Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,163,425 members, 7,853,836 topics. Date: Saturday, 08 June 2024 at 05:48 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results (2193 Views)
Obi, LP Tender 18,088 Blurred Result Sheets, Other Documents / Shocking Polling Unit Results From Rivers State (Photos) / Mr Macaroni Shares His Polling Unit Results (2) (3) (4)
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by waice6571: 7:27am On Sep 20, 2023 |
BluntCrazeMan: You are expecting EYE-NECK to bring evidence against herself?.... Right? You go explain tire.... No exhibit; No case! The plaintiff will have to prove his claims, fact and figures beyond every reasonable doubt in the court of law. There're no two ways about it. 1 Like |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by garfield1: 7:33am On Sep 20, 2023 |
BluntCrazeMan: The apex court in oyetola vs adeleke established the supremacy of the inec copies 1 Like |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by BluntCrazeMan: 7:48am On Sep 20, 2023 |
tinsel:The Copy that was given to the APC Witness during hearing was not an IREV-Printed document.. It was supposed to be a CTC of the original hard-copy. |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by BluntCrazeMan: 7:55am On Sep 20, 2023 |
garfield1:So,, why did the APC-Witness after he was shown the CTCs (ie, the photocopies) of the original EC8A-results,, he said that he couldn't see anything on the copies?? (Which even made INEC Counsels to blame the photocopying-machine,,, and wrote in their response that the toner in the photocopying-machine might had finished during the photocopying, which made the copies to be blurred. -- or didn't you read that part.??) |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by BluntCrazeMan: 7:57am On Sep 20, 2023 |
Lalasticlala, Seun, Nlfpmod |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by netricoin: 7:58am On Sep 20, 2023 |
The fact that party agents sign election results in polling unit, that doesn't mean that that election is credible, because election rigging can happen at the ward level and at the LG level without the knowledge of party agents, and also INEC staff can change polling unit election results before uploading it to the INEC irev portal |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by tinsel: 8:01am On Sep 20, 2023 |
BluntCrazeMan:We are talking about where the blurred 18000 plus labour party presented to the court? Where are they from? From IREV or not? |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by garfield1: 8:04am On Sep 20, 2023 |
BluntCrazeMan: It is irrelevant. |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by BluntCrazeMan: 8:06am On Sep 20, 2023 |
waice6571: I want you to find the Electoral-Act-2022... Go to 1st-Schedule; Paragraph-12(2) and read it.. After that,, Then read: 1st-Schedule; Paragraph-44... It's like you think it is only the Petitioner who has to prove things beyond every reasonable doubts?? THIS PARTICULAR ISSUE OF 18,088 BLURRED CTCS OF THE ORIGINAL RESULTS HAD BEEN ESTABLISHED. It is now the turn of INEC to prove it otherwise beyond all reasonable doubts.. |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by BluntCrazeMan: 8:07am On Sep 20, 2023 |
garfield1:I am not really understanding you. What exactly is irrelevant?? CTCs.?? CTCs of documents are irrelevant?? I don't get it. |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by garfield1: 8:08am On Sep 20, 2023 |
BluntCrazeMan: The most relevant is the top copy or original copies from the polling unit and evidences clearly adduced by obi |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by garfield1: 8:09am On Sep 20, 2023 |
BluntCrazeMan: You will prove it by comparing it with other units and providing the disputed polling units |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by BluntCrazeMan: 8:09am On Sep 20, 2023 |
tinsel:18,088 were seen and tabulated from the IREV by the professor.. INEC then brought CTCs of Original EC8As, EC8Bs, EC8Cs, EC8Ds to the court.. And it happened that the so-called original EC8As had numerous blurred copies too. Running into thousands too |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by BluntCrazeMan: 8:12am On Sep 20, 2023 |
garfield1:CTCs of those original Top-copies were brought to the court.. Did you agree on this too?? |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by Christistruth00: 8:14am On Sep 20, 2023 |
BluntCrazeMan: If the Labour Party were not happy their agents wouldn't have signed them In the first place They should get the copies of their agents |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by garfield1: 8:14am On Sep 20, 2023 |
BluntCrazeMan: What obi tendered and made use of is the irev copies.all the original obi brought were not used by him but simply dumped on the court 1 Like |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by garfield1: 8:15am On Sep 20, 2023 |
BluntCrazeMan: Not true,the original were never blurred just the photocopy from irev 2 Likes |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by tinsel: 8:16am On Sep 20, 2023 |
BluntCrazeMan:Please, the burred copies are only from the 18000 printed from IREV which i attributed to wrong snapping at the polling booths. There are still originals and party agents also should have their own copies. The truth of the matter is labor party did not have agents. |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by BluntCrazeMan: 8:17am On Sep 20, 2023 |
garfield1: Comparing what and what?? The LP wanted to compare the Polling-units that were seen as Blurred inside the IREV, with whatever the INEC would supply at the court as the CTCS OF THE ORIGINAL RESULTS.. But ALASS..!! Those same supposedly blurred polling-units in the IREV are not also available in the so-called pile of CTCs of Original Results.. And then,, there are blurred and blank results in the original results, running in thousands. |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by BluntCrazeMan: 8:18am On Sep 20, 2023 |
tinsel: The truth of the matter is that INEC supplied Blurred Copies as the CTCs of the Original Top-Copies of the Results.. |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by garfield1: 8:19am On Sep 20, 2023 |
BluntCrazeMan: That is not what happened in court sir.prof ofoedu the statistician clearly said he only analyzed the irev copies alone and never saw other copies.nothibg different was in obi final address.obi is bound by this submission 1 Like |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by garfield1: 8:20am On Sep 20, 2023 |
BluntCrazeMan: Obi should identify the units involved for the courts to decide 1 Like |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by BluntCrazeMan: 8:22am On Sep 20, 2023 |
garfield1: garfield1: In the Reply of LP.. The counsel said that the Blurred Copies which was given to the APC witness is the supposed CTCs of top-copies of EC8As. |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by tinsel: 8:23am On Sep 20, 2023 |
BluntCrazeMan:Those copies were from IREV because the labor party requested them as they wanted to prove that the nonuse of IReV is against the electoral act. |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by Christistruth00: 8:26am On Sep 20, 2023 |
garfield1: If the Original were unreadable why would the Labour Party Polling Agents sign then off 2 Likes |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by BluntCrazeMan: 8:29am On Sep 20, 2023 |
tinsel:LP requested for a lot of things.. Including the original polling unit results; and collated results in all the Wards, LGAs, States, and The final collation.. That was why the INEC started telling them to apply to all the States.. WHICH THEY DID.. |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by tinsel: 8:31am On Sep 20, 2023 |
BluntCrazeMan:There agents don't have their own copies? And you are still dodging from where those 18000 blurred copies came? Are they from IREV? |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by Mohamid(m): 8:33am On Sep 20, 2023 |
BluntCrazeMan: LP said they win and they will prove it, that means they have done all their calculation and everything with evidence to prove. BLURRED RESULTS ARE PRINT OUT COPIES FROM IREV LP AGENTS SUPPOSED HAVE EACH POLLING UNITS RESULTS THAT GOOD. |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by BluntCrazeMan: 8:44am On Sep 20, 2023 |
Mohamid: When LP applied for Investigations of the BVAS,, INEC refused, and the Tribunal accepted such refusal.. The proof of Peter-Obi’s victory is inside the BVAS-Machines.. But the Tribunal truncated the BVAS investigations by themselves.. So,, Peter still had something else to prove. And that is,, that the whole election is a shammm.!! |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by Jiokejohn: 8:55am On Sep 20, 2023 |
tinsel:What is the meaning of CTC? And what does it implies? |
Re: Burden Of Proof Of The 18,088 Blurred Polling Unit Results by Nobody: 9:02am On Sep 20, 2023 |
BluntCrazeMan:so inec should bring 18000 results to court for the judges to sort? Did LP demand that INEC produce those results? |
CSU; How A Replacement Certificate Works / Yet Another Food Truck Looted By Mobs In Abuja Nigeria / A Gay Governor
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 52 |