₦airaland Forum

tartar9:
keeping dreaming of Biafra imbecíle!

erikcantona:
. I never coursed any one I just made my plane statement!! But since you attacked me may your first son be an slowpoke isee isee isee ! Ka amadioha !may Nsi okija shrine make him an slowpoke ise ise iseeeeeee

Ilekeh:
Why are Yoruba muslims educated and many Northern muslims aren't?

I don't think religion is the problem, I think culture is a burden.

Look at Arabic Muslims....they're educated and rich.

Gosh dammit, why is Nigeria like this

ECOTERRORS:
Do you think there is a grand plan to Islamise Europe?

ECOTERRORS:
Do you think there is a grand plan to Islamise Europe?

tartar9:
keeping dreaming of Biafra imbecíle!

erikcantona:
u dey mind Dem ,killer religion ! This is the only thing that made me support biafra cos am very sure they wiil bring jihad to every one is. Just matter of time!! But there will be no mosque in biafra cos that's were they hide weapons

kettykings:
Sir I thought your peaceful religion forbids believers from living together with unbelievers and infidels.
Isn't that the reason why the Palestinians want a country of their own. How come Nigerian Muslims are not following the dictates of their holy prophet and Koran but want to live in the same country with infidels rather have a holy country of their own.

Annunaki:
[s]In actual fact there is an evil agenda and grand plan to islamise the whole world, it will fail no doubt but the agenda exists. [/s]

Demmzy15:
Oponu! You're always off point. Just like jellyfish, no brain!

Annunaki:
[s]
Didirin are these not your fellow islamist And they are even Arabs who know their Religion better than a slave boy like you. [/s]

BlackBaron:
They all lack genuine empathy. All the noise made whenever their fellow Muslims are attacked now looks like a religious obligation to moan, fight and chastise.

Some of the Syrians who moved to other middle eastern states faced discrimination rather than acceptance.

It took the same western nations whose flag they readily burn in their streets to take them in. Meanwhile other middle eastern countries have been more concerned with gaining influence in Syria by supporting and supplying proxy groups to continue killing each other.

Shymm3x:
You can't absolve western countries from the Syrian quagmire just as you can't do the same for countries like UAE, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia. They all contributed to the crisis in that country and they all need to share the refugees - same with the US.

The country was peaceful and no one was trying to move to Europe, till they destroyed everything via proxies cos of one man. Same thing they did with Libya and now, gazillion of refugees are coming from that route to Europe as well.

Europe has no choice but to take them in for good PR and based on the fictitious image they project. Arabs on the other hand don't have anything to protect. Deep down in European capitals, they don't want these people. And the overwhelming majority will spend years in immigration detention camps and section 4 homes, even before they grant them anything. So they are basically doing it for the face value.

They should be back to destroy a next peaceful country soon and the cycle will continue. It never stops.

UncleJudax:
You have a point. I am particularly disgusted by America and its foreign policies. But, you didn't tell the full story.
The mess in Iraq is due to the 2003 invasion by the US, however, the Syria turmoil is an Arab problem..via ArabSpring

Then Iran and Saudi Arabia hijacked it. See the thing: Iran supports Asad, he is Alawyte/shyte, Saudi wants him gone, because shytes are not the majority and shouldn't be ruling.

This same ethnic politics played out in Bahrain, Saudi won.

parisbookaddict:
The Arab world’s wealthiest nations are doing next to nothing for Syria’s refugees.
Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/09/04/the-arab-worlds-wealthiest-nations-are-doing-next-to-nothing-for-syrias-refugees/?_e_pi_=7%2CPAGE_ID10%2C3785268814

The world has been transfixed in recent weeks by the unfolding refugee crisis in Europe, an influx of migrants unprecedented since World War II. Their plight was chillingly highlighted on Wednesday in the image of a drowned Syrian toddler, his lifeless body lying alone on a Turkish beach.
A fair amount of attention has fallen on the failure of many Western governments to adequately address the burden on Syria's neighboring countries, which are struggling to host the brunt of the roughly 4 million Syrians forced out of the country by its civil war.
Some European countries have been criticized for offering sanctuary only to a small number of refugees, or for discriminating between Muslims and Christians. There's also been a good deal of continental hand-wringing over the general dysfunction of Europe's systems for migration and asylum.
Less ire, though, has been directed at another set of stakeholders who almost certainly should be doing more: Saudi Arabia and the wealthy Arab states along the Persian Gulf.
As Amnesty Internationalrecently pointed out, the "six Gulf countries -- Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman and Bahrain -- have offered zero resettlement places to Syrian refugees." This claim was echoed by Kenneth Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch, on Twitter:
Guess how many of these Syrian refugees Saudi Arabia & other Gulf states offered to take? 0 http:// /iY0ct3kXBW pic.twitter.com/JI3WTQhlxo
— Kenneth Roth (@KenRoth) September 2, 2015
The way that Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states aid Syrian refugees: pic.twitter.com/2i9gcGiRxe
— Kenneth Roth (@KenRoth) September 2, 2015
That's a shocking figure, given these countries' relative proximity to Syria, as well as the incredible resources at their disposal. As Sultan Sooud al-Qassemi, a Dubai-based political commentator, observes, these countries include some of the Arab world's largest military budgets, its highest standards of living, as well as a lengthy history -- especially in the case of the United Arab Emirates -- of welcoming immigrants from other Arab nations and turning them into citizens.
Moreover, these countries aren't totally innocent bystanders. To varying degrees, elements within Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the U.A.E., and Kuwait have invested in the Syrian conflict, playing a conspicuous rolein funding and arming a constellation of rebel and Islamist factions fighting the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
None of these countries are signatories of the United Nations' 1951 Refugee Convention, which defines what a refugee is, and lays out their rights, as well as the obligations of states to safeguard them. For a Syrian to enter these countries, they would have to apply for a visa, which, in the current circumstances, is rarely granted. According to the BBC, the only Arab countries where a Syrian can travel without a visa are Algeria, Mauritania, Sudan and Yemen -- hardly choice or practical destinations.
Like European countries, Saudi Arabia and its neighbors also have fears over new arrivals taking jobs from citizens, and may also invoke concerns about security and terrorism. But the current Gulf aid outlay for Syrian refugees, which amounts to collective donationsunder $1 billion (the United States has given four times that sum), seems short -- and is made all the more galling when you consider the vast sumsSaudi Arabia poured into this year's war effort in Yemen, an intervention some consider a strategic blunder.
As Bobby Ghosh, managing editor of the news site Quartz, points out, the Gulf states in theory have a far greater ability to deal with large numbers of arrivals than Syria's more immediate and poorer neighbors, Lebanon and Jordan:
The region has the capacity to quickly build housing for the refugees. The giant construction companies that have built the gleaming towers of Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Riyadh should be contracted to create shelters for the influx. Saudi Arabia has plenty of expertise at managing large numbers of arrivals: It receives an annual surge of millions of Hajj pilgrimsto Mecca. There’s no reason all this knowhow can’t be put to humanitarian use.
No reason other than either indifference or a total lack of political will. In social media, many are calling for action. The Arabic hashtag #Welcoming_Syria's_refugees_is_a_Gulf_duty was tweeted more than 33,000 times in the past week, according to the BBC.
"The Gulf must realize that now is the time to change their policy regarding accepting refugees from the Syria crisis," writesthe columnist al-Qassemi. "It is the moral, ethical and responsible step to take."

Demmzy15:
Pkomo brain, the people responsible for this protest are known as the Muhaijiroun group of UK. If you've noticed I've created a thread refuting their leader Anjem Choudhary. So you've got no point, Muslims have condemned them right from the 1990s when no one knew their evil. Oya face front Olodo!

Annunaki:
Okponu so it's the muhaijiroun group that included this verse in your terror manual :




And fight with them until there is no more persecution (fitnah) and religion should be only for Allah; but if they desist, then surely Allah sees what they do [Quran 8:39]

I'm not suppose to engage you in a talk, because your brain is dead! Nevertheless, I'll explain why this verse was revealed.

Qur'an 8 was revealed when Muslims were at war with the Meccans , the Muslims were only 313 while the Meccans were 1000. So most of Surah Anfal( was revealed about this war! Check here for more https://www.nairaland.com/2560300/quran-8-39-fight-until

Tru'thman2013 has dealt with this issue https://www.nairaland.com/2538115/examining-quran-9-29-islam

parisbookaddict:
The Arab world’s wealthiest nations are doing next to nothing for Syria’s refugees.
Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/09/04/the-arab-worlds-wealthiest-nations-are-doing-next-to-nothing-for-syrias-refugees/?_e_pi_=7%2CPAGE_ID10%2C3785268814

The world has been transfixed in recent weeks by the unfolding refugee crisis in Europe, an influx of migrants unprecedented since World War II. Their plight was chillingly highlighted on Wednesday in the image of a drowned Syrian toddler, his lifeless body lying alone on a Turkish beach.
A fair amount of attention has fallen on the failure of many Western governments to adequately address the burden on Syria's neighboring countries, which are struggling to host the brunt of the roughly 4 million Syrians forced out of the country by its civil war.
Some European countries have been criticized for offering sanctuary only to a small number of refugees, or for discriminating between Muslims and Christians. There's also been a good deal of continental hand-wringing over the general dysfunction of Europe's systems for migration and asylum.
Less ire, though, has been directed at another set of stakeholders who almost certainly should be doing more: Saudi Arabia and the wealthy Arab states along the Persian Gulf.
As Amnesty Internationalrecently pointed out, the "six Gulf countries -- Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman and Bahrain -- have offered zero resettlement places to Syrian refugees." This claim was echoed by Kenneth Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch, on Twitter:
Guess how many of these Syrian refugees Saudi Arabia & other Gulf states offered to take? 0 http:// /iY0ct3kXBW pic.twitter.com/JI3WTQhlxo
— Kenneth Roth (@KenRoth) September 2, 2015
The way that Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states aid Syrian refugees: pic.twitter.com/2i9gcGiRxe
— Kenneth Roth (@KenRoth) September 2, 2015
That's a shocking figure, given these countries' relative proximity to Syria, as well as the incredible resources at their disposal. As Sultan Sooud al-Qassemi, a Dubai-based political commentator, observes, these countries include some of the Arab world's largest military budgets, its highest standards of living, as well as a lengthy history -- especially in the case of the United Arab Emirates -- of welcoming immigrants from other Arab nations and turning them into citizens.
Moreover, these countries aren't totally innocent bystanders. To varying degrees, elements within Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the U.A.E., and Kuwait have invested in the Syrian conflict, playing a conspicuous rolein funding and arming a constellation of rebel and Islamist factions fighting the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
None of these countries are signatories of the United Nations' 1951 Refugee Convention, which defines what a refugee is, and lays out their rights, as well as the obligations of states to safeguard them. For a Syrian to enter these countries, they would have to apply for a visa, which, in the current circumstances, is rarely granted. According to the BBC, the only Arab countries where a Syrian can travel without a visa are Algeria, Mauritania, Sudan and Yemen -- hardly choice or practical destinations.
Like European countries, Saudi Arabia and its neighbors also have fears over new arrivals taking jobs from citizens, and may also invoke concerns about security and terrorism. But the current Gulf aid outlay for Syrian refugees, which amounts to collective donationsunder $1 billion (the United States has given four times that sum), seems short -- and is made all the more galling when you consider the vast sumsSaudi Arabia poured into this year's war effort in Yemen, an intervention some consider a strategic blunder.
As Bobby Ghosh, managing editor of the news site Quartz, points out, the Gulf states in theory have a far greater ability to deal with large numbers of arrivals than Syria's more immediate and poorer neighbors, Lebanon and Jordan:
The region has the capacity to quickly build housing for the refugees. The giant construction companies that have built the gleaming towers of Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Riyadh should be contracted to create shelters for the influx. Saudi Arabia has plenty of expertise at managing large numbers of arrivals: It receives an annual surge of millions of Hajj pilgrimsto Mecca. There’s no reason all this knowhow can’t be put to humanitarian use.
No reason other than either indifference or a total lack of political will. In social media, many are calling for action. The Arabic hashtag #Welcoming_Syria's_refugees_is_a_Gulf_duty was tweeted more than 33,000 times in the past week, according to the BBC.
"The Gulf must realize that now is the time to change their policy regarding accepting refugees from the Syria crisis," writesthe columnist al-Qassemi. "It is the moral, ethical and responsible step to take."

Demmzy15:
I'm not suppose to engage you in a talk, because your brain is dead! Nevertheless, I'll explain why this verse was revealed.

Qur'an 8 was revealed when Muslims were at war with the Meccans , the Muslims were only 313 while the Meccans were 1000. So most of Surah Anfal( was revealed about this war! Check here for more https://www.nairaland.com/2560300/quran-8-39-fight-until

Tru'thman2013 has dealt with this issue https://www.nairaland.com/2538115/examining-quran-9-29-islam

Annunaki:
Kitman2013's al ta quiya explanation was pure thrash beating around the bush and not address the real issues. Quoran 9:29 also told you terrorists to fight people that don't believe in Mohamed's pagan idol(allah). Abi you want to deny that too?

adenine02:
pls bro take a deep look at my points
you can investigate more if u want


d arab did not invade iraq

d arab did not invade afganistan

d arab did not invade libya

d arab r not d one dt donate 1billion dollar to syrian rebels

d arab did not create ISIS

all ds r d countries wit problem created by d west

and d pple now seek refuge in d countries dt cause dr problems

so r d arabs not doin anytin? dy r doin alot

oman, jordan, bahrain host millions of refugees while saudi provide most of d aids


so r dy doin enogh? i will say not yet

buh d problem is overwelmin

note dt d problem is spredin more
and d terrorist r usin armonation supplied by d west



it a complex situation and dr is alot of conspiracy "if u know"


9/11

is d origin of d problem

Demmzy15:
I said you can never be reasonable, I've explained everything for you. If you accept or not is left to you. Continue displaying your stupidity!

OZAOEKPE:
[s]You should go and bury your head in shame, all you need to do is to apply common sense here. There is crisis in the middle east, these people are not going to saudi, UAE, Abu Dhabi etc, they are risking their lives going to an "infidel's" country, you still have the guts to be proud of it. If saudi reject its own, I wonder what you preach about. You see all these rich arabians, buying gold and riding jets, yet they can't help their own.
I am not here to argue, but let's condemn what is evil, be it Christian or islam, what is bad is bad.
"Quote me anywhere"





-EPHPHATHA[/s]

Demmzy15:
I said you can never be reasonable, I've explained everything for you. If you accept or not is left to you. Continue displaying your stupidity!

Annunaki:
[s]I should accept your al taquiya explanation when your arab and northern muslim brethen who understand the quoran better are slaughtering non muslims on a daily basis based on this evil instructions in the quoran Remember the quoran claims to be valid till eternity so technically speaking those evil verses remain valid today except you want to admit that the quoran is full of contradictions and is no longer valid today.[/s]

Dull-a-pó oya face front! Goat!!!

Demmzy15:
Dull-a-pó oya face front! Goat!!!

Annunaki:
That's all you do, strike through a post then claim that you have debunked it. Okponu, ode buruku. Have some camel as that illiterate recommended to make you feel better.

Lmaooooo! This guy is dumb!

Shymm3x:
A trusted school of thought believes 9/11 was orchestrated MOSSAD and by top folks in the US and a false flag for US incursion into MENA. And there are a lot of proofs to back it up. Not saying I believe this theory - just using it as a preamble. That was the beginning of the never ending war on terror and all the crisis in that region.

Arab Spring was the fictitious name given to an uprising funded by the US. There was no Arab Spring in Syria and Libya - those folks were paid agents for regime change. And that became a geopolitical war for vested interests and regional powers. Ditto super powers. So they are all to blame.

Iran couldn't have done what the Saudis did in Bahrain cos unlike the Saudis, they have no international backing and the Western media to black it out from mainstream media. If they had gone into Syria when the crisis started - they would have made it an Iranian problem and it would have been an excuse for the West to intervene militarily. And don't forget Bahrain is a very small country - while Syria on the other hand is one of the biggest countries in that region and somewhat a regional power as well. So for Iran to pull anything off there, it would have been supremely expensive and tasking. And I don't think a country under back breaking sanctions would have been able to pull it off.

Shymm3x:
You can't absolve western countries from the Syrian quagmire just as you can't do the same for countries like UAE, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia. They all contributed to the crisis in that country and they all need to share the refugees - same with the US.

The country was peaceful and no one was trying to move to Europe, till they destroyed everything via proxies cos of one man. Same thing they did with Libya and now, gazillion of refugees are coming from that route to Europe as well...