mathematics genius, make una show ooo food don ready seun dey pay N25 per 1hr

where is my paper and pen.Time to work maths.

maestrojay:
this view would be clearer..
gurus in the house.. abeg mek una use dis one shine...

plis...i nid more light. the pishure is nor clear enuf

This one get as e be o

Some of these prints are wrong, if they're wrong, you go work am tire you no go get am.

dovelike:
Love stuffs like this

can you solve it?

(Addition the figures in the inverted Y) - (Addition of the figures in normal Y)= figure at the centre.

I.e
(4+3+7)-(1+1+9)= 3

My head wan blow..., in short, I give up.

Examiner's trick to waste one's time, no solution, move on to next....

Even lalasticla don leave front page biz, em sef dey solve maths

Ask Google.
quote author=maestrojay post=41887827]hello guys... i saw this pattern in a quantitative reasoning textbook.. and i got stucked, to my amazement i couldnt link up the pattern.. can someone try this out??

@lalasticlala, ishilove, etc... abeg allow the world of NL to tackle this.. thanks[/quote]

What Obasanjo Said On Atiku In His Book
Clement Ejiofor 2 weeks ago 108530

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Send email
Former president Olusegun Obasanjo in his autobiography “My Watch” has taken a swipe at his former deputy, Atiku Abubakar, former Senate president, Ken Nnamani, ex-Lagos state governor, Bola Tinubu and former minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Mallam Nasir el-Rufai, defining most of them as liars.

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
obasanjo book - autobiography my watch

The former president in the book gave a vivid account of how the no-love-lost relationship between him and Atiku began right from the inception of their government.

The book which is divided into three volumes with 58 chapters and a total of 1,522 pages; is presented like Obasanjo’s responses to all who have criticized him in the past as well as those he believed wronged him politically.

Read the extract on Atiku below:

“From the day I nominated Atiku to be my vice, he set his mind not for any good, benefit or service of the country, but on furiously planning to upstage, supplant or remove me at all cost and to take my place.

READ ALSO: Suspects Run To Obasanjo To Escape Probe

“That was what I brought him for, but he was impatient and over-ambitious. He was not ready to learn and to wait. His marabout, who predicted that despite being elected as governor, he would not be sworn in as a governor, which happened, also assured him that he would take over from me in a matter of months rather than years.

“All his plans, appointments of people and his actions were towards the actualisation of his marabout’s prediction. Once I realised his intention and programme, I watched him like a hawk without giving any indication of what I knew and letting down my guard. I could not succumb to the distraction, diversion and malevolence of an ambitious but unwise deputy.

“The work in hand was more important than a confrontational relationship with my deputy, a man over whom I knew I had far more experience and outreach in all matters. To alert him of what I knew he was up to, would only lead to lying, denial, more mischievous plans and more duplicity on his part.

“He was better managed that way. What was important was not allowing myself to be surprised or outmanoeuvred by him. I must always seize the initiative and know what was going on if not in his mind, but at least in his camp. That I did very effectively.

“Sometime in the fourth quarter of 2004, an associate of Atiku came to my residence at the Aso Villa from Atiku’s official residence. He felt uncomfortable and I tried to make him feel at ease. Then, he settled to tell me the story of what had just transpired in Atiku’s residence. I listened with rapt attention.

READ ALSO: When I Became Impartial Nigerian ─ Obasanjo

“He went on to say that Atiku told him that for him to become the President of Nigeria, the 2007 elections were only a formality.

“The seven ingredients he needed for his enthronement were already in his hands. He controlled the National Assembly because both the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives were in his pocket. He controlled twenty-eight out of thirty-six governors. He had control of the media. His influence over the judiciary was overwhelming.

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Olusegun Obasanjo
Obasanjo and Atiku
“What he needed was foreign endorsement and for that he had employed two lobby groups in the US and one in the UK. And finally, the money for the elections was in his purse.

“When the man finished, I thanked him without passing any comment. The man was surprised at my reaction and asked, ‘You have nothing to say to these?’ I said that I had nothing to say and I immediately called my ADC, Chris Jemitola, to play a game of squash with me.

“On our way to the squash court with my ADC, I said, ‘People at times make plans and leave God out of their plans.’ My casual remark struck Chris and he said, ‘Sir, that was a profound statement.’ I said that I made the statement because of what I had just heard of Atiku’s plan. I was not convinced he had put God in his plans.

“Atiku was confident and God was laughing. Most of Atiku’s ingredients soon started to fall out of place one by one. The first was the party, PDP.

“He thought I was powerless and had no clue about the execution of his plan with his group; part of his attack on me was for national chairman of the party to give the first salvo, then other things would follow as his grip on the party would be firm and consolidated.

“That salvo came in the form of a letter to me from the chairman of the party, Audu Ogbeh, who had fully defected with (Iyorchia) Ayu to Atiku.

“The letter, which was not the product of any issue or matter discussed with or at any party meeting, came suddenly. When I received it, I could read the sinister intention behind it.

“I spent that night writing my reply and I sent it in the morning. My reply was clear. I wondered why Atiku and his group did not realise that with my reply, the battle line was clear or maybe they thought that the seven ingredients would remain intact to the end.

READ ALSO: Controversy: Fayose Blasts Obasanjo, Faults APC

“My assistants had moles within the Atiku group. Anything that they planned would be reported. That was the case after Ogbeh’s letter. They decided that Ogbeh should appear remorseful and come with the National Working Committee to apologise to me. It was not from their hearts, but to lure me to a ‘killing ground’.

“All pieces of information that were reported were verified because it would not come from only one informant.

“Timely information is a very important principle of war and also of politics. In politics, just as in war, what matters is not just your plan, but knowledge of your opponent’s plan. Knowing their plan, I had the choice of playing along with them or being firm, I chose the latter.

“I told Ogbeh that my relationship with him as national chairman and me as national leader of the party was based on mutual confidence and trust. But with his letter, my reply and what I knew of him then, I could no longer work with him in confidence and trust.

“There were only two choices left for both of us in our best interest and that of the party – he, leaves as chairman or I leave as leader of the party.

“The following Sunday, I called at his house, which I had done on several occasions in the past when there was an important party matter to discuss. This time, I asked him to give me an undated letter of resignation as the national chairman.

“I waited, he gave me but it was wrongly addressed to me rather than to the national secretary of the party as stipulated in the party’s constitution.

“Ogbeh reported to his group and it was decided by them to play on and to wait for my disgrace whenever I presented a letter of resignation not addressed to the national secretary.

“The informants did their job and I, once again, paid another visit to Ogbeh at his residence. He entertained me to a meal and drink, and changed the addressee on his letter of resignation.”

[color=#006600][/color]Ask Google

dovelike:
Love stuffs like this

dove

You're solving for the number in the box. Add the numbers in one "Y" minus the number in the other and it gives you the number enclosed between both "Ys". This an example that's why you already have the answers. Put up an unsolved one and you'll easily get the answer. Quant analysis isn't so difficult really!

maestrojay:
hello guys... i saw this pattern in a quantitative reasoning textbook.. and i got stucked, to my amazement i couldnt link up the pattern.. can someone try this out??

@lalasticlala, ishilove, etc... abeg allow the world of NL to tackle this.. thanks

Guy go return d book na ABA made...I don't tink any1 can sollve dat...my own tot sha

vapid:
You're solving for the number in the box. Add the numbers in one "Y" minus the number in the other and it gives you the number enclosed between both "Ys". This an example that's why you already have the answers. Put up an unsolved one and you'll easily get the answer. Quant analysis isn't so difficult really!

mister! Solve the second example

This is a quantitative aptitude test, it tests your ability to see patterns, and trust me that's a unique problem solving skill when you work with statistics

free2ryhme:
i wanna know how solve this will increase your chance in marketing a product

profmallory:

This is a quantitative aptitude test, it tests your ability to see patterns, and trust me that's a unique problem solving skill when you work with statistics

we see patterns everyday from north to south, east to west

yet we've never prosecute any corrupt politician

3+1+4+1=9

7+3-1=9
3+3+1=7
4+3=7
7+1+1=9
9-1-1=7
9-7+1=3
2+2+1=5
6+2=8
8-6=2

femi4:
(Addition the figures in the inverted Y) - (Addition of the figures in normal Y)= figure at the centre.

I.e
(4+3+7)-(1+1+9)= 3

This doesn't apply to the second example....so, it's wrong

timonski:

plz post some of the exercises following those examples.

@O.P, What he said...

dovelike:
Love stuffs like this

My favorite subject back then but this one pass me o.

139 x 3 = 417

258 x 2 = 516


Trust me, this is the answer. I know, highly annoying, right?

dovetark:
can you solve it?

I started to. Then I got a headache. Then I stopped

agentofchange1:
here.

LOL, This is quite deep

proffemi:
139 x 3 = 417

258 x 2 = 516


Trust me, this is the answer. I know, highly annoying, right?

Wow, you're a genius!!

punche:


My favorite subject back then but this one pass me o.

I tell you

DO AM NA!

dovelike:
Love stuffs like this

proffemi:
139 x 3 = 417
258 x 2 = 516
Trust me, this is the answer. I know, highly annoying, right?

You are a true prof

The answer is so simple when you look at it with simple eyes.

proffemi:
139 x 3 = 417

258 x 2 = 516


Trust me, this is the answer. I know, highly annoying, right?

Now, this...