₦airaland Forum

jaephoenix:
Just check my chat with you. You're the first to start throwing insults, when the insult is hurled back, it becomes a problem. Idiot

Why don't you bring up the proof yourself?

That was how you lied against me on the other thread after I accused you of calling me a retard. You said you never did. Once I proved you did, you started saying I first started it. When I proved you were the aggressor, you started saying it was not directed at me.

Now, trace all our conversations on this thread. Even when you insult me, how have I responded to you? Did I even respond back with insults? Yet, you continue. You start all conversations with insults until I told you that your mind is very dirty.

FxMasterz:
Go and sit down if you don't have anything to say to boy counter. The thoughts are my origin thoughts. The arguments are my original arguments. The counter arguments are mine. We live in a modern world where things are no longer done mechanically. I can use anything to fine-tune my argument and make it more presentable. The thoughts are still mine motherless.

You're using AI to fine-tune what?
Lol 😆 bwahahahah (lemme laugh like LordReed)
You're talking to folks that use AI on the regular. I use them sometimes for my blog even though I don't use them for my arguments here. Any stuff the AI spews out isn't your thought but machine generated, and if another person asks that same question or query, he gets the same answer

jaephoenix:
You told hopefulLandlord that you made the post, liar
You're just like your father

Yes, I made the post. I have never said AI made the post.

Or you don't understand the use of 'If' statements? I'm challenging the fellow that she should challenge the debate whether she thinks it's from AI or from me. A debate is a debate. Meanwhile I emphasized that the thoughts are 100% mine while I asked AI to make it presentable and alert me to scientific errors. The post is 100% my post.

FxMasterz:
Is that your alibi? The truth is that you do not have the mental capacity to enter the debate. Bye!

Obviously, you are the one that lacks the balls or brains to debate, thus you run to chatgpt

FxMasterz:
Shame on you.

Can you prove I plagiarized? Even if I plagiarized, this is a debate and not a thesis. Debate it if you can.

It has been proven. Aren't you seeing the pics?

jaephoenix:
You're using AI to fine-tune what?
Lol 😆 bwahahahah (lemme laugh like LordReed)
You're talking to folks that use AI on the regular. I use them sometimes for my blog even though I don't use them for my arguments here. Any stuff the AI spews out isn't your thought but machine generated, and if another person asks that same question or query, he gets the same answer

Go and sit down.

I made two answers to the same question. One was not fine-tuned, the other was. Only one response out of all the several responses here have been so finetuned. Yet, you want to make a mountain out of that molehill.

Hey, this is a debate and not a thesis. The tools I use in fine-tuning my debates are up to me. There's no rule broken. Moreover, just one answer out of two answers provided to the same mention. So, what's the problem with you guys? And that's the only finetuned response on this thread!

FxMasterz:
Olodo. That's not plagiarism. We're not writing these. That I asked AI to make my submission presentable does not mean anything. The thoughts are still mine nonetheless!

You can't find my argument anywhere online. Prove me wrong.

If you ask chatgpt 'to make your submission presentable' , it won't say the post is 100% AI generated, it would say 50% or so. Stop lying idiota

jaephoenix:
If you ask chatgpt 'to make your submission presentable' , it won't say the post is 100% AI generated, it would say 50% or so. Stop lying idiota

As long as it is rewritten and represented in AI language, it would be more than 50%. It said it's 85% AI. Not 100%.

FxMasterz:
You can go through all my arguments, woman. I'm not your mate when it comes to cognitive competence. It was my competence that gave me the argument points in the first place. I asked AI to fine-tune my texts, proofread, make edits and crosscheck me for any fallacy, what is wrong with that?

The cognition is mine while the fine-tuning is AI. Have you found any similar argument online? Wait till I hit YouTube with this argument. You're just ranting any childish thing your head tells you.

Which Youtube? Don't try this stunt outside Nairaland. Some people no get filter, they would ridicule you til you run away

Everyday247:
Abeg boss, no go YouTube with this. YouTube is more brutal than Nairaland.

I don tell am. Social media get brutal trolls. X, Facobook, Youtube, Tiktok etc

jaephoenix:
It has been proven. Aren't you seeing the pics?

Not proven. That's not plagiarism. The thoughts don't belong to anybody.

FxMasterz:
No wahala. The truth must still go out. The lies atheist tell must be debunked.

Lol. 'Lies atheists tell' that you need chatgpt to tell you
Aint you a nice lil bitch?

jaephoenix:
Obviously, you are the one that lacks the balls or brains to debate, thus you run to chatgpt

For only one answer provided out of 2 answers for one question? Only one fine-tuning for all the numerous answers here? Dey play!

jaephoenix:
Which Youtube? Don't try this stunt outside Nairaland. Some people no get filter, they would ridicule you til you run away

Yes, the attacks are welcome. That's what I want. I want very hot debates!

Lucifyre:
Imagine stealing the words and thought process of someone you "defeated" & then bragged about their defeat. Like how low can you go. So ludacris ludicrous.

The guy na waste

jaephoenix:
Lol. 'Lies atheists tell' that you need chatgpt to tell you
Aint you a nice lil bitch?

Only weak atheist will hold on to one argument presented out of several arguments just because it was finetuned by AI. Agree you have nothing to defend and go rest.

FxMasterz:
Are you afraid of the argument? Bow out for what exactly? You guys can't even put up any reasonable defence but yet you hold on to your falsehood because you're satanic agents on a mission.

Embarrassed by what exactly? Embarrassed by allowing AI to fine-tune my response and presentation? Are you this backward in your reasoning? Lady, this is a debate and not a thesis. I'm free to use AI for fine-tuning and there's no rule against that.

I left the university as a maths graduate almost 30yrs ago. I never took up a scientific job neither did I even take up a science textbook ever since. I branched into something else. It is not wrong for me to tell AI to fine-tune my submissions, alert me to fallacies and scientific errors..

Atheism would be destroyed. Tell Satan when you get to your camp that someone is on Nairaland destroying atheism and that the person has promised to take the fight to YouTube.

There is only one way to believe this bullshit.
Show us the screenshot of the 'idea' you inserted into chatgpt to fine-tune.
Thank you

FxMasterz:
Are you this deficient in reasoning?

AI does not argue for Creationism but against it. So, any argument for Creationism cannot be from an AI's thought process.

AI picks up stuff from a large data base and analyzes it. The database may be theological articles etc. These articles, materials are all part of its programming. Thus it neither argues for or against creationism, dvmmy

jaephoenix:
There is only one way to believe this bullshit.
Show us the screenshot of the 'idea' you inserted into chatgpt to fine-tune.
Thank you

You don't need to believe. Answer the debate. This is not a thesis. I can use anything for my debates.

There are many responses here. Stop dwelling on just one response to make a point.

FxMasterz:
Keep your mouth shut. I'm an IT specialist. You can't even be the one to teach me about AI.

Liar! Who did I chicken out from? What was the debate he or she made that led to me chickening out? What was the exact counter that I could not respond to and ran away from?

AI can fine tune whole documents. Are you this ignorant? So, each time you hear AI, prompt is what comes to your head? Olodo.

Go and sit down!

Which branch of IT? Abi u be phone seller for Otigba dey form IT specialist?
Btw, all your points fall flat. You couldn't counter all the points I raised

jaephoenix:
AI picks up stuff from a large data base and analyzes it. The database may be theological articles etc. These articles, materials are all part of its programming. Thus it neither argues for or against creationism, dvmmy

I showed you that AI debated for evolution, not creationism. Go debate AI yourself and let's see how it goes.

Go online and find similar thoughts as mine if you can find any.

FxMasterz:
Of course, you're really deficient of reasoning. Since you're unable to counter the argument, you want to find solace in blaming AI for your inability.

I've been debating AI for a long time on different topics okay. It's not anything new except for your analogue brains. If this is AI, debate it too like I did if you have any strong counter in your head? Or are you afraid to debate AI? Moreso, the debated points, logic and framework are 100% mine. Stop wailing and start taking the bulls by the horns!

Oga, those points were raised by AI and not you

jaephoenix:
Which branch of IT? Abi u be phone seller for Otigba dey form IT specialist?
Btw, all your points fall flat. You couldn't counter all the points I raised

Nothing concerns you about my branch. I know a lot more than you do concerning these things. I did computer science and maths. So, go and sit down.

FxMasterz:
I did not use prompt for my debate. I wrote and asked AI to detect scientific errors and fallacies, and make my write-up presentable. You're just too angry to see that Atheism is being destroyed by this argument. Stop crying and counter the debate! Even if AI made the whole piece, counter it! I showed you evidence of how I countered AI when it argued against me on this very topic.

You guys are just shameless. You first berated me for debating AI. AI is more intelligent and more knowledgeable than any human. Yet, AI could not counter this argument!

AI has put off the strongest argument against me which none of you humans had been able to match till now! Instead of whining and crying that I'm using AI, put up.your arguments too. Even if it's AI, defeat it. Meanwhile, these are my arguments. 100% my thoughts. No one anywhere can claim this arguments to be his.

AI has been trained on Evolution data only. Not Creationism! AI argues only for Evolution! Stop being a nuisance and face the task at hand!

If you still don't believe that I own this argument, then, take the challenge and defeat AI as I did. Stop crying. These are my thoughts. Not prompts. AI was not trained to deliver my line of argument. Perhaps you don't know that AI cannot do anything outside of its training!

AI uses what was inputed in it. Ask it theological questions and it answers as if it is a priest

jaephoenix:
Oga, those points were raised by AI and not you

Kikiki.

So AI will debate for Creationism? You don't even know what you're saying! Go and try it now and bring it here for us to see.

FxMasterz:
What's there in Youtube? The situation there would not be different from here!

No one can ever prove that other things other than a mind can create purpose. Only a mind can create a purpose. It cannot be argued against anywhere. I don't know why you guys don't want me to go to Youtube. You are afraid of the damage this will do to atheism worldwide?

Oya na go youtube. Please give us link so we go dey watch

jaephoenix:
AI uses what was inputed in it. Ask it theological questions and it answers as if it is a priest

Still it will not debate for Creationism. You can test it out yourself and bring proof if you found it otherwise.

jaephoenix:
Oya na go youtube. Please give us link so we go dey watch

Sure!

FxMasterz:
A car still causes accidents and terminated many lives. How does that prove that the car has no manufacturer? Dumb atheist.

Ignorant atheist, the risks of skin cancer is as a result of the complexity of life, not a flaw in design.


How does not having enough capital base in a business prove that the business has no founder? The excellent work the lung is capable of doing in extracting enough oxygen for the body is another testament to purposeful design.


Ever heard of plane crash, how does a plane crash prove the plane has no manufacturer?😆 The tsunamis and hurricanes contribute to the sharpening of the planet and create diverse ecosystems. The complex design of plate tectonics and oceanic processes demonstrate purposeful designs.



How does that prevent water from from fulfilling its intended purpose? Are you this dumb? The availability of better solvents does not eliminate the fact that water is fulfilling its purpose. Water wasn't made only as a solvent.


The atmosphere and the magnetic field of the earth protect life from harmful radiation. The complex mechanism involved in this protection if further proof of purposeful dealing

1.Maybe you have brain gay, bast.ard Christian. You specifically said we have INTELLIGENT design, not just any design. I keep on pointing to this point you made but obviously you don't know how to counter me cos it was chatgpt that wrote it for you. So type my rebuttal into chatgpt and let it help you, foo.lish fooool
2.Idotic ignoramus, please ask chatgpt how we get skin cancers?
3.But you said we have the PERFECT amount of oxygen in the lungs, didn't you?
4. So the intelligent design of the tectonic plates was to cause tsunamis and earthquakes? Whoa
5. Did you read where I said the protection wasn't enough, idioti.c fo.ol?

jaephoenix:
1.Maybe you have brain gay, bast.ard Christian. You specifically said we have INTELLIGENT design, not just any design. I keep on pointing to this point you made but obviously you don't know how to counter me cos it was chatgpt that wrote it for you. So type my rebuttal into chatgpt and let it help you, foo.lish fooool
2.Idotic ignoramus, please ask chatgpt how we get skin cancers?
3.But you said we have the PERFECT amount of oxygen in the lungs, didn't you?
4. So the intelligent design of the tectonic plates was to cause tsunamis and earthquakes? Whoa
5. Did you read where I said the protection wasn't enough, idioti.c fo.ol?

Jaephoenix, honestly you're very dull.

Go back to the first page of this thread and you'll see clearly that the argument is based on three interwoven factors:

1. Intelligent Design
2. Complex Systems
3. Purposefulness.

All 3 together forms the basis of this entire argument. Everything rests on Purposefulness. Infact if there's no Purposefulness, I'll have no argument today.

You kept arguing on flaws, flaws, flaws and now calling you father a bastard.

FxMasterz:
Oya show me where I said the debate is about intelligent design. I've known for a long time that you're a dullard.

This is the fourth time in this debate youre saying something and denying it. So I'll show you your OP of which Intelligent Design was in fact your first point.
Stupi.d idio.tic liar

jaephoenix:
This is the fourth time in this debate youre saying something and denying it. So I'll show you your OP of which Intelligent Design was in fact your first point.
Stupi.d idio.tic liar

So, why did you crop in only number 1. Why didn't you include the other points?

Are you blind to see that you're the one who is a stupid and idiotic liar? You don't even have shame. Very dull and unintelligent atheist!

I posted Key Points, the pathological liar posted only one point.

It's time to start ignoring all the stupid and unintelligent atheists on this thread!