₦airaland Forum

CondenseMilk:
Events between the Roman and the British is no near the Egypt civilization.


Group of persons who could put up such pyramid should be able to build houses that would stand the test of time.

Ourtruth247:
Calm down. I've not posted anything. Let me land first.

Damian911:
You're capping shit bro!
So a blast or something similar happened and no one one talked about it and no evidence like remains were unearthed and none of your so called cartographer or historian anywhere wrote or observe anything about it as big as the whole Sahara is? Drop this and find some real shit bro this adventure is time wasting and unprofitable.
I been dey read am they think say na sense him wan talk. Werey op want scatter my head, questioning the legitimacy of my research in history.

1Sharon:
We wuz Kangz.

ednut1:
there was a library in timbuktu of which over 700000 texts still exist today. The Sokoto and Kanem also had well stock libraries with communications with mecca, cairo and even the ottomans. Conspiracy theorists ehn🤣

https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2013/jan/28/timbuktu-library-centuries-african-history

Ourtruth247:
The one eyed white Nigerian Giant

Going back to the earliest known map that annotated the whole of Africa, you will notice something very bizzare. What is a white one eyed giant doing in the area that we call Nigeria today. If the creators of the map were specific enough to place such a weird creature on that exact location, then it meant they must have visited that location themselves.

This looks like the greek cyclops, could it be that those mythological creatures like giants, mermaid, cyclops actually existed

I mean, these people were clearly racist, theu could easily have put some naked black people and placed them in that region. However, they instead put a giant creature with caucasian features, as if they were clearly indicating that this area wasn't inhabited by black people, but rather by giant creatures.

This goes back to my theory that our earlier ancestors didn't infact inhabit the regions south of the sahara until roughly 600 years ago, but rather were denizens of the advanced civilizations located within the sahara that history has tried their best to hide from the world. This also explains why there is almost no documented knowledge of people that lived south of the sahara until recently.

ednut1:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romans_in_sub-Saharan_Africa This debunks the hogwash you have up there. The romans, Egyptians arabs etc documented the Sahara desert. Camels were also being used there for a reason. So maps by early explorers are mostly inaccurate. Make una rest

luminouz:
Nope. You are the one wrong.

The Sahara desert was once a lushland with waters and animals in the Pleistocene. Climate change altered the landscape and made it barren. Fossils of mammals, reptiles uncovered in the rocks of the desert told this story. Climate change was the culprit bro.

Ourtruth247:
According to our history books, the 15th century was the first time Europeans "discovered" sub Saharan Africa and interacted with them. The sub Saharan Africans at the time lived in underdeveloped tribes and villages, a stark contrast to the Africans living north of the Sahara, that had built great cities and advanced means of transportation.

On closer inspection, this whole picture looks weird. How did every other part of the word develop advanced means of transportation, advanced architecture and advanced technology, yet sub Saharan Africa almost seemed like they were just begining their civilization?

My research has led me to a conclusion that lots of you will find interesting.

Let's begin.

Zaheertyler:
There was a nuclear war in sub Saharan Africa
Where else do you think the titan war was fought

Ourtruth247:
The first map that showed the whole of Africa

ednut1:
there was a library in timbuktu of which over 700000 texts still exist today.

Spirit04:
Those "cities" were figments of the cartographers imagination because he hasn't been there so he thought up things just as Ptolemy thought the Mediterranean Sea was an ocean and the end of the world. Just as Aristotle thought the sun revolves round the earth. Just as Columbus thought the Americas were in Asia and the people there were Indians. You can't use the mistakes of early men who didn't know better to cook up conspiracy theories. Do our Ancestors looked like descendants of people who had contact with the outside world to you?

ednut1:
learn to read. He said 600 years ago it was green based on the old map. The place has been a desert for more than 20,000 years. When the romans and other conquerors got to North Africa the desert was already there.

luminouz:
Ednut, no make me slap you oh... Na me you dey abuse?

OP has interesting theories. You might not agree with him but don't abuse him. Na why I called you out.

ednut1:
where did i abuse him

Lontorlooka:
REGNUM (NVM) there is the capital of Biafra land.

It is interesting to know that Biafra land has been largely identified since 1400s maps consistently every century till the 1800s until something happen .

CondenseMilk:
The Mediterranean sea was an artificial creation.

It was created the British so that they could get to Asia by sea.

Spirit04:
that's Suez canal. It seems this thread is exclusively for lunatics

CondenseMilk:
But the Suez canal connected the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea.


What made you think that the Mediterranean sea wasn't dredged?

CondenseMilk:
But the Suez canal connected the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea.


What made you think that the Mediterranean sea wasn't dredged?

Ourtruth247:
My Theory

Before I continue, I will like to establish the theory I am trying to expand on.

There were advanced African civilizations located in the sahara 600 years ago. These civilization for some reason, maybe as a result of a nuclear blast or something similar, were destroyed along with their technology and architecture, and the aftermath of this catastrophe led to a massive desertification of that region

The few survivors of the catastrophe migrated south, and restarted civilization in little tribes and villages, having lost most of the knowledge they once had. My research has made me believe that the survivors of this great catastrophe were the ancestors of sub-saharan Africans.

broswilli:
Africa is the location of Atlantis with its capital at Mauritania. Atlantis was ruled by the 10 sons of Poseidon(Nimrod). They worshiped the gods of the sea and wanted everyone to be together. Atlantis had people with different languages brought together. Then a sudden Tsunami came and washed of the city. After the city was washed off it became a desert. Poseidon the god of the sea couldn't protect his land and people from desertification. Somehow Oduduwa one of the sons of Nimrod from Atlantis survived. Many people know that Africans were the ancient atlanteans, which was a colony of Egypt

Spirit04:
Those "cities" were figments of the cartographers imagination because he hasn't been there so he thought up things just as Ptolemy thought the Mediterranean Sea was an ocean and the end of the world. Just as Aristotle thought the sun revolves round the earth. Just as Columbus thought the Americas were in Asia and the people there were Indians. You can't use the mistakes of early men who didn't know better to cook up conspiracy theories. Do our Ancestors looked like descendants of people who had contact with the outside world to you?

Lacox:
Oshogbo is the location of Atlantis with its capital at Ede, Atlantis was ruled by the 10 sons of Eponlabi (Ebora Igbo) . They worshiped the gods of the sea and wanted everyone to be together. Atlantis had people with different languages brought together. Then a sudden Erosion came and washed of the city. After the city was washed off it became a desert. Ijakumo the god of the sea couldn't protect his land and people from desertification. Somehow Oduduwa one of the sons of Obatala from Oshogbo survived. Many people know that Ijebu Igbo was the ancient Atlantis which was a colony and source of Egypt.

As all of us wan begin mental , please share your own theory

CondenseMilk:
Where are the structures they built and lived in as humans ?

Temples, pyramid and others are ceremonial and that's why their location were distinct.

Ourtruth247:
According to our history books, the 15th century was the first time Europeans "discovered" sub Saharan Africa and interacted with them. The sub Saharan Africans at the time lived in underdeveloped tribes and villages, a stark contrast to the Africans living north of the Sahara, that had built great cities and advanced means of transportation.

On closer inspection, this whole picture looks weird. How did every other part of the word develop advanced means of transportation, advanced architecture and advanced technology, yet sub Saharan Africa almost seemed like they were just begining their civilization?

My research has led me to a conclusion that lots of you will find interesting.

Let's begin.

Ourtruth247:
It's funny how I am trying as much as I can to post verifiable evidence along with pictures, yet some people are trying to debunk my arguments by telling me to "ask northerners"

It's actually funny.

NSNO:
It's not funny, you are bending the facts to fit your theory instead of the other way around.

Maps are not irrefutable proofs, Infact when reading the history of cartography you will learn that cartographers regularly made up things instead of admitting they don't know. Even at that there are maps showing the Sahara desert from the 1500s on Google that a single search will show you.

And that image there is how craters appear all over the world, again a single Google search will show you tens if not hundreds of images. So does that mean all those places were "nuked" according to your theory?

Sahara became a desert thousands of years ago. That is a fact.

But you won't listen, you like conspiracy theories because they make you seem smart when it is actually the opposite.

Next time cook a very good one not this one that can be easily debunked with a few Internet searches.