mcfarlin:


Wow...this is dicey I don't know if I should rejoice or be saddened by this latest injury news.

RVP is smart!
he wants to play against arsenal at the emirates. he would be foolish to play for holland & risk hamstring injury.

i am sure he's preserving himself for the battle of the emirates.....

elampiro:


* Your proof that Ronaldo earns less than Rooney.

* Moyes only added earnings from image right to Rooney.

* You don't have the whole picture. Man City were ready to pay Rooney 300k in 2010, but he took pay cut to stay. Summer 2013, Chelsea owner personally wanted Rooney when Mourinho mentioned him. PSG, Madrid and Monaco were options. Even Gerald Pique was asking him to join Barca. You cant know more than the authorities in the business.

Are you minding the Mumu? Rooney will walk into the 1st team of most clubs in the world.

Mourinho actually refused to play a striker against Manyoo in an attempt to lure him away and was willing to pay more than he earns now.

Manyoo was desperate to keep him, and rightly so. How many players of his calibre are there in the world today?

Nihilist:


Coward?

See this mumu....your bait and switch will not work.

Provide a single article overhyping a British manager as you claimed or shut up.

Mr man take your frustrations elsewhere!

coogar:


RVP is smart!
he wants to play against arsenal at the emirates. he would be foolish to play for holland & risk hamstring injury.

i am sure he's preserving himself for the battle of the emirates.....

Time will tell...

I want to see falcao start as our main striker against the w'ankers.

mcfarlin:




You just killed yourself here how can rooney take paycuts from an assumed offer that wasn't confirmed!

Well in a way you are right rooneys love for united is wholly tied to his wallet demands.

You must be new to football.

There are long period of negotiations before deals are signed. Also, Paul Scholes had offers abroad but decided to be loyal. You don't know more than SAF who paid Rooney 250k. He must have seen the heat.

mcfarlin:


Time will tell...

I want to see falcao start as our main striker against the w'ankers.

i have missed falcao but he's not the immediate worry now. thankfully, smalling would be available for the gooners. i hope we can have rafael back too. if we can manage to assemble our strongest possible backline then arsenal are very beatable.

coogar:


i have missed falcao but he's not the immediate worry now. thankfully, smalling would be available for the gooners. i hope we can have rafael back too. if we can manage to assemble our strongest possible backline then arsenal are very beatable.

Smalling is too unstable I prefer mcnair rafael back is good news!

elampiro:


You must be new to football.

There are long period of negotiations before deals are signed. Also, Paul Scholes had offers abroad but decided to be loyal. You don't know more than SAF who paid Rooney 250k. He must have seen the heat.

Mr man rooney can only take a paycut if he moves away from the club and plays somewhere else for less as in sturridges case when he moved to loserpool!

Your earlier assertion that rooney took a paycut to stay was wrong!

Was there any concrete agreement?

mcfarlin:


Mr man rooney can only take a paycut if he moves away from the club and plays somewhere else for less as in sturridges case when he moved to loserpool!

Your earlier assertion that rooney took a paycut to stay was wrong!

Was there any concrete agreement?

There are negotiations behind close doors before papers are signed.

mcfarlin:

Smalling is too unstable I prefer mcnair rafael back is good news!

smalling is very steady - what happened at the etihad was totally out of character. the only weakness smalling has is his use of the ball when in possession. he needs to grow up fast though....paddy & blackett have been miles better than any of our old boys.

smalling needs deliverance....
he panics, he cannot receive a pass & distribute intelligently. however, he's a better defender than jones or even evans. jones just wants to hurt himself and any player near him regardless of who the player is playing for.

mcfarlin:

Mr man rooney can only take a paycut if he moves away from the club and plays somewhere else for less as in sturridges case when he moved to loserpool!
Your earlier assertion that rooney took a paycut to stay was wrong!
Was there any concrete agreement?

rooney didn't take any pay-cut.
he took advantage of the fact that united didn't have a poster player back then to re-engineer an expensive contract. he sucker-punched SAF and SAF waited for his time.

SAF quickly signed van persie & kagawa - rooney was on his way out & he was becoming peripheral at old trafford. he got frustrated, he asked for a transfer verbally but nothing concrete was reached until SAF retired.

had SAF stayed, rooney would have been sold!

coogar:


money did nothing for SAF, he built his empire himself. there was never a time he was handed a sack of cash to buy players. the plenty of titles brought more fans. large fans attracted sponsors, sponsors paid to have their brands advertised.

mourinho can only beat what is put before him. plenty of managers have spent money with nothing to show for it. before mourinho, chelsea hadn't won a league title in 50 years & you are talking about money. abeg, make i hear word.

who are the voters?
an association where 90% of the voters are british? do you even know all the managers of the professional leagues take part in this voting process. who else would they vote for? pellegrini?

arsene wenger that has chiefly operated on a shoe-strïng budget has only won it twice despite the fact that he's one of the greatest managers in this league & yet a perennial failure like moyes got the nod three times? this LMA award is a joke.

* Arsene Wenger spent heavily in some years. Even outspent Man United in 1997/1998 and 1999/2000. SAF was one of the big spenders in the 1990s.

But Mourinho's came with big big money. Same with City, and now Gaal.

Good night my people. This was a crazy evening.

elampiro:

* Arsene Wenger spent heavily in some years. Even outspent Man United in 1997 and 1999. SAF was one of the big spenders in the 1990s.

arsenal
1997 - £7.0m spent
1998 - £0.8m
1999 - £13.8m

man utd
1997 - £5.0m
1998 - £6.0m
1999 - £28m

so how was wenger a big spender & how did he outspend united?

But Mourinho's came with big big money. Same with City, and now Gaal.

mourinho, SAF, wenger & gaal are all better managers than moyes - moyes is a failure.

This nigga screaming "you had only two shots on target" has amnesia? I think nihilist need a reminder of their battle @ the etihad

Zero shot, zero attempt until the red card homie! Now, that's a bingo

I say we start Paddy Mcnair and Blackett

It arsenal folks !!! What can possibly happen

iheanyi40:
m good baba
Wetin dey appen na

no shakement my broda. Na here wey u dy relax nh no doubt abi?

SIRcumalot:
I say we start Paddy Mcnair and Blackett

It arsenal folks !!! What can possibly happen

Underestimating your opponent is the surest way to defeat

mcfarlin:


Mr man take your frustrations elsewhere!

Chairman, answer Nihilist question na. Abeg

coogar:


arsenal
1997 - £7.0m spent
1998 - £0.8m
1999 - £13.8m

man utd
1997 - £5.0m
1998 - £6.0m
1999 - £28m

so how was wenger a big spender & how did he outspend united?




mourinho, SAF, wenger & gaal are all better managers than moyes - moyes is a failure.

I gave you two years.
* Even your chart shows Wenger spent higher in 1997.

* 1997/8 Arsenal €22.03m , Man United €13.5m. (Arsenal bought Overmas, Petit, Gilles, Upson, Boa, Alexander)
*1999/00 Arsenal €22.65m, Man United €7.95m. (Arsenal bought Henry, Suker, Stefan,)

Keky:
Chairman, answer Nihilist question na. Abeg

Mr man are you his advocate?

Nihilist:


So what stage of the game did you rally at against City and Chelsea.

You had only 2 shots on target in 90 minutes yet my man is claiming 'balanced game'

Only a point gained from a possible 6.

Can't you be objective for once in your life?

You and objectivity, what did you expect? 20shots on target with ten men? If I could remember correctly, chelsea had only 2 shots on target there too, you guys couldn't even beat a team down with one man

And at old trafford, you guys had just 4 shots on target in the whole match so please don't tell me about having 2 shots on target, we couldn't beat the same man city with 11men last season, we got flogged with ten men three seasons ago

You seem to have forgotten that you guys gained 2points from a possible 6

Who's not being objective now?

dopeJemi:


You and objectivity, what did you expect? 20shots on target with ten men? If I could remember correctly, chelsea had only 2 shots on target there too, you guys couldn't even beat a team down with one man

And at old trafford, you guys had just 4 shots on target in the whole match so please don't tell me about having 2 shots on target, we couldn't beat the same man city with 11men last season, we got flogged with ten men three seasons ago

You seem to have forgotten that you guys gained 2points from a possible 6

Who's not being objective now?

You're the one who gave the Man Citeh game as an example of playing well. And within that context, a game where you had only 2 shots on target and could easily have given away 3 clear pens if the ref was on his game, cannot be construed as a game of good football.

Chelsea's game against Citeh is irrelevant to the discussion. Infact looking at the table, one could reasonably argue that the draw was a success for Chelsea and a failure for Citeh...but I digress.

The original argument that was put forward was that Manyoo has been playing goodfootball without getting the points. Using the Citeh game as evidence does not advance that argument at all.

Nihilist:



You're the one who gave the Man Citeh game as an example of playing well. And within that context, a game where you had only 2 shots on target and could easily have given away 3 clear pens if the ref was on his game, cannot be construed as a game of good football.

Chelsea's game against Citeh is irrelevant to the discussion. Infact looking at the table, one could reasonably argue that the draw was a success for Chelsea and a failure for Citeh...but I digress.

The original argument that was put forward was that Manyoo has been playing goodfootball without getting the points. Using the Citeh game as evidence does not advance that argument at all.

Bro! We got a red card, even with that they could only manage one goal, that was why I made reference to the chelsea game, even though they were a man short, they pressured you guys

Well I used the city game cause we all expected them to beat us by a large goal margin, before the red card, the game was pretty much balanced, no doubt that after the red card they came at us hard, buh we regrouped and kept them on their toes in the last 15minutes or so, we brought the game to them on their turf, even the commentator said it, we played well, I was impressed

And again, its not everytime we get to dominate possession against chelsea, us dominating the possession against chelsea and pretty much everything on the stats, it speaks volume

dopeJemi:


You and objectivity, what did you expect? 20shots on target with ten men? If I could remember correctly, chelsea had only 2 shots on target there too, you guys couldn't even beat a team down with one man

And at old trafford, you guys had just 4 shots on target in the whole match so please don't tell me about having 2 shots on target, we couldn't beat the same man city with 11men last season, we got flogged with ten men three seasons ago

You seem to have forgotten that you guys gained 2points from a possible 6

Who's not being objective now?

when u win 9 out of 9 matches,u can take 2 out of 6.........but when u ar closer to the relegation than to the top,u should cry cos its a point lost...........

incredibleone:
when u win 9 out of 9 matches,u can take 2 out of 6.........but when u ar closer to the relegation than to the top,u should cry cos its a point lost...........

& this is the first time a team has 9\9 wins yippie

Closer to relegation in what sense, expand...

The incredibly.......one, please complete your name

Keky:
Chairman, answer Nihilist question na. Abeg

Lol this bros still dey flex muscles huh

SailorXY:

Lol this bros still dey flex muscles huh

Dude don calm down after recent tragedies.

incredibleone:
when u win 9 out of 9 matches,u can take 2 out of 6.........but when u ar closer to the relegation than to the top,u should cry cos its a point lost...........

when you win 20 premier league titles and 3 champions league, you can afford to be closer to the relegation zone than to the top

You should cry because its something you guys will never achieve in the next 15years

Arsenal this season

^^ lool... Welbeck's prolly at home watching porn.

mcfarlin:


Mr man are you his advocate?

Just answer the question bro

mcfarlin:


Lol..double post!

Bros abeg can you explain why moyes gave rooney a contract that pays higher than what cr7 gets@madrid .

Ronaldo scores more with his left foot than rooney scores with his whole body!

Can you also explain why LVG in his "fabled, infinite wise-ness" has continued with the "madness" of by Moyes where Rooney is concerned!!?