₦airaland Forum

Two wrongs cannot make a write now.

alphonsojidebab:
Source




https://eyesoflagos.com/2026/02/18/husband-affair-nanny-divorce-lesbian-story/

This one na lie.

Dzzzz:
Why will a man leave you for the nanny !?..You maybe the problem but want to manipulate things here.

Oga men are moved by physical things. The nanny fit get better backyard than the woman, or the front still standing, even if the woman na the most dutiful wife on earth, if the man plans to cheat, he will cheat

Have you not read that verse in the new testament that says" 1st corinthian 7:2 Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.l". There are many laws in the old testament that are no longer valid for the insurance of your soul

lavylilly:
Throughout the Old Testament, several key figures practiced polygyny (one man, multiple wives), and it was not directly condemned.
🔹 Abraham
Had Sarah and Hagar (Genesis 16)
God still called him blessed and made covenant with him.
🔹 Jacob
Had Leah and Rachel, plus their maidservants (Genesis 29–30)
The 12 tribes of Israel came from this arrangement.
🔹 David
Had multiple wives (2 Samuel 5:13)
Described as “a man after God’s own heart.”
🔹 Solomon
Had many wives and concubines (1 Kings 11)
His downfall was idolatry, not the number of wives itself.
The Law of Moses regulated polygyny rather than banning it (Exodus 21:10).
The argument here: If it were inherently sinful, God would have forbidden it explicitly.

📖 In the New Testament:
Church leaders were instructed to be “husband of one wife” (1 Timothy 3:2).
But this requirement was specifically for overseers/bishops — not explicitly for all men.
Some argue this implies monogamy was ideal for church leadership, but not necessarily mandated universally.


Some argue that men separate sex from emotional bonding more easily.
Women often bond more through intimacy.
Therefore, male plural relationships are more “naturally aligned” with male psychology.
This argument says monogamy is a social structure for stability, not necessarily a biological default for men.

alphonsojidebab:
Seeing myself doing this, I got more bitter and want to go back to my husband.

I don't know how to start the process.

You want to go back to who?
If you were your husband, would you take yourself back, after all the "rubbish" you have exposed yourself to?

crazygod:
Oga men are moved by physical things. The nanny fit get better backyard than the woman, or the front still standing, even if the woman na the most dutiful wife on earth, if the man plans to cheat, he will cheat

Bro don’t generalize things..You maybe moved by such things but doesn’t mean others like it.

Nefort:
Why are you making a stupid excuse for cheating? If the husband was not satisfied with the marriage he should have divorced her rather than cheating. You guys will always blame women for everything and will never admit your own failures as men.

Can you leave your mother cause she didn’t give you food tonight?

keemsleek:
3


Check well, cooking f9
House monitoring f9
Children grooming f9
Time for hubby f9
Online presence A1
Friends gathering A1


Househelp
Cooking A1
House monitoring A1
Children grooming A1
Time for hubby A1
Dressing B2

When u don't look once a while for Children and hubby, u don't take care of the house and you hardly have time for your hubby gbam the vampire strike at night. Exactly what's playing among must women in my area. A kids will never eats his lunch in school he will either not touch it or give it out when the question him, he said the food is not sweet and the househelp who cook is not yet back from traveling. Your hubby cheated on you and from thier to a lesbian to a sugar mummy while the househelp might have been upgraded to a full house madam. So whose loose. Women...

GBAMSOLUTELY

Dzzzz:
Can you leave your mother cause she didn’t give you food tonight?

No

Nefort:
No

You too reason am well ..

Nefort:
No

Yes,Most men are useless but we still have many useless ladies..A woman knows the father of a child but na still men Dey impregnate many.. A man is like a pencil in the hand of his creator😂😂Na Wale ADenuga I talk oooo😂😂

A woman has failed if she can't keep a husband.

tgmservice:
Husband leave her! She is the problem
She leave husband! She is also d problem

mumu

Damaged goods

You are too pretty for anyone to leave, what did you do? Anyway, converting to lesbian is a big loss to men.

shepherd316:
Have you not read that verse in the new testament that says" 1st corinthian 7:2 Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.l". There are many laws in the old testament that are no longer valid for the insurance of your soul

1 Corinthians 7:2:
Promotes sexual purity.
Encourages legitimate marriage.
Does not explicitly outlaw polygyny.
If it were a salvation issue:
Jesus would have condemned it directly.
The apostles would have labeled it sin.
A clear command would exist.
Instead, Scripture regulates it but never forbids it.
That said — the New Testament clearly promotes the monogamous ideal as the safest, most stable expression of marriage.
So the stronger argument is:
Monogamy is presented as the Christian norm.
Polygyny is not explicitly called a salvation sin.

Unimaginative fake story.

lavylilly:
Throughout the Old Testament, several key figures practiced polygyny (one man, multiple wives), and it was not directly condemned.
🔹 Abraham
Had Sarah and Hagar (Genesis 16)
God still called him blessed and made covenant with him.
🔹 Jacob
Had Leah and Rachel, plus their maidservants (Genesis 29–30)
The 12 tribes of Israel came from this arrangement.
🔹 David
Had multiple wives (2 Samuel 5:13)
Described as “a man after God’s own heart.”
🔹 Solomon
Had many wives and concubines (1 Kings 11)
His downfall was idolatry, not the number of wives itself.
The Law of Moses regulated polygyny rather than banning it (Exodus 21:10).
The argument here: If it were inherently sinful, God would have forbidden it explicitly.

📖 In the New Testament:
Church leaders were instructed to be “husband of one wife” (1 Timothy 3:2).
But this requirement was specifically for overseers/bishops — not explicitly for all men.
Some argue this implies monogamy was ideal for church leadership, but not necessarily mandated universally.


Some argue that men separate sex from emotional bonding more easily.
Women often bond more through intimacy.
Therefore, male plural relationships are more “naturally aligned” with male psychology.
This argument says monogamy is a social structure for stability, not necessarily a biological default for men.

1. Abraham marrying Hagar was a sign of his lack of faith in God and his refusal to wait for God's timing. And it created problems in his house, leading to him having to send Hagar away.

2. If Jacob had his way, he would have married only Rachel. But Rachel's dad was a sly and smooth operator ( up till today I suspect that Issac sent his son to laban so as to teach him a lesson) who deceived his son into marrying Leah, Rachel's older sister, and as a result that created issues in the house

Which led to Joseph being sold to slavery.

( Now a word about Hagar, billah and Zilpah...in houses where the woman was barren, the wife would hand over a female slave to the man to pregnate on behalf of the wife and the child would be considered the wife's. But as ancient history teaches us, that was the custom of the nations around them, not God instituted. Indeed, the law of Moses does not make allowance for such practice)

3.David married wives and ended up with a taste for women that he eventually ended up collecting Bathsheba from her husband and offing her husband in a plot worthy of a Mafia don, not a king. And let's not forget about the fact that the whole Ammon and Absalom and adonikah show was due to the fact that it was a polygamous household. And of course as with Ammon and Absalom, monkey see, monkey do
Being described as a man after God own heart does not mean you are a special kind of believer in God. It does not excuse sin

( And you didn't mention Solomon because of how his wives turned him from God, lol)

Now a word about exodus 21 vs 10. Yes it regulates polygamy. But as the man Jesus said , original plan of God was one man , one wife ..a man shall leave his house and cleave to his wife. Not wives , wife. Especially important for us under the new covenant.

Yes God knew man was in sin so the Law was brought in to deal with the effects of sin. But under the new covenant we are free from sin and supposed to live according to that original.and perfect will of God.

Plus God created Adam and eve. If God wanted man to be polygamous, why didn't he create more women for Adam? See where I am going. Plus the first polygamist was Lamech the descendant of Cain who was not a believer in God and who was proud. I noted you ran away from including him in your examples

Even the new testament verse you quote does not endorsement of polygamy. A bishop is meant to be an example of christian beleif to his parishioners. Including in being the husband of one wife. The apostles were in some cases married and they were married to one wife each as Paul stated. There is no way God would prescribe one law for bishop and another law for parishioners

Especially since as at the time the verse was written, bishops were chosen directly from the laity. Without training as we know it today. Would a guy with two or three wives in the church then divorce two of them so as to qualify for the role of bishop? Or would a church have had to go without a bishop because no available monogamist?

See the issue?

Your last paragraph has no basis in scripture

alphonsojidebab:
Source




https://eyesoflagos.com/2026/02/18/husband-affair-nanny-divorce-lesbian-story/

You no get Families, or his family but random people to talk to on facebook

All of you and this social media madness...

Get out!

Dzzzz:
Bro don’t generalize things..You maybe moved by such things but doesn’t mean others like it.

It's Biology sir. Not generalizing anything. Women are moved by what they hear while men are moved by what they see.

crazygod:
It's Biology sir. Not generalizing anything. Women are moved by what they hear while men are moved by what they see.

What about Monkey😂

O bu ife a ka anyi ga n'ako?

alphonsojidebab:
Source




https://eyesoflagos.com/2026/02/18/husband-affair-nanny-divorce-lesbian-story/

alphonsojidebab:
Source




https://eyesoflagos.com/2026/02/18/husband-affair-nanny-divorce-lesbian-story/

Vuuuummm and prick no be the same. 🤣

manuelkel:
Honestly, this polygamy stuff is crazy, it's right to be polygamous but cheating on your wife with your Nanny that's some sort messed up act.
You can cheat anyone else but not the nanny, the same as women cheating with their husband's errand boys.... it's rubbish.

Some people have no standards

lavylilly:
Throughout the Old Testament, several key figures practiced polygyny (one man, multiple wives), and it was not directly condemned.
🔹 Abraham
Had Sarah and Hagar (Genesis 16)
God still called him blessed and made covenant with him.
🔹 Jacob
Had Leah and Rachel, plus their maidservants (Genesis 29–30)
The 12 tribes of Israel came from this arrangement.
🔹 David
Had multiple wives (2 Samuel 5:13)
Described as “a man after God’s own heart.”
🔹 Solomon
Had many wives and concubines (1 Kings 11)
His downfall was idolatry, not the number of wives itself.
The Law of Moses regulated polygyny rather than banning it (Exodus 21:10).
The argument here: If it were inherently sinful, God would have forbidden it explicitly.

📖 In the New Testament:
Church leaders were instructed to be “husband of one wife” (1 Timothy 3:2).
But this requirement was specifically for overseers/bishops — not explicitly for all men.
Some argue this implies monogamy was ideal for church leadership, but not necessarily mandated universally.


Some argue that men separate sex from emotional bonding more easily.
Women often bond more through intimacy.
Therefore, male plural relationships are more “naturally aligned” with male psychology.
This argument says monogamy is a social structure for stability, not necessarily a biological default for men.

Rahab was a prostitute, Tamar slept with her father-n-law, Rebekah connived with her son to deceive her husband etc. They were all in the genealogy of Christ.

Then we have the Samarithan woman who had five husbands and a lover who later became an evangelist.

Perhaps, we women should follow these examples also.

Dzzzz:
Why will a man leave you for the nanny !?..You maybe the problem but want to manipulate things here.

@bold:

The same reason a wife will 'leave' her husband for the driver, landlord or her neighbour.

It’s true those women were part of the story — and that’s actually the point.

Their lives weren’t highlighted as examples to copy, but as evidence of something deeper: that God works through imperfect people, messy situations, and broken pasts.

Rahab wasn’t celebrated for prostitution — she was honoured for faith and courage.

Tamar’s story wasn’t praised for deception — it exposed injustice and desperation in a system that failed her.

Rebekah’s manipulation brought consequences that fractured her family for years.

And the Samaritan woman wasn’t affirmed in her lifestyle — her encounter with Jesus marked a turning point that led to transformation, not continuation.

The thread running through all these stories isn’t “live however you like.”

It’s:

Grace can reach anyone. Redemption is possible. Broken beginnings don’t disqualify you from a meaningful future.

So the takeaway isn’t that women (or anyone) should imitate the dysfunction — it’s that no past puts someone beyond purpose when there’s honesty, growth, and change.

bukatyne:
Rahab was a prostitute, Tamar slept with her father-n-law, Rebekah connived with her son to deceive her husband etc. They were all in the genealogy of Christ.

Then we have the Samarithan woman who had five husbands and a lover who later became an evangelist.

Perhaps, we women should follow these examples also.