₦airaland Forum

eph12:
By this guy, you mean manchester united?

whoever is making and accepting that deal

Leyqute:
Is bad.

apart from rashford not like una get better player to sell na

odizeey:
See how Chelsea are valuing their useless players.

My lord.

If they were the ones who had Maguire, they would price him for 60m plus. Let's see how much we can get from Maguire.

like 5m

BlueAngel444:
apart from rashford not like una get better player to sell na

you have good players to sell and battled relegation?

ChristineC:
you have good players to sell and battled relegation?

BlueAngel444:
whoever is making and accepting that deal

But your sense should tell you that that's a good way to avoid paying some money? Won't the club keep it's money if the player doesn't that award?

ChristineC:
you have good players to sell and battled relegation?

The thing is chelsea problem last season was a psychological thing due to the controversial sale down to Tuchel and then to
the players getting injured and who are being sold now. Remember this guys won ucl( the most prestigious trophy in Europe) three seasons ago with a lot of finals and other cups so they are still valued even with the poor form last season. Unlike most Man U players that have been playing poorly for seasons now bar last season so they are mostly not marketable and not valued by most clubs. Imagine Pogba went for free for the second time to Juve. Jones have being there for ages doing nothing and receiving salary, maguire is a poor footballer that if not for British passport he won’t even cost 10m while at Leicester but only Man U can pay 80m for a player like that. If Man U see English player their prick go stand thinking because it worked for Ferguson it will this time. British players strength is tenacity but the ones you guys now buy or have lack that; e.g, Rashford, sancho and maguire. There is a reason ETH want mount badly(tenacity) which most of your attacking players lack bar maybe Bruno.

hensben:
The thing is chelsea problem last season was a psychological thing due to the controversial sale down to Tuchel and then to
the players getting injured and who are being sold now. Remember this guys won ucl( the most prestigious trophy in Europe) three seasons ago with a lot of finals and other cups so they are still valued even with the poor form last season. Unlike most Man U players that have been playing poorly for seasons now bar last season so they are mostly not marketable and not valued by most clubs. Imagine Pogba went for free for the second time to Juve. Jones have being there for ages doing nothing and receiving salary, maguire is a poor footballer that if not for British passport he won’t even cost 10m while at Leicester but only Man U can pay 80m for a player like that. If Man U see English player their prick go stand thinking because it worked for Ferguson it will this time. British players strength is tenacity but the ones you guys now buy or have lack that; e.g, Rashford, sancho and maguire. There is a reason ETH want mount badly(tenacity) which most of your attacking players lack bar maybe Bruno.

how much did Chelsea sign Fofana?

ChristineC:
you have good players to sell and battled relegation?

if united passed through the same thing u guys wud have been relegated

ChristineC:
how much did Chelsea sign Fofana?

And if he don’t perform this coming season he will be sold for a reasonable fee unlike Maguire, jones, and the rest who the board are finding it difficult to sell.

Gambit001:
Understand Manchester United will bid again for Mason Mount. Personal terms are 100% agreed and sealed. 🚨🔴 #MUFC

Mount plans not to sign new deal at Chelsea.

Man Utd want quick resolution — and won’t make ‘crazy’ bids.

Chelsea now flexible; £60/65m enough to get it done.

_Fabrizio Romano

65m for an academy player that won ucl for us is a big win for Chelsea.

hensben:
65m for an academy player that won ucl for us is a big win for Chelsea.

I don't still get what eth sees in mount. On the bright side it shows that Chelsea could sell for 50m if we play our cards right, considering the fact that chelsea bought Sterling for that approximate amount I'm okay.

Gambit001:
I don't still get what eth sees in mount. On the bright side it shows that Chelsea could sell for 50m if we play our cards right, considering the fact that chelsea bought Sterling for that approximate amount I'm okay.

Eth is paying for his tenacity, your team lack that, except Casemiro and Lisandro Martinez. If use properly Mount will turn out one of your important player.

hensben:
Eth is paying for his tenacity, your team lack that, except Casemiro and Lisandro Martinez. If use properly Mount will turn out one of your important player.

There's Bruno, Garnacho, Casemiro, Martinez, Antony. Even Fred is tenacious , it's obvious we don't lack it. We need a partner in that double pivot with Case, but it's obvious eth is going to make changes this coming season probably to a 433.

BlueAngel444:
if united passed through the same thing u guys wud have been relegated

what exactly passed through you?

hensben:
And if he don’t perform this coming season he will be sold for a reasonable fee unlike Maguire, jones, and the rest who the board are finding it difficult to sell.

that's a part of what United pass through. not many teams can survive owners and a board whose major interest is subtly laundering cash... and we still don't fight relegation.

Gambit001:
I don't still get what eth sees in mount. On the bright side it shows that Chelsea could sell for 50m if we play our cards right, considering the fact that chelsea bought Sterling for that approximate amount I'm okay.

sell for 50m way dem don reject or which 50m? 😃

BlueAngel444:
sell for 50m way dem don reject or which 50m? 😃

Watch and see, you guys will not want to pay the wages of a player that's no longer interested for a whole year then losing that same player for free thereafter. Instead of selling for 50m. Like I said, you need the deal we don't, so we can afford to keep dragging this because in the end Chelsea will bulge. I'm very sure because nobody's going to pay that amount for mount.

ChristineC:
that's a part of what United pass through. not many teams can survive owners and a board whose major interest is subtly laundering cash... and we still don't fight relegation.

Glazers have spent more than everyone since 2013 though.

hensben:
Glazers have spent more than everyone since 2013 though.

that's not the point.

Gambit001:

There's Bruno, Garnacho, Casemiro, Martinez, Antony. Even Fred is tenacious , it's obvious we don't lack it. We need a partner in that double pivot with Case, but it's obvious eth is going to make changes this coming season probably to a 433.

Bruno is playing too much of games so his minute will be shared next season with Mount. Fred is not good enough in that position(box to box/CM) and Erickson is old plus his health, he has to be managed (Kanu situation at Arsenal).

ChristineC:
that's not the point.

The point is they are spending but no consistent performance on field and not making anything during sale.

hensben:
The point is they are spending but no consistent performance on field and not making anything during sale.

if you purchase a Corolla for £1m, is that a guarantee you'd win on the tracks against a Porsche 911 or that you'd get better resale value when you decide to dispose of?

hensben:
Bruno is playing too much of games so his minute will be shared next season with Mount. Fred is not good enough in that position(box to box/CM) and Erickson is old plus his health, he has to be managed (Kanu situation at Arsenal).

Did Bruno tell you he's tired?
We have young talented midfielders that if given the playing time of Fred should improve and develop more into the men's game. And mount is nothing like Erikson or Fdj or the pastor. Don't forget.

hensben:
Glazers have spent more than everyone since 2013 though.

Una no spend money last season?

Gambit001:
Understand Manchester United will bid again for Mason Mount. Personal terms are 100% agreed and sealed. 🚨🔴 #MUFC

Mount plans not to sign new deal at Chelsea.

Man Utd want quick resolution — and won’t make ‘crazy’ bids.

Chelsea now flexible; £60/65m enough to get it done.

_Fabrizio Romano

😁😁😁
Crazy people......

hensben:
Glazers have spent more than everyone since 2013 though.

If we ask you to back up this talk with facts and figures, you'll come and remind us english is not ur first language.

Man City lining up a bid for Bruno Fernandes, who they see as the ideal replacement for Bernado Silva

Gambit001:
Watch and see, you guys will not want to pay the wages of a player that's no longer interested for a whole year then losing that same player for free thereafter. Instead of selling for 50m. Like I said, you need the deal we don't, so we can afford to keep dragging this because in the end Chelsea will bulge. I'm very sure because nobody's going to pay that amount for mount.

have you heard or read, united are offering £60+m for Mount 😉

Gambit001:
Did Bruno tell you he's tired?
We have young talented midfielders that if given the playing time of Fred should improve and develop more into the men's game. And mount is nothing like Erikson or Fdj or the pastor. Don't forget.

Mount is something like Bruno is what I am letting you know. Fred is poor with the ball, though energetic, you still need another player in that position.

Lana1:
If we ask you to back up this talk with facts and figures, you'll come and remind us english is not ur first language.

Prior to this past winter signing your net spend was higher. You will become first again after this summer.