₦airaland Forum

SIRTee15:
Just ignore maynman, don't indulge in her ignorant fantasy. She doesn't know what she's talking about.

She's been beaten blue-black here...she don chop dust tire. she knows nothing about bible history.
She thought Paul was speaking to Herod Agrippa in Antioch.
All she's doing now is manipulating words to fit into her delusion.
This only shows she doesn't understand the lexical changes and evolution of language as well as words.
Pls just ignore her.

Yahweh slut.

Maynman:
Yahweh slut.

Whatever u post there means nothing. I don't have your time now, otherwise u go chop dust again.

Ken4Christ:
You are boasting of an unknown demon. Go ahead.

You call my God a demon?
Oh, may his Hallowed Noodly Limbs have mercy on you on the Last Plate when you'll behold all his glory, and die forever

Ken4Christ:
I seriously think you are mentally unstable. No need to converse with you. Otherwise, I will be bringing myself to your low level.

You're the mentally unstable one here. If you cannot see the glory of my Lord and Savior, the Flying Spaghetti Monster then you are indeed spiritually blind

SIRTee15:
Show me where Herod's name is mentioned in that verse.
U just drowning and holding to anything to safe face. Nobody knows it all but u atheist are something else, u want to proof u are the best and never wrong. Nobody here cares, the only thing we have for u guys is pity.
U guys get caught and u start damage control.
U were wrong on John copying mark
U were wrong on serapis being called Christians
And u wrong that Herod called Jesus followers Christians in Antioch.

… and you christies have serious comprehension issues

jaephoenix:
… and you christies have serious comprehension issues

Help your friend out, she's confused and still lost in it.

Where was Paul on trial in acts 26?
Maynman still saying it's Antioch. Bail her out, maybe she will believe u.

U atheists on this forum need to step up your game. This is my 1st time debating u guys and I'm not impressed at all.

SIRTee15:
It's like u struggling with memory loss.
I clearly told u several times this is what I asked of u

We talking of 2 different things.
Pls let's not turn this thread into medical. Just go to Google and bring an evidence of spontaneous remission of stage 4 cancer without therapy.
Just one and I will give it to u. Seriously, it will rest.

Mr Man, post the stuff here yourself.
I have gone through your links and can't find what I'm looking for- A case of SR of metastatic stage 4 cancer without therapy.

So when did I shift goal post.



1. My discourse with u was never about SR. My debate with u was stage 4 SR without treatment.
This is what I said about SR.

One of my patient diagnosed of advanced squamous cell cancer of the mandible has now been told he's cancer free.
He had palliative radiotherapy last yr because they couldn't do surgery- tumour was too advance. Now the oncologist had written that he should be removed from cancer register because the cancer is cleared. I can't count cases like above I've encountered.
My own case is a woman who had fungating advanced cancer and it regressed without any treatment.

I will respond to this because it's medical related. Don't spread fallacy here
Chemo or radio for metastatic cancers still carries poor prognosis, remission do happen esp with advancement on therapy but it's not magic cure at that stage.

Me I can't find this case in all the links you sent. Where did u lift it..pls send the link so we can all learn.
Though shrunk is different from cure/cleared but I will still give it to u if above is true. Stage 4 cancer is not a joke and any remission is worth celebrating.

2. False accusation should not be termed as irrelevant. It's a serious issue, integrity and reputation is at stake. People come here and they read what's written. Nobody likes such accusation against their moniker.
I didn't call u a liar or such ...
I doubted your qualification because u were goofing but u corrected your errors and that settled it.

3. U took up the challenge willingly.u could have rejected it initially and that will be fine by me. Whatever we discuss here won't change the woman's testimony. Besides I told I have them plenty.

I went through your links, quite interesting but unfortunately we will not be able discuss them since u are stiff-necked. But u can read up Immunotherapy in cancer treatment.

1. You know you're funny. You gave me a story of SR in stage 4 cervical CA. And I believed you in goods faith. But I think you should provide evidence it did happen, since you don't believe anything I post
2. You falsely accused me here on 2 occasions, but I let it slide. And in this case, you were not even the accused here, but anything to distract the matter is welcome to you, and you grasp at any irrelevancies to muddy the water.
3. You have no grounds to doubt my creds cos you can't even differentiate between the management of a lump and a cancer. I should be calling your certs (whatever they are) into question. But here you are doing the same to me when you were even in the wrong
4. Whatever the woman's testimony (if it truly happened), you didn't probe to know how the regression happened. Did it happen immediately after or during the prayer? Was it gradual? Was she on any other stuff apart from drugs? Etc. Did you investigate if there's any trace of the cancer by chest x-ray or CT, abdominopelvic imaging, tumor markers etc. Was that a temp or permanent regression? But like every dumb theist out there, swallowed it hook, line, sinker, fish, fisherman etc. Religion really makes a smart man dumb
5. If you don't wanna discuss my links, I don't give 2 hoots.
6. And yes, I know about immunotherapy in management of mitotic lesions. Its not in my direct specialty, so I just take cursory interest. That's all

SIRTee15:
U not in any position to teach anybody about Christianity. U very empty and knows nothing about the bible.
Ordinary bible history, u don't know.
Confusing Antioch for Caesarea.
Mixing conspiracy theories with reality- serapis worshipper.
U need help.

Chatgpt isn't 90% correct, never mind 99%. I told it to write me an article on SecondLive crypto and it wrote total nonsense. Don't base any argument on it. Even the devs know it has its inadequacies. Instead base your argument on collective hits from many sources

TenQ:
I get you.

Are you concurring that The person who first wrote down an Oral history is the originator of the story!?

Adam and Eve were illiterates and deaf and dumb at the same time. They know nothing of value to be passed down to their children. The same with Noah, he was even in addition to being deaf and dumb, a brute who didn't tell anyone why he was building the ark.

See your life!?

1. Whether the first person is the originator or not is irrelevant. The most important question is

WHO DID YAHWEH GIVE THE STORY OF CREATION?
Its a simple question, but you have been dodging it as usual.

2. So Yahweh has been conversing with deaf and dumb peeps? Really?
You're gradually blasting your foot with your own shotgun

jaephoenix:
Chatgpt isn't 90% correct, never mind 99%. I told it to write me an article on SecondLive crypto and it wrote total nonsense. Don't base any argument on it. Even the devs know it has its inadequacies. Instead base your argument on collective hits from many sources

I absolutely agree with u that it's not 100% correct. It can easily be manipulated which I noticed maynman have been doing.
I don't base my argument fully on it. I asked maynman to challenge the chatgpt answer if dissatisfied by providing her own evidence.
Instead she went to chatgpt and started manipulating the poor thing to agree to her theories.

TenQ:
...Ignored!

Punch, referring to a beverage, indicates either a spiced concoction of hard liquor, wine, or beer and fruit juices (sometimes tea), or a refreshing, nonalcoholic mixture of fruit juices often with carbonated soda added; both are made in "party" size quantities.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/punch-words-and-phrases-history

I can't believe I'm teaching a grown ass supposedly literate man this

OLAADEGBU:
Copycat, here's another one for you.

Bible Mistakes

Ray Comfort

Someone calling another person a copycat goes and quickly copies another person's work, just to prove his point.
How dumb can you theists be?

SIRTee15:
Just ignore maynman, don't indulge in her ignorant fantasy. She doesn't know what she's talking about.

She's been beaten blue-black here...she don chop dust tire. she knows nothing about bible history.
She thought Paul was speaking to Herod Agrippa in Antioch.
All she's doing now is manipulating words to fit into her delusion.
This only shows she doesn't understand the lexical changes and evolution of language as well as words.
Pls just ignore her.

He was quoting me not Maynmann. Lol
You're even committing the same sin you accused me of

SIRTee15:
Help your friend out, she's confused and still lost in it.

Where was Paul on trial in acts 26?
Maynman still saying it's Antioch. Bail her out, maybe she will believe u.

U atheists on this forum need to step up your game. This is my 1st time debating u guys and I'm not impressed at all.

You have abandoned my debate with you which you have been so beaten, and you faced another. I wont allow you to go free without collecting more blows

SIRTee15:
I absolutely agree with u that it's not 100% correct. It can easily be manipulated which I noticed maynman have been doing.
I don't base my argument fully on it. I asked maynman to challenge the chatgpt answer if dissatisfied by providing her own evidence.
Instead she went to chatgpt and started manipulating the poor thing to agree to her theories.

Lol.
Obviously you can't 'manipulate' chatgpt. It uses LLM(Large Language Model) and doesn't accept input from users. Whatever it spews out is what it collates from its sources like literatures, articles, journals and uses LLM, its AI variation to put it in a language and form we understand.
Lol. These theists are clowns

jaephoenix:
You have abandoned my debate with you which you have been so beaten, and you faced another. I wont allow you to go free without collecting more blows

Ask TenQ.

jaephoenix:
He's quoting me not Maynmann. Lol
You're even committing the same since you accused me of

Maynman quoted him with her nonsense.

jaephoenix:
Lol.
Obviously you can't 'manipulate' chatgpt. It uses LLM(Large Language Model) and doesn't accept input from users. Whatever it spews out is what it collates from its sources like literatures, articles, journals and uses LLM, its AI variation to put it in a language and form we understand.
Lol. These theists are clowns

U gotta be kidding me

U people just keep falling hand.
Atheist are suppose to be well grounded with facts. I just don't understand the kind ones u be.

jaephoenix:
1. Whether the first person is the originator or not is irrelevant. The most important question is

WHO DID YAHWEH GIVE THE STORY OF CREATION?
Its a simple question, but you have been dodging it as usual.

Do you know who got the first story of Creation from God?
Cause I don't know who the FIRST person to hear the Creation story was!

Moses was certainly NOT the first, but he was the first to write the history of Creation in the lineage of Abraham.

jaephoenix:
2. So Yahweh has been conversing with deaf and dumb peeps? Really?
You're gradually blasting your foot with your own shotgun

That's your apparent claim wasn't it?
Adam and Eve couldn't read nor write, and so, there were no other ways to get information from God!? Same with Noah!?

Adam and Eve were illiterates and deaf and dumb at the same time. They know nothing of value to be passed down to their children. The same with Noah, he was even in addition to being deaf and dumb, a brute who didn't tell anyone why he was building the ark.

See your life!

My quote above is what maynman have been doing to chatgpt.
B4 any fake atheist quote me, pls go and read things fall apart by China Achebe.

jaephoenix:
I can't believe I'm teaching a grown ass supposedly literate man this

Apologies bro!

Never thought of "Punch_Drunk"
I assumed "Punch_Drink" which could be strongly alcoholic depending on its mix!

SIRTee15:
I absolutely agree with u that it's not 100% correct. It can easily be manipulated which I noticed maynman have been doing.
I don't base my argument fully on it. I asked maynman to challenge the chatgpt answer if dissatisfied by providing her own evidence.
Instead she went to chatgpt and started manipulating the poor thing to agree to her theories.

Why don’t you also manipulate the poor thing?

SIRTee15:
Whatever u post there means nothing. I don't have your time now, otherwise u go chop dust again.

You are LITTLE.

Maynman:
You are LITTLE.

Anytime u see 'I apologize for my previous response' on chatgpt...just know manipulation is ongoing.

SIRTee15:
My quote above is what maynman have been doing to chatgpt.
B4 any fake atheist quote me, pls go and read things fall apart by China Achebe.

So was okonkwo killed by suicide or not?

SIRTee15:
Anytime u see, I apologize for my previous response on chatgpt...just know manipulation is ongoing.

Bro there’s no manipulation, who did this to you?
tell me how you can manipulate chatgpt.

Maynman:
So was okonkwo killed by suicide or not?

Go and read about okonkwo in things fall apart. Use other sources.

SIRTee15:
Go and read about okonkwo in things fall apart. Use other sources.

So was okonkwo killed by suicide or not?
How did you manipulate the chatgpt?

It was because of you i even downloaded the chatgpt, before now I didn’t use it.
When you were using it and it was bringing what you like it wasn’t manipulated lol

Maynman:
So was okonkwo killed by suicide or not?
How did you manipulate the chatgpt?

It was because of you i even downloaded the chatgpt, before now I didn’t use it.

Can't us see it gave 2 response to how he was killed?
Initially said it he committed suicide then wrote he was shot.
Do u have comprehension issues?

SIRTee15:
Can't us see it gave 2 response to how he was killed?
Initially said it he committed suicide then wrote he was shot.
Do u have comprehension issues?

It apologized and said it was killed, so I asked you, was okonkwo killed by suicide or gunshot?
Which one is the correct one?
And was the chatgpt incorrect in apologizing and correcting his mistakes?

How did you manipulate it?
can you manipulate it to give you another answer saying he died by drowning?
You are the one with comprehension issues

Maynman:
It apologized and said it was killed, so I asked you, was okonkwo killed by suicide or gunshot?
Which one is the correct one?
And was the chatgpt incorrect in apologizing and correcting his mistakes?

How did you manipulate it?
can you manipulate it to give you another answer saying he died by drowning?
You are the one with comprehension issues

Go and read how okonkwo died in things fall apart.
I can't be spoonfeeding u all the time. Then it will dawn on you what you ve been doing to chatgpt all day.
Things fall apart is one of the common novel someone who passed thru secondary school in naija should have read.
If u did high school abroad, then I will understand.

SIRTee15:
Go and read how okonkwo died in things fall apart.
I can't be spoonfeeding u all the time. Then it will dawn on you what you ve been doing to chatgpt all day.
Things fall apart is one of the common novel someone who passed thru secondary school in naija should have read.
If u did high school abroad, then I will understand.

You brought in okonkwo and things fall apart and you are using it as an argument but you won’t tell us what happened in the book, what kind of logic is this?

was okonkwo killed by suicide or gunshot?
Which one is the correct one?
And was the chatgpt incorrect in apologizing and correcting his mistakes?

How did you manipulate it?
can you manipulate it to give you another answer saying he died by drowning?


It was you that brought in chatgpt now that it doesn’t align with you it’s false, see what religion has done to you.