for Peter Obi is Obidient.

Technically, there are more than 6.1million Obidients in existence, because there are supporters of Peter Obi who didn't Vote.., thus the number is far more than 6.1million.

Thus...
WOULD YOU EXPECT A WHOOPING SIX MILLION PEOPLE TO ALL BE DOING THE SAME THING?
AND ALWAYS BE DOING CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISMS AT ALL TIMES.??

Like,, SIX MILLION PEOPLE.??
SERIOUSLY.??

DO YOU REALLY KNOW WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.??


Let me just mildly assume that you don't know the true meaning of OBIDIENTS..


There are many Obidients who are constantly engaging in numerous Constructive discussions, and making meaningful suggestions..

But the likes of you wouldn't see them.
You prefer to always engage the abusive ones.

REASONS..
Those are the ones you guys can easily relate with.

BluntCrazeMan:


If I tell you to Describe what you understand the term “Obidient” to be, you may just misfire..

But let me help you..
Obidients at this very moment,, Could be described as Everyone who Voted For Peter Obi.

Before now, it used to be those who were actively campaigning for Peter Obi, and then, the supporters of Peter Obi.

But now, anybody who voted for Peter Obi is Obidient.

Technically, there are more than 6.1million Obidients in existence, because there are supporters of Peter Obi who didn't Vote..

Thus...
WOULD YOU EXPECT A WHOOPING SIX MILLION PEOPLE TO ALL BE DOING THE SAME THING? AND BE DOING CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISMS AT ALL TIMES.??

Like,, SIX MILLION PEOPLE.??

DO YOU REALLY KNOW WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.??


Let me just mildly assume that you don't know the true meaning of OBIDIENTS..

As a movement and not a mob, there must be mechanisms for dealing with those giving you bad names so as not to soil your image as been done now.
This is a movement, if properly harnessed, can drive change in Nigeria but you allow different interests to hijack your movement and turning it into a laughing stock in Nigeria.

Sangoamadioha1:



As a movement and not a mob, there must be mechanisms for dealing with those giving you bad names so as not to soil your image as been done now.
This is a movement, if properly harnessed, can drive change in Nigeria but you allow different interests to hijack your movement and turning it into a laughing stock in Nigeria.

This should be the problem of the “MOVEMENT”,, right??


Let the people in Government pay attention to Nigeria, and forget about MOVEMENTS, and what should be happening within the ranks of Such Movements..

The fact that there are diverse interests within the Obidients,, One Interest is sure at the moment..

LAME EXCUSES will never rule us in this country again..

BluntCrazeMan:



This should be the problem of the “MOVEMENT”,, right??


Let the people in Government pay attention to Nigeria, and forget about MOVEMENTS, and what should be happening to Such Movements..

You asked me for an example of an 'Obidient' that insults anyhow. AcuraZDX is one of the people giving you bad name here. Chain that guy, he believes in insulting people for likes.


We can't forget about the movement because we are all brothers and if we see ourselves derailing, we caution.

BluntCrazeMan:
I just scanned through the topics and posts of the Moniker you just mentioned...


You must be a very toxic person within yourself,, for such “catching cruise” comments of his to be catching your attention..
I mean,, to the extent you even have to mention him.

You see what I am saying. Instead of saying the truth, you are taking sides with him. I made a comment in response to a post and your 'guy' quoted me with insults when i was not even knowing he was existing. You expect me to take anything he says seriously, even on another topic
People like these are just there for entertainment and not where serious national issues are discussed because nobody can take such a person seriously.

Lalasticlala Seun

Nlfpmod

Mynd44