₦airaland Forum

Courz:
See? He has nothing to say. Hahahahahaha


Mumu Janosky aka SubPlot aka the Iberibe Master aka Janonsense, went to Google to prove something to us. He said Since Angels are messengers of God, Jesus is also a messenger of God. Therefore, Jesus is an Angel. But Mumu Janosky forgot that Men of Old in the Bible were also messengers of God. And anyone Preaching about Almighty God and Jesus is also a Messenger as well. So, the question to Mumu Janosky is, are these people above also Angels?

Mumu Janosky, keep digging your grave with these useless points. You are helping our argument o. I love it! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

oteneaaron:
Their greatest enemy are their own publications.

When we bring the proof of the publication, they will switch to their default mode - lying and more lying.

advocatejare:

achorladey:
Come here Aemmyjah and see your lies and manipulations exposed once again like your brothers in Jehovah.


Cc: Courz
advocatejare
Emusan
Oteneaaron


You must restate here that the publication screenshot is a fabrication. Should you change your mouth and speak something else. You 100% confirm yourself a liar and a manipulator. You also show indeed 100% that your brains are filled with FUFU the reason you are too weak to research your religious publication

Courz:
achorladey, let me help you out to expose their foolishness. They think they can scrub off their history. They think people are so stupid to fall for their fraud. We are here to finish them today.

Mad MaxInDHouse, Mumu Janosky, Prosper1912 and Fornicator Aemmyjah the boggest mumu out of them all, oya come and debunk this Watchtower publication. Theae screenshots are straight from the original Watchtower publication called The Finished Mystery. Since your brain cells arw clearly not working and you arw too lazy to research your publications, here are the shots from the publications.

Fornicator Aemmyjah with his Maggot infested brain and Mumu Janosky were up there boasting of being able to research. How come they couldn't find this Watchtower publication?

Oya, Foolish JWs, come and debunk this publication. You must prove to us that Watchtower never published this.

achorladey:
It is that blatant denial of the works and publications of their GODS that is interesting for me. I will keep reminding them about it.


They will come back and say the screenshot is not from Jehovah's Witnesses

Courz:
Mumu MaxInDHouse

Courz:
Mad MaxInDHouse

Courz:
Mumu Mad MaxInDHouse,

Courz:
Mad MaxInDHouse

MaxInDHouse:
Bunch of rubbish I just typed

MaxInDHouse:
It seems you don't understand what i'm telling you so i will make it simpler now:

No matter what you think, say or do about my religion as long as you can't present yours for me to compare and contrast so as to choose between yours and mine i will forever remain one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

So your worries all over this forum won't change anything unless you present your own religion and mind you it must be a better performing group than JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES.

God bless you and may you have PEACE!

MaxInDHouse:
It seems you don't understand what i'm telling you so i will make it simpler now:

No matter what you think, say or do about my religion as long as you can't present yours for me to compare and contrast so as to choose between yours and mine i will forever remain one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

So your worries all over this forum won't change anything unless you present your own religion and mind you it must be a better performing group than JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES.

God bless you and may you have PEACE!

Courz:
Mumu MaxInDHouse, Go and debunk the publication I posted. Debunk it and prove to everyone reading that Watchtower has nothing to do with it. Prove with evidence o. Oya Osiso!

Myer:
This is a good answer.

Myer:
This is a good answer.

achorladey:
The reality here is that the intention of the post and thread had nothing to do with comparison but to expose the lies and manipulations that they say they don't do.

MaxInDHouse:
What really baffles me is how i told these guys my journey regarding religion.

I was a Muslim before Jehovah's Witnesses came to present their religion, i compared what i had with what they brought and chose the one that's performing better from my own personal opinion.

So if anyone is now saying anything against Jehovah's Witnesses let them know that i have heard a lot about Islam but nothing moved me until i found a better performing organization therefore it's only the better one that can make sense to me not all these STORY STORY STORY!

Myer:
I understand. I lost interest in the thread when I realised Max and the other JW members were being evasive.
It's pointless engaging with such.

achorladey:
The reality here is that the intention of the post and thread had nothing to do with comparison but to expose the lies and manipulations that they say they don't do.

Janosky:


ACOURZD IBERIBEIST DECEIVING HIMSELF.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[i]H4397 - mal'āḵ - Strong's Hebrew Lexicon (esv) - Blue Letter Bible
www.blueletterbible.org › esv › wlc
מֲלְאָךְ mălʼâk, mal-awk'; from an unused root meaning to despatch as a deputy; a messenger; specifically, of God, i.e. an angel (also a prophet, priest or ...
Strongs's #4397: mal'ak - Greek/Hebrew Definitions - Bible Tools
www.bibletools.org › Lexicon.show › m...
an angel (also a prophet, priest or teacher):--ambassador, angel, king, messenger. Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew Lexicon: mal'âk. 1) messenger, representative."

Janosky:
That screenshot is NOT from JWs.

Copy and paste MUMU.

Myer:
But you can still answer simple questions in honesty about JW without being evasive.

MaxInDHouse:
The purpose of this thread has been met so if anyone wants to bring something different in then we must discuss like interaction not like you asking me questions while you won't answer me when i ask you!

MaxInDHouse:
What really baffles me is how i told these guys my journey regarding religion.

I was a Muslim before Jehovah's Witnesses came to present their religion, i compared what i had with what they brought and chose the one that's performing better from my own personal opinion.

So if anyone is now saying anything against Jehovah's Witnesses let them know that i have heard a lot about Islam but nothing moved me until i found a better performing organization therefore it's only the better one that can make sense to me not all these STORY STORY STORY!

Myer:
But you can still answer simple questions in honesty about JW without being evasive.

Myer:
What do you think is the purpose of the thread?
What questions did you ask that were not answered?

We can all agree to answer one another honestly.

Truth is what sets one free. The challenge is usually when we hide the truth for one reason or the other.

MaxInDHouse:
It's not about what i think but what really led to this thread!

Advocatejare always talk about Muslims and i have once told him it's of no use because Christ taught his disciples to present the Good News of God's kingdom only that's what no religion has. But ever since then he started insulting me so i avoided him still he will follow me from thread to thread questioning me about my religion so i told him if both of us are claiming Christians then you must present your church to compare with mine. He refused so i ignored him.

Then a friend of mine (zoer) commented on his thread so i explained (quoting my friend) that the God of Abraham has no business with Muhammad going by what the Bible say.

Only for Advocatejare to start insulting me again so i told him not to worry because i only spoke for my own God so he can continue speaking for his own.

Then he was talking about Charles Taze Russell being the founder of Jehovah's Witnesses organization that's why i told him not to derail the thread but if he truthfully wants to know who founded Jehovah's Witnesses organization he should start another thread so we can discuss better.

That's what brought about this thread.
I have proved that Charles Taze Russell is not the founder of Jehovah's Witnesses organization so if anyone feels like discussing with me further then it should be a friendly discussion of comparing what you have with mine!

MaxInDHouse:
The one and only intention of this thread is to know who founded the group called Jehovah's Witnesses!

I promised to enlighten the OP about the real meaning of the word FOUNDER and afterwards prove to him that Charles Taze Russell is not the founder of Jehovah's Witnesses.

This has been resolved so anything afterwards is just STORY STORY STORY!

No matter what you think, say or do about my religion as long as you can't present yours for me to compare and contrast so as to choose between yours and mine i will forever remain one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

Myer:
Thanks for patiently honoring me with the background. I really appreciate.

1. Islam vs Christianity discourse is often emotionally charged but we must learn to bring our emotions under control when seeking the Truth.
I don't know if you've read my thread concerning Judaism, Christianity and Islam all being from the same Torah/Pentateich, leading to Father Abraham/Ibrahim and simply in disagreement primarily concerning the promised child (Islam) and invariably Jesus Christ (Judaism and IIslam).

2. Concerning your founder, I don't believe you have answered who the founder is. You have simply said Jehovah is the founder.

3. It is your prerogative to answer or not but please there is no need to be evasive. You can as well let us know you're not comfortable with the question.