₦airaland Forum

TheStoriesOfMan:
I thought a man having money is respectable, not having a wife.

Wow.

There are many levels of respect and types of respect. Yes, people respect a man with money but after that it will fade unless he marries. And then when he marries a second wife, it drops

immortalcrown:
Going by nature, women are the ones that should be considered polygamous.

An average man has no need to bed many women but an average woman has the need to bed many men.

The thing is, humans invented wrong philosophies that misinterpret nature. Some of the philosophies favour women and are unfair to men. Some of the philosophies favour men and are unfair to women.

I am not supporting any form of sexual immorality. But let us face the reality. An average woman can satisfy up to 80% of the men that sleep with her. But an average man cannot satisfy up to 80% of the women that sleep with him. A man that sleeps with 10 different women will probably ejaculate (orgasm) on those 10 occasions. A man that sleeps with only one woman 20 times will probably ejaculate (orgasm) on those 20 occasions. But a woman that sleeps with 10 men will likely not reach orgasm up to 5 times out of those 10 times. A woman that sleeps with only one man for 20 times may not reach orgasm up to 10 times with him. Now, tell me the gender that naturally has the reason or need to keep sleeping around in search of satisfaction.

But like I said earlier, the world accepts and lives according to false ideologies. The claim that men are the ones that are polygamous in nature is widely accepted the same way the world believes that mothers make more sacrifices for children than fathers do. Whoever gets up to explain that men are not the ones polygamous in nature will be persecuted the same way anybody that says that fathers make more sacrifices than mothers will be persecuted. So, trying to debunk a false narrative that people have lived with over time is suicidal in today's world.

A man that cannot satisfy his wife in bed will be sleeping around in the name of men being polygamous and everyone will act cool about it. A man that labours day and night to feed his family will grow old to suffer while the children are shouting "I will make mama proud" and everyone is cool about it. In conclusion, life is not balanced for any gender, and this is because we operate with ideologies built on emotions and sentiments.

Your analogy is very wrong and lacks substance. You are equating the timing of intimacy with a natural process. infact you need to read more to fully understand the biological composition of males and females.

Males are generally hypersexual in nature, and can satisfied hundreds of women during their life times. Women sexual prowess are quite limited, and defined by integrities and values. That says, it is naturally abnormal for women to be sleeping with multiple partners, and unlike men, the implications it melted on their physical body as a result cannot be consider normal. Women don't possessed ability to have sex frequently like men by nature, the ones venturing into prostitution have been psychology induced by materials gains, in which the end result tells on their physical bodies.

This biological composition is not limited to humans, it apply to every living souls including animals. That is why in every herd or breeding flocks, a single male is consider enough for 10-30 females.

Dtruthspeaker:
You atheists and making fallacious arguments. What does infidelity have to do with bread providership?

E dey Pain Yu?
If e pained you, please lemme know. Maybe I can apologize

Jamine01:
The statement "men are polygamous by nature" is often used in discussions about relationships. While there are biological and evolutionary arguments about human mating behavior, some men misuse this belief as an excuse for cheating.

Infidelity is ultimately a choice, not an unavoidable instinct. Many faithful men experience attraction to other people but still choose to honor their commitments. Being attracted to someone outside a relationship is natural; acting on that attraction without a partner's consent is a decision.

Some men use the "polygamous by nature" argument to avoid accountability. When caught cheating, they may claim that their behavior is simply part of being male rather than acknowledging the hurt caused by breaking trust. This shifts responsibility away from their actions and onto biology.

In the end, "men are polygamous by nature" may explain certain desires, but it does not excuse dishonesty. Character is measured not by what we desire, but by how we choose to act on those desires.

Your argument, using orgasm as a metric to judge this, is coming from a place of selfish sexual desire. If it’s for that selfish sexual desire, men will not chase after other women, especially when they have a wife at home. This issue is more than just a sexual satisfaction for men, it’s an inbuilt biological programming that I think you have no idea about. I will stop here. Thank you

i don't think we should look it only from human angle, we should look down animal line and find a common trend about male animal behaviour.
in the lower animals , male animals usually have multiple partners infact if you are raising animals, you have to make the ratio of female animal more than that of male, technically, we are confirming that male animals are wired to be polygamy in nature.
male animal can procreate for a longer time compared to female ones, no menopause in male animals like the female ones.
a drop of sperm contains millions of sperm cells which can pregnant an many women as possible depending on the viability and a male animals can ejaculate as many times has possible in a month.
but when it comes to Human, due to morality which is being influenced by culture and civilization, how many wives a man should have is now refined.
I forgot to even mention gestation period. once a female animals are pregnant, no more ovulation till after birth whereas, the male animals continue to procreate
a woman can only drop 1-3 eggs per month

immortalcrown:
Going by nature, women are the ones that should be considered polygamous.

An average man has no need to bed many women but an average woman has the need to bed many men.

The thing is, humans invented wrong philosophies that misinterpret nature. Some of the philosophies favour women and are unfair to men. Some of the philosophies favour men and are unfair to women.

I am not supporting any form of sexual immorality. But let us face the reality. An average woman can satisfy up to 80% of the men that sleep with her. But an average man cannot satisfy up to 80% of the women that sleep with him. A man that sleeps with 10 different women will probably ejaculate (orgasm) on those 10 occasions. A man that sleeps with only one woman 20 times will probably ejaculate (orgasm) on those 20 occasions. But a woman that sleeps with 10 men will likely not reach orgasm up to 5 times out of those 10 times. A woman that sleeps with only one man for 20 times may not reach orgasm up to 10 times with him. Now, tell me the gender that naturally has the reason or need to keep sleeping around in search of satisfaction.

But like I said earlier, the world accepts and lives according to false ideologies. The claim that men are the ones that are polygamous in nature is widely accepted the same way the world believes that mothers make more sacrifices for children than fathers do. Whoever gets up to explain that men are not the ones polygamous in nature will be persecuted the same way anybody that says that fathers make more sacrifices than mothers will be persecuted. So, trying to debunk a false narrative that people have lived with over time is suicidal in today's world.

A man that cannot satisfy his wife in bed will be sleeping around in the name of men being polygamous and everyone will act cool about it. A man that labours day and night to feed his family will grow old to suffer while the children are shouting "I will make mama proud" and everyone is cool about it. In conclusion, life is not balanced for any gender, and this is because we operate with ideologies built on emotions and sentiments.

yemmit90:
Your analogy is very wrong and lacks substance. You are equating the timing of intimacy with a natural process. infact you need to read more to fully understand the biological composition of males and females.

Males are generally hypersexual in nature, and can satisfied hundreds of women in their life times. Women sexual prowess are quite limited, and defined by integrities and values. That says, it is naturally abnormal for women to be sleeping with multiple partners, and unlike men, the implications it melted on their physical body as a result cannot be consider normal. Women don't possessed ability to have sex frequently like men by nature, the ones venturing into prostitution have been psychology induced by materials gains, in which the end result tells on their physical bodies.

This biological composition is not limited to humans, it apply to every living souls including animals. That is why in every herd or breeding flocks, a single male is consider enough for 10-30 females.

You argue blindly. Being hypersexual means having the desire for frequent sexual intercourse. It doesn't mean having sex with multiple women. Most of the men who cheat on their wives do not give the wives sex as often as the wives want, yet those men meat other women. So, what exactly is your point?

Bendeco02:
Is a fact

Human beings are just like upgraded animals.

No male of other animals mate with only one female throughout it's existence on Earth.

On Women side; If she didn't start sex and wayward life at early age thereby getting addicted, she can stay with one man.

Some of you women need to stop measuring shoulder with men. If you can't abide by the rule or nature, you can remain single.

If you must follow another man because men are dating or flirting with more than one woman, then remain in your father's house and run your package peacfully. Marriage is not by force.

Why don't you compare men and women on other aspect?

From your second paragraph, so which female animal mates with only one male animal throughout it's existence?? You are trying so hard to prove what is not.

A female animal sleeps with a male animal, procreates from that process, sleeps with another male animal reproduces, and the cycle continues till they eventually die. Women these days does not abide by such rule (because they are aware it is a manipulation tactics started by randy men to keep women away from sleeping with different men as men do).

That is why they marry you men, and cheat with reckless abandon just the way you men have laid the example, make you raise and nurture another man's seed and still stay in the marriage. You will only be lucky to find out and if you eventually will, it is already too late. No worry, una go cry.

bamayo:
i don't think we should look it only from human angle, we should look down animal line and find a common trend about male animal behaviour.
in the lower animals , male animals usually have multiple partners infact if you are raising animals, you have to make the ratio of female animal more than that of male, technically, we are confirming that male animals are wired to be polygamy in nature.
male animal can procreate for a longer time compared to female ones, no menopause in male animals like the female ones.
a drop of sperm contains millions of sperm cells which can pregnant an many women as possible depending on the viability and a male animals can ejaculate as many times has possible in a month.
but when it comes to Human, due to morality which is being influenced by culture and civilization, how many wives a man should have is now refined.
I forgot to even mention gestation period. once a female animals are pregnant, no more ovulation till after birth whereas, the male animals continue to procreate
a woman can only drop 1-3 eggs per month

There are animals that maintain sexual fidelity for life. So, are those animals better than the men you defend here? Does science tell you the total volume of sperm in one man is too much for one woman?

immortalcrown:
You argue blindly. Being hypersexual means having the desire for frequent sexual intercourse. It doesn't mean having sex with multiple women. Most of the men who cheat on their wives do not give the wives sex as often as the wives want, yet those men meat other women. So, what exactly is your point?

You still don't get the point, men sexual prowess is born out of a desire to corpulate with different women, and that is what made them polygamous in nature. In short, men are not wired to be having sex with only one woman till the rest of their life.

Men sex hormones are better triggered by different women bodies than just a woman. If you are a man,you can make this little practical to see yourself. The same thing among animals, if you want good result in your herd or flock, you need to introduce males to new set of females periodically because males get used to same set of females, and subsequently lower its testosterone or mating quality.

Jamine01:
The statement "men are polygamous by nature" is often used in discussions about relationships. While there are biological and evolutionary arguments about human mating behavior, some men misuse this belief as an excuse for cheating.

Infidelity is ultimately a choice, not an unavoidable instinct. Many faithful men experience attraction to other people but still choose to honor their commitments. Being attracted to someone outside a relationship is natural; acting on that attraction without a partner's consent is a decision.

Some men use the "polygamous by nature" argument to avoid accountability. When caught cheating, they may claim that their behavior is simply part of being male rather than acknowledging the hurt caused by breaking trust. This shifts responsibility away from their actions and onto biology.

In the end, "men are polygamous by nature" may explain certain desires, but it does not excuse dishonesty. Character is measured not by what we desire, but by how we choose to act on those desires.

Even the ones with many wives still cheat

Being polygamous does not stop men from cheating. We have seen how people with wardrobes full of clothes will still enter market to steal even low quality materials

Jamine01:
The statement "men are polygamous by nature" is often used in discussions about relationships. While there are biological and evolutionary arguments about human mating behavior, some men misuse this belief as an excuse for cheating.

Infidelity is ultimately a choice, not an unavoidable instinct. Many faithful men experience attraction to other people but still choose to honor their commitments. Being attracted to someone outside a relationship is natural; acting on that attraction without a partner's consent is a decision.

Some men use the "polygamous by nature" argument to avoid accountability. When caught cheating, they may claim that their behavior is simply part of being male rather than acknowledging the hurt caused by breaking trust. This shifts responsibility away from their actions and onto biology.

In the end, "men are polygamous by nature" may explain certain desires, but it does not excuse dishonesty. Character is measured not by what we desire, but by how we choose to act on those desires.

"Men are Polygamus is nature" is a myth.
I am contented with my monogamous status.

immortalcrown:
Going by nature, women are the ones that should be considered polygamous.

An average man has no need to bed many women but an average woman has the need to bed many men.

The thing is, humans invented wrong philosophies that misinterpret nature. Some of the philosophies favour women and are unfair to men. Some of the philosophies favour men and are unfair to women.

I am not supporting any form of sexual immorality. But let us face the reality. An average woman can satisfy up to 80% of the men that sleep with her. But an average man cannot satisfy up to 80% of the women that sleep with him. A man that sleeps with 10 different women will probably ejaculate (orgasm) on those 10 occasions. A man that sleeps with only one woman 20 times will probably ejaculate (orgasm) on those 20 occasions. But a woman that sleeps with 10 men will likely not reach orgasm up to 5 times out of those 10 times. A woman that sleeps with only one man for 20 times may not reach orgasm up to 10 times with him. Now, tell me the gender that naturally has the reason or need to keep sleeping around in search of satisfaction.

But like I said earlier, the world accepts and lives according to false ideologies. The claim that men are the ones that are polygamous in nature is widely accepted the same way the world believes that mothers make more sacrifices for children than fathers do. Whoever gets up to explain that men are not the ones polygamous in nature will be persecuted the same way anybody that says that fathers make more sacrifices than mothers will be persecuted. So, trying to debunk a false narrative that people have lived with over time is suicidal in today's world.

A man that cannot satisfy his wife in bed will be sleeping around in the name of men being polygamous and everyone will act cool about it. A man that labours day and night to feed his family will grow old to suffer while the children are shouting "I will make mama proud" and everyone is cool about it. In conclusion, life is not balanced for any gender, and this is because we operate with ideologies built on emotions and sentiments.

There are animals that maintain sexual fidelity for life. So, are those animals better than the men you defend here? Does science tell you that the total volume of sperm in one man is too much for one woman?

You argue blindly. Being hypersexual means having the desire for frequent sexual intercourse. It doesn't mean having sex with multiple women. Most of the men who cheat on their wives do not give the wives sex as often as the wives want, yet those men meat other women. So, what exactly is your point? Your argument would have been valid if those men give their wives enough sex and the wives do not have enough energy to meet the men's sexual demand. Most of the men who cheat on their wives starve the wives of sex.

Bro you are just getting things wrong with your point. What is the biological essence of sex. It is for reproduction and not pleasure. Reproduction is what results in the survival of a species. The more a specie reproduce, the higher it's chances of surviving to the it's environment.
The determinant of the rate of population growth is the female sex. The more females you have the higher your population growth rate and the higher chances of surviving to the next generation. This is the primary reason why poultry farmers usually stock a few cocks to a larger number of hens. Just one male can impregnate more than 50 females in a single day but a single female cannot be impregnated by more than one male at a time. This is the primary reason why nature made the libido of the male sex higher so he could constantly involve in copulation to increase the survival chances of it's specie.
This is simple biology. If this analogy can't make you see the reason why nature made males polygamous then, I don't know how much further the explanation can be broken for you to understand.
It's mainly society that is promoting the concept of monogamy to curb the problem of overpopulation due to scarcity of valuable resources. Monogamy is not natural but I support it to an extent because if we follow the natural order all the time, the human society would become a jungle.

Dtruthspeaker:
Ehen! I for talk

And Bros they don't stay in their place ooo. Women have only set men up to do the physical pursuing but meanwhile they are the ones who started the pursuit. That is why they are always dressed and speak in a manner that always that is meant to invite a man to have sex with them.

So, physically, it looks like it is the man who initiated everything and pursued them which is the set up, whereas it is then who are pursuing all men when you take in the fact that if they do not invite the man for sex, nothing will happen and men will continue to where they were going and this cheating and polygamy issue would not be as big as it is now.

Do you not see how they are always accusing the other woman of husband snatching? Wives and women know that in Truth, it is a woman who pursues a man when cheating occurs.

You're completely right. No man can be "snatched" unless he allows himself to be.

Like you rightly said, deep down, women know this too. That's why, in many cheating situations, the first person the wife goes after is often the other woman. The assumption is usually that she lured him, even though he still made his own choices.

From what I've observed, a lot of chronic cheating is done by men who have money to spare. Cheating is an expensive hobby. A man who's struggling to feed himself and his family rarely has the time, energy, or resources to maintain a whole extra relationship, if you never chop abeg how your dick& wan take gather power rise?

Some men rent apartments for side chicks, furnish them, pay their bills, buy gifts, fly them on vacations, and bankroll an entire lifestyle. Most times, it's not because they love the side chick more than their wife. They're simply spending because they can.

The irony is that once they get bored or someone else catches their attention, they're ready to walk away from everything they invested and start the whole cycle again. That's how disposable it can become when money isn't the issue.

What's even more interesting is that many side chicks know where the line is. They may enjoy the benefits, but they also know not to disrespect the wife. If his wife calls while they're together, many will stay completely quiet because they understand that crossing that line could cost them everything, even if the call is for 30 minutes.

The men I struggle to understand are the ones who neglect their wives, abandon their children, ignore their responsibilities, and spend the little they have trying to impress someone else. To me, that's not just cheating, it's failing the people who depend on you. Those choices often come with consequences that don't disappear with time.

Like I've said all along, this is just my personal opinion.

Dtruthspeaker:
There are many levels of respect and types of respect. Yes, people respect a man with money but after that it will fade unless he marries. And then when he marries a second wife, it drops

Hmm.

This answers it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnC-RgaiglI

If you have a personal relationship with God all of this won't be an issue.. a man filled with the holy spirit cannot be polygamous in nature

This question is for men whose marriages have lasted for decades. If you've been married for less than that, please scroll through and read the comments instead. Those who have been married that long know exactly what this is about.

And if your marriage hasn't lasted that long but you're here quoting scriptures, keep asking yourself this same question every 10 years. When you eventually start experiencing "power failure," perhaps try a different 'soup' before resorting to pills, other artificial remedies, and living in a world of "delulu."

Experience has a way of changing perspectives.

Jamine01:
Nah
This is the exactly reason most ppl not only men can be proud to call themselves nonchalant, we think kindness is weakness

Yes that's right. To a woman's psychology. Kindness is weakness! This is why a woman plays and toys with nice guys.

Nice guys always finish last. Women preferz bad guys alot including you writing this

It is a lie from the pit of hell! Every man is capable of remaining faithful to one woman. It is usually the ones who lack self discipline that engage in extramarital affairs and claim that all men are polygamous in nature. Me personally, I know that I can never cheat on my wife no matter what! I'm a principled man and I have trained myself to be committed to only my wife.

Kennatic:
You're completely right. No man can be "snatched" unless he allows himself to be.

Like you rightly said, deep down, women know this too. That's why, in many cheating situations, the first person the wife goes after is often the other woman. The assumption is usually that she lured him, even though he still made his own choices.

From what I've observed, a lot of chronic cheating is done by men who have money to spare. Cheating is an expensive hobby. A man who's struggling to feed himself and his family rarely has the time, energy, or resources to maintain a whole extra relationship, if you never chop abeg how your dick& wan take gather power rise?

Some men rent apartments for side chicks, furnish them, pay their bills, buy gifts, fly them on vacations, and bankroll an entire lifestyle. Most times, it's not because they love the side chick more than their wife. They're simply spending because they can.

The irony is that once they get bored or someone else catches their attention, they're ready to walk away from everything they invested and start the whole cycle again. That's how disposable it can become when money isn't the issue.

What's even more interesting is that many side chicks know where the line is. They may enjoy the benefits, but they also know not to disrespect the wife. If his wife calls while they're together, many will stay completely quiet because they understand that crossing that line could cost them everything, even if the call is for 30 minutes.

The men I struggle to understand are the ones who neglect their wives, abandon their children, ignore their responsibilities, and spend the little they have trying to impress someone else. To me, that's not just cheating, it's failing the people who depend on you. Those choices often come with consequences that don't disappear with time.

Like I've said all along, this is just my personal opinion.

Bros, it's not an assumption oo, it's a fact especially for men who do not want to cheat and who have organised themselves so. And of course, the man nust be compromised and "snatched" after all she plays it by flying under the rader of good sweet friendship which the man wants, needs and must take as he normally takes especially as this moment always comes unexpectedly. But it is usually short lived and momentary and this is what the man is expecting only for the sweet moments to keep going on, until it happens as the world has continuously said that it is ok to play small and that it is normal. That's one of the reason why he falls.

This of course excludes those who have already sworn that they must eat every woman they will.

tanigororo:
E dey Pain Yu?
If e pained you, please lemme know. Maybe I can apologize

No, its not. I'm just enjoying the fact that now I see that you atheists arguments are usually fallacious, so i enjoy looking for it and pointing it out.
Bad arguments are bad.

only one sperm cell will fertile an egg and the other sperm cells will die off. in artificial insemination, they only extract good sperm cells to fertilize the ovum.
if a man ejaculates and we take the sperm to the lab, we can extra as many as possible sperm cells that can fertilize ova from thousands of women in vitro fertilization (IVF).
yes, I know that some animals maintain fidelity, they are only few of them compared to those that do not.
if there's no religion, do you think Men will stick to only one wife?
beside, you only scrutinized only 2 points I raised, what about others.

immortalcrown:
There are animals that maintain sexual fidelity for life. So, are those animals better than the men you defend here? Does science tell you the total volume of sperm in one man is too much for one woman?

Anyone can be POLYGAMOUS in nature.Men or women..However, what some men lack is SELF CONTROL and DISCIPLINE.
Simple!??

lailo:
All living organisms are polygamous in nature including women.
Even your wife is secretly straffing another man, na u no know
Same way a man feels he wants to change toto, same way women feel they should at least hump on another dikkk.
Know this and know peace
A young lady will have at least 6 boyfriends that she is managing before marriage and after marriage wills till keep some illicit relationships besides her husband. Is that not polygamy?
The difference is that women can not finance polygamy, if by any means they have the financial muscle and societal approval to have many husbands, they will also do like men.
Both men and women are polygamous.

No. Banging around is not polygamy. For women, it is called hoeing or bitching. Polygamy comes with a huge financial responsibility. So, women by their self-centered nature, can never be polygamous. They can be ho*s, though. And why are men tagged polygamous in nature? That should be the question. My answers to this are as follow: 1.Women flock around successful men naturally and want to bear his children. This is not the case for successful women. Infact, it is even more difficult for a successful woman to find men to commit to them. 2. Women automatically want to be with a man that other women want. This is not the same for women. Furthermore, in polygamy, a man takes care of the rent and other bills in that relationship, whether the woman he is involved with are 2, or 10. However,women, who claim to be 'polygamous in nature' only want to do so as a bed-to-bed mid-fielder. No woman,no matter how rich,can marry two men or more, and pay all their bills or buy them cars and shelter them.Like men do in polygamy. It is never going to happen

Gbogbodirin:
No. Banging around is not polygamy. For women, it is called hoeing or bitching. Polygamy comes with a huge financial responsibility. So, women by their self-centered nature, can never be polygamous. They can be ho*s, though. And why are men tagged polygamous in nature? That should be the question. My answers to this are as follow: 1.Women flock around successful men naturally and want to bear his children. This is not the case for successful women. Infact, it is even more difficult for a successful woman to find men to commit to them. 2. Women automatically want to be with a man that other women want. This is not the same for women. Furthermore, in polygamy, a man takes care of the rent and other bills in that relationship, whether the woman he is involved with are 2, or 10. However,women, who claim to be 'polygamous in nature' only want to do so as a bed-to-bed mid-fielder. No woman,no matter how rich,can marry two men or more, and pay all their bills or buy them cars and shelter them.Like men do in polygamy. It is never going to happen

I understand your point of view brother. But I was defining polygamy based on women's perspective. When women say men are polygamous in nature, they mean you a man dont have the tendency to be sexually committed to one woman only, mark that word SEXUALLY. They will never mean RESPONSIBILITY. It is on that understanding that I'm also making my contribution that women too also dont have tendency to be committed to only one dick. It is bcs of society and culture that is preventing them.

I don't know what modern men turning to.
Marying more than one wife is in Quran . marying one wife is not biblical but man's law in the Bible .

tanigororo:
Its a fact with evidence, not an excuse.
Importantly, the word infidelity doesn't apply to the Male Gender.

If it's that easy to be the man of the house, Women should marry men, and marry as much man as she can take care of.

immortalcrown:
Going by nature, women are the ones that should be considered polygamous.

An average man has no need to bed many women but an average woman has the need to bed many men.

The thing is, humans invented wrong philosophies that misinterpret nature. Some of the philosophies favour women and are unfair to men. Some of the philosophies favour men and are unfair to women.

I am not supporting any form of sexual immorality. But let us face the reality. An average woman can satisfy up to 80% of the men that sleep with her. But an average man cannot satisfy up to 80% of the women that sleep with him. A man that sleeps with 10 different women will probably ejaculate (orgasm) on those 10 occasions. A man that sleeps with only one woman 20 times will probably ejaculate (orgasm) on those 20 occasions. But a woman that sleeps with 10 men will likely not reach orgasm up to 5 times out of those 10 times. A woman that sleeps with only one man for 20 times may not reach orgasm up to 10 times with him. Now, tell me the gender that naturally has the reason or need to keep sleeping around in search of satisfaction.

But like I said earlier, the world accepts and lives according to false ideologies. The claim that men are the ones that are polygamous in nature is widely accepted the same way the world believes that mothers make more sacrifices for children than fathers do. Whoever gets up to explain that men are not the ones polygamous in nature will be persecuted the same way anybody that says that fathers make more sacrifices than mothers will be persecuted. So, trying to debunk a false narrative that people have lived with over time is suicidal in today's world.

A man that cannot satisfy his wife in bed will be sleeping around in the name of men being polygamous and everyone will act cool about it. A man that labours day and night to feed his family will grow old to suffer while the children are shouting "I will make mama proud" and everyone is cool about it. In conclusion, life is not balanced for any gender, and this is because we operate with ideologies built on emotions and sentiments.

There are animals that maintain sexual fidelity for life. So, are those animals better than the men you defend here? Does science tell you that the total volume of sperm in one man is too much for one woman?

You argue blindly. Being hypersexual means having the desire for frequent sexual intercourse. It doesn't mean having sex with multiple women. Most of the men who cheat on their wives do not give the wives sex as often as the wives want, yet those men meat other women. So, what exactly is your point? Your argument would have been valid if those men give their wives enough sex and the wives do not have enough energy to meet the men's sexual demand. Most of the men who cheat on their wives starve the wives of sex.

If you leave 2 men in a room with 5 women for a period of time and leave 2 women in a room with 5 men over a period of time, which set do you think with get exhausted faster?

Babangidapikin:
They don't need be polygamous in nature but there tanks needs evacuation regularly... and their roving eyes 👀 can't stop seeing beautiful angels around them and ugly demons too.

thats the point! women want to have sex with only who they admire, men just want have sext with every mature thing with boobs and arse

docjeph:
Your argument, using orgasm as a metric to judge this, is coming from a place of selfish sexual desire. If it’s for that selfish sexual desire, men will not chase after other women, especially when they have a wife at home. This issue is more than just a sexual satisfaction for men, it’s an inbuilt biological programming that I think you have no idea about. I will stop here. Thank you

He seriously has no idea... but trust me, he knows what it takes from him to belive this.... but we know them. Get a sweet girl with standing boobs to brush his back with them oranges and you will see him loose focus instanta. He is just trying to fight his nature, just let him continue.

Joshuaomakacha:
If you have a personal relationship with God all of this won't be an issue.. a man filled with the holy spirit cannot be polygamous in nature

Ya, until Sister Joy sits carelessly and you get a glimpse of her holy pant

immortalcrown:
Going by nature, women are the ones that should be considered polygamous.

An average man has no need to bed many women but an average woman has the need to bed many men.

This another expression of opinion,

But being polygamous is not referred to hypersexual (sexual satisfaction), it's ability to husband differences women concurrently. Women lack ability to give birth for two husband at a time, obviously it one of them that will fertiliser her ovary. While men can impregnat many women concurrently.

And once she gets pregnant for a man, she need to wait for specific period of antenatal and post natal before she can give another child to another man. While nothing hold men from impregnat another women at any period of time.

Even if the woman is single mother and difference men are cohabiting with her, the child will still belong to one man among them.