₦airaland Forum

placeofallure:
Hmmm, so I be sinner like this?

I wear ankle chains, I wear waist beads, I've got multiple ear piercings. I wear about 4 rings on my fingers simultaneously, I have tattoos in hidden places, though they're not permanent. I plan to start wearing a stud on my nose soon, then what again? I'm gonna dye my hair golden for Christmas. Mohbad Style, loading.
I am a daughter of zion and don't joke with my prayer meetings and choir rehearsals. I came back from the church (choir practice) about an hour ago. I'm a good girl, those things don't define me. I work 9-5, I'm very resourceful. Yesterday was our annual Award Day at the office, and guess what, I won the Staff of the Year award, It came with a cheque. I have my side hustles too, not Prostitution. My hubby is proud of me always cause I'm not a liability. I've got a good head on my shoulders...if any man runs away from me because of those things the OP has mentioned, it's his loss!

TechBaron:
Chief.. Go and play with your mates.

We're not in the same strata.

I see that you're the OP and you have a bunch of senseless threads that you've been churning out.

I can never have a meaningful conversation with someone that still have this type of orientation.

DonroxyII:
Wild Daughter Of Zion ....

Life must be Lived Aswear.....
Wa Gbayi!

A life without Touches Of Ogbaaa na Boring Life

DMCA:
Yummy looking 😋🤤

---

SisterANnn can you do this for me? 🤤

Whois:
➜The way you dress is the way you'll be addressed. Indecent dressing will always be a red flag to someone that doesn't want complicated relationship. Know this and know peace

SisterAnn:
Please look for your mate. Small attention I gave you is now entering your head. Don't you ever mention me again. What rubb.ish!

Kobojunkie:
Wrong! That mentality is stewpid reasoning!🥱 🥱🥱

Go ask the many Nigerians who japa-ed and are now in jail for thinking that a person's dressing should dictate their actions towards the individual. 🥱

DMCA:
come UnCloth for me

Kobojunkie:
Go tell your mama that one. 🥱🥱

mariovito:
Ah

You nor talk quick

My own get butterfly tattoo

SixSeven:
Women manipulate, the good ones and the bad ones. Just have the brain to be discerning. When a man realizes that he is the worker of the woman, he will understand a lot of things in life.


The Manipulated Man is a 1971 book by author Esther Vilar, originally written in German and translated to English by Eva Borneman.
The main idea behind the book is that women are not oppressed by men but rather control men to their advantage.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fssTMUSVaq8

SixSeven:
➜Women manipulate, the good ones and the bad ones. Just have the brain to be discerning. When a man realizes that he is the worker of the woman, he will understand a lot of things in life.
The Manipulated Man is a 1971 book by author Esther Vilar, originally written in German and translated to English by Eva Borneman.
The main idea behind the book is that women are not oppressed by men but rather control men to their advantage.

The book argues that, contrary to common feminist and women's rights rhetoric, women in industrialized cultures are not oppressed, but rather exploit a well-established system of manipulating men.

Vilar writes, "Men have been trained and conditioned by women, not unlike the way Pavlov conditioned his dogs, into becoming their slaves. As compensation for their labours men are given periodic use of a woman's vagina." The book contends that young boys are encouraged to associate their masculinity with their ability to be sexually intimate with a woman, and that a woman can control a man by socially empowering herself to be the gate-keeper to his sense of masculinity. Vilar states that this has been going on for some time.

The author says that social definitions and norms, such as the idea that women are weak, are constructed by women with their needs in mind. Vilar explains how it works: if women are viewed as weak, less is expected of them; and therefore they are given more leeway in society than men. Vilar states that women are generally "gold diggers" who attempt to extract money and other material resources from men. One means by which women control men to effect this transfer of resources is praise. Women dole out praise to men only when their needs are met in some way.

Another means of manipulation is the calculated use of emotional displays. Vilar claims that women can control their emotional reactions whereas men cannot, and that women create overly-dramatized emotional reactions to get their way: they "blackmail" men emotionally. Women also use sex as a tool of manipulation and control but also traditional concepts of love and romance, which are seen more positively than sex, to control men's sexual lives. Vilar writes that men gain nothing from marriage and that women coerce them into it under the pretense that it fulfills their romantic desires. ...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Manipulated_Man

Sonofgod1990:
She no fit tie me down bro

Her plan was to hold me down with pregnancy....I just dey look am with one eye. Na because of my son I still dey scrutinize her opue. She too love me and I'm not ready for that kind of too much love.

Kobojunkie:
If Vilar's arguments are to be held up as factual—

SixSeven:
➜The idea that men must avoid women or become gay to escape manipulation is a deeply flawed inference. Pathology isn’t inherent in ‘women’ or ‘men’; it emerges in individuals and in poorly negotiated relationships.
What actually protects people from exploitation is the development of competence: clear boundaries, articulated values, and the willingness to walk away from situations that violate them.
If a man can’t stand up for himself, changing the gender of the person he dates won’t fix that. He’ll recreate the same dynamic elsewhere.
Strength isn’t found in avoidance; it’s found in taking responsibility for your part in the pattern, and correcting that first.
Men know the importance of women, so it's only a weak man who would bend over his kness for another man to pump his semen in his butt. That doesn't create any legacy, it destroys society. It doesn't continue evolution.
Men won't run to other men to escape delusional women. What they will do is LEAD. They will take responsibility.
Women don't want true "equality." They want selective equality when it serves them. They don't like to be held accountable as well.
But I am not here to argue with you. I know where you stand and the suggestion of generalization or alt sex is as ridiculous as no man will propose.

The book argues that, contrary to common feminist and women's rights rhetoric, women in industrialized cultures are not oppressed, but rather exploit a well-established system of manipulating men.

Vilar writes, "Men have been trained and conditioned by women, not unlike the way Pavlov conditioned his dogs, into becoming their slaves. As compensation for their labours men are given periodic use of a woman's vagina." The book contends that young boys are encouraged to associate their masculinity with their ability to be sexually intimate with a woman, and that a woman can control a man by socially empowering herself to be the gate-keeper to his sense of masculinity. Vilar states that this has been going on for some time.
The author says that social definitions and norms, such as the idea that women are weak, are constructed by women with their needs in mind. Vilar explains how it works: if women are viewed as weak, less is expected of them; and therefore they are given more leeway in society than men. Vilar states that women are generally "gold diggers" who attempt to extract money and other material resources from men. One means by which women control men to effect this transfer of resources is praise. Women dole out praise to men only when their needs are met in some way.
Another means of manipulation is the calculated use of emotional displays. Vilar claims that women can control their emotional reactions whereas men cannot, and that women create overly-dramatized emotional reactions to get their way: they "blackmail" men emotionally. Women also use sex as a tool of manipulation and control but also traditional concepts of love and romance, which are seen more positively than sex, to control men's sexual lives. Vilar writes that men gain nothing from marriage and that women coerce them into it under the pretense that it fulfills their romantic desires. ...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Manipulated_Man

Kobojunkie:
Wrong! That mentality is stewpid reasoning!🥱 🥱🥱

Go ask the many Nigerians who japa-ed and are now in jail for thinking that a person's dressing should dictate their actions towards the individual. 🥱

Whois:
➜Someone that doesn't want complicated relationships would have avoided any relationship with an indecent dressing loving person to begin with. Inner peace is bae

Kobojunkie:
I am glad you avoid indecent dressing people so they can instead find their peace with others who are not as shallow enough to consider human character associated with fashion sense.

Whois:
➜Yes avoid indecent dressed people for marriage. FYI I don marry sha n my due diligence is paying off

Kobojunkie:
Well, glad that Nigeria and their churches/mosques are filled with women for your kind of sense.

MikeofKd:
Avoid These Set Of Women For Your Own Good.



Add your own guys.

Starz825:
your head dey there. thanks for that word "character".....

When a man marries a woman...he has not married her beauty, good cooking skills, money but he has married her character and where she hails from.

hafeeanubasy:
My wife does 1o 7 and SHE IS ONE OF THE BEST THINGS THAT HAS EVER HAPPENED TO ME