G00DHardDick:


Dude if there's a rerun, Tinubu definitely won't partake. He stands a much more better chance of getting disqualified than any of the candidates. The competition will be between Obi and atiku, giving obi clear victory ahead.

Not true.none of the charges can disq him.he is not a convict neither is he a Guinean citizen or does shettima have two nominations.if theres a rerun be cause of abuja,then obi is out

Wow

garfield1:


Not true.none of the charges can disq him.he is not a convict neither is he a Guinean citizen or does shettima have two nominations.if theres a rerun be cause of abuja,then obi is out

Why would Obi be out? On what basis? Dude Get rid of your sentiment and hatred and think with your Brain.

If there's a rerun today, Tinubu won't partake. You're even talking about shettima, that one isn't even qualified to start with. Dude, neither Tinubu or shettima is qualified to contest and will both not participate in the rerun. APC will likely fill in another candidate. However the main focus will be on obi and atiku, with obi emerging victorious. Tinubu definitely won't participate in the election. Man will be disqualified.

alsudan:


If there’s a rerun, you know who all of Obi’s votes will go to naa. Thiefnubuu is finished

Not until Peter Obi has proved that his vote numbers were reduced to place him in 3rd position.

Jagabanarmy:
the FCT is known as the 37th state in Nigeria according to the law,so as long as a candidate got 25 percent in 24 states of the federation with or without FCT that candidate has satisfied the preconditions stated in the constitution. The supreme court had decided on this in previous rulings

Your opinion can't hold sway as the AND invalidate any mathematical rule for obtaining a fractional number under such consideration. If we all agreed upon the status of Abuja as a state, the only reasonable logical interpretation will be that a winner must have FCt among his 24 states won or win it in addition to the 24 states won. Any other interpretation is illogical and lack common sense, as the 1999 constitution rightly factor in the eveness of the available states from where a two third can be obtained, you can't obtain a two third from a 37 state structure, reason I suppose the use of the word AND to show the importance of having 25% in the FCT among others, otherwise why mention it at all if it's inconsequential or same as others?
It therefore shows that whatever you're getting, your eyes must be in fct as one of the important place to secure the least of the benchmark to seal up your victory. For how can you govern from the midst of an indigenous people who're hostile to your candidacy to the extent they can't give you 25% of their vote?

garfield1:


Not true.none of the charges can disq him.he is not a convict neither is he a Guinean citizen or does shettima have two nominations.if theres a rerun be cause of abuja,then obi is out

Oga, Tinubu lied under oath. He has a drug related case. He presented false school documents. This means he has no certificate. He has daul citizenship. The man is so full of dishonesty and untrustworthy. Dude, if there's a rerun Tinubu won't partake. Stop arguing blindly and carelessly.

Kubin:
The word and is a verb,is a command that must be fulfilled in a sentence,so is none negotiable tinubu is gone,that and is a must,is not like or,maybe, either,so in conclusion tinubu is returning the certificate.

But obi won't participate in the rerun.by the way,certificates are not returned,inec simply issue a new one.the problem with obidients is they dont know much about politics

OKOATA:
Why's it so easy in winning 36 states and find it hard to have 25% in FCT? Don't you find it odd also? You need to think deep before you talk and stop calling people dull.

Will you keep quiet. Na aliens dey FCT?

garfield1:


And in law is different from and in lay sense son.even if theres a rerun,obi won't partake

U sef, u no dey tire. Why d rigmarole? The personality of who will partake isn't the issue but the implication of AND Abuja

garfield1:


But obi won't participate in the rerun.by the way,certificates are not returned,inec simply issue a new one.the problem with obidients is they dont know much about politics

And you are an emeritus scholar?

slivertongue:



And you are an emeritus scholar?

Far more knowledgeable than obidients

Don't mind them. They don't even know the weight of the petition the tribunal is dealing with. They don't even know there is something called precedent in court. If the law is wrongly interpreted, other offenders will take the opportunity and cite this case to get away with so many things.

OKOATA:
People are expectant of it because that's what the law says, if the law should go against it's own rule then there's every right as a citizen to also go against the Law and that will lead to anarchy. You can't set a Law, go against it and call it an exercise.

slivertongue:



U sef, u no dey tire. Why d rigmarole? The personality of who will partake isn't the issue but the implication of AND Abuja

Obidients should stop fronting it as if they will benefit.
From precedents and customs,you already know where the apex court will rule

G00DHardDick:


Oga, Tinubu lied under oath. He has a drug related case. He presented false school documents. This means he has no certificate. He has daul citizenship. The man is so full of dishonesty and untrustworthy. Dude, if there's a rerun Tinubu won't partake. Stop arguing blindly and carelessly.

how did he lie under oath? can you prove it? which false documents did he present? did ge voluntarily acquire the citizenship? obi has failed

garfield1:


And in law is different from and in lay sense son.even if theres a rerun,obi won't partake

You are fraudulent being, lair and thief! Obi must partake because while considering the fact that your irresponsible daddy (druggie) did not achieve 25% in Abuja, the tribunal must return all Obi's votes stolen by your zaddy and his criminal political party in PH, Lagos, Benue and all other states, thus in the end you will come to terms with the fact that he "BAT" won less than eight ( states, so the rerun if at all must be between Atiku who came second and Obi who came FIRST. Imagine Inec did not compromise IREV, by evening of 25/02/23, Obi would have won that election with wide margin and we would not be hear discussing this in the first place.

abbey621:


The first definition completely contradicts your argument. If I said buy me 5 bread, 2 fried eggs and 1 yam with 25% of each going to 2 of my 3 children, would you buy yam alone and give it to the children?

Law is simple when applied with common sense, why would Abuja be the determining factor in an election with 36 states? Why would they campaign in all states, if all they had to do was win Abuja convincingly to ensure the other candidates never make it to 25%? Make una think

whatever it means bro...the major issues is that till date over 9000 polling units results haven't been uploaded on the BVAS yet because INEC can't match the original figures from those units with what they announced, same thing they tried to do in adamawa. Secondly the issues of realtime transmission of results have to be decided cos that's where the whole controversy lies.

abbey621:


The first definition completely contradicts your argument. If I said buy me 5 bread, 2 fried eggs and 1 yam with 25% of each going to 2 of my 3 children, would you buy yam alone and give it to the children?

Law is simple when applied with common sense, why would Abuja be the determining factor in an election with 36 states? Why would they campaign in all states, if all they had to do was win Abuja convincingly to ensure the other candidates never make it to 25%? Make una think

whatever it means bro...the major issues is that till date over 9000 polling units results haven't been uploaded on the i-Rev portal yet because INEC can't match the original figures from those units with what they fraudulentlt announced, same thing they tried to do in adamawa. Secondly the issues of realtime transmission of results have to be decided cos that's where the whole controversy lies.

garfield1:


Obidients should stop fronting it as if they will benefit.
From precedents and customs,you already know where the apex court will rule

They are NIGERIANS and might in southern interest root for tinubu. They have a big say if there is a rerun. Even the apex court doesn't know where they will rule. The interpretation has an implication, stick with earlier ruling or make a shift. Sticking with with the former makes future ruling in d opposite direction near impossible, shifting positions will open interpretation to 'a matter' of choice.

garfield1:


Far more knowledgeable than obidients

I doubt, everyone see's things from his/her point of view

slivertongue:



They are NIGERIANS and might in southern interest root for tinubu. They have a big say if there is a rerun. Even the apex court doesn't know where they will rule. The interpretation has an implication, stick with earlier ruling or make a shift. Sticking with with the former makes future ruling in d opposite direction near impossible, shifting positions will open interpretation to 'a matter' of choice.

Majority of obidients are formerly pdp/atiku fans.they still prefer atiku to tinubu.therefore,it is of no use.how many atiku fans do you see making noise about fct?

The apex court does not easily change position.it does so if there was a mistake per incuriam or in the face of new evidence or amendments by nass and none of this has happened.
Late justice obaseki clearly stated that when faced with two opposing statutes,they will choose the one that is simpler,less absurd and more commonsensical as the lawmakers do not intend to create absurdities.
In 2003,the apex court still stated that if they will ever rule on that,they will take the one that makes more sense and creates less confusion.
In 2019 and 2021,the court stated that the fct is not inferior or Superior to a state.section 299 already gives fct a state like status.all over the world,all votes are equal,all polling units,states are equal.no vote supercedes the other except in the electoral college system of the us.based on the above,it is crystal clear where they will rule.

slivertongue:



I doubt, everyone see's things from his/her point of view

True but they should comment on matters they know and remain silent on what they dont know.

Phantom233:
whatever it means bro...the major issues is that till date over 9000 polling units results haven't been uploaded on the BVAS yet because INEC can't match the original figures from those units with what they announced, same thing they tried to do in adamawa. Secondly the issues of realtime transmission of results have to be decided cos that's where the whole controversy lies.

That they are not on irev doesnt mean elections didnt hold there.it is not compulsory to upload it on irev.there is no real time transmission.the law says transmit to inec server not irev

Phantom233:
whatever it means bro...the major issues is that till date over 9000 polling units results haven't been uploaded on the BVAS yet because INEC can't match the original figures from those units with what they announced, same thing they tried to do in adamawa. Secondly the issues of realtime transmission of results have to be decided cos that's where the whole controversy lies.

Why would results being uploaded on BVAS matter more than iREV? Further, real time transmission is not an issue since the Electoral Act allows for manual processing in case of technological failure. The case is so easy to dismiss I'm sure the lawyers are laughing on both sides.

Nigeria is a federation of 36 states AND 1 federal capital territory (Abuja). The used of "AND" there is like saying 《INCLUDING》 FCT, meaning Abuja is not exempted from the 25% obligation.

abbey621:


Why would results being uploaded on BVAS matter more than iREV? Further, real time transmission is not an issue since the Electoral Act allows for manual processing in case of technological failure. The case is so easy to dismiss I'm sure the lawyers are laughing on both sides.

the excuse of network failure was all a game plan by the evil inec chairman. Yes we had option but the fraudulent INEC chairman had on several national n international media forum announced that the option that would be used was realtime transmission n that there would be no excuse or going back on that. The only thing is that Nigeria is a doomed nation else the victims won't be celebrating their oppressors.

garfield1:


That they are not on irev doesnt mean elections didnt hold there.it is not compulsory to upload it on irev.there is no real time transmission.the law says transmit to inec server not irev

What is inec server and what is I-Rev?
We've seen several results that were mutilated, these forms if results shouldn't have been announced. In Some other local governments in rivers state we could see that the results on iREV is not what inec announced. So save your strength. We know that the case has already been settled by Tinubu n the chief judge during their oversea meeting but at the end the blind followers will cry.

Phantom233:
the excuse of network failure was all a game plan by the evil inec chairman. Yes we had option but the fraudulent INEC chairman had on several national n international media forum announced that the option that would be used was realtime transmission n that there would be no excuse or going back on that. The only thing is that Nigeria is a doomed nation else the victims won't be celebrating their oppressors.

Well the INEC chairman is not God, even the most advanced countries are susceptible to technological or human errors. This is why the Electoral Act made the provision for alternate processing. Again ask yourself without using sentiments, strictly speaking on legality, was manual processing illegal? Your tantrum is like that of a student that got angry at the lecturer because the exam questions were essay style instead of multiple choice.....WAKE UP!

Phantom233:

What is inec server and what is I-Rev?
We've seen several results that were mutilated, these forms if results shouldn't have been announced. In Some other local governments in rivers state we could see that the results on iREV is not what inec announced. So save your strength. We know that the case has already been settled by Tinubu n the chief judge during their oversea meeting but at the end the blind followers will cry.

Irev is for public viewing,inec has a secure,internal server.it is from here they send results to irev.mutilated results doesnt mean it is void.since you have prove of fraud in rivers,why can't you prove that of other states? If you can't,it means tinubu won.again,since the chief judge has been settled according to you, then obi is on a folly as usual

Tntsi:

Just write, OBIDATTI is coming. Tinubu is going no where , and submit.

Sure odd.

garfield1:


Majority of obidients are formerly pdp/atiku fans.they still prefer atiku to tinubu.therefore,it is of no use.how many atiku fans do you see making noise about fct?

The apex court does not easily change position.it does so if there was a mistake per incuriam or in the face of new evidence or amendments by nass and none of this has happened.
Late justice obaseki clearly stated that when faced with two opposing statutes,they will choose the one that is simpler,less absurd and more commonsensical as the lawmakers do not intend to create absurdities.
In 2003,the apex court still stated that if they will ever rule on that,they will take the one that makes more sense and creates less confusion.
In 2019 and 2021,the court stated that the fct is not inferior or Superior to a state.section 299 already gives fct a state like status.all over the world,all votes are equal,all polling units,states are equal.no vote supercedes the other except in the electoral college system of the us.based on the above,it is crystal clear where they will rule.

That's your opinion which is valid to you and not binding on the Judges who has traveled a different route in 2003. It's easier to say 24 of 37 states FCT inclusive, than say 24 states and FCT. Everyone who understands English knows the implication of AND. Which ever direction the judges chooses to rule NIGERIANS will obey but that won't take the away understanding and the debate.

Most of you APC supporters should first understand the difference between PDP, Atiku & OBIDIENTs. Each has supporters, PDP supporters are mainly with PDP and Atiku, a few with the OBIDIENTs. The OBIDIENTs are non party members, they are diehards independent minded folks. If you say you know where there votes I'll go then you ain't right. A rerun will present a different dynamics.

Thanksful:
Omo! If the lecture nah APC card carrying member. You must find away to turn the And to or. If not, nah you know.

Thank God the lecturer isn't daft and depend on constitutional provisions to assess them, any mob who dwell on social media judgement will likely fail the question!