imam07:
mobile court. Sit down there. If d judge have talked against your opinion will u come here to tell us. I dont know d type of judge in your area that will be hiring bolt as transport. Who be dat suffer head judge.

AskNgige2:


Ask Ngige sup

senatordave1:


The penalty is not cancellations

imam07:
I dont need to ask anyone. I never meet a judge using bolt service. Nah from u u hear am

IfnobeGod20:

Sometime I beg to question your intelligence. If someone is penalized for doing wrong thing, does his illegality turned to legality? Please let us reason intelligently.

fabolouz1:
I don't see how changing of statement by the head of an electoral commission invalidate a result.

AskNgige2:
I have carried deputy governor wife before in disguise..

Bro u don't know chumthin

imam07:
gov self can disguise govs do socialize but judges are restricted to somethings. Those using bolt will not disclose their identity to u. U are claiming they disguise. Is that not foolishness from them letting u know their identity

senatordave1:


Obi's evidences are watery.when the defence session starts,they will bring back that newspaper

IfnobeGod20:

How would they bring what is not front loaded at the pre-hearing? My brother, you're more than this. Even at that, the content of the news therein doesn't exonerated or dispelled transmission of results by the polling officer. If you read it with keen interest and not with bias mind.

princekwi:


Yes at least we have fake products, which one do you have? The only people killed for drug in this country are you people, and ironically killed by your so called Messiah; Buffon, you can only intimidate those that knows nothing, you can't intimidate me bro, I am well learned and know your history more than you, zombie

Gajagojo:
. Who are those people ?
You need to check your facts

princekwi:



Enough, Arise TV crew are all Yorubas, I love and respect them so much, take your tribalism elsewhere

princekwi:


Y The only people killed for drug in this country are you people, and ironically killed by your so called Messiah;

olisaEze:
After speaking and reiterating on how the BVAS is integral to the 2023 polls on every major news network in the country, it’s an unverifiable story in the tribune that is their last line of defense. Ndi ala!!

onuman:


Semi-illiterate and coalition.

Nigeria 🇳🇬 did not spend a fortune paying members of the National Assembly to prepare the Electoral Act of 2022 and signed into law by the president of Nigeria; spent billions of Naira to establish the system for electronic transmission of vote results as provided in the Electoral Act; then Nigeria turned around to have the old manual collation of votes to remain a valid method for collation of votes.
Is Nigeria a land of the pigmies and the hottentots you people want it to be; because you want a near octogenarian Tinubu who is battling all forms of age related illnesses, and who is a former drug trafficking lord, to preside over Nigeria 🇳🇬 even for one year?

bentenny:

The rules and regulations of INEC are an extension of the electoral act and holds as much authority and is binding just like the act!
This is as clear as daylight!
What does clause 93 of the rules and regulations of INEC say?
This talks specifically about collation!
How is collation related to the authenticity and power of the rules and regulations of inec?

IfnobeGod20:

Note that any guideline not in tandem with the constitution and Electoral Act is null and void. All guidelines must take there roots from the enabling laws. Just the same way, any law in the Electoral Act that goes against the constitution, is null and void and the constitution takes superiority over it.
That is why it is very clear in the 2022 Electoral Act, how to collate disputed results. It was well spelt out and no way to circumvent the electoral Act. Section 64 (5)(6) is very clear and I will reproduce it here same way I did before.

(5) Subject to subsection (1), a collation officer or returning officer shall use the number of accredited voters recorded and transmitted directly from polling units under section 47 (2) of this Act and the votes or results recorded and transmitted directly from polling units under section 60 (4) of this Act to collate and announce the result of an election if a collated result at his or a lower level of collation is not correct.

'footnote'
It is even mandatory for a collation officer or returning officer to compare the recorded results with transmitted results from the polling units as stated in the above section.

(6) Where during collation of results, there is a dispute regarding a collated result or the result of an election from any polling unit, the collation officer or returning officer shall use the following to determine the correctness of the disputed result –
(a) the original of the disputed collated result for each polling unit where the
election is disputed;
(b) the smart card reader or other technology device used for accreditation of voters in each polling unit where the election is disputed for the purpose of
obtaining accreditation data directly from the smart card reader or technology device;
(c) data of accreditation recorded and transmitted directly from each polling unit where the election is disputed as prescribed under section 47 (2) of this Act; and
'footnote'
In this section, it was made explicit that in case there is a dispute in the collation of results, it is expected for the collation officer or returning officer to rely on data of accreditation recorded and transmitted directly from each polling unit so disputed.

(d) the votes and result of the election recorded and transmitted directly from
each polling unit where the election is disputed, as prescribed under section 60 (4) of this Act.

'footnote'
Anything outside this section is null and void my brother. This section had explained how to collate any disputed results and no shortcuts.

(7) If the disputed result under subsection (6) were otherwise found not to be correct, the collation officer or returning officer shall re-collate and announce a new result
using the information in subsection (6) (a)-(d).

'footnote'

Note these, as stated by the section above "using the information in subsection (6) (a) - (d)".
If anyone use any information outside this section, such has breached electoral Act.
We are talking of disputed results, which has been taken care by the Electoral Act.

Meanwhile, INEC guidelines on clause. 92-94 is talking of missing INEC hard copy results during collation as you can see below:

92. At every level of collation, where the INEC copy of collated results from the
immediate lower level of collation exists, it shall be adopted for collation.
94. Where no hardcopy of collated results is available, the results, where possible, shall be regenerated from the preceding level (Collation or Polling Unit) in accordance with Clause 93 of these Regulations and Guidelines.
93. Where the INEC hardcopy of collated results from the immediate lower level of collation does not exist, the Collation Officer shall use electronically transmitted results or results from the IReV portal to continue collation. Where none of these exist, the Collation Officer shall ask for duplicate hardcopies issued by the Commission to the following bodies in the order below:
(i) The Nigeria Police Force; and
(ii) Agents of Political Parties.

Now, read the clause 93 as I quoted it verbatim which in part is in line with the Electoral Act. Read it slowly this time around and don't rush.

You people are just confusing yourself thinking you're smart. I am here to always puncture your lie.

abbey621:


I suggest you go and read clause 48 and 93 properly, this time very slowly and try to comprehend!

AntiTerrorist:
If you support Tinubu or APC, may your life be like Nigeria under their rulership.

Emperormartin:

You just nailed it in lay man terms

Tinubu is trying to convince us with signing of bills up and down.

Oloribukun Ballot box snatcher!!!

aswani:


I can't see the words "mandatory" or "must be used" in what you have kindly detailed.

I also can't see anything along the lines of "otherwise declared null and void".

If Peter Obi's retinue of lawyers had proof that figures were falsified enough for the elections to favour them, do you genuinely think they will be focusing heavily on this electronic transmission of a thing after 2 weeks at the Tribunal?

Why do they need to play the video of the INEC personnel saying something and then call as witnesses, journalists to confirm what was said in the video?

Time wasting tactics, I commend the Judges for their patience in tolerating such. However, only one thing will end up happening when Judges are indulge you in this manner, your case will eventually be struck out and you will be asked to pay damages to the other party.

bentenny:

Guy i have read the clauses and it has nothing to do with the reason i replied you!
You tried to make nonsense of the legitimacy and authority bestowed on rules and regulations of INEC by the amended 2022 electoral act of which i called you out and corrected you!
Go back and read my previous reply but just take your own advise and read it slowly!

It was not just said,it was also documented as rules and regulations of INEC which is an extension of the electoral act and holds as much power and binding authority!

IfnobeGod20:

Mr. Man, breached of any enabling laws, guidelines or the manual for the election invalidate the election according to section 65 of the 2022 Electoral Act.

Read below:

Section 65 Nigeria Electoral Act 2022
Decision of returning officer on ballot paper


(1) The decision of the returning officer shall be final on any question arising from or relating to –
(a) unmarked ballot paper;
(b) rejected ballot paper; and
(c) declaration of scores of candidates and the return of a candidate:

Provided that the Commission shall have the power within seven days to review the declaration and return where the Commission determines that the said declaration and return was not made voluntarily or was made contrary to the provisions of the law, regulations and guidelines, and manual for the election.

The last paragraph is even the cruise of everything. The commission even reserve the right to void an announced results within seven days wherein its detected that the declaration was done against the provisions of the law and guidelines and manual for the election.
'footnote'
Breached of:
1. Provisions of the law (both constitution and Electoral Act)
2. INEC guidelines
3. INEC manual so provided
The breached of any of these three can render the election null and void according to Electoral Act quoted above.

abbey621:

Then you obviously have trouble comprehending simple English. Here's your initial comment
Your comment would make sense if clause 48 and 93 did not exist which gives INEC the right to use alternative method when electronic coalition and transmission fails. Now what exactly is your argument? Are you saying those clauses are irrelevant? Did you read them? Goodluck convincing a competent court that they don't matter

abbey621:


Is INEC chairman, the Electoral Act? Man can promise you heaven and earth but if it is not documented na ofutufete, LAMBA!

It was not just said,it was also documented as rules and regulations of INEC which is an extension of the electoral act and holds as much power and binding authority!

senatordave1:


Obi has been bringing things that are not front loaded.why it was rejected was not because it wasn't frontloaded but because it is premature.it will be brought again once the defence session starts son

fabolouz1:


How does your long epistle answer my poser?

bentenny:


The highlighted was what you said.....


My reply.....


Maybe you should be the one to make an effort to comprehend your own comments!

IfnobeGod20:

I hope you read the objection of the lead examiner to the witness? We shall see if it would be brought again during argument.
I always think you're a refined person but your foul language gives me a second thought. How would you go low to call someone you don't really know a son in closed forum like this? Desist!

abbey621:


Again na comprehension be your problem, Mahmoud said this Mahmoud said that but it does not mean his words will supersede what is officially written as rules and regulations. Yo usaid it was written that electronic transmission was mandatory, I provided you with a counter via Clause 48 and 93, yet you still dey argue? Na wa o

senatordave1:


Sorry about that...they will bring it under subpoena as lp are doing