₦airaland Forum

4everGod:
When we call you a dumbo now you will start crying.


M.D.s are practitioners, not scientists. While they apply scientific advances in their practice, that does not make them "scientists". It's safe to say that a large percentage of medical doctors do employ the scientific method with respect to how they assess and treat their patients.


Educate yourself. Dont just argue for sake of relevance. Read read read.

KingEbukaNaija:
. So if you pick a needle in a dark room , you wont know you have found one . From your "smart talk " , blind people who need to feel are always wrong

You again . No wonder sha He is an atheist

KingEbukaNaija:
The word scientist was not used until in 1833 . But anyway , science is based on research , experimentation and doctors as far as 4 000 BC can be described as scientists since they supposedly made discoveries themselves .

Some doctors are scientists .

BlackIsLife:
It's worrying bro - christians thought science began in the C.E - imagine someone telling me that medical doctors are scientist, today is the first day i heard something as gross as that


I'm patiently waiting for them though to come up with their googled deduction.

KingEbukaNaija:
Physicians are medical doctors and obviously have a great knowledge of biological science

4everGod:
[s]Ok so the brain is like a cpu right? Why then is a computer not conscious when you put in the cpu since the brain is like a cpu?

I have told you that scientists themselves have all agreed theh cannot link consciousness to the brain or to the body even. I also posted links for you to read and confirm it yourself.

Do you know what the scientists who themselves are denying knowledge and whose imaginary scientific theory you are using?

Imagine this guy sha....simple biology....I just dey look u dey laugh.[/s]

Am Sure U Don't Know The Function Of CPU In The Computer So Its Obvious U Would Be Ignorant On That

The Link U Provided?? THAT U DISPUTED NOT LONG AGO?? CAUSE U Didn't Even Read It And Then Concluded NDE Was Death

BlackIsLife:
Ebuka, I am here to learn and to teach not to argue, that's why i stopped replying 4evergods since his points are not making sense to me - to be frank with you doctors are not scientist and scientists are not doctors

UyiIredia:
These atheists sef. Dem just dey make me laugh. Especially HardMirror. They know if they admit that consciousness is immaterial the the points I stated in the OP stands. So they decieve themselves into thinking consciousness is physical when it's clearly not.

4everGod:
When we call you a dumbo now you will start crying.


M.D.s are practitioners, not scientists. While they apply scientific advances in their practice, that does not make them "scientists". It's safe to say that a large percentage of medical doctors do employ the scientific method with respect to how they assess and treat their patients.


Educate yourself. Dont just argue for sake of relevance. Read read read.

Lilbrown007:
Am Sure U Don't Know The Function Of CPU In The Computer So Its Obvious U Would Be Ignorant On That

The Link U Provided?? THAT U DISPUTED NOT LONG AGO?? CAUSE U Didn't Even Read It And Then Concluded NDE Was Death

KingEbukaNaija:
Some doctors can be scientists . I hope you know what a scientist is . Anyone can be a scientist

BlackIsLife:
I'm confused bro, do employing a scientific method to treat a patient makes me a scientist? so why do they go to medical school? do you know the meaning of science and scientist at all? - if yes, please explain, if no, keep mute.

Lilbrown007:
Am Sure U Don't Know The Function Of CPU In The Computer So Its Obvious U Would Be Ignorant On That

The Link U Provided?? THAT U DISPUTED NOT LONG AGO?? CAUSE U Didn't Even Read It And Then Concluded NDE Was Death

4everGod:
If you knew the true function of a computers cpu then you would never ever liken it to the brain. You are making yourself look extremely silly.

4evergod2:
Dalaman I somehow alwaya get drawn to you for some reason. I know that you are smart somehow sha so on this thread a bunch of you raised arguments and made submissions which eventually was shown to have absolutely zero scientific support. No proof came from you to back your claims up.

I posted proof upon proof with live links too. Like I said, I know you are smart somehow and I always want to trigger your thinking ability and not this your "run with the crowd syndrome".

Discover for yourself if life designed or it just happened or you just do not know.

This thread is another clear cut opportunity.

4everGod:
I am sure you have a brain. Why not use it.

Before science can lay claim to anything it musr first test it by creating a perfect scenario for their theory.

Scientists wanted to know if their was consciousness after death. And when does death occur (supposedly) when brain acrivity stops and when there are absolutely no vital signs so they recreated all that so that their test subjects could be brought back to attest or refute what they seek. If the test subjects never came back how would it be a proven test?

So if someone is made to simulate death and still experiences consciousness this means that in actual death there is still consciousness.

Use your brain and stop making yourself look silly.

KingEbukaNaija:
@CoolUsername

You have proof man evolved from fish ?

Lilbrown007:
Am Sure U Don't Know The Function Of CPU In The Computer So Its Obvious U Would Be Ignorant On That

The Link U Provided?? THAT U DISPUTED NOT LONG AGO?? CAUSE U Didn't Even Read It And Then Concluded NDE Was Death

UyiIredia:
These atheists sef. Dem just dey make me laugh. Especially HardMirror. They know if they admit that consciousness is immaterial the the points I stated in the OP stands. So they decieve themselves into thinking consciousness is physical when it's clearly not.

CoolUsername:
I've said time and time again, no modern species evolves to another one. Man didn't evolve from fish. Maybe you, though.

Rather, man and fish share a common ancestor that lived a very long time ago.

4everGod:
A scienist is different from a medical practitioner. This is plain english. Scientists discover. Doctors apply what was discovered. I think you need to reboot your brain.

Lilbrown007:
Oooooooooooooooooo How Am I Gonna Explain NDE For U Again Even A Kid Knows From The Name The Person Ain't Dead!! Gosh Ur Level Of Ignorance Is Pathetic Pls Don't Quote Me Again

BlackIsLife:
Sorry to say this: YOUR IQ IS EXTREMELY LOW!

Say, i'm a software engineer & i've a software need before you can surf the net - does that automatically makes you an engineer?


I'm a mechanical engineer i build a car - does that makes the driver and owner of the car an enginee?


i'm a funiture man and i build chairs, tables etc for my customer - does that make my customers a furniture man?


I'm a scientist i make discoveries for the medical school of thought to use and better peoples lives - does that make the doctors and patients a scientist?

Bro, you not making any sense with your respone.

4everGod:
Human brain contains about 100 billions neurons (10^11) and about hundred trillions synapses (10^14). Each neuron can fire about 100 times a second. If we model brain as a simple neural network, then it would be equivalent to machine that performs 10^16 operations per second.
This is a lower bound, which it is equivalent to capability of best current supercomputers. (Titan, Sequoia and K computer). However, speed is not the most important factor here. Complexity is more important one. Each neuron has complex structure and is connected to hundred or even thousands of other neurons, sometimes in non-trivial way. There is an emerging field of computational neurobiology that tries to model functionality of nervous systems in computer simulations.

They estimate that simulation of the whole human brain would require supercomputer with about 500 petabytes of memory. Current record in one system is 1.5 petabytes (Sequoia supercomputer). So we need a system over 300 times larger. Such machines are not expected in this decade.

Yet you compare this to a computers cpu?

CoolUsername:
I've said time and time again, no modern species evolves to another one. Man didn't evolve from fish. Maybe you, though.

Rather, man and fish share a common ancestor that lived a very long time ago.

dalaman:
Is consiousness a function of the brain or not?

Lilbrown007:
[size=15pt]Olodo U Are The One Relating Size To Consciousness Even A Kid Knows am Talking About Function And Not Size [/size]

youngestland:
is there really difference between consciousness and the brain.
I believe that consciousness is nothing more than the ability of our brain to acquire
information (which is the state of being awake) AND all the content that the information contains AND the
ability to get all that information into and out of memory. The key word is "ALL".
My believe is that the brain can do all that, and, therefore, a functioning brain is identical to a conscious
mind.

KingEbukaNaija:
Oh ... sorry a fish-like creature . Right ?

CoolUsername:
Human embryos develop gill slits which are then quickly reabsorbed before birth. In fish, these gill slits develop into gills.

Reading about tetrapods would help you put things into perspective. There are fish today which have lungs for breathing. Fossil record shows that gills predate lungs. Tetrapods made the transition from water to land.

There are several but I know better than to waste my time trying to reason with you.

CoolUsername:
Human embryos develop gill slits which are then quickly reabsorbed before birth. In fish, these gill slits develop into gills.

Reading about tetrapods would help you put things into perspective. There are fish today which have lungs for breathing. Fossil record shows that gills predate lungs. Tetrapods made the transition from water to land.

There are several but I know better than to waste my time trying to reason with you.